Literature Review: Cross-Cultural Management in International Orgs

This literature review examines cross-cultural management within international organizations, focusing on the interplay of culture and communication in a globalized world. It traces the evolution of cross-cultural management, highlighting the rise of cultural awareness from the 1980s to 2000 and the historical development of global leadership, contrasting viewpoints on its origins. The review explores the importance of cross-cultural management, the impact of globalization, and the evolution of theories and models like Hofstede's. It discusses the role of cross-cultural communication, the challenges posed by linguistic and cultural differences, and the need for skills like cognitive and behavioral flexibility. The paper also analyzes the strengths of cross-cultural management in fostering innovation and social awareness, while also acknowledging the different perspectives on the subject matter. In conclusion, the review underscores the necessity of understanding cultural dynamics for effective leadership in multinational corporations, emphasizing the use of various theories and models to navigate cultural diversity.

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 1
LITRATURE REVIEW ON CROSS CULTURLA MANAGEMENT
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 2
Introduction
In the past decades, globalization has influenced the movement of people from one nation to
another that has resulted in the development of various behaviors and practices among
communities and organizations. These behavioral changes and practices among communities and
employees in organizations caused difficulty in management calling for the need of managing
the cross-cultural issues. The cross-cultural management practiced in various nations has given
the growth of the global leadership. The global leadership has been applied in managing
international corporations, which have different employees of varied cultural background. The
article is a literature review of on the cross-cultural management of international organizations
with emphasis on the culture and communication.
Reasons against
The Rise of Culture- According to the article, the rise of culture took place between the 1980s to
2000, a period suggested by some scholars that are the evolution onset of the” multi-domestic”
“regional” and “matrix” organizational structures emerging in the multinational cultures(Moeller
2010,p.334). The individualistic cultures such as from the United Kingdom, express
independence of employees in completing tasks while the collectivist cultures such as China
embraces a lot of group work. With all these, it is evidential that every multinational corporation
requires varied ways of management to succeed and this can only be possible when the company
strikes a balance in honoring all the cultures. However according to Garriot (2017) behavior was
something that originated and determined by genes. The articles state that the selection changed
the population behavior due to the change of the environment. Human beings developed cultural
capacity during the period of Pleistocene and the cetaceans.

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 3
History of Global Leadership- According to the article of cross-cultural management to global
leadership evaluation and adaptation, culturally diverse administration and worldwide initiative
are interrelated and have a long history. The article means that different administration emerged
at the same time with associations conduct and administration back in the 1900s and not because
of the World War II. The early works of cross culture administration comprised of distinguishing
proof of the speculations that were fit for relating and making societies important to others.
These speculations needed refined methodologies for contrast investigation of societies and
organizations., therefore from1960 to 1980, diverse administration concentrated on the
investigation of hierarchical conduct and administration frameworks of different nations
separated from the United States that had social settings that were seen as outside. (Weber
2016).After the World War II, numerous associations primarily from America moved crosswise
over outskirts looking for a business opportunity for their items.
The notion is objected by the article done by Monjoo( 2017 ) that insist that leadership
originated from the early history when human needed direction from their clansmen. These
ancient communities chose their own administer to manage every aspect their lives and therefore
as population continued to grow and mix more leaders were developed cutting across all the
cultures.
Origin of global leadership Global leadership and development defers in some of these articles.
For example according to the cross-cultural management and leadership is shaped by various
factors such as expatriate, comparative research, intercultural communication and global
management. Employees from North America were always posted in foreign countries to foster
the development of various organizations, a process known as expatriation. Global leadership
development has received much scholarly work; however, the German Thurnau Conference of

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 4
1998 was the early catalyst of the development of the global leadership as it resulted into
publications of numerous works on international leadership. Ther are numerous types of global
leadership.
Reasons For
Agrees on the early works of cross-cultural management- Both the articles on the Cross-Cultural
Management and Expatriates managers agrees that The early works of cross-cultural entailed the
identification of theoretical interests that were never the same in countries as result of different
cultures. Herzberg’s study of motivation in of workers in Finish and work attitudes among the
Soviet workers are one of the early studies about cross-cultural management (Jeffreys & Zoucha
2017, p.8) (Oliver 2017, p.1230). However, most of the early theories lacked sophistication in
their approaches. By start of 1960’s, numerous works about cross-cultural management begun to
appear, as a result of the introduction of the approaches of American management. There was a
need to expand the American administration systems by ostracizes who experienced issues in
adjusting to the nearby societies and appointing of the neighborhood workers prompted
worldwide authority.
From 1960 to 1980, cross-cultural management field focused mainly on the organizational
behavior and the administrative systems across various countries with a focus on the expatriate’s
managers. The posting of such mangers resulted into the transfer of knowledge from the United
States to other parts of the countries (Mar 2008, p.190). This prompted an authoritative
rebuilding of the greater part of the multinational partnerships from the multi-residential, local
and grid hierarchical structures, along these lines expected exile to procure more abilities that
empowered them effectively worked in those outside nations. This prompted the improvement of

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 5
Hofstede's cultural hypothesis utilized by current worldwide pioneers (Alexander, Havercome, &
Mujtaba 2015, p.18). Culturally diverse administration requires uses of different speculations, for
example, Hofstede's model that involves independence/cooperation, manliness/women's
activist/vulnerability/evasion, and power separate (Garriott et al. 2017, p.306). The approach
gives different reasons of social conduct of representatives from the other foundation, for
instance, in control remove societies; people are dependably infatuated for control and
dependable feel terrible when giving requests by other individuals. A representative from
nations, for example, Malaysia tends to indicate awesome regard to those that are on the higher
positions of expert, not at all like that person from the low culture grasp overall discourse levels
of cooperation.
Cross-Cultural Management Cross-cultural management refers to the process of accommodating
and controlling differences cultural practices in an organization to allow mutual understanding
among employees of the different cultures (Konrad 2012,p.552).
Three of the articles state that Multinational Corporations are companies that operate in some
countries with all operations done from the home country. Such group companies are always
subdivided into four main categories that are: multinational, decentralized corporation with the
availability of stable home country (Molwa et al. 2013, p.10). The centralized global corporation
that tends to acquire cheaper resources on the availability of support that is more cheaper thus
international companies that develop Parent Corporation’s technology, and the transnational
enterprise that applies the three approaches in their operation.
Cross-Cultural Researches

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 6
The collective classes of cross-cultural management studies are the uni-cultural, comparative
and intercultural. Uni-cultural investigation majored on the organizational administration within
the borders of a specific country and was founded by both the anthropological and sociological
worker such as in Japan(Cheng et al. 2916, p.267). The unicultural furnished the cross-cultural
management with in-depth knowledge of the dynamics of a specific country, behaviors, and
process that are directly related to effective leadership in various aspects such as conflict
resolutions and employees motivations .Additionally, the unicultural researchers have been
significant in influencing the success of international managers. Intercultural research majored
on the association of organizational members from more than one cultures and had been heavily
influenced by several theoretical works from the sociopsychology, cross-cultural psychology,
and intercultural communication. The comparative research explored the organizational
administration of more than two countries and was influenced by the psychological and
sociological works and theories such as that of Geert Hoftedes’that impacted the international
management.
Culture and Communication
Globalization of pioneers powers the presentation of various correspondences. As indicated by
the article, cross culture correspondence is the successful method for an individual executes
correspondence practices that consult with social personality in a social domain. Culture decides
the sort of dialect being talked and consequently impacts the correspondence capacity and style
of the general population specifically nations. Culture shapes people group’s mindsets, seeing
translating, and hearing (Oili and Dong 2016, p.408). The distinction in dialects of various
individuals in a similar association makes correspondence for challenging as each culture offers
an alternate arrangement of principles and codes. Worldwide administration intercultural

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 7
correspondence requires the securing of different abilities, for example, care, behavioral
adaptability, intellectual adaptability, the resistance of equivocalness and multifaceted
compassion (Ye,Ng & Lian 2015,p.523).
Care alludes to the reasoning procedure that empowers one to process new data, new classes, and
various points of view. It causes one to be aware of the subjective suppositions, feelings, and
discernment. Intellectual adaptability empowers one to look at various points of view and think
about an assortment of structures(Melton, Malloy & Chance 2012,p.89). Behavioral adaptability
alludes to the individual expertise of executing practices while resistance uncertainty is the
partiality to perceive hypothetical situation as attractive. Intercultural correspondence is
partitioned into different settings, for example, high-setting versus low setting, successive versus
synchronic, and full of feeling versus impartial.
In High setting societies, for example, Arabs, Asians tend to carry on a lot of unspecified
messages, and subsequently, nonverbal signals are basic in the middle of the lines of
correspondence (Lewis 2017, p.298). Then again, the low setting societies, for example, Britain
have express and particular messages’ sequential societies, for example, the United States tend to
think about the time and hold onto time as a right item that requires appropriate administration.
These societies are dependably specialists and tend to give careful consideration to particular
plans previously moving into another. While others, for example, Europe, and Asia, tend to see
time synchronically, as an unfaltering supply that should be knowledgeable about a minute and
as a power that requirements to confinement. These societies see the time stream as the cycle
with the logical connection of the past, display, and the future in this way impact how individuals
and associations of such societies approach speculation, due dates, and key reasoning.

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 8
Each universal business, have particular practices and feelings, that significantly rely upon the
emotional or impartial viewpoints. The people from the full of feeling society, for example, the
U.S tend to promptly demonstrate feelings while individual from the unbiased societies, for
example, Japan tends to keep of control their sentiments. These make contrasts in
correspondence in a blend of such culture; as more often than not, individuals expect affirmation
n sentiments and signals amid the exchange(Puppart, Burmeister & Deller 2017,p.70). For
instance, if the correspondence approach is exceptionally passionate, at that point coordinate
enthusiastic reactions, for example, "I feel a similar way" is ideal while when the correspondence
approach is profoundly unbiased, at that point aberrant reactions, for example, " I agree with
your thoughts" are more suitable.
Qualities and Weakness of Cross-Cultural Management in Global Leadership
The significant quality of culturally diverse administration in worldwide authority is the capacity
to encourage advancement. Colleagues from various foundation share thoughts that are joined to
concoct a betters system, item, or administration (Etowa and Debs 2017, p.280).Additionally,
multifaceted administration help pioneers to enhance the social mindfulness that in the long run
makes them oversee individuals from different foundations viably. Be that as it may, there is no
different proof of shortcoming of culturally diverse administration on the worldwide initiative.

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 9
Conclusion
In conclusion the article agrees on some point and disagrees on some pints. For example the
articles differs on the rise of culture and global leadership while tend to share the same notion on
the cross-cultural management and communication. During the establishment of cross-cultural
management, the major focus was on the management with little emphasis on the leadership, and
this was consistent with the approach of major scholars on the managerial behaviors in the
international level. Globalization led to the mixture of cultures that resulted into the growth of
different behaviors and practices among people, resulting into the need of cross-cultural
management. The cross-cultural management developed majorly on various models and theories
that helped the expatriates and the international managers in becoming global leaders.
Distinctive models and speculations, for example, Hofstede's hypotheses among others have
been created to help such multinational partnerships in overseeing societies. The speculations
help the directors to comprehend the premise of the social contrasts and how the to handle any
busbies requirement achieved by assorted social variety.
The primary article has a few qualities concerning the multifaceted administration of worldwide
pioneers, for example, it gives the structure and improvement of worldwide authority. In any
case, it doesn't characterize the term worldwide concerning the way of life. The multifaceted
administration empowers worldwide pioneers to have bits of knowledge on the most proficient
method to successfully oversee individuals from assorted foundations.

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 10
List of References
Alexander, V, Havercome, C, &Mujtaba, B 2015, 'Effectively Managing Employees to Get
Results in a Diverse Workplace such as American Express', Journal Of Business Studies
Quarterly, 7, 1, pp. 13-26, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Cheng, X, Fu, S, Sun, J, Han, Y, Shen, J, & Zarifis, A 2016, 'Investigating individual trust in
semi-virtual collaboration of multicultural and unicultural teams', Computers In Human
Behavior, 62, pp. 267-276, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Etowa, J, & Debs-Ivall, S 2017, 'Leadership and Organizational Commitment to Ethno-Cultural
Diversity in Healthcare', Journal Of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 11, 4, pp. 277-292,
Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Garriott, P, Faris, E, Frazier, J, Nisle, S, &Galluzzo, J 2017, 'Multicultural and International
Research in Four Career Development Journals: An 11-Year Content Analysis', Career
Development Quarterly, 65, 4, pp. 302-314, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 5
May 2018.
Hye, O, Sangmin, L, & Se Hyung, O 2018, 'Expatriate Managers' Cross-Cultural Motivation And
Host Country National Employees' Attitudes', Social Behavior & Personality: An International
Journal, 46, 5, pp. 841-860, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 11 May 2018.

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 11
Jeffreys, M, & Zoucha, R 2017, 'The Invisible Culture Of The Multiracial, Multiethnic
Individual: A Transcultural Imperative (Reprint From 2001)', Journal Of Cultural Diversity, 24,
1, pp. 6-10, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Konrad, E 2012, 'National Cultures and Human Development Index', Psihologijske Teme /
Psychological Topics, 21, 3, pp. 549-556, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May
2018.
Lewis, GR 2017, 'General Revelation Makes Cross- Cultural Communication
Possible', Evangelical Review Of Theology, 41, 4, pp. 292-307, Academic Search Premier,
EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Mars, G 2008, 'Corporate cultures and the use of space: an approach from Cultural
Theory', Innovation: The European Journal Of Social Sciences, 21, 3, pp. 185-204, Academic
Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Melton, T, Mallory, B, & Chance, L 2012, 'Global Perspectives on School Leadership: An
ongoing Study Of Policy, Practice, and Cultural Context', Journal Of Global Intelligence &
Policy, 5, 9, pp. 81-91, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Moeller, H 2010, 'China-West Interculture: Toward the Philosophy of World Integration. Essays
on Wu Kuang-ming's Thinking – Edited by Jay Goulding', Journal Of Chinese Philosophy, 37, 2,
pp. 333-336, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Moonjoo, K 2017, 'Effects of Team Diversity, Transformational Leadership, and Perceived
Organizational Support On Team-Learning Behavior', Social Behavior & Personality: An

CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT 12
International Journal, 45, 8, pp. 1255-1270, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9
May 2018.
Mowla, M, Hoque, N, Mamun, A, & Rahim-ud-Din, M 2013, 'Dynamics of Cross Cultural
Management: A Critical Review', Abasyn University Journal Of Social Sciences, 6, 2, pp. 1-15,
Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Oliver, K 2017, 'The Origin and Development of Prison Fellowship International: Pluralism,
Ecumenism and American Leadership in the Evangelical World 1974–2006', Journal Of
American Studies, 51, 4, pp. 1221-1242, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 11 May
2018.
Puppatz, M, Burmeister, A, & Deller, J 2017, 'The assessment of organizational culture in cross-
cultural settings: Investigating the psychometric quality and cultural equivalence of three
quantitative instruments', International Journal Of Selection & Assessment, 25, 1, pp. 43-60,
Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Qili, L, & Dong, C 2016, 'The Difficulties and Possibilities of Cross-Cultural Communication: A
Case Study of the Global Development of the Confucius Institutes', Chinese Education &
Society, 49, 6, pp. 402-410, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Weber, O, Sulstarova, B, &Singy, P 2016, 'Cross-Cultural Communication in Oncology:
Challenges and Training Interests', Oncology Nursing Forum, 43, 1, pp. E24-E33, Academic
Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.
Ye, D, Ng, Y, & Lian, Y 2015, 'Culture and Happiness', Social Indicators Research, 123, 2, pp.
519-547, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 May 2018.