SPSS Statistics Psychology Report: Empathy and Emotional Congruence

This report presents an analysis of psychological data using SPSS, focusing on the emotional responses of individuals from different cultural groups (Lebanese and Anglo). The study utilizes a screening survey via SurveyMonkey and employs one-way MANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests to examine the impact of cultural groups on various emotional variables (Disgust, Joy, Surprise, Fear, and Contempt) elicited after watching a video. The research explores the concepts of affective and cognitive empathy, and the elicitation of self-conscious emotions. The study uses the 'iMotions' scores to describe the empathetic accuracy scale and the Likert scale measures. The analysis includes descriptive statistics, multivariate tests, and tests of between-subjects effects across three different thresholds (50%, 25%, and 10%) based on attention levels. The findings indicate that at the 50% threshold, measures regarding facial mimicry, empathic accuracy, and emotional congruence are independent of cultural groups. The report provides detailed tables and statistical outputs, including descriptive statistics, multivariate tests, and tests of between-subjects effects, to support the conclusions drawn about the relationship between cultural groups and emotional responses.

Running head: SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
SPSS Statistics Psychology
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s note:

1SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Table of Contents
Introduction:................................................................................................................................................................................................2
Data Analysis:..............................................................................................................................................................................................2
50% Threshold.........................................................................................................................................................................................2
25% Threshold:........................................................................................................................................................................................7
10% Threshold:......................................................................................................................................................................................12
Frequency distribution of demographics:..............................................................................................................................................16
Frequency Distribution of Disgust People:............................................................................................................................................17
Frequency Distribution of Contemptuous People:................................................................................................................................21
Frequency Distribution of Happy People:.............................................................................................................................................24
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................................................................................27
Annotated Bibliography:...........................................................................................................................................................................28

2SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Introduction:
A screening survey was utilised via “SurveyMonkey” for determining whether participants met the inclusion criteria. SPSS
statistics generates many various tables in the one-way MANOVA (Multivariate analysis of variance) analysis. In this section, we
indicate the main tables needed for understanding the outcomes from one-way MANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. For, a complete
explanation, we discuss MANOVA assumptions for having a valid result.
The Disgust, Joy, Surprise, Fear and Contempt are the dependent variables that define the emotional situations after watching
the video. Affective and Cognitive empathy can be conceptualized by the outcomes of MANOVA. The elicitation of self-conscious
includes expanded cognitive methods that have self-hearted notion. Collectivist self and Inner-Focused individualistic self are
described by analysed data.
To test the extent of emotions received from the video, we developed the measures of emotions. The aspects of measures that
are used to define psychology are-
1. Anger, Disgust and Sadness (Disgust)
2. Fear, Contemptuous and Attention (Disgust and Contemptuous)
3. Joy, Surprise and Engagement (Happy)
The Likert scale measures are used here. The scores used here, are “iMotions” scores describes empathetic accuracy scale. The
emotions after watching the videos are characterised by Cultural groups. The research aims to verify the equality of means of the
multiple variable average levels of emotions.
We have taken into account 11 Anglo and 10 Lebanese people in each sample. The assigned video reactions are stored for 1)
Disgust, 2) Disgust & Contemptuous and 3) Happy reactions. This way, for all 3 “Facial Mimicries”, we collected total 63 samples
with collaboration. With the all three types of facial mimicries, we are eager to calculate the behavioural factors regarding empathetic
accuracy and emotional congruence. The calculation of MANOVA is executed into three types of thresholds that are 50%, 25% and
10% as provided in the SPSS dataset.
Data Analysis:
Cultural group vs. facial mimicries for measuring different empathic accuracy and emotional congruence behaviours:
50% Threshold
(Cases excluded if attention < 75%)
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Culture 1.00 Lebanese 30
2.00 Anglo 33
Descriptive Statistics
Culture Mean Std. Deviation N
Duration_50
Lebanese 6355.2000 2384.42131 30
Anglo 6686.1818 2113.96172 33
Total 6528.5714 2234.63449 63
frames_total_50
Lebanese 202.3667 64.38113 30
Anglo 203.0303 63.71150 33
Total 202.7143 63.51313 63
Anger_frames_50 Lebanese .0000 .00000 30

3SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Anger_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_frames_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Disgust_frames_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .2424 1.39262 33
Total .1270 1.00791 63
Disgust_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .1332 .76525 33
Total .0698 .55384 63
Joy_frames_50
Lebanese 31.8667 54.04196 30
Anglo 39.1818 60.81758 33
Total 35.6984 57.34689 63
Joy_percent_50
Lebanese 13.6307 21.07689 30
Anglo 17.8776 27.62259 33
Total 15.8553 24.62050 63
Surprise_frames_50
Lebanese .7000 2.81805 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .3333 1.95926 63
Surprise_percent_50
Lebanese .2887 1.10555 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .1375 .76995 63
Fear_frames_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .4242 1.96898 33
Total .2222 1.43059 63
Fear_percent_50
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .2731 1.39375 33
Total .1431 1.01069 63
Contempt_frames_50
Lebanese 2.0000 10.95445 30
Anglo .5758 3.30748 33
Total 1.2540 7.89236 63
Contempt_percent_50
Lebanese .6993 3.83022 30
Anglo .1999 1.14839 33
Total .4377 2.75789 63
Engagement_frames_50
Lebanese 38.2333 57.13124 30
Anglo 41.3333 62.58178 33
Total 39.8571 59.58644 63
Engagement_percent_50
Lebanese 16.6142 22.45838 30
Anglo 18.8772 28.73940 33
Total 17.7996 25.75879 63
Attention_frames_50
Lebanese 194.2000 65.83490 30
Anglo 183.1212 83.36057 33
Total 188.3968 75.13312 63
Attention_percent_50
Lebanese 96.1102 11.35888 30
Anglo 90.2709 27.36894 33
Total 93.0515 21.34487 63
The 50% threshold of mean of duration, frames_total, anger_frames, sadness_frames, disgust_frames, Joy_frames,
Fear_frames, Comtempt_frames are Sadness_frames are found to be greater in case of Anglo people rather than Lebanese people.
Surprise_frames and Engagement_frames show Lebanese people has greater mean than Anglo peoples do.
Multivariate Testsa
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerc
Intercept Pillai's Trace .996 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000
Wilks' Lambda .004 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000
Hotelling's Trace 274.673 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000

4SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Roy's Largest Root 274.673 941.737b 14.000 48.000 .000 .996 13184.323 1.000
Culture
Pillai's Trace .258 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
Wilks' Lambda .742 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
Hotelling's Trace .347 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
Roy's Largest Root .347 1.190b 14.000 48.000 .314 .258 16.654 .624
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
b. Exact statistic
c. Computed using alpha = .05
The value of partial Eta-squared is 0.258. The significant p-value of “Wilks’ Lambda” of Culture is found to be 0.314. It is
greater than 0.05. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. Hence, we can conclude that the measures regarding facial mimicry,
empathic accuracy and emotional congruence are independent of Cultural groups at 50% threshold.
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
F df1 df2 Sig.
Duration_frames_25 .001 1 61 .978
Frames_total_25 .011 1 61 .915
Anger_frames_25 . 1 61 .
Anger_percent_25 . 1 61 .
Sadness_frames_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Sadness_percent_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Disgust_frames_25 4.182 1 61 .045
Disgust_percent_25 4.187 1 61 .045
Joy_frames_25 2.586 1 61 .113
Joy_percent_25 4.922 1 61 .030
Surprise_frames_25 8.620 1 61 .005
Surprise_percent_25 10.108 1 61 .002
Fear_frames_25 4.825 1 61 .032
Fear_percent_25 4.183 1 61 .045
Contempt_frames_25 1.903 1 61 .173
Contempt_percent_25 1.919 1 61 .171
Engagement_frames_25 .461 1 61 .500
Engagement_percent_25 1.684 1 61 .199
Attn_frames_25 .338 1 61 .563
Attn_percent_25 4.713 1 61 .034
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
The Levene’s test for equality of error variance indicate that Duration of frames, Frames total, Joy frames, Contempt
frames, Engagement frames are Attention frames are homogeneous in nature. Sadness frames, Surprise frames and Fear frames are not
homogeneous in nature.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum of
Squares
df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerr
Corrected
Model
Duration_50 1721483.719a 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
frames_total_50 6.921b 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .

5SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Sadness_frames_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_percent_50 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Disgust_frames_50 .924d 1 .924 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Disgust_percent_50 .279e 1 .279 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Joy_frames_50 840.894f 1 840.894 .253 .617 .004 .253 .078
Joy_percent_50 283.422g 1 283.422 .464 .499 .008 .464 .103
Surprise_frames_50 7.700h 1 7.700 2.040 .158 .032 2.040 .290
Surprise_percent_50 1.310i 1 1.310 2.255 .138 .036 2.255 .315
Fear_frames_50 2.828j 1 2.828 1.391 .243 .022 1.391 .213
Fear_percent_50 1.172k 1 1.172 1.150 .288 .019 1.150 .184
Contempt_frames_50 31.876l 1 31.876 .508 .479 .008 .508 .108
Contempt_percent_50 3.919m 1 3.919 .511 .477 .008 .511 .108
Engagement_frames_50 151.014n 1 151.014 .042 .839 .001 .042 .055
Engagement_percent_50 80.476o 1 80.476 .120 .731 .002 .120 .063
Attention_frames_50 1928.764p 1 1928.764 .338 .563 .006 .338 .088
Attention_percent_50 535.821q 1 535.821 1.179 .282 .019 1.179 .188
Intercept
Duration_50 2672648624.291 1 2672648624.291 529.528 .000 .897 529.528 1.000
frames_total_50 2582591.048 1 2582591.048 629.910 .000 .912 629.910 1.000
Anger_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Disgust_frames_50 .924 1 .924 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Disgust_percent_50 .279 1 .279 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Joy_frames_50 79323.942 1 79323.942 23.830 .000 .281 23.830 .998
Joy_percent_50 15600.694 1 15600.694 25.514 .000 .295 25.514 .999
Surprise_frames_50 7.700 1 7.700 2.040 .158 .032 2.040 .290
Surprise_percent_50 1.310 1 1.310 2.255 .138 .036 2.255 .315
Fear_frames_50 2.828 1 2.828 1.391 .243 .022 1.391 .213
Fear_percent_50 1.172 1 1.172 1.150 .288 .019 1.150 .184
Contempt_frames_50 104.257 1 104.257 1.660 .202 .026 1.660 .245
Contempt_percent_50 12.706 1 12.706 1.657 .203 .026 1.657 .245
Engagement_frames_50 99484.856 1 99484.856 27.587 .000 .311 27.587 .999
Engagement_percent_50 19794.419 1 19794.419 29.409 .000 .325 29.409 1.000
Attention_frames_50 2237263.240 1 2237263.240 392.096 .000 .865 392.096 1.000
Attention_percent_50 545881.761 1 545881.761 1201.620 .000 .952 1201.620 1.000
Culture
Duration_50 1721483.719 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
frames_total_50 6.921 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_percent_50 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Disgust_frames_50 .924 1 .924 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Disgust_percent_50 .279 1 .279 .908 .344 .015 .908 .155
Joy_frames_50 840.894 1 840.894 .253 .617 .004 .253 .078
Joy_percent_50 283.422 1 283.422 .464 .499 .008 .464 .103
Surprise_frames_50 7.700 1 7.700 2.040 .158 .032 2.040 .290
Surprise_percent_50 1.310 1 1.310 2.255 .138 .036 2.255 .315
Fear_frames_50 2.828 1 2.828 1.391 .243 .022 1.391 .213
Fear_percent_50 1.172 1 1.172 1.150 .288 .019 1.150 .184
Contempt_frames_50 31.876 1 31.876 .508 .479 .008 .508 .108
Contempt_percent_50 3.919 1 3.919 .511 .477 .008 .511 .108
Engagement_frames_50 151.014 1 151.014 .042 .839 .001 .042 .055
Engagement_percent_50 80.476 1 80.476 .120 .731 .002 .120 .063
Attention_frames_50 1928.764 1 1928.764 .338 .563 .006 .338 .088
Attention_percent_50 535.821 1 535.821 1.179 .282 .019 1.179 .188
Error Duration_50 307881177.709 61 5047232.421
frames_total_50 250095.936 61 4099.933
Anger_frames_50 .000 61 .000
Anger_percent_50 .000 61 .000
Sadness_frames_50 .000 61 .000
Sadness_percent_50 .000 61 .000
Disgust_frames_50 62.061 61 1.017
Disgust_percent_50 18.739 61 .307
Joy_frames_50 203056.376 61 3328.793

6SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Joy_percent_50 37299.055 61 611.460
Surprise_frames_50 230.300 61 3.775
Surprise_percent_50 35.445 61 .581
Fear_frames_50 124.061 61 2.034
Fear_percent_50 62.161 61 1.019
Contempt_frames_50 3830.061 61 62.788
Contempt_percent_50 467.649 61 7.666
Engagement_frames_50 219982.700 61 3606.274
Engagement_percent_50 41057.474 61 673.073
Attention_frames_50 348060.315 61 5705.907
Attention_percent_50 27711.583 61 454.288
Total
Duration_50 2994804090.000 63
frames_total_50 2838967.000 63
Anger_frames_50 .000 63
Anger_percent_50 .000 63
Sadness_frames_50 .000 63
Sadness_percent_50 .000 63
Disgust_frames_50 64.000 63
Disgust_percent_50 19.325 63
Joy_frames_50 284183.000 63
Joy_percent_50 53419.989 63
Surprise_frames_50 245.000 63
Surprise_percent_50 37.946 63
Fear_frames_50 130.000 63
Fear_percent_50 64.623 63
Contempt_frames_50 3961.000 63
Contempt_percent_50 483.639 63
Engagement_frames_50 320215.000 63
Engagement_percent_50 61098.016 63
Attention_frames_50 2586071.000 63
Attention_percent_50 573738.514 63
Corrected Total
Duration_50 309602661.429 62
frames_total_50 250102.857 62
Anger_frames_50 .000 62
Anger_percent_50 .000 62
Sadness_frames_50 .000 62
Sadness_percent_50 .000 62
Disgust_frames_50 62.984 62
Disgust_percent_50 19.018 62
Joy_frames_50 203897.270 62
Joy_percent_50 37582.477 62
Surprise_frames_50 238.000 62
Surprise_percent_50 36.755 62
Fear_frames_50 126.889 62
Fear_percent_50 63.333 62
Contempt_frames_50 3861.937 62
Contempt_percent_50 471.568 62
Engagement_frames_50 220133.714 62
Engagement_percent_50 41137.950 62
Attention_frames_50 349989.079 62
Attention_percent_50 28247.404 62
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
b. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
c. R Squared = . (Adjusted R Squared = .)
d. R Squared = .015 (Adjusted R Squared = -.001)
e. R Squared = .015 (Adjusted R Squared = -.001)
f. R Squared = .004 (Adjusted R Squared = -.012)
g. R Squared = .008 (Adjusted R Squared = -.009)
h. R Squared = .032 (Adjusted R Squared = .016)
i. R Squared = .036 (Adjusted R Squared = .020)
j. R Squared = .022 (Adjusted R Squared = .006)
k. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
l. R Squared = .008 (Adjusted R Squared = -.008)
m. R Squared = .008 (Adjusted R Squared = -.008)
n. R Squared = .001 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)

7SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
o. R Squared = .002 (Adjusted R Squared = -.014)
p. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
q. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
r. Computed using alpha = .05
We can observe from this table that the Cultural effect has a statistically insignificant effect on the respective score below:
frames_total (p-value =0.967, partial Eta-squared = 0.0),
Disgust_frames (p-value=0.344, partial Eta-squared =0.015),
Joy_frames (p-value=0.617, partial Eta-squared=0.004),
Surprise_frames (p-values=0.158, partial Eta-squared = 0.032),
Fear_frames (p-values= 0.243, partial Eta-squared= 0.022),
Contempt_frames (p-values= 0.479, partial Eta-squared =0.008),
Engagement_frames (p-values = 0.839, partial Eta-squared=0.001),
Attention_frames (p-values=0.563, partial Eta-squared= 0.019).
Cultural group vs. facial mimicries for measuring different empathic accuracy and emotional congruence behaviours:
25% Threshold:
(Cases excluded if attention < 75%)
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Culture 1.00 Lebanese 30
2.00 Anglo 33
Descriptive Statistics
Culture Mean Std. Deviation N
Duration_frames_25
Lebanese 6355.2000 2384.42131 30
Anglo 6686.1818 2113.96172 33
Total 6528.5714 2234.63449 63
Frames_total_25
Lebanese 202.3667 64.38113 30
Anglo 203.0303 63.71150 33
Total 202.7143 63.51313 63
Anger_frames_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Anger_percent_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0000 .00000 63
Sadness_frames_25
Lebanese .1667 .91287 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0794 .62994 63
Sadness_percent_25
Lebanese .1208 .66147 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .0575 .45646 63
Disgust_frames_25
Lebanese 4.9333 26.09258 30
Anglo .2727 1.56670 33
Total 2.4921 18.03390 63
Disgust_percent_25
Lebanese 2.7064 14.49693 30
Anglo .1498 .86081 33
Total 1.3673 10.01699 63
Joy_frames_25 Lebanese 33.0667 55.02284 30
Anglo 40.0000 61.70798 33

8SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Total 36.6984 58.25490 63
Joy_percent_25
Lebanese 14.2260 21.62949 30
Anglo 18.2706 28.20166 33
Total 16.3446 25.16877 63
Surprise_frames_25
Lebanese 1.0000 4.11892 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .4762 2.86163 63
Surprise_percent_25
Lebanese .4055 1.57035 30
Anglo .0000 .00000 33
Total .1931 1.09321 63
Fear_frames_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo 1.4545 7.35311 33
Total .7619 5.33314 63
Fear_percent_25
Lebanese .0000 .00000 30
Anglo .9854 5.29913 33
Total .5162 3.83919 63
Contempt_frames_25
Lebanese 3.2667 17.89227 30
Anglo 1.0606 6.09272 33
Total 2.1111 13.04349 63
Contempt_percent_25
Lebanese 1.1422 6.25609 30
Anglo .3683 2.11557 33
Total .7368 4.55726 63
Engagement_frames_25
Lebanese 44.9667 65.89201 30
Anglo 42.1818 63.11074 33
Total 43.5079 63.94147 63
Engagement_percent_25
Lebanese 19.4087 25.40261 30
Anglo 19.2708 29.00292 33
Total 19.3364 27.12909 63
Attn_frames_25
Lebanese 194.3000 65.73151 30
Anglo 183.1212 83.36057 33
Total 188.4444 75.09452 63
Attn_percent_25
Lebanese 96.1581 11.16617 30
Anglo 90.2709 27.36894 33
Total 93.0743 21.30059 63
The 25% threshold of mean of duration, frames_total, anger_frames, disgust_frames, Fear_frames, are Sadness_frames are
found to be greater in case of Anglo people rather than Lebanese people. Attention_percent, Surprise_frames, Comtempt_frames,
Joy_frames, sadness_frames and Engagement_frames show Lebanese people has greater mean than Anglo peoples do.
Multivariate Testsa
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powerc
Intercept
Pillai's Trace .996 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Wilks' Lambda .004 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Hotelling's Trace 277.013 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Roy's Largest Root 277.013 796.413b 16.000 46.000 .000 .996 12742.607 1.000
Culture
Pillai's Trace .291 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
Wilks' Lambda .709 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
Hotelling's Trace .410 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
Roy's Largest Root .410 1.177b 16.000 46.000 .321 .291 18.838 .647
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
b. Exact statistic
c. Computed using alpha = .05
The value of partial Eta-squared is 0.291. The significant p-value of “Wilks’ Lambda” of Culture is found to be 0.321. It is
greater than 0.05. Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis. Hence, we can conclude that the measures regarding facial mimicry,
empathic accuracy and emotional congruence are independent of Cultural groups at 52% threshold.

9SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
F df1 df2 Sig.
Duration_frames_25 .001 1 61 .978
Frames_total_25 .011 1 61 .915
Anger_frames_25 . 1 61 .
Anger_percent_25 . 1 61 .
Sadness_frames_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Sadness_percent_25 4.728 1 61 .034
Disgust_frames_25 4.182 1 61 .045
Disgust_percent_25 4.187 1 61 .045
Joy_frames_25 2.586 1 61 .113
Joy_percent_25 4.922 1 61 .030
Surprise_frames_25 8.620 1 61 .005
Surprise_percent_25 10.108 1 61 .002
Fear_frames_25 4.825 1 61 .032
Fear_percent_25 4.183 1 61 .045
Contempt_frames_25 1.903 1 61 .173
Contempt_percent_25 1.919 1 61 .171
Engagement_frames_25 .461 1 61 .500
Engagement_percent_25 1.684 1 61 .199
Attn_frames_25 .338 1 61 .563
Attn_percent_25 4.713 1 61 .034
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Culture
The Levene’s test for equality of error variance indicate that Duration of frames, Frames total, Joy frames, Contempt frames,
Engagement frames are Attention frames are homogeneous in nature. Sadness frames, Disgust frames, Surprise frames and Fear
frames are not homogeneous in nature.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum of
Squares
df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Observed
Powert
Corrected
Model
Duration_frames_25 1721483.719a 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
Frames_total_25 6.921b 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_25 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_25 .000c 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_25 .437d 1 .437 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Sadness_percent_25 .229e 1 .229 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Disgust_frames_25 341.334f 1 341.334 1.050 .309 .017 1.050 .172
Disgust_percent_25 102.708g 1 102.708 1.024 .316 .017 1.024 .169
Joy_frames_25 755.403h 1 755.403 .220 .641 .004 .220 .075
Joy_percent_25 257.067i 1 257.067 .402 .528 .007 .402 .096
Surprise_frames_25 15.714j 1 15.714 1.948 .168 .031 1.948 .279
Surprise_percent_25 2.583k 1 2.583 2.204 .143 .035 2.204 .309
Fear_frames_25 33.247l 1 33.247 1.172 .283 .019 1.172 .187
Fear_percent_25 15.259m 1 15.259 1.036 .313 .017 1.036 .171
Contempt_frames_25 76.477n 1 76.477 .445 .507 .007 .445 .101
Contempt_percent_25 9.412o 1 9.412 .449 .505 .007 .449 .101
Engagement_frames_25 121.870p 1 121.870 .029 .865 .000 .029 .053
Engagement_percent_25 .299q 1 .299 .000 .984 .000 .000 .050
Attn_frames_25 1963.740r 1 1963.740 .345 .559 .006 .345 .089
Attn_percent_25 544.648s 1 544.648 1.204 .277 .019 1.204 .191
Intercept Duration_frames_25 2672648624.291 1 2672648624.291 529.528 .000 .897 529.528 1.000
Frames_total_25 2582591.048 1 2582591.048 629.910 .000 .912 629.910 1.000
Anger_frames_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_25 .437 1 .437 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Sadness_percent_25 .229 1 .229 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Disgust_frames_25 425.905 1 425.905 1.311 .257 .021 1.311 .203
Disgust_percent_25 128.200 1 128.200 1.278 .263 .021 1.278 .200
Joy_frames_25 83894.451 1 83894.451 24.410 .000 .286 24.410 .998

10SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Joy_percent_25 16594.748 1 16594.748 25.944 .000 .298 25.944 .999
Surprise_frames_25 15.714 1 15.714 1.948 .168 .031 1.948 .279
Surprise_percent_25 2.583 1 2.583 2.204 .143 .035 2.204 .309
Fear_frames_25 33.247 1 33.247 1.172 .283 .019 1.172 .187
Fear_percent_25 15.259 1 15.259 1.036 .313 .017 1.036 .171
Contempt_frames_25 294.255 1 294.255 1.714 .195 .027 1.714 .252
Contempt_percent_25 35.853 1 35.853 1.711 .196 .027 1.711 .251
Engagement_frames_25 119347.775 1 119347.775 28.734 .000 .320 28.734 1.000
Engagement_percent_25 23510.150 1 23510.150 31.429 .000 .340 31.429 1.000
Attn_frames_25 2238449.264 1 2238449.264 392.749 .000 .866 392.749 1.000
Attn_percent_25 546162.381 1 546162.381 1207.724 .000 .952 1207.724 1.000
Culture
Duration_frames_25 1721483.719 1 1721483.719 .341 .561 .006 .341 .089
Frames_total_25 6.921 1 6.921 .002 .967 .000 .002 .050
Anger_frames_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Anger_percent_25 .000 1 .000 . . . . .
Sadness_frames_25 .437 1 .437 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Sadness_percent_25 .229 1 .229 1.102 .298 .018 1.102 .178
Disgust_frames_25 341.334 1 341.334 1.050 .309 .017 1.050 .172
Disgust_percent_25 102.708 1 102.708 1.024 .316 .017 1.024 .169
Joy_frames_25 755.403 1 755.403 .220 .641 .004 .220 .075
Joy_percent_25 257.067 1 257.067 .402 .528 .007 .402 .096
Surprise_frames_25 15.714 1 15.714 1.948 .168 .031 1.948 .279
Surprise_percent_25 2.583 1 2.583 2.204 .143 .035 2.204 .309
Fear_frames_25 33.247 1 33.247 1.172 .283 .019 1.172 .187
Fear_percent_25 15.259 1 15.259 1.036 .313 .017 1.036 .171
Contempt_frames_25 76.477 1 76.477 .445 .507 .007 .445 .101
Contempt_percent_25 9.412 1 9.412 .449 .505 .007 .449 .101
Engagement_frames_25 121.870 1 121.870 .029 .865 .000 .029 .053
Engagement_percent_25 .299 1 .299 .000 .984 .000 .000 .050
Attn_frames_25 1963.740 1 1963.740 .345 .559 .006 .345 .089
Attn_percent_25 544.648 1 544.648 1.204 .277 .019 1.204 .191
Error
Duration_frames_25 307881177.709 61 5047232.421
Frames_total_25 250095.936 61 4099.933
Anger_frames_25 .000 61 .000
Anger_percent_25 .000 61 .000
Sadness_frames_25 24.167 61 .396
Sadness_percent_25 12.689 61 .208
Disgust_frames_25 19822.412 61 324.958
Disgust_percent_25 6118.379 61 100.301
Joy_frames_25 209649.867 61 3436.883
Joy_percent_25 39017.883 61 639.637
Surprise_frames_25 492.000 61 8.066
Surprise_percent_25 71.514 61 1.172
Fear_frames_25 1730.182 61 28.364
Fear_percent_25 898.585 61 14.731
Contempt_frames_25 10471.745 61 171.668
Contempt_percent_25 1278.240 61 20.955
Engagement_frames_25 253365.876 61 4153.539
Engagement_percent_25 45630.912 61 748.048
Attn_frames_25 347665.815 61 5699.440
Attn_percent_25 27585.699 61 452.225
Total Duration_frames_25 2994804090.000 63
Frames_total_25 2838967.000 63
Anger_frames_25 .000 63
Anger_percent_25 .000 63
Sadness_frames_25 25.000 63
Sadness_percent_25 13.126 63
Disgust_frames_25 20555.000 63
Disgust_percent_25 6338.858 63
Joy_frames_25 295252.000 63
Joy_percent_25 56105.152 63
Surprise_frames_25 522.000 63
Surprise_percent_25 76.446 63
Fear_frames_25 1800.000 63
Fear_percent_25 930.628 63
Contempt_frames_25 10829.000 63
Contempt_percent_25 1321.854 63

11SPSS STATISTICS PSYCHOLOGY
Engagement_frames_25 372743.000 63
Engagement_percent_25 69186.790 63
Attn_frames_25 2586842.000 63
Attn_percent_25 573888.919 63
Corrected Total
Duration_frames_25 309602661.429 62
Frames_total_25 250102.857 62
Anger_frames_25 .000 62
Anger_percent_25 .000 62
Sadness_frames_25 24.603 62
Sadness_percent_25 12.918 62
Disgust_frames_25 20163.746 62
Disgust_percent_25 6221.087 62
Joy_frames_25 210405.270 62
Joy_percent_25 39274.951 62
Surprise_frames_25 507.714 62
Surprise_percent_25 74.097 62
Fear_frames_25 1763.429 62
Fear_percent_25 913.844 62
Contempt_frames_25 10548.222 62
Contempt_percent_25 1287.652 62
Engagement_frames_25 253487.746 62
Engagement_percent_25 45631.211 62
Attn_frames_25 349629.556 62
Attn_percent_25 28130.347 62
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
b. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
c. R Squared = . (Adjusted R Squared = .)
d. R Squared = .018 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
e. R Squared = .018 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
f. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .001)
g. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .000)
h. R Squared = .004 (Adjusted R Squared = -.013)
i. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.010)
j. R Squared = .031 (Adjusted R Squared = .015)
k. R Squared = .035 (Adjusted R Squared = .019)
l. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
m. R Squared = .017 (Adjusted R Squared = .001)
n. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.009)
o. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.009)
p. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
q. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.016)
r. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = -.011)
s. R Squared = .019 (Adjusted R Squared = .003)
t. Computed using alpha = .05
We can observe from this table that the Cultural effect has a statistically insignificant effect on the respective score below:
Duration_total (p-value=0.561, partial Eta-squared =0.006),
Sadness_frames (p-value=0.298, partial Eta-squared=0.018),
frames_total (p-value =0.967, partial Eta-squared = 0.0),
Disgust_frames (p-value=0.309, partial Eta-squared =0.017),
Joy_frames (p-value=0.641, partial Eta-squared=0.004),
Surprise_frames (p-values=0.168, partial Eta-squared = 0.031),
Fear_frames (p-values= 0.283, partial Eta-squared= 0.019),