Analyzing Relationships: Culture, Society, and Ecology in Anthropology

This essay delves into the intricate relationships between culture, society, and ecology, drawing upon key anthropological concepts and arguments. It begins by distinguishing between culture and society, highlighting their differences and intersections as described by Miller, Keesing, and Strathern. The essay then explores how ecology plays a crucial role in shaping these relationships, referencing the works of Harris, Shankman, and Steward to illustrate various perspectives on cultural ecology and human adaptation to social and physical environments. Examples such as the cultural ecology of India's sacred cattle and the analysis of Dani warfare are used to demonstrate the complex interplay between cultural practices, societal structures, and ecological factors. The essay concludes by emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary approach to understanding these relationships, particularly in the context of globalization and environmental change, and points to the importance of considering human agency in conservation efforts. The essay is contributed by a student and is available on Desklib, a platform offering a wide range of study tools and resources.

Running head: CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note:

1CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Society and Culture are essentially different and similar and this conception is argued or
analyzed by many authors and scholar throughout times about the differences and similarities of
such case (Hepp, Hjarvard & Lundby, 2015, p. 314-324). The ecosystem plays an
important role in asserting the relationship between the culture and society. The ecosystem is the
background or environment against which the relationship of the culture and the society grows.
Society can be described as the group of people who are organized under certain circumstances
and that have certain connections among them. Hepp, Hjarvard & Lundby (2015), There
are some cultural similarities among the people who give rise to social structures. Culture is the
way of living of a group of people of a certain location or region, and even if some people are
separated from that region they follow the same cultural norms (p. 314-324). Cultural ecology is
again the study which deals with the adaptation of human kind to “social and physical
environments”. The theory of adaptation not only refers to the biological adaptation but it also
refers to the cultural process that helps the individual to adapt in a particular ecosystem.
Sociology as a field of study is the analysis and understanding of society in which the
particular group to be studied lives. There might be culturally different people living in the same
society, however there must be some basic cultural similarities of the people living in that
particular society, this may be based on beliefs, food habits, language, world views, way of
living, likings and preferences, ambitions, shared goals, shared historical ideas and so on and so
forth. However these similar aspects can undergo certain changes when they are applied in
localized aspects in a large society (Keesing, 1987, p. 369-394).
Viably organizing thought in regards to “globalization, sexual introduction, class, race
and ethnicity, and the earth,” scholar have endeavored in establishing interfaces with
understudies with persuading ethnographic cases and by showing the essentialness of humanities.

2CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
There are reasons to understand that there are many distinctions and similarities between the
concepts of culture and society. Ecology plays an important role in acting as an enabler or
disabler in this case (Hepp, Hjarvard & Lundby, 2015, p. 314-324).
“Cultural Anthropology in a Globalizing World”- This book, in perspective of Miller's
full-length Cultural Anthropology content, effectively delivers class trade, increase staff
understudy duty, and enhance student learning. Material all through the book includes the
congruity of humanities to students and how they can apply these concepts in their callings
(Miller, 2005). By weaving respect for key speculations for understanding society with a
complement on centrality of anthropological learning and capacities, this work of the critically
appraised worker is an ideal choice for introductory social human sciences courses (Steward,
2006, p. 5-9).
There is a completely different perspective of the relationship between culture and
society in context of an ecosystem is presented in work “The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred
Cattle”. The relationship among human and cattle’s especially cows in India has starting at as of
late been widely observed as an essential case of favorable position misuse impacted by religious
instruction. However the system is rooted in deep social thought where the cattle which produce
economically viable materials and take part in activities like farming in rural areas are considered
to be best friend of humanity. This will automatically lead to preservation of such species and
greater economic gain of the society (Steward, 2006, p. 5-9). Exactly when all is said in done, the
mishandling of steers assets continues in such a course as not to cripple the survival and cash
related achievement of the human masses. The relationship between the human and cattle is
pleasing as opposed to concentrated; more adjust creatures than are a little while later open are
required for doing essential developing works (Harris et al., 1966, p. 51-66). Under existing

3CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
technology based conditions the method of farming and dairy industry are changing alike ,
however all things considered high degree of interaction between dairy creatures to people is
normally unavoidable. This does not mean that with adjusted techno-typical conditions, new and
more gainful sustenance vitality structures can't be created.
The article “Culture Contact, Cultural Ecology, and Dani Warfare” looks at ongoing
struggle among the Dani of the New Guinea Highlands as for two isolating methodologies:
“culture contact and sociology”. A present article by Blick has recommended that sparse Western
contact and new exchange designs, indigenous regular engaging can raise to harming degrees;
the Dani are an a significant delineation. In any case, an elective examination of the Dani
information endorses that broad scale engaging was a pre-contact ponder and that this sort of
fighting had an environmental beginning. Ethnographic information from the Dugum Dani,
recorded information from the Ilanga Dani, and close information from the New Guinea
Highlands propel assists to a biological approach (Harris et al., 1966, p. 51-66).
Research on the exchanges between human immediate and natural frameworks tends to
base on the fast impacts of human exercises on conditions, for example, biodiversity mishap.
There is in the same way broadening research exertion encouraged towards normal structure
associations. Regardless, mediations to control individuals' utilization of the earth change the
motivations that general asset clients go up against, and in this way their choices about asset
utilization. The indirect impacts of security mediations on biodiversity, coordinated through
human basic activity, are inadequately thought about at any rate are in all likelihood going to be
fundamental and possibly preposterous. This is especially so where individuals are subject to
different trademark assets for their occupations, when both conflict and biodiversity episodes are
unprecedented. A inter disciplinary approach is required to evaluate these relationship, with an

4CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
impression of human principal activity at its inside; generally, presumptions about the effects of
protection strategies might be to a great degree astounding.

5CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Bibliography:
Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: theorizing the interplay between
media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314-324.
Keesing, R. M. (1987). Models," folk" and" cultural. Cultural models in language and thought,
369-394.
Miller, B. D. (2005). Cultural anthropology. Boston, New York etc: Pearson.
Harris, M., Bose, N. K., Klass, M., Mencher, J. P., Oberg, K., Opler, M. K., ... & Vayda, A. P.
(1966). The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred Cattle [and Comments and
Replies]. Current Anthropology, 7(1), 51-66.
Steward, J. H. (2006). The concept and method of cultural ecology. The Environment in
Anthropology: A Reader in Ecology, Culture and Sustainable Living, 5-9.