Accounting and Thought: Current Development Analysis Report

This report provides an in-depth analysis of current developments in accounting and thought. It begins by exploring the importance of relevance and faithful representation in financial reporting, arguing that faithful representation is crucial for accurate and reliable financial information. The report then examines different accounting methods, including Current Purchasing Power, Current Cost Accounting, and Continuously Contemporary Accounting, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. Finally, it delves into the building blocks of a conceptual framework, highlighting its advantages such as establishing accounting standards and minimizing political pressure, while also acknowledging criticisms related to the burden on smaller organizations and the limited focus on social and environmental perspectives. The report concludes by emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive approach to accounting that considers broader societal impacts.

Running Head: CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT
Current Development in Accounting and
Thought
Subject Code-
Trimester No.-
Student’s name-
Word Count -2000
Name of the tutor -

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 2
Question 1:
Relevance is that characteristic which makes the information relevant and helpful for
the purpose of decision making. Relevance is a combination of the predictions related to the
future and the past (Bragg, Relevance definition, 2013). Faithful representation vouches for
the accuracy with respect to the business. Apart from the financial statement, it extends its
reflection on the financial position and another course of operations (Bragg, Faithful
Representation, 2014).
As per my level of understanding, faithful representation is more important. In order
to make the financial information useful, only being relevant will not be sufficient enough. It
should authentically represent the occurrences it implies to represent. The quality of faithful
representation elevates the inner characteristics of completeness, error free and neutrality.
The role of relevance is an important but faithful representation is the necessity. Faithful
representation acts as a backbone to the financial information and result which can be cross
verified at different areas. This confirms the authenticity and reliableness of an organization
(Charterededucation, 2017).
Suppose a difference has been found between the substance and legal form, it is the
faithful representation which comes to the rescue. Relevance cannot solve this issue solely.
With the help of faithful representation, the financial information should signify the financial
substance. For example, if the company possess $ 125,640 inventory, it can be easily traced
with the help of past trends and the requirements of future. But, if it is not fairly represented
in the financial information, the decision making of users will stand misleading. Such is the
role play of fair representation that it needs to be accurately mentioned and cross verified by
other sources. The agenda of any information stands incomplete and incorrect if it has not
been fairly represented even if confirms its relevancy. Practically, the companies are getting

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 3
trapped in fair representation due to which fraud and misleading decisions crop up in the
corporate world (iasplus, 2017). Fair representation also includes the required compliance of
accounting policy, relevant disclosures, and reliable information. Its domain is relatively
broader than relevance and without satisfying fair representation, it is highly difficult to
survive for any organization.
The framework of IAS, Presentation of Financial Statements itself includes the
component of fair representation. The basic theme of any accounting standard is to disclose
proper information with disclosures and depicts its true nature. The purpose of faithful
representation is somewhat similar to the theme of any accounting standard. Fairness in the
quality of information, proper disclosures and error free are its three distinctive features. The
backbone of any accounting standard also stands on these three pillars. It is not required to be
outrightly discussed in fact it is an unsaid fact in some of the accounting standards (iasplus,
2017).
In this developing environment, the need for different kinds of disclosures has
increased since the past decades. Stakeholders want both kinds of information to be it
financial or non-financial information. It has been noticed that now the stakeholders are
understanding the importance of non-financial information and its impact in the corporate
world. The changes made in the accounting standards have been made in connection with the
diversifying needs of the corporate environment. For example, related party disclosures were
not exhaustive enough as it is in today’s times.
But today, due to the need for transparency, the list of details required for the related
parties had been made exhaustive. Apart from the name and the nature of transaction of
related parties, the outstanding amount, the relation of such parties and other parameters are
required to be disclosed. The importance of faithful representation is so high that the auditors

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 4
can even qualify their report if the financial statements are not complying its characteristics
(FASB, 2017).
By judging the requirements of the stakeholders, companies and the corporate world,
it can be understood that faithful representation is not just a mere requirement, but a
necessity. If the financial information is not faithfully represented, the organization will not
survive in the long run on the basis of projecting a misleading image. It is very important to
gain the confidence of the stakeholders and the government in order to establish a brand
image.
Though, it is still difficult to maintain this quality because there exist some companies
who are misleading their stakeholders but not for a longer period of time. If completeness
does not comply, the stakeholders will not invest in such companies. If the financial
information is not free from biases, the final result will turnout vague or misleading.
Omissions or inaccuracies will tantamount to fraud be it intentional or unintentional. It is now
a basic need to follow such parameters for the survival of companies.
Question 2:
Current Purchasing Power: The first alternative is of Current Purchasing Power. This
alternative works on the basis of the price index. The historical cost was supposed to be
adjusted with respect to the purchasing power through price index. Price index used to exist
for a particular asset and in the form of Current Price Index (CPI) as well. For example, if an
asset is required to be valued, a specific price index can be used and if not available for
anytime, CPI is adopted to make the necessary adjustments. The profit and loss of such kind
of accounting are only confined to the monetary items and excludes the non-monetary ones
(Accounting-Management, 2017).

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 5
Current Cost Accounting: The second alternative i.e. the current cost accounting
defines works on the replacement cost mechanism with respect to the non-monetary
concerns. This, in turn, uplifts the value of assets and hence the inflated mechanism is not
included in it when the profit is calculated. For example, a machine’s cost is $200,000 with a
life of 10 years and no salvage component. Depreciated as per straight line mechanism, its
expense will be $20,000 per year. As per current cost accounting, if the replacement cost of
$220,000, the new depreciation amount will be $ 22,000 per year. Thus, this extra $2000 will
be reduced to ascertain the current cost accounting profit (AccountingManagement, 2017).
Continuously Contemporary Accounting: The third normative alternative, i.e. the
continuously contemporary accounting works on the mechanism of the current cash price.
For example, if an asset is supposed to be sold at $1500 but if its net realizable value is
$2000, as per this method of accounting, it will be measured at $2000. It does not recognize
any difference between the realized and unrealized profits like other methods of accounting.
In this component, all types of gains are considered as a fragment of profit. The method
incorporates the adjustments with respect to the general purchasing power to the assets
(Chambers, 1967).
Weakness:
For Current Purchasing Power, a single price index does not practically turn out to be
the best solution for the purpose of accounting. A single price index for all the assets will not
correspond accurately to the actual value of assets. The valuation as per this method of
accounting turns out to be more time consuming and costly (Nandwani, 2017).
For Current Cost Accounting, replacement cost does not reflect the asset’s selling
price. It is, in fact, the buying price. When it comes to the specialized form of assets, it is not
easy to ascertain its replacement cost. This process of accounting may turn out to be quite

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 6
expensive for an organization. A lot of effort and time is required to know the replacement
cost, so the result may not be positive always (Nandwani, 2017).
For Continuously Contemporary Accounting, subjectivity prevails when it comes to
valuation of assets. It is because the market price is not available for all kinds of assets. The
concept of value in use has been totally ignored by this method of accounting. It fails to value
goodwill on the exit price because it cannot be sold separately (Nandwani, 2017).
The definition of successful is an exhaustive one which not only includes the
profitability of an organization but other factors like, going concern, transparency,
consistency, neutrality, and error free information. As far as the above types of accounting
are concerned, none of them are in use as per the modern concepts. Previously, as the method
of accounting was evolving from time to time, each of the methods was successful for a
certain period of time.
When the CCA and CoCoA were not ascertained, it was CPP which was adopted by
the organizations and the business used to be successful. Similarly, CCA and CoCoA also
had their own period of being successful. As on today, historical method of accounting is not
much in use because it fails to recognize the other parameters of accounting like
transparency, error free work, neutrality etc. The mode concepts have been adopted which
paves the way towards the success of an organization.
Question 3:
Building blocks refer to the base on which conceptual framework has been framed.
Reporting entity, the purpose of financial statements, users related to the financial reports, its
assumptions, objectives, and elements serves the purpose of the building block. The reporting
entity is that responsible entity who knows the fact that there are users who are going to make
decisions based on their reports. The basic purpose of the financial statement is to provide

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 7
relevant information to all the possible users. Users are of three kinds i.e. the providers –
investors, receivers – customers and the regulatory parties – government, media, and labor
group. The basic objective is to measure and maintain the scope of accountability between an
organization and its related person who make decisions based on the organization’s
information (Bovens, 2007).
The assumption based on which financial statements are prepared is on the accrual
basis. Going concern is another assumption which helps in justifying the conceptual
framework. The concept of making things understood to its users, information free from any
error and represented in a faithful manner are the basic pillars of a conceptual framework.
Comparability and conservatism also serve the purpose of the conceptual framework. The
elements like, equity, assets, expenses, liabilities, and income are the basic tenets based on
which the conceptual framework works on a larger basis. Thus, these are all key building
blocks of a conceptual framework based on which the world of accounting works worldwide
(IFAC, 2013).
One of the advantages of accounting that can result from the development of
conceptual framework is the setup of accounting standards. These define each characteristic
of accounting in terms how to classify them to its relevant disclosures. These are the logical
and most consistent parameters that have evolved from the conceptual framework. Another
advantage is the role of political pressure is very minimal because the standard setter cannot
go beyond the basic tenets of the conceptual framework when setting the standards
(Chartered-education, 2017).
There exists its own level of criticism like due to the weight of the conceptual
framework, smaller organizations may feel overburdened due to the reporting obligations. A
conceptual framework has only been stressing upon the financial perspective. Social and

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 8
environmental perspective are still being undermined in the corporate world. Today,
profitability is the barometer of measuring the success rate of any organization whereas the
duty towards the environment and society are totally being ignored. It fails to depict an ideal
step towards accounting rather it is a bundle of standards and practice (Chartered-education,
2017).
To some extent, I agree with the criticism because of our world, today, is not limited
to the power of money. The dimension has widened enough to incorporate our duty towards
the society and environment. This somehow seems to be untouched today. Reporting
requirements surely highlight transparency to the users but at the same time, it turns out to be
a cumbersome process for those organizations who are not multinationals. For smaller
organizations, the conceptual framework should be flexible enough to provide them
relaxation otherwise it may affect their normal course of business.
It is now high time that our conceptual framework should now be diversified. It
should not be limited to the practices and standards of the financial component but should
also govern non-financial component. Though, a system like corporate social responsibility
has been introduced, this shows that it is getting diversified gradually. In this dynamic
corporate environment, we cannot adopt or practice with conventional methods.
References

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 9
AccountingManagement. (2017). Meaning and Characteristic of Current Cost Accounting.
Retrieved from Accoutning-Management:
http://accountlearning.blogspot.in/2011/06/meaning-features-and-objectives-of.html
Accounting-Management. (2017). Meaning and Characteristics of Current Purchasing
Power. Retrieved from Accounting-Management:
http://accountlearning.blogspot.in/2011/06/meaning-and-characteristics-of-
current.html
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework.
European law journal, 13(4), 447-468.
Bragg, S. (2013, March 12). Relevance definition. Retrieved from Accounting Tools:
https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/what-is-relevance-in-accounting.html
Bragg, S. (2014, September 22). Faithful Representation. Retrieved from Accounting Tools:
https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/what-is-faithful-representation.html
Chambers, R. (1967). Continously Contemporary Accounting. The Accounting Review, 42(4),
751-757. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/244170
Charterededucation. (2017). Accounting Policies- Fair Representation and Faithful
Representation in IFRS. Retrieved from Chartered Education:
http://www.charterededucation.com/ifrs/accounting-policies-fair-presentation-and-
faithful-representation-for-ifrs/
Chartered-education. (2017). Understanding the Purpose of Conceptual Framework for
IFRS. Retrieved from Chartered Education:
http://www.charterededucation.com/ifrs/understanding-the-purpose-of-conceptual-
framework-for-ifrs/

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOUNTING AND THOUGHT P a g e | 10
FASB. (2017). Conceptual Framework. Retrieved from FASB:
http://www.fasb.org/project/cf_phase-c.shtml
iasplus. (2017). IAS1 - Presentation of Financial Statements. Retrieved from Ias Plus:
https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias1
IFAC. (2013). Conceptual Framework for General Purpose Financial Reporting . Retrieved
from IFAC: https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/conceptual-framework-
general-purpose-financial-reporting-public-sector-enti-6
Nandwani, M. (2017). HCA - meaning, benefits and limitations. Retrieved from Accounting
Notes: http://www.accountingnotes.net/historical-cost-accounting/historical-cost-
accounting-hca-meaning-benefits-and-limitations/5454