Evaluating Contractor Proposals: Key Criteria and Considerations

This essay explores the criteria customers use to evaluate contractor proposals, focusing on three key aspects: compliance with the statement of work (SOW), understanding customer needs and suggestions, and the realism of the contractor's schedule. The statement of work is defined as a formal document outlining the complete working scope, timelines, costs, and deliverables. Understanding customer needs involves tools like answeringthepublic.com, conducting customer interviews to identify challenges, and reviewing customer feedback to gauge experiences and value gained. Assessing the realism of the contractor's schedule requires collaboration among contractors, subcontractors, and others involved in the construction process to create a realistic timeline and foster a sense of ownership. By addressing these criteria, customers can effectively evaluate proposals, solve problems, and reposition their businesses for success. Desklib offers more resources for students.

Running head: EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL
Evaluation of contractor’s proposal
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author Note

1EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL
Three criteria that a customer could use to evaluate a contractor’s proposal:
The customers can analyse proposals of contractors in various ways. There are multiple
criteria through which customers can evaluate contractor proposals. In this study, the compliance of
contractors with a statement of work of customer is analysed. Next, understanding the needs and
suggestions of customers are discussed. Next, the realism of the contractor’s schedule for those
issues has been demonstrated here.
The statement of work is a formal document defining the complete working scope included
for vendors. This has been clarifying timeline, costs and deliverables. This is required in cases where
these projects have involved vendors and different external contributors besides internal project
group 1. This has been important that SOW gets cleared to every stakeholder for clarifying metrics
for success and then avoid disputed including timelines, budgets and deliverables. Here, the
statement of works for customers includes every deliverable and due dates, distinct tasks leading to
deliverable and who those tasks are being assigned.
To understand customer needs and problems is the first step. For this the first tool is top
reveal about answering the public. This has been a cool site since this has been essentially being a
search engine of sorts. However, one put search terms this has been a thorough list of questions and
related topic for treating them 2. Next, the customers are to be interviewed. Here the most
1 Hyari, K.H., 2016. Owner’s countermeasures to skewed bidding in construction projects: Review of current practices
and proposal for new countermeasures. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(3), p.04016053.
2 Błaszczyk, P. and Błaszczyk, T., 2015. On the support of the general contractor’s decisions in the processes of event
project management. In Global Enterprise Management (pp. 189-204). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

2EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL
significant way to push them for helping us to reveal what the challenges have been. Most
importantly they need to recognize what issues are to be solved actually.
Next, the reviews are to be seen. As studies are received from customers they are going to
seek that. They should be open about proper experiences they have been possessing and the value
they have gained from that 3.
The last one is the realism of the contractor’s schedule. Here product planning is the process
where every contractor, subcontractors and others included in construction must collaborate to
generate a realistic timeline 4. They must be involved in main scheduling processes helping to devise
a more realistic program from the beginning and provide people who have been performing one of a
sense of ownership in a project.
The above mentioned criteria that customers can analyse contractor’s proposals are useful
clues to experience issues that ate needed to be addressed. They must be looked for solving the
problems are to be turned for connecting and repositioning the entire business. These are efficiently
instanced from various clients. The highlights of all those reviews have stated the similar thing that
they are to be resolved as early as possible.
3 Welch, H.J., Kabnick, L., Vasquez, M.A., Monahan, D.L., Lurie, F. and Jacobowicz, G., 2017. Proposal for a national
coverage determination for the treatment of varicose veins and venous disease due to disparate Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services local coverage determination policies. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic
Disorders, 5(3), pp.453-459.
4 Rodin, D.N., 2014. The cybersecurity partnership: A proposal for cyberthreat information sharing between contractors
and the federal government. Pub. Cont. LJ, 44, p.505.

3EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL
References:
Błaszczyk, P. and Błaszczyk, T., 2015. On the support of the general contractor’s decisions in the
processes of event project management. In Global Enterprise Management (pp. 189-204). Palgrave
Macmillan, New York.
Hyari, K.H., 2016. Owner’s countermeasures to skewed bidding in construction projects: Review of
current practices and proposal for new countermeasures. Journal of Management in
Engineering, 33(3), p.04016053.
Rodin, D.N., 2014. The cybersecurity partnership: A proposal for cyberthreat information sharing
between contractors and the federal government. Pub. Cont. LJ, 44, p.505.
Welch, H.J., Kabnick, L., Vasquez, M.A., Monahan, D.L., Lurie, F. and Jacobowicz, G., 2017.
Proposal for a national coverage determination for the treatment of varicose veins and venous
disease due to disparate Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services local coverage determination
policies. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 5(3), pp.453-459.