Decision Making: Personal Preferences and Style Analysis Report

This report analyzes personal decision-making styles, preferences, and tools used for business decision analytics. The report begins with an introduction emphasizing the importance of informed decision-making in today's fast-paced business environment, followed by an exploration of personal decision-making preferences, including the role of intuition and reasoning. It then delves into a decision-making style analysis, highlighting preferences for independent decision-making and the impact of self-esteem. The report incorporates the MBTI test to identify decision-making types, strengths, and weaknesses. The report also provides recommendations for improving decision-making by trusting intuition, considering others' perspectives, avoiding overconfidence, and balancing extroversion and introversion. The conclusion summarizes the key takeaways and emphasizes the value of considering others' suggestions and avoiding over-reliance on personal biases.

Running head: [Shortened Title up to 50 Characters]1
[Title Here, up to 12 Words, on One to Two Lines]
[Author Name(s), First M. Last, Omit Titles and Degrees]
[Institutional Affiliation(s)]
Author Note
[Include any grant/funding information and a complete correspondence address.]

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 2
Introduction
When you make a decision today, it will be the reflection of your tomorrow and the kind
of individual you want to become in the future, which will be the result of what you actually
decide to do today. This statement has been read by almost every individual including associates
who are older. It is a matter of concern where the decision the person makes today might have an
impact on his or her life later (Juanchich, Dewberry, Sirota and Narendran, 2015). The aim of
this report was to jot down preferred decisions as well as recognize weaknesses and strengths in
this field as the researcher come up with strategies to cope with some of the weaknesses in a
proper manner.
Personal Decision Making Preference
After making the decision, I have realized that having preferences is quite important for
the decision I have taken and I actually need to trust my gut. This is because once I say otherwise
(or maybe yes), I would want to be correct according to my own understanding as a person of
high intuition who has to be aware of everything they do. On the other hand, I cannot rate
reasoning at the high point of the scale, neither can I see myself at the lower point of the scale.
Therefore, I can say I am logical to the medium part of the scale with regard to reasoning. I am
quite considerate about how my decision affects other people and try my best to balance between
the others' side and my side (Alexander, 1997).

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 3
Decision Making Style Analysis
While reflecting on making decision and preference styles, I realized I have a high
preference when making decisions on my own, which seems to be correct, instead of making
ones that might feel to be right to the individual as I feel it might also lower my self-esteem.
Hence, it can be said that once I make a decision, I would see myself as courageous at the same
time and be ready to protect any other decision I made, which might also look like straight
opposition.
It is quite simple for me because I trust my gut, and I feel that whatever decision I make
will be fine for me (Brunell and Buelow, 2015). I have also realized what others decide and have
decided to do or what to do next unless I am the special one and involved in the other person's
decision. My question is, when the person is my senior with regard to authority, I seem to be
rational in making or taking the decision, so I might first make the decision myself without
knowing anyone.
Outcome – MBTI Test
The four scale MBTI test is to recognize the type of decision making in a primary
manner. I have noted that I am an extravert and am confident to make decisions I make. I have
high extraversion thinking which makes me ready for decision-making. The test helped me
identify that I am an individual who makes a decision and perceives that decision without
making room for change. While making the decision, I won’t judge and would be less
judgmental which helps me keep my focus on the decision I made. This decision would affect me
by the judgments as it would actually turn me incline to the scale and made me emotional at the
same time (Primi, Morsanyi, Chiesi, Donati and Hamilton, 2015).

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 4
Strengths & Weaknesses
Employing the MBTI test outcomes, I have noted that I have not even embraced the best
form of decision-making that generates a negative impact on my decisions. Thus, this test has
helped me realize my weakness in decision-making and to recognize the changes I should make
to correct my mistakes, and to provide a positive change in my life. The community or the
individual that is affected by the decision needs to be involved in the decision-making procedure.
This makes me feel quite happy, contented and appreciative at the same time because it makes
me believe that I have made a good decision. Conversely, this has to be limited to the extent that
it would result to live with other people life and according to what other people suggest.
If other people help me make a decision, I would feel I am a part of the decision because
their part has also contributed and the decisions I make will have their part involved already
(Helfand, 2007).
How to Improve Decision
For improving the decisions, following suggestions are made.
a) I need to trust my own gut while making the decision in a suitable way.
b) The decision needs to take the people into consideration even if they did not take part in the
procedure.
c) Never bother to clarify or justify the decision.
d) I need to avoid being overconfident while making a decision or in the process of making a
decision (Mastrogiorgio, 2015).
Recommendations
The issue selected for this suitable method of solution development has been
recommended for this study. This is because I need to be intuitive and avoid being overconfident

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 5
with my gut. There should be a mutual balance between the level of extroversion and
introversion. Therefore, if a person makes their own decision, they need to clarify that specific
decision that needs to be a correct version - there is no need to justify to the individual how it
affects their own psychology in a negative way.
Conclusion
With the intention to summarize the study, it has opened my eyes and taught me about
making a decision and not just hoping on thoughts and ideas that might not be right for me. It is
quite good to avoid feeling superior because to me, I think people can change your mindset if we
ask them about suggestions and make a decision on the basis of their suggestions. It is also good
to involve people in making the decision - however, they must not dominate the process as this
may lower the individual's self-esteem and make him/her feel that the decision followed earlier
was formulated by others (Sinayev and Peters, 2015).

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 6
References
Alexander, C. (1997). Influencing decision making. Nursing Standard, 11(38), 39-44. doi:
10.7748/ns.11.38.39.s54
Brunell, A., & Buelow, M. (2015). Narcissism and Performance on Behavioral Decision-making
Tasks. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1900
Helfand, M. (2007). Shared Decision Making, Decision Aids, and Risk Communication. Medical
Decision Making, 27(5), 516-521. doi: 10.1177/0272989x070270050101
Juanchich, M., Dewberry, C., Sirota, M., & Narendran, S. (2015). Cognitive Reflection Predicts
Real-Life Decision Outcomes, but Not Over and Above Personality and Decision-Making
Styles. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(1), 52-59. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1875
Mastrogiorgio, A. (2015). Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision
making. Frontiers In Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00936
Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M., & Hamilton, J. (2015). The Development and
Testing of a New Version of the Cognitive Reflection Test Applying Item Response
Theory (IRT). Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453-469. doi:
10.1002/bdm.1883
Sinayev, A., & Peters, E. (2015). Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision
making. Frontiers In Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 7
Appendixes
Appendix 1
Identification and understanding of the problem
Willingness to act
Solving the problem with rational approaches
Appendix 2