Comparative Essay: Declaration of the Rights of Man and Woman

This essay provides a comparison and contrast of "The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Woman," highlighting the key differences and similarities between the two documents. It references Olympe de Gouges' "Declaration of the Rights of Woman and Citizen," which was a response to the original declaration, arguing that women should have the same rights as men. The essay discusses the articles in Gouges' declaration that advocate for women's rights to freedom, property, security, and participation in government, as well as the right to name the father of their children. It also mentions the social contract proposed by Gouges, which promotes equal partnership and shared wealth between men and women. The essay concludes by noting Gouges' execution for conspiracy, underscoring the challenges faced by advocates for women's rights during the French Revolution. Desklib offers similar essays and study resources for students.

Running Head: COMPARISON AND CONTRAST ON “THE DECLARATION OF THE
RIGHTS OF MAN AND WOMAN"
Comparison and contrast on “The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Woman"
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1
COMPARISON AND CONTRAST ON “THE DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN
AND WOMAN"
Assertion of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, French Declaration des Droits de
l'Homme et du Citoyen, one of the essential contracts of human freedoms, containing the
rules that enlivened the French Revolution. Its 17 articles, embraced between August 20 and
August 26, 1789, by France's National Assembly, filled in as the prelude to the Constitution
of 1791 (Jellinek, 2018).
Assertion of the Rights of Woman and of the [Female] Citizen, French Déclaration
des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne, flyer by Olympe de Gouges distributed in France in
1791. Demonstrated on the 1789 report known as the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of
the [Male] Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen), Gouges' pronouncement
stated that ladies are equivalent to men in the public arena and, all things considered,
qualified for a similar citizenship rights.
The prelude of Gouges' flyer accentuated that ladies must be incorporated among
those thought about piece of France's National Assembly. It expressed that ladies, similar to
their male partners, have common, basic, and sacrosanct rights. Those rights, just as the
related obligations and duties to society, are sketched out in the rest of the record (Gouges,
2000).
Following the introduction, (Gouges, 2000) included 17 articles plotting the
fundamental rights that ought to be stretched out to ladies, including the privilege to freedom,
property, security, and protection from persecution; the option to partake completely really
taking shape of laws that they are to submit to; to one side to take an interest at all degrees of
government; and the option to voice sentiments in broad daylight. All the more drastically,
Article 11 gives a lady the option to openly name the dad of her kids and to be qualified for
go along property to those youngsters (Gouges, 2000). That was one of the more dubious

2
COMPARISON AND CONTRAST ON “THE DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN
AND WOMAN"
components of the presentation, since it holds that men who father youngsters outside of
marriage must be considered responsible for those kids similarly as they are for kids fathered
inside marriage. Article 15 gives ladies, who were for charge purposes considered piece of a
male-headed family unit, the option to get some information about the funds of the family
unit, and Article 17 stretches out property rights to ladies paying little mind to their conjugal
status.
A postscript to the archive urges ladies to perceive the inconsistent ways they are
treated in the public arena and to make a move to cure those treacheries. The statement
further incorporates a Form for a Social Contract Between Man and Woman. In that
agreement, a man and a lady consent to join in an equivalent association inside which riches
is shared, having a place with the two gatherings, and, all things considered, can be isolated
among all kids having a place with either individual from the organization. Moreover, as
indicated by the agreement, in case of a partition of the two gatherings, that riches will be
saved for any offspring of either party. At last, the hand out traces gauges that ought to be
taken to accommodate widows and little youngsters bamboozled by bogus guarantees
(Gouges, 2000).
In November 1793, two years after the distribution of the Declaration of the Rights of
Woman, Gouges, who had favoured the Girondins, was gone after for and saw as
blameworthy of conspiracy and was executed.

3
COMPARISON AND CONTRAST ON “THE DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN
AND WOMAN"
Reference
Gouges, O. D. (2000). Declaration of the Rights of Woman and Citizen (1791). Women’s
Political & Social Thought: An Anthology, 150-53.
Jellinek, G. (2018). The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens. BoD–Books on
Demand.