Workplace Learning: Developing Individuals, Leaders, Organizations

This report explores the development of individuals, leaders, and organizations through the lens of workplace learning, emphasizing the importance of both formal and informal learning environments. It highlights how organizational activities can either foster or constrain individual learning, particularly in informal settings, and discusses various learning philosophies applicable to such environments. The report also delves into individual characteristics that influence workplace learning, such as openness to learning, capability, future orientation, and problem-solving nature, and how these traits can be leveraged within an organization. Furthermore, it outlines the potential benefits of informal workplace learning for both individuals and the organization, including happier employees, role flexibility, and improved communication structures. The report concludes by offering recommendations for organizations to enhance their learning environments and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Desklib provides solved assignments and past papers for students.

Running Head: DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
Developing individuals, leaders and organizations
Report
Student name
[Pick the date]

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
1
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................2
Individual learning & constrain informal workplace learning.....................................................................2
Individual characters that influence workplace learning..............................................................................4
Potential benefits to individual &organization from informal workplace learning......................................5
Recommendations.......................................................................................................................................7
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................8

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
2
Introduction
An effective organization has three main features: persons contributing to its achievement,
activities persuading the persons’ learning, and an arrangement regulating the learning development.
Learning provides numerous welfares for both the individual/person and the organization; though
learning wants a suitable and tidy salver to grip it and a willing attendant to assist it. Inappropriately, not
all corporate have arrangements and activities that are favorable to learning (Kyndt, Dochy & Nijs,
2009). In fact, some corporate arrangements and activities can restriction contract and even abolish
person/individual learning. The organizational place of work is where individuals devote maximum of
their period and where they are visible to a constant movement of information, data and contributions. It
is through precise and deliberate activities that organizations can impact, enable, speed-up and alter this
diversity of efforts into a learning practice. These activities can take the usage of exercise, communities
of exercise, allocation, valuations, information management, and other activities which will, in the end,
generate a win-win participation learning ring (García-Peñalvo, Colomo-Palacios & Lytras, 2012).
To be operational, individual knowledge events in the workplace involve evidence, of development, but
also the suitable harmonization of this evidence. Good harmonization will attain a flow of evidence
capable of providing precisely what an individual needs to acquire, exactly at the period and location
where it is desirable. The organization’s arrangement is the instrument castoff to attain such
harmonization because it organizes individual actions across all stages of the grading through accepted
inside message lines, defined accountabilities, and vibrant inside policies, procedures and measures
(Hoekstra et. al., 2009). In fact, the total organization can be deliberated a harmonizing body, and
learning and the stream of material are two actions that necessity coordinating through the proper
structure. Another factor that impact learning in corporation is corporation activities. Each organization
improves its own outline of learning activities which must deliver persons with the learning essential to
get their task complete in a well-organized manner.
Individual learning & constrain informal workplace learning
Organizational activities can smoothly go a stage additional and convert individual learning into
common learning by inspiring co-participation and teamwork amongst individuals employed in the same
corporate. Workplace learning in informal situations is currently being accepted as providing welfares
which are not attained in formal sequences. This has commanded to a rising attention in the environment
of learning in the informal situation (Ellström, 2011). The outcome has been the invention of a set of
learning philosophies valid to informal situations: e.g. intellectual apprenticeship; everyday intellect;

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
3
located learning; and fastened instruction and cleverness in workplace circumstances .The investigation
into the prescribed situation has been subjugated by the individual mindset of learning – on the inner
mental procedures of the individual – while the little investigation into the informal background has
trusted further on the public, inter preterits, social-constructionist style of learning. Official learning is
subjugated by ‘knowing that’ while the informal setting is extra about ‘knowing how’. As Brown in1989,
define it, formal instruction has expected “a departure between knowing and actions, considering
knowledge as an essential, self-sufficient material, theoretically self-governing of the circumstances in
which it is well-read and explore”.
Company can utilize this Learning in a specific framework, its precise human connections, its
level of jobs and resources used essential be understood because they fundamentally shapes the learning
that happens. Deprived of exploring and recitation the framework, we cannot recognize the learning
(Ellstrom, Ekholm & Ellström, 2008). For our company informal learning situations, the context is
the program, it will demarcate the believable learning, it will both limits and permits learning, it will
specify what can be acquired and how it must be acquired: Participate recognize obviously what the
program is, and it classifies the sketches of their everyday activities. We can use positioned learning
which means not only that the circumstances limits but what can conceivably be learnt, the informal
program, but it also straight tracks on all of the information and services that are academic (Ellstrom,
2011). The readings of situated awareness have designated that learning does not snappy the limitations
of situations; learning is fundamentally located and deeply organized by the framework in which it
happens.
In our company financial support cannot be provided due to week monetary conditions. Hence, in
workplace of our company, learning can also be labeled as environment of social activity in which the
work location will offer a chance for co-workers to obtain information that attaches theory to preparation
in a truthful and well-organized way (Fenwick, 2008). This workplace learning will also include
experience-based knowledge, related and familiar learning, self- focused learning, as well as, prescribed
company learning. Learning novel skills and awareness will make it promising for workforces to
accomplish change, achieve well, and be pleased with their effort. Because of this job and learning will
happen concurrently as practices gather in the sequence of daily involvement in work events. Learning in
daily surroundings, just like workplace will remain forming positioned learning. Positioned learning will
highlight the forces at our company’s work of normal learning and communication, and emphasis on the
communicating association among co-workers and their work atmosphere (Van Der Heijden et. al.,
2009). Positioned learning will offer styles of learning in background, and will help in highlighting how

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
4
learning can occur in our company`s workplace. As per Billett in 2001, recommended that “offices and
educational organizations simply signify dissimilar incidences of social activities in which learning
happens through involvement”. A significant portion of positioned learning will be structure of
information within the social and cultural situations in which learning happens, specifically the social
setting. If learning happens as portion of daily experiences and involvement, then it has the latent to
happen in numerous dissimilar ways (Manuti et. al., 2015). This comprises informal approaches, as well
as, official learning ingenuities that are related with exercise. An investigation was carried by Enos,
Thamm Kehrhahn and Bell in 2003, recommended that maximum of the learning that happens in
company is informal and forms portion of daily work events. The significance of informal learning
emphases interaction among informal learning events along with the atmosphere where they occurs and
the features of those involved. This will involve creation wisdom of the daily learning that will occurs in
company and involves investigative entrenched knowledge and inspiring learners to be self-focused and
reproduce on their learning practices (Jacobs & Park, 2009). Informal learning will offer a direct
contrast to official learning and recommends greater suppleness for adult learners. Though, Eraut
proposes carefulness on the usage of this strategy which he understands as “pointers of lazy philosophy in
2004. He labels informal learning as wisdom that derives quicker to the casual rather than the official
finish of a range and which comprises learning that is understood, unintentional, resourceful and
shapeless.
Individual characters that influence workplace learning
Individual character play significant role in the learning process. As every individual is different
so it also displays different characters which drive their learning capability. But as the individual starts
working in an organization, it starts adopting some of the character of the organization because of its
work environment (Noe, Tews & Marand, 2013). Overall it can be said that there are some individual
characters that influence workplace learning that can be used in the company.
Openness to learning
This individual character ensures the devotion towards learning new things. Individual having
these kind of character are very successful in their personal as well as professional life because these
people are self-motivated and well understanding the changing business need (Billett, 2008). They
clearly believe that the best way to survive in this dynamic atmosphere is to become part of evolution.

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
5
Capability
This kind of individual character ensures the extent up to which an individual can understand.
Every individual has its different learning capability some will learn very fast, some medium and some
slow because of which synchronizing their learning process becomes very difficult (Nga &
Shamuganathan, 2010). Hence, we have decided to go for workplace learning which provides on-job
experience. It has been found that all individual is able to learn fast if the individual is able to see the
whole process through his eyes or experience that thing himself.
Future oriented
This kind of individual character ensures that the individual is very serious for his/her future and
is ready to face any kind of challenges to attain his/her future goals because they believe that dream goal
cannot be attained until a strategic plan for future which includes both short term and long term goal is
not formed (Stewart et. al., 2008). For this strategic plan there is requirement of current situation and
future situation which can only be analyzed by hand on experience learning or workplace learning.
Hence, we will trigger this character in company’s employees.
Problem solving nature
This kind of individual character decides that whether the individual will remain steady until the
problem is solved or will move away. This character individual is ready to face the on roll job problem
and try to find out new solution for these problems (Sørensen & Fassiotto, 2011). From many study it
has been found that these character individuals learn very fast as compared to other individuals because of
their experimental nature. Hence, we will try to generate this character in each individual with the help of
workplace learning.
Potential benefits to individual &organization from informal workplace learning
Organization point of view
Happier Employees
The workplace atmosphere plays a contributory part in defining an individual’s attitude.

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
6
While individuals do gain some compensation from a reputable working arrangement, an
informal working atmosphere permits individuals to involve in less official and restricted
discussions. Additionally, it offers individuals a path to prompt themselves without sensation as
if they have exceeded a spot (Tannenbaum et. al., 2010). Based on a study conducted by JP
Morgan Chase, it has establish that “95% of workforces working in an atmosphere where the
executive is delicate to work and individual life – counting informal tractability – feel interested
to surpass expectations as compared to 80% of workforces in atmospheres where the executive is
not delicate to wants for informal tractability”.
By receiving to identify the concern and characters of their managers and co-workers, it
enhances a more individual association to the occupation and the persons (Carmeli, Brueller &
Dutton, 2009). These adjacent and special working relations must have a positive influence,
making workforces feel further at relaxed and at home. This interprets to a cheerier and
optimistic attitude which associates to healthier and amplified output inside the organization.
Role Flexibility
In difference to an official reporting association, executive and subordinate, an informal
workplace awards workforces the capability to enhance to their parts and to activate it to the
wants of other workforces (Hoekstra et. al., 2009). As workforces progressively have to cross
old-style specialized limitations and organizations have to assemble resources quickly to
function professionally, an informal working atmosphere allows workforces to go outside their
secure job explanation and advance their knowledge to other squads or sections, although not
officially inside that section. This inspires supple workplace learning, providing workforces
additional career tracks for career development. At the similar time, it permits workforces to
shape up their network associates (Jacobs & Park, 2009).
Better Communication Structure
Comment and message is vital in each company as it services development of business
procedures in the organization. Usually, collecting of comment is complete in a vertical
arrangement, whereby the executives will express his subordinate’s zones for development and
what wants to be done (Ravenscroft et. al., 2012). Assumed the reserve of such a company

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
7
arrangement, comment hardly works in the differing way and this can demonstrate to be
tremendously incompetent.
In a less formal working atmosphere, it breaks message barriers among executives and their
workforces. Whereas some executives might panic that the informal workplace decreases the
regulator that executives have on their workforces, the consequence is otherwise. Executives
who give importance to informality learning might really gain more inspiration in this aspect. An
engaged executive who is eager to attend to his subordinates’ comments can create robust trust
and relationship with his workforces and is more expected to be greeted into break-room
meetings (Zhao & Kemp, 2012). Under these circumstances, an executive is capable to address
untrue gossips and reinforce the connection inside his squad.
There are abundant benefits for organizations to instigate accepting informal workplace learning.
There is no necessity for the old-fashioned corporate authority arrangement. Companies
nowadays must be flexible and familiarize to the quickly altering business atmosphere. With an
improved business atmosphere, companies are capable to yoke the full ability of every staff to
effectively develop their business.
Individual point of view
Collecting and assembling the preferred information is at ease nowadays owed to the
comprehensive media and strategies. Informal learning does not need any previous learning
involvements (Marsick, 2009). In our company all individual requirements are the readiness to
comprehensive learning. Learning informally is comforting and less bullying for maximum
persons. With no tests or missions to comprehensive inside restricted schedules, numerous
learners obligate to learning a novel skill or a notion readily. In an informal situation, individual
will discovery our companies eager to share extra information than ever. Hence, if individual
have a cluster of specialists in our organization merely organize an informal conference and will
share their proficiency (Le Clus, 2011). As Informal learning is near to ordinary learning,
individual will incline to track the path that best outfits their individual wants. Lifetime learning
is a finest sample of informal learning. Individual will obtain more understanding informally as
compared to formally in our company. Confrontation to learn novel concepts and ideas is also
lower when learning is presented informally. Adult learners strive on independence and self-
focused. Boredom and postponement are substituted by enthusiasm and inquisitiveness. Time

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
8
and price fences are nearly non-existent in informal learning atmospheres (Li et. al., 2009). With
the help of informal learning a individual is able to experiment all his ideas or related aspects
which otherwise become difficult in a standard operating procedure of the organization which
ensures thinking out of box.
Recommendations
Take informal methods in our company like work distribution and alternation, will nurture
a wisdom of interest and provide informal interacting chances are all paths for human resource
subdivisions of our company to endorse and associates in offering an informal learning
workplace atmosphere will inspires these paths of informal workplace learning for our
employees. To actually make this happen in our company, the management of company has to
take care of some important things. The management of the company should observer workloads
to safeguard that there enough time in staff`s weeks for informal workplace learning.
Management should make sure that there is broadmindedness for failure as well as achievement.
Management must develop an atmosphere that permits for near teamwork so that employees can
acquire learning from each other. Management of the company must inspire flexibility in work
place and permit employees to trial. Inspire the inquisitiveness that will lead to novel learning.
Management must inspire the creation of groups of practice inside the workplace while
also inspiring contribution in practice further than the workplace. Identify aptitude skillful of
foremost these groups of repetition and inspiring contribution in them. Company must reshape
jobs; job revolution and rearrangement profession trails are also samples of how businesses
spread learning for workforces and mix it with work. Management should inspire an intelligence
of personal accountability for knowledge, and a sense of admiration and gratitude for the
learning procedure. Management should identify the roles of administration in backup or
overpowering a learning atmosphere. It has been seen that Jobs that work to reinforce an
employee’s sought-after ability fixed will upsurge inspiration and learning in a manner that jobs
precise to companies requirements The management should not take up that jobs are definable
in such a manner that jobs can continually be resolved by exercise measures. It should identify
the difficulty of the work and the necessity for receptiveness to an ever-changing business.
Modification management should not be loomed from the mutual viewpoint of inspecting

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
9
employee modification to change as partially a difficult of boldness and partially a procedure of
learning novel clear information. In its place, time should be allowable for novel practices and
tacit information to be erudite and executive should display the similar broadmindedness for
disappointment from novel arrival and those attending in novel or meaningfully altered locations
required to have their assignments cautiously stable with the requirement to replicate on and
learn from novel jobs.
Conclusion
Both informal and official learning events are important for professional and
organizational learning. The outcomes of report help recognize several elements that seemed to
endorse informal workplace learning and an optimistic attitude near informal workplace learning
in a medium-sized company. Workforces who required assist proactively and touched additional
self-efficacious at effort described more chances to involve in knowledge on the occupation.
Managers should attain their significant role in that they should inspire supportive on the work
and regulate how helpful the organizational environment is at workplace. In addition, report
presented that the significance accredited to learning requirements may vary between employees
and administrative staffs, possibly as a purpose of higher specialized self-efficacy and position
consciousness amongst executives. This might generate an unlucky supply gap for workforces as
they might depend on their executives for learning chances and requirements. It is found that
administrative support and chances offered to employees might be contingent on administrative
perceptions and ascriptions. This is in streak with indication that administrative reassurance and
learning provision forecast occupational learning. In deduction, informal workplace learning and
a optimistic learning boldness between workforces might depend on administrative resources and
executive support as well as workers’ own competence, knowledge related involvement and
approaches. Organizations intense to uphold the well-informed and affianced workforce
obligatory to withstand and possibly endorse modest advantage might hence wish to explore
which variables endorse proper and informal workplace learning in their company.

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
10
References
Billett, S. (2008). Learning throughout working life: a relational interdependence between
personal and social agency. British Journal of educational studies, 56(1), 39-58.
Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role
of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research
and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems
Research, 26(1), 81-98.
Ellstrom, E., Ekholm, B., & Ellström, P. E. (2008). Two types of learning environment: Enabling
and constraining a study of care work. Journal of workplace learning, 20(2), 84-97.
Ellström, P. E. (2011). Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics. The Sage
handbook of workplace learning, 105-119.
Ellstrom, P. E. (2011). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated
learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet
and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.
Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual—collective learning in work: A
review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227-243.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Lytras, M. D. (2012). Informal learning in work
environments: training with the Social Web in the workplace. Behaviour & Information
Technology, 31(8), 753-755.
Hoekstra, A., Korthagen, F., Brekelmans, M., Beijaard, D., & Imants, J. (2009). Experienced
teachers' informal workplace learning and perceptions of workplace conditions. Journal
of workplace learning, 21(4), 276-298.

DEVELOPING INDIVIDUALS, LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS
11
Hoekstra, A., Korthagen, F., Brekelmans, M., Beijaard, D., & Imants, J. (2009). Experienced
teachers' informal workplace learning and perceptions of workplace conditions. Journal
of workplace learning, 21(4), 276-298.
Jacobs, R. L., & Park, Y. (2009). A proposed conceptual framework of workplace learning:
Implications for theory development and research in human resource
development. Human resource development review, 8(2), 133-150.
Jacobs, R. L., & Park, Y. (2009). A proposed conceptual framework of workplace learning:
Implications for theory development and research in human resource
development. Human resource development review, 8(2), 133-150.
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Nijs, H. (2009). Learning conditions for non-formal and informal
workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 369-383.
Le Clus, M. (2011). Informal learning in the workplace: A review of the literature. Australian
Journal of Adult Learning, 51(2), 355.
Li, J., Brake, G., Champion, A., Fuller, T., Gabel, S., & Hatcher-Busch, L. (2009). Workplace
learning: the roles of knowledge accessibility and management. Journal of Workplace
Learning, 21(4), 347-364.
Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and
informal learning in the workplace: a research review. International journal of training
and development, 19(1), 1-17.
Marsick, V. J. (2009). Toward a unifying framework to support informal learning theory,
research and practice. Journal of workplace learning, 21(4), 265-275.
Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic
factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of business ethics, 95(2),
259-282.
Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., & Marand, A. D. (2013). Individual differences and informal learning in
the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 327-335.