Open University B208 Developing Leadership: Ethical Issues Discussion

Verified

Added on  2023/04/12

|2
|450
|265
Discussion Board Post
AI Summary
This discussion post, created for the Open University module B208 Developing Leadership, addresses ethical issues in the context of workplace practices. The author focuses on two key concepts from the provided reading: moral myopia and moral reasoning. The post emphasizes the importance of ethical sensitivity and decision-making within a team environment, highlighting the need for constructive criticism, effective delegation, and a positive working atmosphere. The author reflects on how studying these concepts will influence their approach to work, ensuring decisions are made in the best interest of the group, balancing organizational and individual interests, and considering existing policies and moral values. The post references relevant academic sources to support the arguments presented. This assignment is available on Desklib, a platform providing AI-based study tools and resources for students, including past papers and solutions.
Document Page
Responding to ethical issues in your practice
Ways of approaching ethical issues
The aim of this activity is for you to engage in a collective discussion of the how the contents of this
session has or might affect your practice.
Main Activity and Question to Answer:
Read the Reading 2 PDF, and pick 1 or 2 concepts, and write no more than 250 words on how you
would use these concepts in your place of work. Your place of work can be a theoretical place, for
example an office, factory, team or group you are involved with, with good or bad management.
This activity is trying to encourage you to talk about something that you have learned in terms of
ethical issues.
Really it's encouraging you to say something like, "after studying this part of the module I would try
to apply this concept......or I would so this differently."
In this discussion post, I will focus on moral myopia and moral reasoning. The fact that moral
sensitivity is important in all employees, such that they can make the appropriate decision in
conjunction with the ethical requirement. According to my perspective, ethics is of high
importance while working in a team. Common examples which are relevant in routine
activity include offering constructive criticism during group discussion, managing delegation
with co-workers, supporting and helping team members to accomplish their responsibilities,
and maintaining a positive working environment at the workplace. All these standards are
crucial because they ultimately support team dynamics and help in achieving the
organizational goals (Hutton 2019). After studying this part of the module, I will ensure that
my work practice and decision making standards must be constructive and should not be
affected by my personal insight or perspectives. Rather, it should be on the interest of the
group and must be responsible for the generation of a positive environment.
Moral reasoning is also linked to the personal perspective where employees must be aware of
their responsibilities, expected support. Often there arises a situation in which personal profit
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
should not be given preference over the organizational interest. However, the balance
between employees’ interest and organisational interest should be preserved (Kwon and
Constantinides 2018). Note that the decision-making approach must keep in view of the
existing policies, the situational context, and the moral values of the team. Hence, after
studying this part of the module, I would apply the concept by reasoning if organizational
interest and individual interest are being balanced.
References:
Hutton, M., 2019. The care-less marketplace: exclusion as affective inequality. Consumption
Markets & Culture, pp.1-17.
Kwon, W. and Constantinides, P., 2018. Ideology and Moral Reasoning: How wine was
saved from the 19th century phylloxera epidemic. Organization Studies, 39(8), pp.1031-
1053.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 2
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]