Policy Consultation Report: State Disability Inclusion Plan Analysis

This report provides a detailed analysis of a policy consultation concerning the State Disability Inclusion Plan, focusing on the equal participation of South Australians with disabilities in society. The discussion explores the policy area, emphasizing human rights and the removal of barriers. It highlights the strengths, such as value creation for disabled individuals, and weaknesses, such as the lack of inclusive platforms. Key public health principles, including participation, community creation, and equality, are examined. The report supports its arguments with documentation and recommends improvements like increased policy involvement and empowerment of disabled people, justifying these recommendations by highlighting their potential to improve living standards and societal engagement. The report also considers possible outcomes such as lifestyle improvements and future policy reviews, concluding with the importance of providing equal opportunities for disabled individuals to excel in various spheres of life. The document is contributed by a student to be published on the website Desklib, a platform which provides all the necessary AI based study tools for students.

Running head: POLICY CONSULTATION.
POLICY CONSULTATION
Name of the student
Name of the university
Authors note

2
POLICY CONSULTATION
Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Discussion..................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................6
References..................................................................................................................................7

3
POLICY CONSULTATION
Introduction
The main area of focus, which would be given in the response, is linked to the factor state
disability inclusion plan. This made focus would be widely discussed in the report.
Discussion
Policy area
The main policy area, which is needed to be addressed, is focused on the point that South
Australian with any forms of disability would be able to participate in working of the society
equally (Armstrong, Armstrong and Barton 2016). The main area, which is considered in the
section, is linked to the factor of human rights, which directly controls the entire member
prevailing in society (Beresford 2016). On the other hand, the policy area tends to remove
any forms of barriers for the people having any forms of disability.
Strength and weakness
The main strength area, which can be stated here, is linked to value creation for the disability
people. In most of the cases, it tends to increase the working creation, which is seen in them
(Dwyer, 2017).
The main weakness, which can be stated here, is linked to a missing platform in which the
disabled people would be able to indulge (Fulcher, 2015). This mainly means there must be a
proper environment in which they can directly involve which was missing in the present
situation.
Comment on key public health principles/outcomes
The main principle, which was stated in the context of the creation of a platform relating to
the disabled people, was linked to a few of the points, which are stated below:

4
POLICY CONSULTATION Participation in the area of decisions making
 Community creation which is liveable
 Opportunity creation
 Safety, fairness, and equality (Grover and Piggott 2015).
Each of the area, which was covered in the domain, can be stated to be very much important
which drives the success factor and enhancement increase of the disability people (Snell,
Bevan and Thomson, 2015). This area directly forms of backbone or infrastructure around to
which the overall planning would be based.
Document that supports
One of the documentation areas which can be stated as a support to the above discussion
point is the vision which directly states that the South Australian community hou8ld be
inclusive and accessible for the people having some forms of disability. One of the areas,
which are focused in the domain, is linked to changing position toilets, which directly help in
the purpose of usage by the disabled people (Thill 2015). This makes the disable people more
self-dependent, and they can lead a life without any forms of the problem and depending on
others. This helps increase the inner satisfaction level, which helps them to be attached to
more services.
Do not support
One of the areas, which do not support the context, is linked to the factor of infrastructure in
which the disabled people would be able to engage themselves. In this area, it can be stated
that there must be a common platform where the disabled people would be able to engage
themselves in the sector. The involvement of the plan can be considered very much lacking,
and just the sector of implementation was made. This made the disabled people less engaged
in the sector of management, and it directly affected the sector of opportunity creation.

5
POLICY CONSULTATIONRecommended improvements
One of the areas of recommendation which can be stated here is linked to the factor of
involvement of more area of policies were the focus point would be the involvement factor of
the disable people (Grover, C. and Piggott, L. eds., 2015). It can be considered as one of the
main factors, which should be focused in the domain, is increasing of chances of
improvement in the society, which is prevailing in the disabled people(Grover and Piggott
2015). Improvement in the area of changes would be directly helping in the sector of
management of the health condition, which is one of the main factors, which should be
playing a vital role in the disabled people.
Justify why these are needed.
The main area of justification why such recommendation of improvement is needed is that it
directly helps in the sector of empowering the disabled people. This would be helping them to
lead a better life, which would be improving their living standard. On the other hand, it can
be stated that this sector of involvement would be very much beneficial for the engagement
increase in the level of society (Fulcher, G., 2015). The engagement factor of the people
would also be increased in the sector, which would be helping the disabled people to be more
familiar with the common standard of the people.
Possible outcomes
Improvement in the life style of the people who are disabled is one of the main concern area,
which can be seen in recent times. Hence, it can be stated here that the possible outcome,
which can be stated here, would be for the betterment of the society so that the people would
be able to engage more into different areas of their interest (Beresford, P., 2016). This
concept would be directly bringing the concept of improvement of the standard of disabled

6
POLICY CONSULTATIONpeople more, and hence management of the area would be very much beneficial for the near
future.
Future policy reviews
The Policy of disability, which was formed in the year 2010, stated that equal opportunity
should be one of the most primary factors of focus, which should be given. This would be
helping the disabled people to play an active role in society, which would be directly helping
in the management area of the service (Turmusani, 2018). Improvement area is seen to
plating a significant role in the recent times and this context, it can be stated that more and
more people are engaged in the NGO who help in the betterment of the life of the people.
This impact factor can be seen most in the operational area of the disabled people and their
impact on society.
Conclusion
The main conclusion, which can be stated here, is linked to the factor of improvement of the
standard of the disabled people. As per the discussion disabled people should be given equal
opportunity so that they can excel in different sphere of living an better life.

7
POLICY CONSULTATION
References
Armstrong, F., Armstrong, D., and Barton, L., 2016. Inclusive education: Policy, contexts
and comparative perspectives. Routledge.
Beresford, P., 2016. All our welfare: Towards participatory social policy. Policy Press.
Dwyer, P., 2017. Rewriting the contract? Conditionality, welfare reform and the rights and
responsibilities of disabled people. Social policy in an era of competition: From global to
local perspectives, p.135.
Fulcher, G., 2015. Disabling policies?: A comparative approach to education policy and
disability. Routledge.
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. eds., 2015. Disabled people, work and welfare: Is employment the
answer?. Policy Press.
Snell, C., Bevan, M. and Thomson, H., 2015. Justice, fuel poverty and disabled people in
England. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, pp.123-132.
Thill, C., 2015. Listening for policy change: how the voices of disabled people shaped
Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Disability & Society, 30(1), pp.15-28.
Turmusani, M., 2018. Disabled people and economic needs in the developing world: A
political perspective from Jordan. Routledge.