Document Falsification: A Type of Fraud and Business Challenges

This essay delves into document falsification as a form of fraud, examining its increasing challenges within the business community. It explores the ethical implications of academic misconduct, specifically the practice of students paying for assignments and submitting them as their own work, considering it a breach of scholarly integrity and a form of plagiarism. The essay utilizes MacDonald's four levels of business ethics to analyze the unethical nature of providing such services and discusses the consequences faced by individuals involved in these practices. It also examines the issue through major ethical theories like consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, providing a comprehensive understanding of the topic and its impact on both academic and professional environments. The essay also discusses the consequences of such actions on individuals, groups, and the legal repercussions.

Running head: DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Document Falsification Is a Type of Fraud That Is Of Increasing Challenge in the Business
Community
Name of the University:
Name of the Student:
Authors Note:

1DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Introduction
The essay intends to explain whether document falsification is a type of fraud that is
contributing to increased challenges within the business community. The essay will also explain
that practice of any student for paying someone in order to complete any assigned assignment for
them and submitting the same as their work considering the same as ethical issue. Moreover, the
essay will also explain the ways in which such practice is unethical for an organization to
provide such services. To explain the same MacDonald’s four levels of business ethics will be
employed. The essay will also explain consequences that might be faced by individual involved
in such ethical practices.
Discussion
Practice of a Student Paying To Write Assignment and Then Submitting It as Own Work
an Ethical Issue
Practice of paying to write assignment and then submitting it as own work an ethical issue
can be considered as academic misconduct behaviour is a type of misrepresentation and
scholarly integrity breach and is a genuine break of scholastic trustworthiness (Button, Lewis,
Shepherd, & Brooks, 2015). It covers a scope of exercises including:
 Plagiarism
 Cheating
 neglecting to conform to examination or appraisal standards or rules
 taking part in other conduct of paying someone to complete assignments with a view to
increasing out of line or unjustified favourable position

2DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
 conferring research misconduct
Such act of a student to pay others ad getting assignment done by others is an act of
plagiarism that is the act of submitting or displaying the thoughts, composing or other work of
another person, in entire or to some extent, just as it is your own particular work (Ferro & Fanha
Martins, 2016). That is, without legitimate affirmation of the sources. Rewording someone else's
work without attribution is likewise written falsification. The source of the work incorporates yet
is not restricted to:
 different students – present or previous
 a companion or guide
 anybody the student have paid to deliver the work
 A composed work or part thereof (counting a website page, book, article, database,
handout, leaflet, diary, daily paper, address notes, and so on.)
 a PC program or part thereof
 a musical composition, sound, visual, realistic or photographic work made by someone
else
 Realia (e.g. objects, emblem, ancient rarities, ensembles, models and so forth).
It is likewise plagiarism on the off chance that the student submit or show fill in as solely
your own particular when it has been set up with someone else, without recognizing the source,
regardless of the possibility that it is with the information or assent of the other individual (Hadi,
Anuar & Paino, 2016).
The act of student to pay an organization for getting their assignment done by them can
be a misconduct of:

3DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
 Copying sections, sentences, a solitary sentence or huge parts of a sentence and an end
reference without quotes around the replicated content may likewise constitute literary
theft.
 Duplicating thoughts, ideas, inquire about outcomes, measurable tables, PC programs,
outlines, pictures, sounds or message or any mix of these (Hosny & Fatima, 2014).
 Rewording another's work nearly, with minor changes yet with the fundamental
importance, shape or potentially movement of thoughts kept up.
 Depending on a particular thought or elucidation that is not one's own without
recognizing whose thought or understanding it is.
 Cutting or sticking articulations from numerous sources or sorting out work of others and
speaking to them as unique work.
 Displaying as autonomous, work done in a joint effort with other individuals (e.g. another
understudy, a guide)
 Submitting as one's own, all or part of another understudy's unique work.
Academic misconduct can likewise happen in assemble act as represented in the
accompanying illustrations (Huynh, Williams, Golden & Verbeck, 2015). Plagiarism, conspiracy
and cheating takes place if any student:
 duplicate (or permits to be replicated) from different individuals from a gathering while
at the same time working in the gathering
 duplicate the first work, in entire or to a limited extent, of a person who is not an
individual from the gathering, with or without the information of different individuals
from the gathering, and contribute the copied work to a gathering task

4DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
 Talk about with different individuals from the gathering how to approach a common
assessment item that requires individual submission and depends on the same or
fundamentally the same as approach in the submitted evaluation, with no affirmation of
cooperation with associates and without the authorization of the assessor (Miller, 2016).
Gaining an unfair advantage when a student asserts an equal share of marks yet has done at
least one of the accompanying:
 contributes not as much as an equivalent offer to a gathering task and afterward
guarantees an equivalent offer of the work or checks
 does not swing up to group gatherings or potentially does not contribute in group
gatherings
 does not attempt their offer of the work with the suitable level of care and consideration
 Does not finish their segment
Macdonald’s Four Levels of Business Ethics
It is unethical for any company to offer such services to any student and this can be
explained through discussing McDonald’s four levels of business ethics (Palshikar, 2014).
Consistence with Law: Business exercises of suppliers might conform to relevant laws and
controls in countries furthermore, wards in which these individuals belong. Such Code is
applicable to certain areas in which providers' products are manufactured, in which certain
associated management is carried out administrations are performed and in which the products
remain within inventory network (Price, Degraffenreid, Dito & Price 2014).

5DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Against Bribery: Suppliers should not remain a part within any pay off, kickbacks, debasement,
corruptions or misappropriation. Providers should not make certain moves that might disregard,
or might result in McDonald has to disregard, any relevant against remuneration law or control,
counting the Remote Corrupt Practices Act.
Books and Records: Suppliers should keep up precise and straightforward books, records and
records to illustrate consistence with pertinent laws and directions and this Code.
Confidentiality: Suppliers might shield McDonald's data by keeping it secure, constraining
access, and staying away from examining or uncovering such data out in the open spots. These
prerequisites broaden even after the decision of a provider's business association with
McDonald's (Quinn, 2014).
Grievance Mechanism: Suppliers might make inward programs for dealing with reports of
work environment grievances, counting unknown reports.
The Practice from the Perspective of the Major Ethical Theories
The practice of any company to offer such services to any student can be explained
through use of certain major ethical theories:
Consequentialism
Outcomes are taken into consideration simply the activities. For example, under
utilitarianism the objective of people is to make things move joy, paying less respect to
inspirations or the activity’s nature (Hadi, Anuar & Paino, 2016).
Deontology and Virtue Ethics

6DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Both concentrate on the activity itself instead of the results, and ask whether the activity
is reasonable in its purpose, henceforth the contrast amongst those and consequentialism.
Deontology
Deontology serves as morals, for it focuses on a man's activities considering some
obligation or goal. Kant's Deontology can be an example that has certain Categorical Imperative
that most individuals must have closes all by themselves and might not be utilized. Deontology
decides the nature of all the activities (Hadi, Anuar & Paino, 2016).
Value Ethics
Values measure activities against some given arrangement of temperance are, with the
objective being to be a high-minded individual (eudaimonia, the Greeks called it). A case is
Stoicism, which, among different perspectives, holds the Excellencies of astuteness, equity, guts
and balance. Goodness morals underline the character of the individual making the activities
(Hadi, Anuar & Paino, 2016).
Consequences Considered For Individuals Who Engage In Such Practices
A punishment for academic misconducts such as document falsification fraud that is
contributing to increased challenges within the business community is explained below:
Individual assignments
On the off chance that an asserted appraisal inconsistency is detected in the student’s
work, he might get an email instructing regarding this, requesting that the student should go to a
meeting with the unit convenor or teacher within the sight of an eyewitness (Ferro & Fanha

7DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Martins, 2016). Following this, an examination will be directed and a report composed. On the
off chance, that the student has a past record of copyright infringement this will be noted.
Where plagiarism is discovered, you will be informed inside five working days of the
choice. The punishments can incorporate charges of scholastic offense, cancelation of results and
prohibition from your course. Conceivable approvals for academic misconduct are explained in
the Student Academic Misconduct Regulations 2012 (Ferro & Fanha Martins, 2016).
Group assignments
On the off chance that it has been affirmed that an understudy has not contributed
similarly to a gathering task, the unit convenor/instructor may alter the imprints for that
understudy to mirror their individual commitment (Ferro & Fanha Martins, 2016). In the event
that any imprints are to be changed, this procedure will be plainly imparted ahead of time,
together with data to demonstrate how singular imprints are figured.
Cheating in exams
Punishments for charting in exams are point by point in the Student Academic
Misconduct Regulations 2012.
The outcomes for swindling, copyright infringement, unapproved cooperation and types
of scholastic unscrupulousness might get intense, potentially encompassing suspension or
ejection from Institute. Certain infringement of guidelines laid out in this handbook, developing
by teacher or going inappropriate from capable lead of research, can be considered infringement
of trustworthiness (Huynh, Williams, Golden & Verbeck, 2015).

8DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Within a class, the teacher takes into consideration what move is fitting to make. These
conducts might include:
 Need for studying to complete the task for a diminished review
 Appointing the understudy a coming up short review for the task
 Allocating the understudy a fizzling grade for class
For a research venture, manager figures out a strategy that is suitable to make. These activities
might include:
 Ending the understudy's support in the examination venture
 Devastated Student Reputation
 Literary theft claims can make an understudy might get eliminated or removed. Their
scholarly record might decrease the morals offense, potentially making the understudy
might get banned from entering school arriving through secondary school (Button, Lewis,
Shepherd, & Brooks, 2015). Schools and colleges consider copyright infringement
important. Highly instructive companies have scholarly trustworthiness boards of trustees
those are students. Several schools suspend students for their initial breach. Students are
normally ousted for facilitate offenses.
Obliterated Professional Reputation
An expert specialist, government official, or open figure might reveal that misconduct from
literary theft releases them from their position. Not exclusively will they likely be let go or made
a request to venture down from their present position, yet they might unquestionably consider
that it is hard to attain a respectable occupation (Button, Lewis, Shepherd, & Brooks, 2015).

9DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Based on a particular offense and liar's open stature, their name might end up plainly
demolished, that can make certain significant profession bizarre.
Wrecked Academic Reputation
The outcomes of written falsification have been revealed within the scholarly world. Once
scarred with copyright infringement claims, a researcher’s profession can be destroyed.
Allocating is an essential piece of a renowned scholastic vocation. To lose capacity to allocate
doubtlessly implies completion of a scholarly position and demolished dishonour (Huynh,
Williams, Golden & Verbeck, 2015).
Legal Repercussions
The legal repercussions of unoriginality might get very genuine. Copyright laws remain
highly strict. One cannot use someone else's research work without reference. A researcher has
privilege to sue the copyright infringer. Some literary theft may likewise can be considered as
criminal offense, potentially along with a jail sentence (Button, Lewis, Shepherd, & Brooks,
2015). The individuals those consider being in a profession, for instance, columnists or creators,
are particularly defenceless to counterfeiting concerns. The individuals those have enough time
must be ever cautious not to make mistakes. Journalists are highly aware of copyright laws along
with strategies to keep a strategic distance from written falsification.
Financial Repercussions
Several recent news reports and articles have exposed copyright infringement from
writers, writers and open figures along with specialists. In such case where a creator sues a
literary thief, the creator can be endorsed fiscal compensation (Button, Lewis, Shepherd, &

10DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
Brooks, 2015). In this case where a columnist contributes to a magazine, daily paper and certain
other distributer or not considering the possibility that the student has discovered counterfeiting
in school, responsible literary plagiarist might require going through certain money related
punishments.
Conclusion
The essay also intended to explain whether document falsification is a type of fraud that
is contributing to increased challenges within the business community. The essay also explained
that practice of any student for paying someone in order to complete any assigned assignment for
them and submitting the same as their work considering the same as ethical issue. It is gathered
from the essay that practice of paying to write assignment and then submitting it as own work an
ethical issue can be considered as academic misconduct behaviour is a type of misrepresentation
and scholarly integrity breach and is a genuine break of scholastic trustworthiness.

11DOCUMENT FALSIFICATION A TYPE OF FRAUD
References
Button, M., Lewis, C., Shepherd, D., & Brooks, G. (2015). Fraud in overseas aid and the
challenge of measurement. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(2), 184-198.
Ferro, M. J., & Fanha Martins, H. (2016). Academic plagiarism. British Journal of Education,
Society & Behavioural Science, 13(1), 1-11.
Hadi, A., Anuar, K., & Paino, H. (2016). Legal Perspectives Towards Forgery, Fraud And
Falsification Of Documents: Recent Development. Malaysian Accounting Review, 15(2).
Hosny, M., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitude of students towards cheating and plagiarism:
University case study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(8), 748-757.
Huynh, V., Williams, K. C., Golden, T. D., & Verbeck, G. F. (2015). Investigation of falsified
documents via direct analyte-probed nanoextraction coupled to nanospray mass
spectrometry, fluorescence microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Analyst, 140(19),
6553-6562.
Miller, K. (2016). The legal, community policing, and resource challenges of dealing with
advance fee fraud (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
Palshikar, G. K. (2014, December). Detecting Frauds and Money Laundering: A Tutorial.
In International Conference on Big Data Analytics (pp. 145-160). Springer, Cham.
Price, M., Degraffenreid, S., Dito, J., & Price, T. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,805,925. Washington,
DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Quinn, M. J. (2014). Ethics for the information age. Pearson.