Economic Analysis of Health: Externalities and Environmental Valuation

This essay critically reviews the important issues in the economic analysis of the health sector, particularly focusing on the valuation of externalities and environmental impact. It examines economic approaches for valuing the effects of environmental fluctuations on public well-being, discussing how monetary assessments can inform economic strategies for effective and equitable public health management. The analysis covers methods like stated and revealed preference, cost-of-illness, human capital reviews, and quality-adjusted life year trainings. It also addresses the importance of demand analysis, cost-output analysis, and sustainability in health projects, highlighting the challenges in measuring and valuing health outcomes. The paper uses literature review to provide insights for policy intervention and attainment of ecological sustainability.

Economic analysis of health 1
Economic analysis of health
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date

Economic analysis of health 2
Abstract
In this paper we critically review the most important issues faced in taking account of the
aspects of valuation of externalities and environmental impact. We will analytically review the
cost-effective literature on the sound effects of environmental fluctuations on public wellbeing in
both evolving and the developed domain. We first emphasis on the economic approaches that are
offered for the valuation of the possessions of environmental fluctuations on public wellbeing.
Secondly, we will expound how the monetary assessments of these properties can respond in the
creation of economic strategy for generating agent-specific enticements for more effective public
health running, which remains also equitable plus environmentally justifiable. Our explanation is
escorted by a mixture of the available quantifiable empirical results.

Economic analysis of health 3
Introduction
Health sector preparation poses a chain of unique and challenging disputes. Unlike other
regions, there is no compromise in well-being sector actions, as they are tangled in addressing
very elusive issues such as treatment of sickness or evasion of illness, mutually involving human
lives plus having suggestions for human reserve development. Additionally, the tendency
towards tidied, appraised and design. This changing surroundings, the justification for public
participation, both in investment scheme and in policy feature such as regulations. The
surroundings affects our well-being in a verity of ways (Bending, 2012, p. 142).
Relations between the surroundings and the social health has been widely studied and
ecological risks have been confirmed to significantly influence human health. This is either
indirectly by distracting life supporting ecosystem or directly by divulging people to risky
agents. Though the exact impact of environmental aspects to the growth of disease plus decease,
hence cannot be accurately determined. Nevertheless, huge economic progresses and population
development become the cause of continuing environmental deprivation. Magnification of
industrialization, agronomy plus accumulative energy use, remain the utmost severe driving
cause of environmental well-being problems (Herve-Bazin & Cameron, 2014, p. 164).
For nations in the early phase of development, the key environmental risks to health are
related with widespread scarcity and severe deficiency of public organization. These
infrastructures comprise access to drinking water, deficiency of health care as well as evolving
problems of industrialized population and hygiene. Nevertheless, environmental health threats
are not restricted to the evolving world. Though at a lesser level, environmental hazards are also
existing in wealthier nations and are largely attributed to metropolitan water and air

Economic analysis of health 4
contamination. Incidences of Asthma are increasing dramatically all over the developed nations,
and environmental factors seem to be at least partially to blame (Committee, 2012, p. 159).
Literature review
This paper delivers a review of the literature on appraisal studies eliciting budgetary
values related with reduced ecological hazards and in particular emphasizing on climate change
justification, compact indoor and outdoor air contamination plus enhanced water quality.
Findings of the estimation studies have significant policy implications, meanwhile the
environmental hazards factors that are deliberate can largely be evaded by efficient and
justifiable policy intervention (Kongstvedt, 2013, p. 130). Reducing the exposure environmental
hazard factors by improving air quality and admittance to improved source of cleansing and
drinking water, hygiene and clean vigor, is found to be related with important health paybacks
and can donate significantly to the attainment of the Millennium Progress Goals of ecological
sustainability, well-being and development (Bajpai, et al., 2010, p. 154).
Economic valuation methods
Quantifying the influence of environmental deprivation on human well-being is essential for
the progress of well-informed strategies by the health region and consequently many assessments
studies have been steered worldwide over the past decades lecturing environmental hazards to
public well-being. The main methods for the health influence valuations can be largely classified
into stated and revealed preference methods. First take into explanation observable market info
which can be attuned and used for tight-fitting an individual’s valuation. Exposed preferences
comprise cost of sickness, human capital reviews and quality attuned life year trainings. Damage
cost approximations from environmental risk for the economy equally as a whole are

Economic analysis of health 5
correspondingly obtained through overall equilibrium macroeconomic molding (Korn &
Graubard, 2011, p. 162). These studies evaluates welfare impacts in a state or intercontinental
level by scrutinizing all the sectors of economy plus estimating environmental well-being impact
on constraints of the economy like revenue and consumption (Buse, et al., 2012, p. 121). A sign
of the profits from a healthcare intermediation in terms of well-being related quality are
delivered by quality attuned life year. Pooled with the expense of providing different
intercessions, a cost effectiveness scrutiny can follow to permit comparison of altered
interventions.
Other approaches include time-trade-offs, the visual analogue scale and standard gamble.
Pricing techniques assess alteration in the value of housing in uncontaminated or polluted zones,
or the alteration in wages between risky and non-hazardous work. Quantified approaches include
the reliant valuation method plus choice experiments. Respective differences between the dual
methodologies recount to the way in which the monetary values are provoked. In a contingent
assessment scenario that defines the changes in the establishment of the public worthy resulting
from the strategy under assessment and, in the modest open-ended presentation. Before
appreciating the health damage, the formation of a dose-response purpose relating pollutant
meditation to health influences is required (Carpio & Bench, 2015, p. 99). The effects of
environmental deprivation on mortality, stated as the increase in the likelihood of premature
decease, and quality of life (Maantay & McLafferty, 2011, p. 144).
Project economic study as practiced by multidimensional development bank drives beyond
just the association of cost and profits of a health care plan to assess equity effects and project
durability. The determination of these additional studies is to make certain the delivery of
excellence health care amenities, are sustained all the way through the project lifespan so that the

Economic analysis of health 6
monetary benefits are apprehended (Vujicic, et al., 2012, p. 102). ADB recommends three major
considerations in health project economic analysis;
Figure 1: key phases in the economic study of health region projects
Determine the objective of the activity
Identify alternative options
Exclude any unfeasible or obviously uneconomic options
Identify required resources and resultant benefits associated with each option
Cost the resources
Can the major benefits be expressed in money terms?
Yes (cost-benefit analysis ) (cost-effectiveness analysis) No
Value benefits in money terms express benefits in outcome/ output
terms
Discount
Perform sensitivity analysis
Compare costs with benefits Compare costs with outcomes
Make appraisal

Economic analysis of health 7
ADB endorses three major contemplations in health scheme economic analysis;
I. Availability or equity consideration, cost recovery and affordability.
II. Review of the health care system and national health plans, macroeconomic
consideration, including justification of project in terms of demand or need.
III. Identification of cost and benefits, cost-effectiveness analysis, efficiency considerations,
disease impact assessment, acceptance and demand of users, project sustainability,
providers of health care.
Demand breakdown
Quality of scheme, economic assessment and design can be upgraded if demand scrutiny
is made basic to project grounding. Demand analysis responses to the following queries:(i) what
is the mandate for the amenities, taking into justification the fact that consumers may be required
to pay for the facility, (ii) who should collect the welfares of the database, and(iii) how would the
program be battered to the designated recipients group, i.e, geographical locality, means
analyzing gender and age, utilization form and self-selection over willingness-to-pay. Project
must prediction demand to regulate the right level of scheme service to offer and see if the
scheme cab be constructed on a scale big enough to exploit possible economist (Makinen, et al.,
2012). Former is indemnify, for instance, that health cares are not constructed so big, that they
drive low tenancy rates. The final will affect the marginal price of delivering the facility and
greatly upset benefit-cost scheming. In both circumstances, demand will vary depending on the
level which user funding will be used to discover the project (Salverda, et al., 2013, p. 76).
Cost-output analysis

Economic analysis of health 8
Cost-output study of health segment project necessitates that health benefits be valued in
economic units so that one can be able to calculate the net monetary output of a program. Cost-
effectiveness study only requires that a measurable measure of well-being effectiveness be well-
defined. Economic valuation of well-being output through decreasing in mortality plus morbidity
as an outcome of a health program is kwon to be very challenging (National economic council &
council of economic advisers, 2014, p. 133). There are several possible approaches, nevertheless,
the record popular kwon method are the mortal capital methods and willingness-to-pay tactic.
Under the earlier, improvements in well-being status are viewed as funds that yield future
improvements in productivity (Colorado, 2012, p. 126). Nevertheless this technique is
disapproved in that it overlooks the consumption worth of health.
Figure 2: Instances of potential outcomes from health schemes
a. Direct government source savings resulting from interior efficiency improvements
b. Greater effectiveness of the school structure including resource investments hence less
squandered education expenditure plus higher future output due to enhanced mental
and physical growth.
c. Effects of condensed mortality on efficiency which include less family period, lost and
fewer worker days lost throughout untimely death.
d. Effects of condensed morbidity on efficiency which include fewer days of minor
productivity from long-lasting disability, fewer days of productivity temporarily
reduced through either changed pace of work or failure to work and fewer days lost
from acute stages of illness from workers plus members of the family taking care of
the sick.
e. Consumption outcomes which comprise of higher quality of life, improved benefits of

Economic analysis of health 9
unmarked families goods and increased time-out.
f. Other effects include decrease of fertility following reputable increase in child
endurance and externalities.
Valuation of outcomes and cost
Most of the responsiveness in the general program, appraisal literature has been fixated on
computing cost appropriately for these scheming. These concerns are well debated and not
unique to the well-being sector. Economic ideologies and pricing techniques are identical as in
other programs. As an outcome we will not emphasis much on general costing disputes here,
nevertheless rather emphasis on the more challenging issues of determining project benefits. The
health segment is different from new types of programs in that the outcomes are more
challenging to measure and worth in economic terms (Sawada, et al., 2017, p. 179). Just like all
other projects, the well-being sector has non-incremental and incremental outcomes. Outcomes
from non-incremental enhance in improving planning and managerial capacity as they are
measured by scheming cost saving. More challenging cases are in terms of determining
incremental outcomes. The following are the three major categories of incremental outcomes;(i)
enhancement in utility from threat reduction,(ii) enhancement in access to health care benefits for
exposed population,(iii) general enhancement in well-being benefits.
Regardless of this discussion, there are numerals of measurement that program evaluation
application should pursue. Programs whose impartial is to improve well-being benefits should
offer data on basic pointers of the quantity of which is expected for the scheme intervention to
adjust these indicators and well-being outcomes (Shelton, et al., 2015, p. 64). The following are
most mutual measures of health standing collected.in imperative to move from measuring the

Economic analysis of health 10
outcomes in terms of schedules in the disaggregated well-being indicators to cost-effectiveness
analysis. Changes in well-being indicators need to be accumulated across mortality measure with
diverse economic characteristics (Craft-Rosenberg & Pehler, 2011).
Program sustainability analysis
Whereas economic study is critical to evolving the most efficient program design in
terms of the leading development influence per dollar consumed. Also, it is significant in the
assessment of whether the scheme activities are justifiable. Sustainability denotes to making
project activities and penalties continue after program activities terminate. The three critical
regions of sustainability where monetary analysis is valuable include; cost recovery, risk
assessment and financial influence (Shillabeer, 2016, p. 135).
Esteeming redistribution outcomes
Valuation of outcomes should contemplate targeting objectives and if the main drive of
the program is to enhance admission of the less fortuned to health care, then enhancements in
their use plus well-being benefits should be biased more heavily in the accumulation outcomes.
Whereas outcomes to unintended individuals should be involved, equal assessing may bias the
outcomes in a technique that is counterproductive in dealings of achieving relocation goals. In
specific, since the less fortuned use health care not as much as the rich people and in some cases
benefit from it less, then equivalent weighting will clue to programs that errand the rich people
who are considered to form the group of the non-poor (Tulchinsky & Varavikova, 2014, p. 122).
To add to, a simple method of analyzing the magnitude to which the program redistribute
appropriations is to perform a benefit-incidence study. Analysis actions the amount of
appropriations that accrue to a precise group without or with scheme (Gruszczynski, 2010, p.

Economic analysis of health 11
112). Outcomes frequency is measured by the element subsidy of a specific service multiplied by
the number of elements of that service spent by the group hence the unit appropriation is the unit
cost minus the fee deducted to users.
Concluding remarks
This paper has revised the key theoretical issues, styles and methods regarding
economic study of health sector schemes principally in reference to many-sided development
banks such as the ADB and World Bank, plus bilateral support agencies like the DFID,
organized with the appropriate body of literature. Main findings recommend the following;
I. As in the instance of any plan, it is desired for all health segment projects at the
preliminary planning phase to assess request or need for the planned project, and to think
through alternative replacements of the plan, and select the best appropriate one.
II. Economic exploration of health segment projects is destined to aid conclusions making
by selecting scheme that achieves anticipated health outcomes at the smallest cost of
funds.
III. Ordinarily, cost considerations in relative to desired health benefits should be one of the
important factors in choosing what substitutes to pursue.
IV. Economic exploration should be extensive enough to look at the impartiality
considerations and sector allegations, project sustainability and economic efficiency.
V. A project structure analysis is beneficial in both the strategy and implementation of well-
being sector projects.
VI. Concerning economic assessment techniques, in the situation of projects where health
welfares are meaningfully appreciated in monetary expressions, as they may be exposed
to a full cost-benefit exploration in which the monetary values of health outcomes are

Economic analysis of health 12
compared with the financial cost of the plan, and an interior rate of profit higher than
economic occasion cost of investment.
VII. Like in the instance of any scheme, economic exploration of health subdivision projects
should go past the scheming of cost-benefit proportions and examine the plans
distributional influence, to discovery out whether the profits are likely to reach the
battered beneficiaries, plus to evaluate whether there are satisfactory arrangements for
essential institutional competence and financial capitals to sustain plan activities
VIII. Wherever health outcomes are not potential to value in economic terms because of the
challenges of health benefit assessment, cost-effectiveness, founded on the subjective and
discounted cost per element of health benefits.
References
Bajpai, N., Sachs, J. & Dholakia, R. H., 2010. Improving access and efficiency in public health
service. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Economic analysis of health 13
Bending, M., 2012. Empirical analysis of participation patterns in microfinancial market. New
york: Peter lang.
Buse, K., Mays, N. & Walt, G., 2012. Making health policy. Berkshire: open university press.
Carpio, C. & Bench, N. S., 2015. the health workforce in latin America and the caribbean.
washington D.C: World bank.
Colorado, 2012. Fiscal health analysis of colorado school districts. Denver: office of the state
Auditor.
Committee, O., 2012. Evaluation of lovell federal health care center merger. s.l.:national
academies press.
Craft-Rosenberg, M. & Pehler, S. R., 2011. Encyclopedia of family health. Calif: sage.
Gruszczynski, L., 2010. regulating health and environmental risk under WTO law. oxford:
oxford university press.
Herve-Bazin, C. & Cameron, J., 2014. economic analysis of health. london: IWA publishing.
Kongstvedt, P. R., 2013. Essential of managed health care. Burlington: jones and bartlett
learning.
Korn, E. L. & Graubard, B. I., 2011. Analysis of health surveys. Hoboken: john wiley & sons.
Maantay, J. & McLafferty, S., 2011. Geospatial analysis of environmental health. Dordrecht:
springer.
Makinen, W. N., Denville, L. & World bank, 2012. assessment of private health sector.
washington D.C: World bank.

Economic analysis of health 14
National economic council & council of economic advisers, 2014. an economic analysis.
washington D.C: National academies press.
Salverda, W., Nolan, B. & Smeeding, T. M., 2013. The oxford handbook of economic inequality.
london: adventure work press.
Sawada, Y., Ueda, M. & Matsubayashi, T., 2017. Economic analysis. Singapore: springer.
Shelton, L. E., Hoffer, T. A. & Muirhead, Y. E., 2015. Behavioral analysis of maternal filcide.
london: open university press.
Shillabeer, A., 2016. The health of vietnam. Singapore: springer.
Tulchinsky, T. H. & Varavikova, E., 2014. The new public health. Amsterdam: Academic press.
Vujicic, M., Ohiri, K. & Sparkes, S., 2012. Working in health: Financing and managing the
public sector health workforce. s.l.:world bank.