BUS171 - Evaluating Denmark's Fat Tax: Economic Analysis & Lessons

This essay examines Denmark's implementation and subsequent abolishment of a 'fat tax' on foods high in saturated fat. It explains the economic rationale behind such a tax, which aims to correct negative externalities associated with the consumption of unhealthy foods, using a Pigouvian tax model. The essay details why the Danish fat tax failed, citing issues such as high administrative costs, increased cross-border trade, minimal impact on consumption habits, and disproportionate impact on lower-income populations. It further discusses the broader advantages and disadvantages of fat taxes as a tool for addressing public health concerns and market failures. The analysis includes graphical representations of negative consumption externalities and the effects of taxation. The study concludes that while the intent of the tax was valid, its execution in Denmark resulted in unintended consequences that outweighed its benefits.

Running Head: FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
Foudation of Economics
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Couse ID

1FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
Several countries today have implemented a tax on unhealthy food to combat obesity and
other health related problem. In today’ world, the consumption habit of people has shifted from
traditional food to unhealthy fast food containing huge amount fat. The consumption of these
food entail a negative externality in form of different diseases and associated health cost. In the
presence of negative externality, the functioning of demand and supply fails to ensure efficient
outcome. The negative consumption externality ends up with an overconsumption of unhealthy
food. To correct the externality a market based policy tool is Pigouvian taxation. With
implementation of taxes government aims to reduce consumption of healthy foods and ensure
efficient outcome. A pioneering nation that implement a fat tax is Denmark (Alston and Okrent
2017). Denmark however has failed to achieve the intended objective of tax. The benefit of
reduced consumption was more than offset by other unintended costs. Hence, the tax was
abolished within 15 months from its introduction.
In response to the worldwide problem of obesity and overweight and resulted increase in
the health expenditure become a major cause of concern for government. This makes
government and public authorities to intervene in the market to incentivize heathy food habit or
discourage unhealthy food habits in order to control body weight. In particular, government aims
to prevent people from too much intake of fatty food by imposing a tax on unhealthy food. A fat
tax signifies a tax that is levied on fattening food or beverages with the objective of reducing
consumption of food items that are related to obesity or other health risk. In 2011, Denmark
imposed a fat tax on butter, milk, pizzas, cheese, oil, meet and processed food products with the
benchmark that the product contains more than 2.3% of the saturated fat (Vallgarda, Holm and
Jensen 2015). The rationale for levying food tax was simple. The basic economic rationale is to
make unhealthy fatty food more expensive relative to healthy foods. Following simple law of

2FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
demand, the high price induces people to shift their consumption habit from unhealthy to healthy
food habit. The imposition of tax becomes crucial as it is evident that the unhealthy of fatty food
comes at a lower cost as compared to fresh products and meat. Government in different nations
thus call for a tax on fatty products. Government hopes that in response to tax people tend to
change their dietary habits which in turn help to improve health condition of the society (Poppitt
2017). Researchers have found that current epidemic of obesity is expanding fast due to
expansion of food industry. The Junk outlets are spreading at a fast rate contributing to a change
in dietary habits that lead to a detrimental effect on health. Taxes in addition to reducing
consumption on unhealthy food provides an additional source of government revenue.
Under free market condition the demand and supply side forces lead to a stable market
equilibrium. The demand here reflects the marginal social benefits while supply reflect the
marginal social cost. At equilibrium, as marginal social benefit coincides with marginal social
cost the socially efficient outcome is achieved. However, in presence of any external effect the
demand and supply curve do fails to represents the true social benefit or cost (McKenzie and Lee
2016). Hence, free market equilibrium deviates from socially efficient outcome. This is
described as the situation of market failure. Presence of externality is one primary reasons for
market failure. Externality is defined as a spill-over effect generated from either production and
consumption activity and affect a third party not involved in production or consumption. The
positive external effect is termed as positive externality while the negative effect is termed as
negative externality.
A negative consumption externality is present when consumption of something imposes
an additional cost on society. Consumption of unsaturated fat has the consequence of raising
calorie intake and results in various diseases (Jensen et al. 2016). With too much intake of such

3FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
fatty product people suffer wit problem of obesity, diabetes and other associated diseases. The
health cost or additional medical expenses are not reflected in free market pricing of these items.
The negative consumption externality associated with unhealthy fatty products thus leads to
overproduction of such items (Rader 2014).
Figure 1: Negative consumption externality and market failure
(Source: as created by Author)
The market demand curve is DD and the market supply curve is SS. Because of added health and
medical cost, demand curve only represents marginal private benefit not marginal social benefit.
In the presence of negative consumption externality marginal social benefit curve lies below the

4FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
marginal private benefit. Without government intervention, the market produce Q1 amount of
output sold at a price P1. Socially efficient outcome is at point E1 where marginal social benefits
intersects marginal social cost (Cowen and Tabarrok 2015). Corresponding to E1, the socially
efficient outcome is QE. The presence of negative externality thus results in overconsumption of
unhealthy foods. The social inefficiency or welfare loss is represented as the area of the dead
weight loss.
In order to correct negative externality of consumption and ensure socially efficient
outcome government need to intervene in the market. Government can use the instrument of
pigouvian taxation to address the problem of externality. Under this rule a tax is levied on
consumption of specific good or service. Tax raises the price paid by the buyers of the tax. The
Pigouvian tax is a market based policy to address the problem of externality (Nicholson and
Snyder 2014). The tax is imposed by an equivalent amount of the difference between marginal
social benefit and marginal private benefit. The figure below describes how a Pigouvian tax
works to correct negative consumption externality.

5FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
Figure 2: Effect of tax on consumption externality
(Source: as created by Author)
The demand and supply curve in the market is represented as DD and SS respectively.
Without tax the equilibrium is at point E yielding a market price of P* and corresponding
quantity of Q*. Now, suppose a tax on t is imposed on consumption of food that has saturated
food by more than 2.3%. As the tax is imposed on consumption, the immediate impact is one the
demand curve. There is a proportionate shift in the demand curve by the amount of tax (Bodker
et al. 2015). Market equilibrium now shifts to E1. Buyers now pay a price of P1 while sellers
receive only P2. The difference in the two prices go the hand of government (Mochrie 2015).
From the proposed tax, the earned government revenue is shown by the rectangle P1P2E1F. As
seen from the figure above the tax reduces equilibrium quantity to Q1.

6FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
The first problem associated with the fat tax in Denmark was in form of regulatory
framework. The collection and institution of fat tax seems very costly. This weakened the
medium and small enterprises of Denmark. The administrative formalities associated with a very
high institutional cost (Smed et al. 2016). The direct effect of the fat tax was artificial increase in
the prices if food items covered under the range of the levied tax. The price in Denmark soared
far higher as compared to those in other Euro region. Before the tax, prices of these items were
close to the average price prices prevailed in the continent. However, after tax price rose by 14%
in case of oil and fats, 4% for meat and around 3% for milk. The imposed tax instead of reducing
domestic consumption gave a rise in trans-border trade as price outside Denmark seems
relatively cheaper. The expansion of trade hurts domestic production and distribution of food
industry in Denmark. The tax failed to achieve any notable reduction in consumption of the
intended items. The consumption has declined only by 0.4% from October 2011 to July 2012
(Smith et al. 2018). Instead of reducing consumption of fatty items the shoppers switch to
consumption cheaper brands which has a higher adverse impact on health. The victims of the tax
are mostly the poorer section of the society.
The fat tax in Denmark has thus proved a failure. Once the ministry realized the tax is
creating no benefits rather imposing additional burden on society on the society and government,
it was decided to abolish the tax in January 2013 (Vallgqarda, Holm and Jensen 2015).
The obesity and related health diseases has now become a widespread problem. The
problem of obesity is generally associated with too much intake of food having high percentage
of fat. Unhealthy food habit of people leads to the problem of overweight. This raises the burden
of health or medical expenses. Consumption of these items is thus associated with a negative
external effect. The presence of negative externality results in a market failure. In order to

7FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
correct the market failure, government intervene in the market by introducing a tax on products
that are harmful to health. Denmark in 2011 introduced such a fat tax to reduce the consumption
of items containing excessive fats. The policy however was far from success. Consumption
reduced only by a smaller proportion. The added costs of taxation were high level of inflation,
cross border trade, huge administration cost and job losses in domestic market.

8FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
Reference list
Alston, Julian M., and Abigail M. Okrent. "Introduction." In The Effects of Farm and Food
Policy on Obesity in the United States, pp. 1-12. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2017.
Bodker, Malene, Charlotta Pisinger, Ulla Toft, and Torben Jorgensen. "The rise and fall of the
world's first fat tax." Health policy 119, no. 6 (2015): 737-742.
Cowen, Tyler, and Alex Tabarrok. Modern Principles of Microeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan,
2015.
Jensen, Jorgen Dejgaard, Sinne Smed, Lars Aarup, and Erhard Nielsen. "Effects of the Danish
saturated fat tax on the demand for meat and dairy products." Public health nutrition19, no. 17
(2016): 3085-3094.
McKenzie, Richard B., and Dwight R. Lee. Microeconomics for MBAs. Cambridge University
Press, 2016.
Mochrie, Robert. Intermediate microeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Nicholson, Walter, and Christopher M. Snyder. Intermediate microeconomics and its
application. Cengage Learning, 2014.
Poppitt, S. D. "Obesity and Weight Control: Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?." Current
Nutrition Reports 6, no. 2 (2017): 51-62.
Rader, Trout. Theory of microeconomics. Academic Press, 2014.
Smed, Sinne, P. Scarborough, M. Rayner, and Jørgen Dejgård Jensen. "The effects of the Danish
saturated fat tax on food and nutrient intake and modelled health outcomes: an econometric and

9FOUDATION OF ECONOMICS
comparative risk assessment evaluation." European journal of clinical nutrition 70, no. 6 (2016):
681.
Smith, Emma, Peter Scarborough, Mike Rayner, and Adam DM Briggs. "Should we tax
unhealthy food and drink?." Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (2018): 1-7.
Vallgårda, Signild, Lotte Holm, and Jørgen Dejgård Jensen. "The Danish tax on saturated fat:
why it did not survive." European journal of clinical nutrition 69, no. 2 (2015): 223.