This essay examines the controversial case of Edward Snowden, focusing on the conflicting values at play and the ethical justifications for his actions. The essay begins by identifying the core values in conflict, including confidentiality, legality, and individual privacy versus national security. It analyzes the harm caused by Snowden's disclosures, particularly the damage to government confidentiality and potential benefits gained by other nations, while also acknowledging the benefits generated through his actions, such as raising awareness about government surveillance. The essay then delves into whether Snowden's actions were ethically justified, even if legally prohibited, by weighing the competing values and considering the public interest. It argues that while his actions may not have been legally sound, they were ethically justifiable because they were done to protect individual privacy and expose unjustifiable surveillance. The essay concludes by emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations and the right to privacy.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
