CQU BUSN20017 Essay: Writing Literature Reviews Analysis

This essay provides a detailed analysis of literature reviews, emphasizing their significance in effective business communication. The essay begins by defining literature reviews and their role in presenting information, both orally and in written form. It then explores the key objectives of literature reviews, focusing on high-quality publications dedicated to human resource development (HRD). The essay delves into the characteristics of a good literature review, including the importance of concise, clear, critical, contributive, and convincing arguments. It examines different types of literature reviews such as integrative, argumentative, and historical reviews, highlighting their distinct features. Furthermore, the essay discusses the relevance of literature reviews in academic research and their contribution to evidence-based decision-making, identifying knowledge gaps, and strengthening research focus. The analysis also emphasizes the role of literature reviews in the publication process, particularly in high-impact journals, and their impact on the author's reputation. The essay concludes by summarizing the key traits of literature reviews, offering guidance for authors, and underscoring the importance of clear and structured communication to enhance the effectiveness of the message and build rapport with the target audience.

Writing Literature Reviews: A Reprise and Update
Communication is the most significant factor in an enterprise in every aspect, considering
the decision-making process, motivation, and employee performance. There are various ways to
present information and communicate to make another party understand the information. This
can be either oral or written form. The report purpose is to understand the writing
communication skills in the form of literature reviews. The key objective of the research is a
review of high quality publications that is human resource development review that is
specifically dedicated to reviewing articles. This would include an understanding of literature
review importance and major characteristics that make a literature review a better and effective
communication way to a large group of people for years (Callahan, 2014).
From the literature, it was identified that the key objective of the editorial was to regain
the focus of the readers or the author on aspects that considers for developing a good review
article. Moreover, it discussed the documentation of work in an effective way to make it
presentable and understandable. As per the scholar research, in 2015 Toronto presented an
integrative literature review in descriptive form, which was followed up by the scholar that had
identified various difference of character among conceptual frameworks, and integrative
literature reviews (Quirke, 2017).
Whilst conceptual frameworks and integrative literature review are the two maximum
commonplace styles of manuscripts posted in HRDR, different styles of review works also are
published in the article. Those may be categorized as opportunity varieties of literature
evaluations, and they share some, however not all, of the traits of integrative reviews. The
editorial seeks to make clear these differences and provide tips for authors lettering any sort of

literature review. At the same time as the word integrative literature review has to turn out to be
ubiquitous inside the discipline of human resource improvement, there are numerous other
varieties of literature opinions and HRDR accepts a huge variety of manuscripts, which might be
non-empirical in feature—inclusive of methodological opinions, ancient reviews, and conceptual
reviews. An argumentative review is written to offer an opposing opinion to a given role. this
could be appreciated to encourage others to link you in assisting your thesis. A historical
evaluation will check all the ancient information of scholarship chronologically even as
methodological assessment scrutinizes the studies methods by oneself. It includes series of
information, their crucial analysis, elucidation, and studies consequences, as an instance. For this
understanding, the initial aspect would be to understand what exactly the literature review is and
related concepts (Torraco, 2016).
A literature review discusses posted facts in a specific subject location, and sometimes
facts in specific difficulty vicinity within a positive term. A literature review can be only a
pretentious summary of the resources; nevertheless, it typically has an organizational sample and
comprises of both précis and synthesis. A summary is an outline of the vital facts of the source,
however a synthesis is a pre-business enterprise, or a reorganizing, of that info. It might supply a
brand new elucidation of old substantial or integrate new with historical interpretations.
Alternatively, it might hint the intellectual development of the sector, together with primary
debates. Then depending on the scenario, the literature review might also examine the assets and
suggest the reader at the maximum pertinent or appropriate. Literature reviews offer one with an
accessible manual to a specific topic. When one has confined time to conduct research, literature
critiques can come up with a top level view or act as a stepping stone (Sharma, 2015). For
experts, they are beneficial reviews that hold them updated with what is current inside the field.

For researchers, the intensity and breadth of the literature overview lay emphasis on the
trustworthiness of the writer in his or her discipline. Literature reviews additionally offer a dense
background for a studies paper’s research. Comprehensive information on the literature of the
sector is important to most studies papers. The principle awareness of an educational research
paper is to progress a new argument, and a research paper is in all likelihood to include literature
as one among its components. In a research paper, one can use the literature as a basis and as a
guide for a new perception that one contributes. The point of interest of a literature overview,
but, is to condense and combine the arguments and thoughts of others without including novel
contributions. The relevance of the literature review was also identified through the research
(Nolan & Garavan, 2016).
Literature reviews are vital to this field for the reason that they have “made major
contributions to the know-how base of human aid improvement”). Amalgamations of present
literature on any specified occurrence are important due to the fact they enhance evidence-
primarily based choice making and selection, they perceive gaps in knowledge around specific
phenomena, they pick out synergies inside existing literature, and that they slender the gap
between understanding and “lore” within the discipline (Johns, 1995). Additionally, literature
reviews are significant in the publication procedure for at the least two motives—several
excessive-effect journals solely post review articles and the excessive citations frequently
endorsed to review articles are valuable for reinforcing the popularity and readership of each the
author and the publication journal. According to personal opinion, and from analysing the study
it can be identified that the key importance of the literature review in the real world would be the
creation of rapport with the target audience that is the receivers in this communication method. It
helps the author to provide their view point in a more structured and presentable way to make the

point clear and precise after searching for facts and figures and relevance of the information.
Other than this, it is also helpful in strengthening the research criterion and focus of the author.
The literature review includes the study of a specific area instead of broad aspects that lead to a
better and detailed understanding of specific are and disciple and will condense, synthesis, and
evaluate the facts and information and presented in originality while avoiding plagiarism.
Moreover, the literature review would also be responsible for to contrast and compare the
historical content that the author is working on and that would make the study more reliable.
There are various specialized areas that can be considered by a literature review that could be
various forms like an integrative review, argumentative review, theoretical review, systematic
review, and historical review. A literature review is found to be relevant in any discipline
because it is offering a recapitulation and comprehensive overview on a provided scholarship
from historical to the current scenario, which headed the new research direction the reader
making written communication way more effectively. Therefore, through the various use of
literature review that provides relevance for the literature review understanding and effective
writing. This also presents the key characteristics of the literature review (Galvan & Galvan,
2017).
A huge sort of works has been prepared available that focus on the features of various
styles of literature critiques. From those works, the research recognized as a minimum of five
awesome traits that are representative of laborious literature opinions. Literature reviews need to
be concise, critical, clear, contributively, and convincing. Therefore, it can be said that the
characteristics of the literature review were understood on the bases of these five C’s that would
include. First C represents Concise. This represents Literature opinions have to be summarizing
syntheses of a broad collection of literature on a given subject matter. Conceivably most

prominently, there ought to be a particular guiding query or evidence for the assessment no
longer notably, the query is first-class derived by addressing an expanse wherein there may be a
recognizable requirement for a response; that is usually denoted to as “the gap” inside the
literature that requires exploration. The gap, though, is not regarding whether or now not
researches have discovered the phenomenon of interest, nevertheless alternatively that the
prevailing literature is missing in a few manners with admire to the specific query that
publications review. Second C denotes Clear that is the readability of the tactics for gathering the
“data” that shape the foundation of the literature overview is important for rigorous evaluation;
and, regularly, submitted manuscripts miss the mark to definitely articulate the approaches used
in engaging in the literature review. According to Torraco encouraged, generating established
way (consisting of a matrix) for all “Artifact” recognized for the review in the course of data
series will enhance the rigor, best, and readability of the concluding literature review (Fook,
2018).
Critical is the third C, which includes rigorous literature reviews consist of each essential
reflection and vital evaluation. Reflection states back to the position that authors ought to
remember while reviewing and studying the literature of the facts established that are their
beliefs, assumptions, and morals that affect the approaches wherein they understand the literature
and finally create insights. Evaluation refers back to the valuation, or critique, of the writings
itself. This evaluation “frequently exposes understanding that may be engaged for granted or
concealed through years of intervening studies (Dosser & Nicol, 2016).” Convincing reflects that
after seriously studying the records, a resounding argument needs to be advanced. This signifies
the discoveries of the literature overview or the synthesis that trails the study. Set the evaluation
of the information gathered, articulate a unique mode of deciphering the synthesis provided and

offer supporting intent (Herd, Cumberland, Herd, Alagaraja, & Kerr, 2016). The evaluation can
be based in lots of special methods to maximum truly depict the explanation for the disagreement
(e.g., competing models or guiding theories) mechanical enterprise that is consisting of
chronological or alphabetic schedules of the literature, nevertheless, usually do no longer lend
the sustenance essential to generate a substantial reason for the individuality of review (Okoli,
2015). Contributive is the character that reflects like different sorts of studies, literature review
has to also contribute to the frame of expertise. Rigorous literature opinions provide extensive
contributions to outspread or generate new theory and enhance the exercise, or have an effect on
policy. Similarly, to recommendations provided for concept and exercise, literature review need
to monitor parts in which greater studies is required (Adams, Smart, & Huff, 2017).
From the literature, it can be said that Exemplary literature reviews weather they are
historic, integrative, rapid, systematic, based, or certain another sort of review are interesting to
provide. There may be a growing frame of literature at the approaches of manufacturing rigorous
literature evaluations, several of which have been considered in the study. The key purpose of
this research was to combine a number of the key traits of literature critiques to offer a handy
source of facts for the ones looking for to jot down literature reviews. The reminders provided in
the literature, 5 C’s of literature evaluation traits and six W’s of literature assessment strategies,
are intended to manual authors as they put together literature critiques, especially for Human
resource development assessment. Through the literature key importance of the literature review
in the real world were identified that would be the creation of rapport with the target audience
that is the receivers in this communication method. Other than this, it is also helpful in
strengthening the research criterion and focus of the author. Moreover, the literature review
would also be responsible for to contrast and compare the historical content that the author is

working on and that would make the study more reliable. Therefore, through the various use of
literature review that provides relevance for the literature review understanding and effective
writing.

References
Adams, R., Smart, P., & Huff, A. (2017). Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey
literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International
Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432-454.
Callahan, J. (2014). Writing literature reviews: A reprise and update. Sage Journals, 13(3), 271-
275.
Dosser, I., & Nicol, J. (2016). Understanding reflective practice. Nursing Standard, 30(36).
Fook, J. (2018). REFLECTIVE MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS IN PRACTICE .
Methodologies for Practice Research: Approaches for Professional Doctorates, 1, 57.
Galvan, J., & Galvan, M. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social
and behavioral sciences. London: Routledge.
Herd, A., Cumberland, D., Herd, A., Alagaraja, M., & Kerr, .. (2016). Assessment and
development of global leadership competencies in the workplace: A review of literature.
Advances in Developing Human Resources, 301.
Johns, C. (1995). Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of
knowing in nursing . Journal of advanced nursing, 22(2), 226-234.
Nolan, C., & Garavan, T. (2016). Human resource development in SMEs: a systematic review of
the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 85-107.
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37.

Quirke, B. (2017). Making the connections: using internal communication to turn strategy into
action. London: Routledge.
Sharma, P. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for
empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, , 40(2), 193-237.
Torraco, R. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore
the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428.