Effective Collaboration: Resource Management & Employee Retention

This essay examines collaborative measures in organizations, drawing upon articles discussing employee overload, the role of algorithms, and the impact of automation. It analyzes how resources affect teamwork, why collaboration can lead to employee turnover, and what managers can do to maintain effective collaboration. The essay also addresses the need for diversity in organizations and emphasizes the importance of recognizing collaborative contributions. Ultimately, it concludes that effective workforce management requires guidance and proper resource allocation to prevent employee burnout and ensure organizational growth. Desklib provides comprehensive study tools and resources for students.

Running head: COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
Name of the student:
Name of University:
Author Note:

1COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
In the article ‘Collaborative overload’ by Cross, Rebele and Grant, has discussed the
situation in the current organizations around the world. The CEOs, Human Resource
Managers and other higher authorities are facing numerous problems associated with the
employees. First of all, the employees of an organization are the backbone of the company.
Secondly, the improvement in the technological sphere is affecting the workplace for which
either the employees are leaving their organizations or the management are replacing them
with machines in order to cut cost. The chief aim is to increase productivity of the employees
so that they can support the measures of the companies as well as complete tasks more
perfectly than technology. This particular article discusses the collaboration to be the means
to maintain healthy work culture in the companies in one hand and maintain flow of
knowledge and resources in the company. All the three article somehow related with
employees and impact of proper management skills. Be it a machine, algorithm or human
employee all need managers to direct them. Proper guidance is the method to utilize these
elements of production of a firm.
This article focuses on the method of collaboration which help the companies to
maintain their human resources more profitably. However, in the article ‘Algorithms need
managers, too’, Luca, Kleinberg and Mullainathan has analysed the algorithms can
successfully predict the future of the companies. The responses of algorithm lead to
customers’ satisfaction, quality management and obviously the production and sales. It can
help the companies in identifying subtle patterns which the human employees may overlook.
Algorithms are capable to generate accurate insights and help managers to make the best
decisions. Despite all these assistances there are problems too. As the authors have said,
“Algorithms tend to be myopic. They focus on the data at hand—and that
data often pertains to short-term outcomes” (Luca, Kleinberg and Mullainathan
2016). This is the reason, the authors support the fact that the managers who use algorithms,

2COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
need to be more efficient to understand the risks or limitations of these then unlock this
highly potential technique.
In the article named Beyond Automation by Davenport and Kirby, discuss another problem
that the mangers face while emerging technologies are used and controlled by the human
employees of the company. The emerging problem of replacing employees through machine
in the workplaces especially in the manufacturing sector and use of artificial intelligence in
working as the employees. as the business is becoming more cross cultural the issues among
the employees are increasing. In this context, using automation in the workplaces reduce cost
as well as other human problems. In this article, the authors have analyzed steps which the
people usually follow when a new technology is introduced. According to the authors,
machines and human employees need to have coexistence in an organization so that
technology can augment human strengths and fill the gap created by the machine knowledge.
What are the effects of resources in team work?
As the core article ‘Collaborative overload’ have discussed that employees largely
depend on various types of resources. These include personal, social and informative
resources. For creating values, the employees use different resources in different ways to
solve any problem as well as in completing tasks efficiently. The informational resources are
effective which can be recorder and passed from one employee to another, the social
resources are based on the personal access to the networks, involve individual’s awareness
and position. On the other hand, the personal resources include personal skills a time.
Moreover, other resources can be replenished by the personal resources are finite and need
more time and energy to acquire. This is the chief fact that create difference among the
human employees. Some have a large pool of personal resources and some have less. These
latter employees request for help to the highly resources employees which reduce

3COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
productivity of the assisting people. moreover, the latter employees can again knowledge
about one particular issue in other places but they do not spend time in this process rather ask
for help from others. These employees asking for help are like those who are described in
‘Beyond Automation’, as those who ‘step aside’ from resources and draw attention on the
lacked aspects of a development.
Why collaboration leads to employee turnover?
This inequality of knowledge or resources among the employees create pressure on
the top collaborators. The employees who possess more knowledge, gradually become the
reason of development stagnancy in the organization. This is because everyone depends on
them and no work can progress without their interference. This is the reason why these
employees feel themselves to be overtaxed. Moreover, the personal resources that they use to
ease the process of collaboration by helping other employees remain unnoticed for which
they do not get any reward or recognition. This is why they do not feel attached with the
organization anymore. The study has found that the top collaborators in an organization are
the first people to leave their job. First of all, the pressure of demand from both higher
authorities as well as the junior colleagues make them frustrated with their job. On the other
hand, in other organization in similar industry, these top collaborators get more recognition
and promoted to better designation which help them in attaining success in their desired
carrier.
What the managers do to maintain collaboration?
The mangers in order to prevent such assets to leave their organizations take various
measures such as proper distribution of resources among the employees, this will help the top
collaborators to concentrate on their own tasks rather than helping others and become less
productive. In understanding the expectation ad future of the organizations the employees

4COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
need to have proper training as well as knowledge on various tools. In this matter the article
‘Beyond Automation’ provides great knowledge which is supportive of applying technology
in increasing human productivity (Davenport and Kirby 2015).
By encouraging the top collaborators to use methods of filtration as well as
prioritization of the requests can solve this problem. In this aspect algorithms can be used
extensively (Luca, Kleinberg and Mullainathan 2016). Algorithms reduce the efforts of these
employees and help to redistribute the works among the potential employees who can
successfully replace the efforts of these collaborators. Thus can reduce the stress of these
highly resourced employees.
The managers of the organization must allow collaborators to maintain a negative
approach so that other employees check alternative ways to complete the tasks. They can
apply team collaboration software which help the employees to build strong varieties round
their incoming information flow. Moreover, “managers should collocate highly
interdependent employees to facilitate brief and impromptu face-to-face
collaborations, resulting in a more efficient exchange of resources” (Cross,
Rebele and Grant 2016).
The organizations can create a special designation of supporting stuff for different
department who will possess ample and all necessary resources that the employees of that
particular department need. These supporting staff may not have contribution in the main
stream production of the firm but assist other to achieve the organizational goals. This will
definitely reduce stress among these employees and the managers will be able to prevent high
employee turnover in the organizations.
Is diversity needed in organization?

5COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
In ‘Algorithms need managers, too’ the authors supported the idea of diversity in data
which ultimately help the organizations to gain extra predictive powers “each data set
has a unique perspective, a lot more value is created” (Luca, Kleinberg and
Mullainathan 2016). This is the case exactly applicable in the organizations. More diversity
of people will increase quality of the firm. The women employees are said to perform more
collaborative works this is the reason why they feel more burden for helping others to
accomplish a job. To the authors of the core article ‘Collaborative overload’ this
collaboration to do a job ultimately cost more enjoy and time making the companies
dependent on a few number of employees.
The article supports this view that the managers need to ensure that like proper
distribution of workload and resources, the employee must get recognition irrespective of
gender. By the means of improving the systems of measuring, rewarding the collaborative
contributions the leaders can shift view from emerging problems among the employees
associated with knowledge sharing to addition of value.
Therefore, it can be concluded that these three articles are closely related with the
workforce management in the organization, like machines and algorithms, the human
employees also need guidance from the most knowledgeable colleagues so that they can get a
proper direction in performing their tasks. Despite the fact that automation in the firms has
been replacing the human employees constantly, these technologies need to have proper
direction by the human operators. The algorithms can predict the future of the firms but need
managers to control them. Similarly, in a common firm, the employees are to be directed by
the managers so that they do not become weight and create pressure for the firm and prevent
its growth.

6COLLABORATIVE MEASURES IN ORGANISATION
References:
Cross, R., Rebele, R. and Grant, A., 2016. Collaborative overload. Harvard Business
Review, 94(1), p.16.
Davenport, T. and Kirby, J. (2015). Beyond Automation. Harvard Business Review.
Luca, M., Kleinberg, J. and Mullainathan, S., 2016. Algorithms need managers, too. Harvard
business review, 94(1), p.20.