Assessing NHS Intensive Treatments for Smoking Cessation in England

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of intensive smoking cessation treatments provided by the National Health Service (NHS) in England. It examines various intervention models, including face-to-face support, pharmacotherapy, and telephone support, evaluating their impact on cessation rates. The report also addresses the challenges associated with smoking cessation interventions, particularly for pregnant women, and explores ways to improve implementation strategies. The research synthesizes findings from multiple studies, highlighting the importance of factors like internal NHS structures, patient demographics, and the need for tailored approaches. The report concludes by emphasizing the significance of continued research, policy implementation, and public health initiatives to reduce smoking rates and improve health outcomes in England. The report also includes a discussion on the effectiveness of mobile digital applications to support smoking cessation. The study also explores the need to address the disparities in smoking rates across different demographic groups and the need for targeted interventions.

Research Methodology 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 ...................................................................................................................................1
Introduction.................................................................................................................................1
CHAPTER 2....................................................................................................................................1
To examine intensive interventions for smoking cessation conducted through NHS................1
To determine effective models of NHS treatment for smoking cessation..................................3
To identify core challenges of smoking cessation intervention aimed at pregnant women. ......3
To recommend ways through smoking cessation can be implemented in England....................4
CHAPTER 3....................................................................................................................................5
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

TOPIC: To study the effectiveness of intensive treatments provided by National Health Service
(NHS) for smoking cessation in England
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Literature review contains views of different authors and findings from previous research
study. It assists to determine appropriate concept and relevant information to improve further
studies. In the present research, study is conducted to assess effectiveness of intensive treatment
which is provided by NHS for smoking cessation in England. This is because; cigarette smoking
remains the leading cause for death in England in today's era. There are around 86,500 death
continuously occurring due to smoking. As a result, UK government exposed strong allegiance
to reduce smoking. With the help of this, at workplace tobacco price enhances, which assists to
ban smoke at public places (West, 2017).
There are different studies undertaken which suggest intensive NHS treatments for break-
off which is effective to help smokers to quit. More effective and one to one treatment is
implemented by the chosen health institute. Furthermore, evidence on the effectiveness of patient
intervention currently narrow so that NHS also create successful plan (Kotsen, Santorelli and
Foulds, 2018). Recently, younger smokers, pregnant smokers, female more increasing
continuously which have lower quit rate in term of smoking as compare to other groups. In this
research extent about nature of harms due to smoking.
This present paper aims to identify effectiveness of intensive treatment provided by NHS
for smoking cessation. With the help of different methods and models, present study carries out a
systematic review of research which is implemented for smoking cessation. In addition to this,
comprehensive search is also conducted which includes abstract and published to conclude report
in an appropriate manner. Data is also extracted with quality assessment in two reviewers.
External factors also affect NHS services which appear to influence the effectiveness of intensive
smoking cessation which is delivered through NHS. However, qualitative evidence is not
evaluated because it is not suitable with the present research (Healey, Roberts and Robson,
2018).
3

CHAPTER 2
To examine intensive interventions for smoking cessation conducted through NHS
As per the views of Mytton, Jackson and Woodcock, (2018), tobacco smoking consist
problems to intervention for smoking cessation in NHS. Commonly, cigrettes is mostly used in
term of smoking but there are some other elements such as cigarillos, vigars, pipes, etc. Apart
from this, there are certain smokeless tobacco also popular in different areas of the world which
carry signifivant health risks. In addition to this, stopping smoking usually involves intention not
to smoke more cigrettes at a given point of time. Smokers are more likely to quit when primary
case physicians consider intensive intervention including recommendation for medicaton and
arrange follow-up that are mainly undertakes by NHS. Less-intensive intervention ineffective for
new research shows. However, Kotz, Brown and West, (2014) stated that low number of
effective intervention are disappointing because physicians seemed to be missing to teach them
at particular momemt that are came from both physicians and patients which received result of
lung screening. With more screening, decisions completed to conduct combined discussion and
consider test results with smoking cessation strategies. In NHS, smoking services experimented
with intervention in which individual smokers pair up offer with mutual support.
In addition to this, Shahab, Mortimer and Tyndale, (2017) stated that there have been
recent progress in NHS to stop smoking services to enter in hospital settings. Therefore, it can be
explored effectiveness on inpatient intervention in UK setting create negative impact on smoking
cessasion. This experiment focuses on increasing the effectiveness of smoking cessation
intervention which includes diseases related with it. The chosen health institute mainly deals in
services to stop smoking with buddy intervention. High quality of (1++) randomised which
explored to implement appropriate intensive intervention for smoking cessassion. Furthermore,
Greenhalgh, Macfarlane and Walton, (2016) explored that internal factors are also influenced to
increase the effectiveness of NHS to stop smoking services. There are generally five factors
highlighted which potentially impact to develop the effectiveness of intervention. As a result,
evidence made with statement that provided for content, mode of delivery and setting useful to
implement intervention. Effectiveness of pharmacy can be delivered which impact positively for
smoking cessasion rates.
As per the views of Williams, Steinberg and Burke, (2016), in the present study, there are
smoking cessation intervention provided in NHS which reviewed to focus on England studies
4

from other parts of the UK. Interventions are also moderately conducted by NHS which includes
advice to stop smoking by health professionals. Therefore, this study is quality based and it
critically develop appropriate perspective which categories on the basis of grade.
To determine effective models of NHS treatment for smoking cessation
According to the views of Sohanpal, Rivas and Walton, (2016), consumption of tobacco
is widely researched and discussed area where health effects exists. There are several models
consider to make effective results for NHS treatment to implement smoking cessation. In this
regard, face to face group support with pharmacotherapy must be implement in successful
manner. In this regard, health institute weekly consider group sessions that are facilitated with
one or more specialist to stop smoking. With a number of smokers at a particular time and place,
practitioners take 6 to 12 weeks. All smokers have access towards the choice of
pharmacotherapy and smoking status. On the other hand, Masters, Anwar and Capewell, (2017)
stated that face to face individual support with pharmacotherapy successfully develop in NHS to
take weekly sessions for individual smoker with specialist practitioner for stop smoking. At a
particular time, session also conducted where all smokers can access with pharmacotherapy for
smoking status. In each session, monitoring is done which is verified by carbon monoxide.
In contrasting, Klonizakis, Crank and Brose, (2017) generated their views that telephone
support must be implemented with multiple sessions that support and provided by trained advisor
in 6 to 12 weeks. Session is also conducted in average of 15 to 30 minutes. It is more important
to consider intervention with appropriate system that supported to take access and effectiveness
to stop smoking. It boost quitting rates which depends on optimal treatments of protocols. It
make specialist advisor for individual who can support to access medication easily. It can be
boost in appropriate manner in greater context to smoking cessation. Besides this, Ronaldson,
Dyson and Rhodes, (2018) argued that there is one more important perspective to prevent
smoking which is mobile digital applications. This is because; there is fixed evidence that
consider effectiveness of mobile application to stop smoking in good quality of research that are
required before any option recommend. Hence, it is one of the important perspectives that
increases effectiveness with strong evidence (Models of delivery for stop smoking services
Options and evidence, 2018).
5

To identify the core challenges of smoking cessation intervention aimed at pregnant women
According to the views of Maskrey, Blyth and Brandon, (2015), there are several women
smoking in pregnancy. Therefore, smoking cessation intervention not help to reduce for pregnant
smokers because they are unable to access face to face discussion. Targeting specific group of
smokers increase uptake and effectiveness. Hence, current study explores the needs and
preferences of pregnant women which seeks to online method that stop seeking support and take
features and components to reduce smoking. Internet based smoking cessation interventions help
to quit smoking for pregnant women with appropriate support. On the other hand, Drummond,
Sculpher and Torrance, (2015) explored their views that participants expressed preferences for
stopping smoking which is important to feedback and progress for development and support that
undertaken from experts. It assists to provide forum which allow for appropriate communication
with other pregnant women who want to quit it. Furthermore, tobacco has serious effect for
pregnant women to known general health risks which not conduct in gender specific.
In contradicting, Burke, Ebbert and Hays, (2015) generated their views that behavioural
support is one of the core challenges which is most effective smoking cessation intervention for
pregnant smokers. In the UK, NHS offered to stop smoking services so that pregnant attendees
set quit with appropriate services which verified with follow-up by pharma therapy in NHS.
Fewer minority of pregnant women can access them. As a result, barriers reported by pregnant
ladies which includes time constraints. Besides this, Gilbert and et.al., (2017) stated that in
England, there are 47% of pregnant attendees who quit smoking. However, there are several
pregnant ladies smokers including time constraints who have fear of stigmatization or failure to
quit it. Alternative cessation method also support which found for acceptable for pregnant
smokers. With the help of printed materials and text- messaging, vast majority of UK quit and
attempts remain for smoking.
To recommend ways through which smoking cessation can be implemented in England
As per the views of Shahab, Mortimer and Tyndale, (2017), in England, smoking rates
continuously declined with new concepts and model implications. By 2025, tobacco free
generation will be made because it shows that it works to help people to stop smoking. Nearly,
there are 90,000 regular smokers aged between 11 to 15 years. Smoking causes 17% of all deaths
in people over age of 35 years. Smoking also reinforces health inequalities because it is evenly
distributed in more deprived areas that are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit. On the
6

other hand, Klonizakis, Crank and Brose, (2017) stated that minimum dataset must be prepared
by country in which appropriate tobacco use and quit attempted in appropriate manner. It assists
to assess short-term success of cessation treatment which helps to consider additional
measurement. Self-reported smoking status at 12 months which follow up and resultant to
measure appropriate treatment to quit smoking.
In addition to this, Kotsen, Santorelli and Foulds, (2018) explored their ideas that
smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases continuously increasing. It is also greater
and need to stop smoking than the average smoker. Cigarette smoking causes significantly to
promote cessation. All patients should asked about tobacco which used and assessed with self-
motivation to quit and encounter it in appropriate manner. Message also repeated at every
opportunity which should be offered pharmacologic assistance in quitting to replace therapies,
bupropion, etc. On the other hand, Shahab, Mortimer and Tyndale, (2017) stated that individual
approach also undertaken that contain treatment from tobacco dependence and smoking. It
assists to encourage for proper treatment and measurement of taxation and price policies.
Advertising restrictions and information regarding smoking at public place also considered with
implementation of broader framework. It is the one of the important perspective as strengthen
resources and capacities. Public health approach also seeks to change social climate to promote
supportive environment.
According to the views of, Klonizakis, Crank and Brose, (2017), in a country, it can be
seen that research and information approach promotes exchange of information and knowledge
to increase awareness and need to make changes with social norms. With the help of willingness,
current level of nicotine dependence so that patients asked about timeline for quitting and
previous attempts. Behaviour changes can be conceptualised into five progressive stage so that
intervention also change and implement which not be necessary for all people. As a result, all
patients are equally motivated which assists to change behaviour in appropriate manner.
CHAPTER 3
Conclusion
From the following analysed that, NHS services affect cessation rates so that intensive
interventions for smoking are effective in the short-term. Therefore, it can be influence their
effectiveness which includes intermediate interventions that also appears to be effective
7

facilitating for smoking cessation. Pharmacy delivered intervention accomplished to deliver
appropriate services. Furthermore, it can be summarised that there are limited evidence on
effective strategies to increase access of cessation services. Hence, it increases disadvantages for
smokers. There are several studies collected on the basis of socio-economic data and
information. With few analyses and contribution of results potentially develop interventions for
further research development. Apart from this, further research can be consider on impact of
alcohol, drugs and other nicotine on people health. Therefore, England can make appropriate
plan to reduce its impact on people health.
Along with this, present research also suggested that England has quit attempt to support
in stop smoking. NHS determines the largest part in it to improve access and increasing
programmes to successfully support with individual counselling. Appropriate strategies also
assists to identify, contact and support for increasing development and guidance related with
effectiveness. As a result, present research contain promotion of good health and prevention of
treatment of ill people in England due to smoking. In this regard, it is essential to prepare
appropriate database with sociological abstract. All types of studies identified that includes
detailed about full research in appropriate manner. Guidance also undertaken for women
smokers which cause death or negative impact on new born baby. In addition to this, report
provide recommendation which helps to consider appropriate functioning for primary
advantages.
8

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Burke, M.V., Ebbert, J.O. and Hays, J.T., 2015. Treatment outcomes from a specialist model for
treating tobacco use disorder in a medical center. Medicine. 94(44).
Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J. and Torrance, G.W., 2015. Methods for the economic
evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford university press.
Gilbert, H. and et.al., 2017. Effectiveness of personalised risk information and taster sessions to
increase the uptake of smoking cessation services (Start2quit): a randomised controlled
trial. The Lancet. 389(10071). pp.823-833.
Greenhalgh, T., Macfarlane, F. and Walton, R., 2016. What works for whom in pharmacist-led
smoking cessation support: realist review. BMC medicine. 14(1). p.209.
Healey, A., Roberts, S. and Robson, D., 2018. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stop Smoking
Interventions in Substance Use Disorder Populations undergoing treatment. Nicotine &
Tobacco Research.
Klonizakis, M., Crank, H. and Brose, L.S., 2017. Smokers making a quit attempt using e-
cigarettes with or without nicotine or prescription nicotine replacement therapy: Impact
on cardiovascular function (ISME-NRT)-a study protocol. BMC public health. 17(1).
p.293.
Kotsen, C., Santorelli, M.L. and Foulds, J., 2018. A Narrative Review of Intensive Group
Tobacco Treatment: Clinical, Research, and US Policy Recommendations. Nicotine &
Tobacco Research.
Kotz, D., Brown, J. and West, R., 2014. ‘Real‐world’effectiveness of smoking cessation
treatments: a population study. Addiction. 109(3). pp.491-499.
Maskrey, V., Blyth, A. and Brandon, T.H., 2015. Self‐help educational booklets for the
prevention of smoking relapse following smoking cessation treatment: a randomized
controlled trial. Addiction. 110(12). pp.2006-2014.
Masters, R., Anwar, E. and Capewell, S., 2017. Return on investment of public health
interventions: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 71(8). pp.827-834.
Mytton, O.T., Jackson, C. and Woodcock, J., 2018. The current and potential health benefits of
the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme
in England: A microsimulation study. PLoS medicine. 15(3). p.e1002517.
Ronaldson, S.J., Dyson, L. and Rhodes, R., 2018. The impact of lung function case‐finding tests
on smoking behaviour: A nested randomised trial within a case‐finding cohort. Health
Science Reports. 1(6). p.e41.
9

Shahab, L., Mortimer, E. and Tyndale, R.F., 2017. Characterising the nicotine metabolite ratio
and its association with treatment choice: A cross sectional analysis of Stop Smoking
Services in England. Scientific reports. 7(1). p.17613.
Sohanpal, R., Rivas, C. and Walton, R., 2016. Understanding recruitment and retention in the
NHS community pharmacy stop smoking service: perceptions of smoking cessation
advisers. BMJ open. 6(7). p.e010921.
Williams, J.M., Steinberg, M.L. and Burke, M.V., 2016. An argument for change in tobacco
treatment options guided by the ASAM criteria for patient placement. Journal of
addiction medicine. 10(5). p.291.
Online
Models of delivery for stop smoking services Options and evidence. 2018. [Online]. Available
through: <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/
attachment_data/file/647069/models_of_delivery_for_stop_smoking_services.pdf>.
West, R., 2017. Tobacco smoking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions.
[Online]. Available through:
<https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3b69/a9c73a0fdde3dceb90dbc3dacba32fc3631f.pdf>.
10