Critical Review of EIA Procedures on Cumulative Impacts in EIA

Verified

Added on  2023/01/19

|4
|671
|37
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a critical review of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures in Western Australia, specifically focusing on cumulative impacts. The analysis examines the EIA process, highlighting the strengths of the current procedures, such as expert involvement and government oversight, as well as weaknesses like the potential oversight of future ecosystem developments. The report references the Western Australia Government Gazette and emphasizes the importance of identifying past, current, and future human actions impacting ecosystems to enable effective legislation and prevent cumulative impact crises. The assessment also suggests the adoption of better cumulative impact management procedures and emphasizes the role of the Environmental Protection Authority in mitigating adverse environmental impacts through appropriate circumstances and offset suggestions. The report concludes that Western Australia adheres to best practice requirements for cumulative impact assessment in the EIA of the region.
Document Page
Critical review the EIA procedures on cumulative Impacts in EIA
Figure 1 a model illustrating the EIA stages
According to Elliot (Mandy Elliot, 2009), the cumulative impacts in the EIA of Western
Australia have covered the crucial areas of concern through its assessment steps.
A good cumulative assessment is required to identify valued ecosystem components affected by
the project evaluation and the involvement of local authorities, the Western Australia process in
its EIA procedures ensures that the screening process doesn’t over look both site evaluation and
local authority’s involvement to identify valued ecosystems according to the Government gazette
(Australian protection Authority, 2013)
To fully curb the cumulative impacts there should be expert involvement to give expert analysis
on the cumulative assessment impact of the project on the area of study and the surrounding
(European Commission. Directorate-General for the Environment,Paola Banfi, Adrien Lantieri,
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Jennifer McGuinn, Alicia McNeill, 2017).in the Western Australia EIA procedures (Australian
protection Authority, 2013) the fourth stage involves the EIA expert panel review. The experts
with a vast amount of knowledge and according to best practice addressing cumulative impacts
in EIA practices of western Australia will terminate assessment of approve the proposal if it
doesn’t meet the requirements as per the Government gazette s. 40A(1) requirements in the
(Australian protection Authority, 2013, p. s. 40A(1)). The main strength of this is that it includes
an expert point of view and the government to do its assessment and approval. The weakness of
this assessment is that it may overlook the probability of new ecosystems arising in future in the
area of project development.
The Western Australia government through its Government Gazette requires that we know which
past, current and upcoming human actions have affected or will impact the valued ecosystems.
This enables legislation of various laws and regulations which will help preserve valued
ecosystems. This is a splendid requirement since it helps us predict the possible outcomes and
avert any cumulative impact assessment crisis (International Institute for Enviroment and
Development, 2010).
In addressing best practice accumulative impacts it is suggested that we find better cumulative
impact management procedures (Enviroment institute of Australia and Newzealand Inc., 2010).
The Western Australia government in its EIA procedures makes it possible for the
Environmental Protection Authority to suggest circumstances that are related to, and should
moderate, the damaging impact on the environment which the unrestricted application of the
project proposal may lead to. It’s also its mandate to suggest the best suitable offset
circumstances, where a substantial long lasting effect remains after the use of the qualification
procedure. This is a good way to shield the environment against any future impacts of the
Document Page
projects .These shows that Western Australia upholds the best practice requirements as per the
cumulative impact assessment of the EIA of the region.
(Words: 563words)
References
Australian protection Authority. (2013, December 13). http://www.epa.wa.gov.au. Retrieved
April 18, 2019, from http://www.epa.wa.gov.au:
http://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Policies_and_Guidance/Gg223.pdf
Enviroment institute of Australia and Newzealand Inc. (2010). Good practice scoping in impact
assesment. Good practice scoping in impact assesment, 16.
European Commission. Directorate-General for the Environment,Paola Banfi, Adrien Lantieri,
Jennifer McGuinn, Alicia McNeill. (2017). Environmental Impact Assessment of
Projects: Guidance on Scoping. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
International Institute for Enviroment and Development. (2010). A Directory of Impact
Assessment Guidelines. Edinburgh: IIED.
Mandy Elliot, I. G. (2009). Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia: Theory and Practice.
Sydney: Federation Press.
Document Page
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]