Impactful Transformations in Big Energy: A Case Study Analysis

This essay analyzes the impact of a business integration model on employees within the Big Energy organization. The essay begins by outlining the economic and commercial conditions, focusing on a case where a government-owned energy company, XYZ, was acquired by the private sector Big Energy Corporation. It explores the strategic management of both entities, highlighting the pre-integration success of XYZ, which was attributed to a loyal employee base and effective management. The essay then details the negative consequences of the integration, particularly the dismissal of key management personnel and a shift in focus from quality improvement to rapid integration. This resulted in employee demoralization, job insecurity, and a decline in job satisfaction. The essay emphasizes the importance of effective leadership, communication, organizational planning, and employee respect. It suggests that the integration process should have encouraged innovation and quality production. The essay concludes by recommending strategies for improving the management system, such as fostering transparent communication, promoting employee well-being, and ensuring fair treatment. It provides a detailed analysis of the integration's impact and proposes actionable steps for improvement.

Running head: IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
Name of the student
Name of the University
Author note

1IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
Strategy is the key component for a successful business plan and foundation. In relevance
to the competitive market and the operational management of the contemporaries, an
organization needs to manage its goals with correct methodologies. These involve the proper
construction of business models, which serves as a transparent medium to insight the set
ambitions of an organization. Proper beneficial implications are the responsibility under the
header referred as the Management. The managerial implications are the key determinant of
success rate for any organization. Systematic approaches towards the employee base are
important for a sustainable stature. Each infrastructure should have a view to form a rewarding
system for employees, in most cases, observant this is a recorded failure. This essay is set to
analyze the impacts of an adapted integration business model in the Big Energy organization, on
its employees and some recommends some mitigation for the raised issues ("Case Study Essay:
Big Energy", 2017).
In the context of analysis, the prior necessity is to discuss the prevailing economic and
commercial conditions persistent in the XYZ, of which Sally Johnson is a management member.
To start with, the mentioned company in discussion is a government owned energy Sector
Company with a high rating of sales processes (Kim, Trimi, & Chung, 2014). Followed by its
success rate and market position, a contemporary to this one advanced to the procedural purchase
of the brand or the organization. The contemporary in discussion for analysis is the Big Energy
Corporation, which is a private sector infrastructure (Schaltegger, Lüdeke-Freund, & Hansen,
2012). The XYZ Company was a profound stature with an established amount of strength and
efficiency following robust management to handle business and the risk involved. With a loyal
employee-base forming an efficient team to support all the innovative measures taken by the
company it was all set to capture the market with a competitive advantage. Any success related

2IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
to an organization is not self-owned but only efficient and diligent team members can contribute
to the high rate of success as is witnessed in this case (Foss & Loasby, 2013). In reference to the
sales success, initially the staff of XYZ was not enthusiastic or confident enough, however, the
figures relative to the same was the reason of pride for the staff. Amidst this successful process,
the staff was introduced to the Big Energy enterprise with an expectation that it would provide
the recognition to the existing processes adapted by the XYZ Company relative to which they
captured a huge customer base (Lee, Olson, & Trimi, 2012).
The operational management for both the companies was similar enough as they adjoined
in the same energy producing and sailing market, with an addressing management team for the
departments involved. Sally Johnson commendably managed the strategy department of the XYZ
Company.
On the collaboration or at the phase of sales between the two companies, members from
the management team were deliberately terminated from the organization prior to any
collaborative actions following the integration of the XYZ into the Big Enterprise (Katz &
Krueger, 2012). Post to this collaboration of the two companies, the technique of the removal of
the core management team was providing more or less a transparent transcript and view about
the future aspects of the employee base involved in the organization. This methodology followed
by the Big enterprise indicated the rapid redundancies that was yet to surface post the completion
of major procedures. Post the sale the prime attention was given to the integration model of the
business organization to maintain a seamless management rather than focusing on the quality of
the deliverables. All these activities from the senior management section was adversely affecting
the employee base as well understood by Sally, the one who was retained to follow up with
strategy department. The decisions from the high-level executives highly demoralized the

3IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
already present employees who performed immensely well throughout to provide support and
effort for the betterment of the XYZ organization (Mazzucato, 2015). The adverse impacts
accelerated as the employees gradually realize that would not be able to compete for their job
positions based on the merit as for the other management members. The case continued to
witness an upraised frustration accounting in the employees as the adjoining organization
stopped focusing on any innovative measures or quality improvement and only concentrated on
the speed of integration (Vulimiri et al., 2013). The long-term goals seemed to take a back seat.
Another impactful behavior from the newly developed management was the non-engaging act
with the XYZ team members. In this work environment, employees are likely to develop all
possible kinds of negativities surrounding the job. Some emotional impacts could be shock,
anger, disbelief on the job market and the loss that is difficult to manage.
The later crucial effects relative to such redundancies affect a person’s mental health,
self-esteem, financial insecurity, all these triggering depression the stigma of being unemployed
cause social embarrassments (Lounkine et al., 2012). Following all these, one important key
factor is the job satisfaction, which in an environment like this as presented in the case is most
likely to experience a downfall (Adesope & Nesbit, 2012). This in turn leads to more self-
detachments of the employees from the organization leaving a more stressful effect on the
remaining employees in the organization. The team spirit and unity is crucially important for
success rates. As a true and logical management member,
Sally, one of the remaining employees, realized the fault in the model, the Company was
following and it is commendable on her path to be able to think about the employees who have
been a support in the growing stage of the organization and decided to commence an argument
on this topic of unjust managerial behavior (Haufler, 2013).

4IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
Following the analysis of the case, it was clear enough that Big Energy enterprise set a
bad example from a management point of view. Strategic and afflictive moves from a
management system are a prior expectation and a necessity. A management system involves a
systematic method aiming for the smooth and proper functioning of an organization through
standardized practices (Birolini, 2012). The managerial functions comprise of firstly, organizing
an enterprise, setting the justified code of policies, establishing proper operational management
and finally an efficient supply chain (Rice, 2013). This is a generalization applicable to all the
present organizations. In relevance to the case, major management issues are witnessed to which
there are present possible mitigations and strategies to control and overcome the intense and
adverse situation prevailing after the integration model adapted in the collaboration of the two
parties. Few suggestive and recommended measures are discussed in the upcoming sections.
This section highlights some enlisted traits and strategies a good management system and
as a result, the management members should possess to build an effective and active system
(Hill, Jones, & Schilling, 2014). Firstly, as a priority, the leadership style should be considered in
this subject. Ideally few qualities that should be present in the leader is the quality to motivate
and guide the team in the correct direction, involving the innovative measures and improvement
in quality. Upon criticism to this case, majorly these traits seem lacking. Secondly, the
management team be actively participating in communication methods. Effective and efficient
leading systems involve leaders who potentially maintain transparency between the system
implications and the employee base, the essence of any organization. This is an effective way to
gather inputs, which could eventually benefit the Company (Laudon & Laudon, 2016). Next is
the strategy towards effective organizational plans, which allow the team members to get
motivated and perform diligently. Next is the quality of being respectful towards the organization

5IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
members, which could encourage the employees and provide them with job satisfaction. The
management system should be able to show empathy towards the employees as without them it
is near impossible to build a successful foundation and thus rewarding them is essential. Just for
the fact that one may be an employer and the other an employee, it is unethical to be judgmental.
The other crucial trait an ideal manager in a managing system should possess is the trait of being
fair and balanced. This is a quality allows the system to provide justice and equal rights to every
single employee present in the organization (Batool, 2013). Even in a model of integration as in
this case, the XYZ staff should have been considered a part of the total organization and the
unjust way of redundancies was incorrect from every point of criticism. Unbiased and empathetic
are the essentialities an organization to have smooth run.
On analysis of the case study, it can be rightfully concluded that the collaboration process
should have been more justified. The integration model should have had the features encouraging
innovation and quality production involved in a system. The actions implied by the senior
management team adversely affected the team bonding and job-satisfaction of the employees
from the XYZ Company, demoralizing them completely. The employees were not rewarded for
the long-term support that they provided the company to build the grandeur that the company
built. The management system set out a wrong example in the case study involved. However,
certain strategies for developing an improved management system are suggested and
recommended. In the process of analysis, some positively impactful measures are introduced for
the improvement of the organization.

6IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
References:
Adesope, O. O., & Nesbit, J. C. (2012). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning
environments: A meta-analysis.
Batool, B. F. (2013). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Journal of Business Studies
Quarterly, 4(3), 84.
Birolini, A. (2012). Quality and reliability of technical systems: theory, practice, management.
Springer Science & Business Media.
Case Study Essay: Big Energy. (2017). Myassignmenthelp.com. Retrieved 7 September 2017,
from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/case-study-essay-big-energy
Foss, N., & Loasby, B. (Eds.). (2013). Economic Organization, Capabilities and
Coordination (Vol. 8). Routledge.
Haufler, V. (2013). A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global
economy. Carnegie Endowment.
Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: theory: an
integrated approach. Cengage Learning.
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2012). Changes in the Structure of Wages in the Public and
Private Sectors. In 35th anniversary retrospective (pp. 721-756). Emerald Group
Publishing Limited.
Kim, G. H., Trimi, S., & Chung, J. H. (2014). Big-data applications in the government
sector. Communications of the ACM, 57(3), 78-85.

7IMPACTFUL TRANSFORMATIONS IN BIG ENERGY
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2016). Management information system. Pearson Education
India.
Lee, S. M., Olson, D. L., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and
co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817-831.
Lounkine, E., Keiser, M. J., Whitebread, S., Mikhailov, D., Hamon, J., Jenkins, J., ... & Shoichet,
B. K. (2012). Large scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect
targets. Nature, 486(7403), 361.
Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector
myths (Vol. 1). Anthem Press.
Rice, A. L. (Ed.). (2013). The enterprise and its environment: A system theory of management
organization (Vol. 10). Routledge.
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability:
the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal
of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95-119.
Vulimiri, A., Godfrey, P. B., Mittal, R., Sherry, J., Ratnasamy, S., & Shenker, S. (2013,
December). Low latency via redundancy. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on
Emerging networking experiments and technologies (pp. 283-294). ACM.