Comprehensive Analysis of an English Peer Review Assignment

This document provides a detailed analysis of an English peer review assignment, focusing on identifying weaknesses in the original text. The analysis highlights several key areas for improvement, including the lack of a clear title, introduction, and conclusion, which are crucial for establishing context and summarizing the main points. The reviewer emphasizes the importance of clarity in discussion, pointing out that the original document's purpose is unclear, making it difficult for the reader to understand the author's intent. The analysis also critiques the poor organization of the content, noting the absence of separate paragraphs to develop ideas effectively. The reviewer suggests incorporating these elements to enhance the document's structure, clarity, and overall effectiveness, ensuring that the writing is easily comprehensible and conveys its purpose clearly to the reader. The analysis concludes with a reference to a source on bad technical publications, indicating a comparative context for the review.

Running head: ENGLISH PEER REVIEWING
English Peer Reviewing
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

ENGLISH PEER REVIEWING 2
1. Incorrect Title and Lacks Introduction & Conclusion
The title of this document indicates that it is about individuals and their comparison of
“who” is at the top and “who” is at the bottom. So, the title should be the way that can
symbolize it as it is about some war weapons. Moreover, it lacks an introduction and
conclusion, making it unclear about the reason for writing. While writing something, three
key components are important, including a good start, the main body and a proper end.
Firstly, the start or introduction gives readers the background of writing a specific
composition. Then, the main body includes a detailed description of the purpose of the
article. In conclusion, that particular piece of writing is summarized or concluded to make
that composition a clear picture that is easily comprehensible. So, this letter must have a
correct title according to the purpose, an introduction to state the background and, a
conclusion at the end for summarizing the document.
2. Lacks Clarity of Discussion
At first, the title of the document is unclear about whether it is speaking of any
individual or warheads which are mentioned in the content. So, it is obvious from the first
suggestion that the document is lacking in clarity of its purpose. The reason is that it does not
possess the background regarding why is this document written? what is the importance of
writing it? why is it addressing warheads? what are the technical reasons and why are they
necessary? The answers to all these questions can give this composition clarity in its content,
which is immensely significant for comprehending it. So, clarity is important because easily
understandable writing is often simpler to comprehend. This, however, is not the only
explanation of why content is necessary for clarity. They often tend to avoid different
thoughts from spilling through one another. Moreover, paragraph breaks allow readers room
and space to absorb any argument that has been made.
3. Unclear Purpose

ENGLISH PEER REVIEWING 3
From the above suggestions, it is clear that the document is unclear in delivering the
purpose of being written. A significant aspect of reading comprehension is understanding the
intent of the text. That is because when you review the final paragraph, understanding why an
author penned a letter is the secret to learning what to recall. It is the type of like having an
obvious intent. In principle, a writer has three fundamental motives to compose something: to
persuade his reader, to educate his reader or to impress his reader. One method of cultivating
and retaining a potential audience is to integrate the audience into the letter’s intent. If you
need your writing to be good, it is crucial to indicate its purpose. So, for grasping the
attention of readers, the purpose should be clear and written in simple words. This will not
only make readers understand the content, but will also bring clarity that will make readers
further read the letter.
4. Poor Organization of Content
In the organization of content, the three critical components, which are present in the
first suggestion, are necessary to be there. Then, the organization of different ideas comes in
separate paragraphs, while this letter only contains a single paragraph and not fulfilling the
necessary elements of an essay. This proves that the organization has great importance in
writing, which this letter does not contain. Conveying your thoughts, efficiently to the
readers, calls for strong structure and organization. Realizing what to put first will keep the
writing effective and competent, how to lead the audience from one segment to the next, and
when to incorporate knowledge and observations. The strong organization brings the job to
the next stage, no matter what sort of writing you do. So, in light of all these facts, the
organization can be brought into this letter by making it a bit lengthier with all essential and
necessary components.

ENGLISH PEER REVIEWING 4
Reference
Impact Technical Publications. (n.d.). The Rogues’ Gallery of Bad Technical Publications.
Retrieved from http://www.impactonthenet.com/gallery.html