This case study delves into the ethical dimensions of Edward Snowden's actions, exploring the conflict between moral and ethical values, specifically in the context of whistleblowing and the disclosure of confidential information. The analysis examines the justification of Snowden's actions, considering the potential benefits of exposing government surveillance programs versus the harm caused by leaking confidential data. The assignment further explores the student's perspective on Snowden's decisions, including whether they would have taken similar actions and under what circumstances those actions might have been altered, such as in the case of a threat to someone's life. The study concludes by discussing the ethical considerations of whistleblowing, determining when it is ethically permissible and when it is prohibited, based on the specific circumstances and the need to protect confidential information and the privacy of citizens. The student's perspective is provided, along with analysis of the ethical issues involved.