PHI-413V8: Healthcare Ethics: Ranking Principles and Biblical Context

This essay, written for PHI-413V8, delves into the ranking of the four key principles of bioethics: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. The author prioritizes these principles within a Christian framework, offering a unique perspective on their application in healthcare decision-making. The essay explores the implications of each principle, defining their roles and importance. It also contrasts the secular ranking of these principles with their ordering within the Christian biblical narrative. Beneficence is linked to creation, autonomy to the fall, justice to redemption, and non-maleficence to restoration. The essay provides a comprehensive analysis of ethical and spiritual decision-making in healthcare, making it a valuable resource for students studying bioethics and related fields.

Running head: PHI-413V 1
Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care
Student Name
Institution

PHI-413V 2
Principalism, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often
been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it
trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the
four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian
biblical narrative?
Pricipalism is known as the four key principles since its contemplations have four good
principles that are the structure of bioethics created by Thomas Beauchamp and James Childres
(Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics 2007). Four key principles incorporate four first-party
middle-level moral principles, which usually have non-ranked moral principles: With the
background of Christian, I would rank the four principals as:
Respect for autonomy: A principle that requires regard for the capacity of the
autonomous individual to decide.
Non-maleficence: A commitment to purposefully hurt (no harm)
Beneficence: Beneficiary activity is improved the situation the advantage of others. The
useful move can be made to help prevent or wipe out harm or to enhance the state of others.
Justice: A group of principles requires reasonable dispersion of hazard and cost
advantage.
Respect for autonomy: Any idea of settling on moral choices accept that rational
specialists are associated with making on voluntary and informed choices. In the decision of
health services, our regard for the autonomy of the patient will be in the general trend, showing
that the patient can work intentionally, with knowledge, and without controlling those impacts,

PHI-413V 3
against a voluntary and free work will reduce. This principle is the premise of the act of "
informed consent " in regard to health services in patient/physician exchanges.
Non-maleficence: For the principle of nonmaleficence we are required that we don't
purposefully injury or harm the patient through the acts of omission or commission. Usually, we
think of it as negligent in a case that somebody forces an inappropriate or harmful risk on others.
Giving appropriate principles of care that secure or reduce the threat of loss, not just supported
by us for the most part composed moral judgments, also additionally by the laws of society (see
law and restorative morals). This hypothesis demonstrates the requirement for the medical limit.
Mistakes in medical happen is clear; However, this hypothesis communicates a basic promise to
protect the health of the patient is a duty of health professional.
Beneficence: The general importance of this principle is that human services suppliers
have a responsibility to benefit the patient, and additionally it is the responsibility to find a way
to keep and expel the loss from the patient. These responsibilities are viewed as reasonable and
plainly obvious and they are broadly acknowledged as proper objectives of medication.
Justice: Justice in health services is, for the most part, characterized as decency, or as
Aristotle once stated, "providing for everybody what is expected." It is the best possible
dissemination of merchandise in the public arena and it is vital that we see the part of privilege.
The topic of dissemination justice additionally appears that a few products and enterprises are
hard to come by, it isn't sufficient to go there, hence there ought to be some fitting methods for
apportioning uncommon assets.
How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical
narrative?

PHI-413V 4
Beneficence = Creation: It is the request of creation that brings peace, a word called
shalom, "Man lives in peace with all his relationship: with God, with himself, with nature,
alongside nature, with nature".
Autonomy = Fall: The order made was broken by Adam and Eve, broke the Shalom and
resulted in the dissolution of humanity from God.
Justice = Redemption: God's plan of redemption for humanity is realized in Jesus Christ.
The estrangement from God is made right through the death of Jesus Christ. This is where
salvation occurred.
Nonmaleficence = Restoration: Goal of having shalom again.