Ethical Relativism: A Detailed Analysis of Arguments and Objections
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/03
|5
|1257
|457
Essay
AI Summary
This essay delves into conventional ethical relativism (CER), examining arguments for and against it. CER posits that moral truths are relative to specific individuals or societies, evolving with social norms. The arguments in favor of CER include cultural diversity, avoiding ethnocentrism, and culturally conditioned values. However, CER faces criticisms regarding conflicting cultures and the role of reformers, whose beliefs often challenge the cultural majority. The essay concludes by noting that while ethical relativism highlights cultural differences in moral practices, fundamental moral principles often underlie these variations, and some moral beliefs can be universally recognized despite cultural contexts. Desklib offers a platform for students to access this and other study resources.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 5