Business Ethics and Strategies: Case Study Analysis Report
VerifiedAdded on 2022/12/27
|18
|3694
|90
Report
AI Summary
This report delves into the critical intersection of ethics and strategies within the business landscape. It begins with an executive summary and a table of contents, setting the stage for an in-depth analysis of several case studies. The first section examines various ethical dilemmas, such as data loss risks, workplace favoritism, sexual harassment, and breaches of the chain of custody, highlighting the ethical issues, stakeholders, potential alternatives, and actions that should be taken. The second part of the report focuses on Raytheon, providing a SWOT analysis, outlining short, medium, and long-term objectives, and proposing five key strategies for future growth, along with potential challenges. The report concludes with a summary of findings and recommendations, offering a comprehensive understanding of the importance of ethical conduct and strategic planning in achieving business success. References are included to support the analysis.

Case study analysis of ethics and significance of strategies in business
Microsoft
[Type the company address]
[Type the phone number]
[Type the fax number]
[ P i c k t h e d a t e ]
REPORT
Microsoft
[Type the company address]
[Type the phone number]
[Type the fax number]
[ P i c k t h e d a t e ]
REPORT
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ethics is an integral part of any business as it helps to differentiate between the right and
wrong of any situation or circumstance. Unethical business firms are preferred less by the
customers as ethics also help to build up the goodwill of any business firm. Also ethics help
in the proper working environment of any business organisation.
Strategies play a significant role in any business development or growth of the business there
are different strategies for different growth prospects of the firm. In the absence of strategies
the process of development cannot be initiated.
In this project, the importance of ethics is communicated through various cases of unethical
situations that depict the relevance of ethics in any business firm is extremely important.
The business growth depends on the strategies adopted by the firm, similarly the project
discusses about the type of strategies, their application and the significance of strategies in
any business organisation for growth prospects. Raytheon is the organisation undertaken to
elaborate the strategic methods for future growth.
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ethics is an integral part of any business as it helps to differentiate between the right and
wrong of any situation or circumstance. Unethical business firms are preferred less by the
customers as ethics also help to build up the goodwill of any business firm. Also ethics help
in the proper working environment of any business organisation.
Strategies play a significant role in any business development or growth of the business there
are different strategies for different growth prospects of the firm. In the absence of strategies
the process of development cannot be initiated.
In this project, the importance of ethics is communicated through various cases of unethical
situations that depict the relevance of ethics in any business firm is extremely important.
The business growth depends on the strategies adopted by the firm, similarly the project
discusses about the type of strategies, their application and the significance of strategies in
any business organisation for growth prospects. Raytheon is the organisation undertaken to
elaborate the strategic methods for future growth.
Table of Contents

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Question -1:................................................................................................................................4
Analysis of the cases in related to ethics:...............................................................................4
Case 1:.................................................................................................................................4
Case 2:.................................................................................................................................6
Case 3:.................................................................................................................................8
Case 4:...............................................................................................................................10
Question- 2:..............................................................................................................................13
Raytheon...............................................................................................................................13
Swot analysis of Raytheon:...............................................................................................13
Short term, medium term, and long term objectives of the organisation:........................14
Five strategies required to be implemented to accomplish the above mentioned
objectives:.........................................................................................................................14
Potential challenges in implementing the strategies:........................................................15
Question 3:...............................................................................................................................16
Conclusion................................................................................................................................18
References
Question -1:................................................................................................................................4
Analysis of the cases in related to ethics:...............................................................................4
Case 1:.................................................................................................................................4
Case 2:.................................................................................................................................6
Case 3:.................................................................................................................................8
Case 4:...............................................................................................................................10
Question- 2:..............................................................................................................................13
Raytheon...............................................................................................................................13
Swot analysis of Raytheon:...............................................................................................13
Short term, medium term, and long term objectives of the organisation:........................14
Five strategies required to be implemented to accomplish the above mentioned
objectives:.........................................................................................................................14
Potential challenges in implementing the strategies:........................................................15
Question 3:...............................................................................................................................16
Conclusion................................................................................................................................18
References
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Question -1:
Analysis of the cases in related to ethics:
Case 1:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Rachel works as a Quality Assurance Engineer and works at an electronic company.
2. The company has finalised a contract with a company that manufactures chips which
are engulfed in the servers made by the company where Rachel works.
3. Rachel is responsible to deliver a new generation server half yearly accordingly she
has very less time left.
4. The company cannot perform every test because there is very limited time available.
5. Rachel will be providing a product of low quality which is more likely to result in loss
of data as she is bounded by the competition.
What are the Ethical Issues?
Ethics basically refers to the moral values and principles that help in recognising the
right and wrong aspects of an individual or an organisation (Neyroud, 2012).
Similarly, Ethical Issues are such situations or the circumstances that tells the
relevance of business ethics in any firm or an organisation. Ethical Issues related to
the case are as follows:
1. Is it right to sell a product that carries the risk of data loss?
2. Is Rachel doing justice to her job?
3. Is it right to put the reputation of the company at stake?
Question -1:
Analysis of the cases in related to ethics:
Case 1:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Rachel works as a Quality Assurance Engineer and works at an electronic company.
2. The company has finalised a contract with a company that manufactures chips which
are engulfed in the servers made by the company where Rachel works.
3. Rachel is responsible to deliver a new generation server half yearly accordingly she
has very less time left.
4. The company cannot perform every test because there is very limited time available.
5. Rachel will be providing a product of low quality which is more likely to result in loss
of data as she is bounded by the competition.
What are the Ethical Issues?
Ethics basically refers to the moral values and principles that help in recognising the
right and wrong aspects of an individual or an organisation (Neyroud, 2012).
Similarly, Ethical Issues are such situations or the circumstances that tells the
relevance of business ethics in any firm or an organisation. Ethical Issues related to
the case are as follows:
1. Is it right to sell a product that carries the risk of data loss?
2. Is Rachel doing justice to her job?
3. Is it right to put the reputation of the company at stake?
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Rachel
2. Company
3. Another company
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Rachel can consider the quality of the product and the reputation of the company
at the first priority.
2. Rachel can avoid following the competitors by focusing on the customer
satisfaction and do justice to her job.
3. Rachel can assure some quality which can protect the data loss of the customers
and save them from any kind of suffrage.
What are the Ethics of the alternatives?
The alternative of assuring some quality while keeping in mind the time limit to
protect the customer from any kind of suffrage. Also she can avoid following the
competitor as that will make her focus on the quality aspect.
What are the practical constraints?
Rachel can risk the reputation of the company by providing the customer with
unqualified product that is more likely to lose the data of the customer and will also
describe her unethical behaviour towards the company.
What action should be taken?
If it is not possible to take every quality test then she can opt to consider some
important tests to be undertaken for quality purpose to avoid the suffrage of
customer.
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Rachel
2. Company
3. Another company
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Rachel can consider the quality of the product and the reputation of the company
at the first priority.
2. Rachel can avoid following the competitors by focusing on the customer
satisfaction and do justice to her job.
3. Rachel can assure some quality which can protect the data loss of the customers
and save them from any kind of suffrage.
What are the Ethics of the alternatives?
The alternative of assuring some quality while keeping in mind the time limit to
protect the customer from any kind of suffrage. Also she can avoid following the
competitor as that will make her focus on the quality aspect.
What are the practical constraints?
Rachel can risk the reputation of the company by providing the customer with
unqualified product that is more likely to lose the data of the customer and will also
describe her unethical behaviour towards the company.
What action should be taken?
If it is not possible to take every quality test then she can opt to consider some
important tests to be undertaken for quality purpose to avoid the suffrage of
customer.

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Case 2:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Anne is an engineer employed at onerous.
2. Two newly hired employees were given visible role in a prominent project.
3. On the other hand, Anne’s co-workers were not given any recognition despite of
their completion of work and were asked to play supporting roles.
4. The co-workers of Anne consequently decided to leave the organisation because
of being biased, on consulting this matter to Anne she considered it to be reported
to her manager but she dropped the idea as her manager is excessively stubborn
and inflexible.
What are the Ethical Issues?
1. Absence of justice and fairness in the organisation (Phillips, 2018).
2. Favouritism
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Co-workers
2. New comers
3. Manager
4. Anne
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Anne can bring up the matter to the manager irrespective of his stubborn
behaviour.
2. The co-workers of Anne can raise their voice for being treated unfairly.
What are the ethics of the alternatives?
The alternative brings up the Justice and fairness among the employees of the
organisation, no favouritism in the organisation and exercising the rights of the
employees of the company.
Case 2:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Anne is an engineer employed at onerous.
2. Two newly hired employees were given visible role in a prominent project.
3. On the other hand, Anne’s co-workers were not given any recognition despite of
their completion of work and were asked to play supporting roles.
4. The co-workers of Anne consequently decided to leave the organisation because
of being biased, on consulting this matter to Anne she considered it to be reported
to her manager but she dropped the idea as her manager is excessively stubborn
and inflexible.
What are the Ethical Issues?
1. Absence of justice and fairness in the organisation (Phillips, 2018).
2. Favouritism
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Co-workers
2. New comers
3. Manager
4. Anne
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Anne can bring up the matter to the manager irrespective of his stubborn
behaviour.
2. The co-workers of Anne can raise their voice for being treated unfairly.
What are the ethics of the alternatives?
The alternative brings up the Justice and fairness among the employees of the
organisation, no favouritism in the organisation and exercising the rights of the
employees of the company.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
What are the practical constraints?
The practical constraint here is the relevance of favouritism in the organisation and
unjustified treatment towards the deserving employees of the company they are not
able to raise their voice regarding the matter because of the stubborn behaviour of the
manager.
What actions should be taken?
Anne should report the matter to her manager, without considering his behaviour as
this is an ethical issue. The co-workers of the Anne should also raise their voice for
being treated unfairly in the organisation.
Case 3:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Victoria just kick started her new job as an analyst at an investment bank.
2. The company is set to hold an annual meeting after Victoria has completed her 2
months at the job.
3. Luke, who is an executive of the company, asks Victoria if he could drop her
home.
4. While on the drive Luke asked for a casual dinner to Victoria at his house and
being pressured she says yes to him.
5. Luke and Victoria are currently working together on a project, but the dinner did
not proved to be that productive as Luke continued to discuss his personal issues.
6. At Luke’s house he directly makes an advance move towards Victoria. Which is
totally unacceptable to her, she is also in dilemma about what step should be taken
further.
What are the Ethical Issues?
1. Is Luke behaving unprofessionally?
What are the practical constraints?
The practical constraint here is the relevance of favouritism in the organisation and
unjustified treatment towards the deserving employees of the company they are not
able to raise their voice regarding the matter because of the stubborn behaviour of the
manager.
What actions should be taken?
Anne should report the matter to her manager, without considering his behaviour as
this is an ethical issue. The co-workers of the Anne should also raise their voice for
being treated unfairly in the organisation.
Case 3:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Victoria just kick started her new job as an analyst at an investment bank.
2. The company is set to hold an annual meeting after Victoria has completed her 2
months at the job.
3. Luke, who is an executive of the company, asks Victoria if he could drop her
home.
4. While on the drive Luke asked for a casual dinner to Victoria at his house and
being pressured she says yes to him.
5. Luke and Victoria are currently working together on a project, but the dinner did
not proved to be that productive as Luke continued to discuss his personal issues.
6. At Luke’s house he directly makes an advance move towards Victoria. Which is
totally unacceptable to her, she is also in dilemma about what step should be taken
further.
What are the Ethical Issues?
1. Is Luke behaving unprofessionally?
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
2. Should Victoria bring up the matter to the lights of the higher level management
people?
3. Is this type of behaviour acceptable because of the “Bullpen” relevance?
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Victoria
2. Luke
3. HR Department
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Victoria can report the issue to the HR head without concerning about the project,
as this type of behaviour is not at all acceptable in any type of organisation.
2. Victoria can ask the HR manager to shift her to another project as she is not
comfortable working with Luke.
3. Victoria can warn Luke not to behave in that particular manner (Christopher
Hodges, 2018).
What are the Ethics of the alternatives?
The alternatives brings up the matter of harassment which is considered next to crime
and ruins the work environment for the employee facing the same, but once the matter
is reported and solution to that is been given, accordingly the code of conduct will
also be maintained in the organisation.
What are the practical constraints?
The practical constraint here is the behaviour of Luke towards Victoria which is a
matter of huge concern the behaviour of Luke is next to crime and organisations have
strict rules and regulations regarding these matters taking place in the organisation.
What actions should be taken?
2. Should Victoria bring up the matter to the lights of the higher level management
people?
3. Is this type of behaviour acceptable because of the “Bullpen” relevance?
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Victoria
2. Luke
3. HR Department
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Victoria can report the issue to the HR head without concerning about the project,
as this type of behaviour is not at all acceptable in any type of organisation.
2. Victoria can ask the HR manager to shift her to another project as she is not
comfortable working with Luke.
3. Victoria can warn Luke not to behave in that particular manner (Christopher
Hodges, 2018).
What are the Ethics of the alternatives?
The alternatives brings up the matter of harassment which is considered next to crime
and ruins the work environment for the employee facing the same, but once the matter
is reported and solution to that is been given, accordingly the code of conduct will
also be maintained in the organisation.
What are the practical constraints?
The practical constraint here is the behaviour of Luke towards Victoria which is a
matter of huge concern the behaviour of Luke is next to crime and organisations have
strict rules and regulations regarding these matters taking place in the organisation.
What actions should be taken?

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Victoria should report the matter to the HR department because tolerating this kind of
activities will encourage Luke to go beyond limits, she should report the same without
concerning about the project they are working on together, if she is not comfortable in
reporting the same to HR then she can also ask the project manager to remove either
her or Luke out of the project.
Case 4:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Ilene Kennedy received a job in contract sales as a manufacturing representative,
which sells office furniture to large scale companies.
2. As per the chain of custody of business Ilene was authorised to sell the furniture
only to the dealers and not to the ultimate buyers.
3. New boss of Ilene told her that, they often didn’t follow the same and asked Ilene
to sell it directly to the consumers cutting out the dealers to make bigger profit.
4. Later, to that Ilene felt like cheating so she reported the concern to her boss who
was totally unsupportive and asked her to leave the firm if she is uncomfortable
doing the same.
5. For 6 months, Ilene only sold that to the dealers and designers only as per the
custody, after following the boss’ instruction for short time.
6. After those 6 months she left the job and joined another industry where she was
very successful.
What are the Ethical Issues?
1. Is it right to break the code of conduct of business to increase the profits of the
firm?
2. Is it correct to ask the employees of the firm to choose the unfair means to
continue to stay in the organisation?
Victoria should report the matter to the HR department because tolerating this kind of
activities will encourage Luke to go beyond limits, she should report the same without
concerning about the project they are working on together, if she is not comfortable in
reporting the same to HR then she can also ask the project manager to remove either
her or Luke out of the project.
Case 4:
What are the relevant facts?
1. Ilene Kennedy received a job in contract sales as a manufacturing representative,
which sells office furniture to large scale companies.
2. As per the chain of custody of business Ilene was authorised to sell the furniture
only to the dealers and not to the ultimate buyers.
3. New boss of Ilene told her that, they often didn’t follow the same and asked Ilene
to sell it directly to the consumers cutting out the dealers to make bigger profit.
4. Later, to that Ilene felt like cheating so she reported the concern to her boss who
was totally unsupportive and asked her to leave the firm if she is uncomfortable
doing the same.
5. For 6 months, Ilene only sold that to the dealers and designers only as per the
custody, after following the boss’ instruction for short time.
6. After those 6 months she left the job and joined another industry where she was
very successful.
What are the Ethical Issues?
1. Is it right to break the code of conduct of business to increase the profits of the
firm?
2. Is it correct to ask the employees of the firm to choose the unfair means to
continue to stay in the organisation?
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Ilene
2. New boss
3. Dealers & designers
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Ilene can report the matter to the higher authorities as her boss refused to follow
the chain of custody (Andrew Crane, 2019).
2. Ilene can also use the option of whistle-blowing in the government authorities.
What are the ethics of the alternatives?
The alternative shows the ethical conduct of business by following the chain of
custody and also bringing the matter to the notice of higher authorities after Ilene’s
boss refuses to follow the chain of custody.
What is the practical constraint?
The practical constraint here is the matter of chain of custody which the Ilene’s boss’
refuses to follow and also asks Ilene to go according to him rather the chain of
custody.
What action should be taken?
Ilene can report the concern to higher authorities either directly to the government or
to the ethic committee which follows up to the cases like these.
Do you think the sales strategy of Ilene’s boss is unethical or just an aggressive tactic?
The strategy is unethical of the boss’ rather than just an aggressive line of action as
breaking the chain of custody is not considered an aggressive scheme.
Who are the primary stakeholders?
1. Ilene
2. New boss
3. Dealers & designers
What are the possible alternatives?
1. Ilene can report the matter to the higher authorities as her boss refused to follow
the chain of custody (Andrew Crane, 2019).
2. Ilene can also use the option of whistle-blowing in the government authorities.
What are the ethics of the alternatives?
The alternative shows the ethical conduct of business by following the chain of
custody and also bringing the matter to the notice of higher authorities after Ilene’s
boss refuses to follow the chain of custody.
What is the practical constraint?
The practical constraint here is the matter of chain of custody which the Ilene’s boss’
refuses to follow and also asks Ilene to go according to him rather the chain of
custody.
What action should be taken?
Ilene can report the concern to higher authorities either directly to the government or
to the ethic committee which follows up to the cases like these.
Do you think the sales strategy of Ilene’s boss is unethical or just an aggressive tactic?
The strategy is unethical of the boss’ rather than just an aggressive line of action as
breaking the chain of custody is not considered an aggressive scheme.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
What would be your advice be to Ilene on how to deal with this discomfort she felt
with selling directly to the end users?
My advice on this matter to Ilene would be to report the matter to higher authorities in
order to ensure some strict action is taken on the issue.
How this practice of breaking the chain of custody will impact the industry?
It will impact the industry adversely because breaking the chain of custody will put
down the image of the company and the dealers would also be disappointed and will
never consider any type of deal with the company.
Does Ilene have the obligation to push for broader changes within the system, rather
than only changing her own job responsibilities to align with her personal ethics?
Yes, Ilene is liable for pushing forward the required changes within the system,
because she is an employee of the organisation so is liable to report if there is any
unethical situation in the company.
Is it ethically forbidden to go out of the sales chain?
Yes it is, because ethics is basically following the principles, rules and regulations of
the organisation and chain of custody is the manner how the business should be
conducted so breaking that will eventually be described as an unethical activity.
What would be your advice be to Ilene on how to deal with this discomfort she felt
with selling directly to the end users?
My advice on this matter to Ilene would be to report the matter to higher authorities in
order to ensure some strict action is taken on the issue.
How this practice of breaking the chain of custody will impact the industry?
It will impact the industry adversely because breaking the chain of custody will put
down the image of the company and the dealers would also be disappointed and will
never consider any type of deal with the company.
Does Ilene have the obligation to push for broader changes within the system, rather
than only changing her own job responsibilities to align with her personal ethics?
Yes, Ilene is liable for pushing forward the required changes within the system,
because she is an employee of the organisation so is liable to report if there is any
unethical situation in the company.
Is it ethically forbidden to go out of the sales chain?
Yes it is, because ethics is basically following the principles, rules and regulations of
the organisation and chain of custody is the manner how the business should be
conducted so breaking that will eventually be described as an unethical activity.

ETHICS AND STRATEGIES
Question- 2:
Raytheon
Vision and mission statement
“The objective which summarises all our goals is the customer satisfaction and success
(raytheon, n.d.).”
9 elements of the mission statement: product, consumers, target market, technology, growth
prospects and profitability, ethical values, competitive advantage, social responsibility and
employee concern (Yohn, 2013).
An ideal mission statement has all the components mentioned above, Raytheon has most of
the elements of the ideal mission statement however it seems to omit the technology and
employee concern mentioned in the mission statement.
Swot analysis of Raytheon:
Strength:
The major strength of Raytheon is the immense amount of liquid cash in hand from
the increased international sales which is enough pay off the debts.
Weakness:
The major reason considered to be the weakness of Raytheon is a lot of amount of
cash could be used to set off the losses.
Threat:
Instability in the political environment is the major threat to the company as the cuts
in the budget by the government can affect the business.
Opportunities:
Question- 2:
Raytheon
Vision and mission statement
“The objective which summarises all our goals is the customer satisfaction and success
(raytheon, n.d.).”
9 elements of the mission statement: product, consumers, target market, technology, growth
prospects and profitability, ethical values, competitive advantage, social responsibility and
employee concern (Yohn, 2013).
An ideal mission statement has all the components mentioned above, Raytheon has most of
the elements of the ideal mission statement however it seems to omit the technology and
employee concern mentioned in the mission statement.
Swot analysis of Raytheon:
Strength:
The major strength of Raytheon is the immense amount of liquid cash in hand from
the increased international sales which is enough pay off the debts.
Weakness:
The major reason considered to be the weakness of Raytheon is a lot of amount of
cash could be used to set off the losses.
Threat:
Instability in the political environment is the major threat to the company as the cuts
in the budget by the government can affect the business.
Opportunities:
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide
1 out of 18
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
Copyright © 2020–2025 A2Z Services. All Rights Reserved. Developed and managed by ZUCOL.