Examining the Sociological and Ethical Implications of Euthanasia

This essay delves into the complex ethical and sociological aspects of euthanasia, a highly debated topic in contemporary society. It explores the individual's right to choose their own death, particularly in cases of incurable diseases causing immense suffering. The essay presents arguments both for and against euthanasia, considering scenarios where a person can make a responsible decision about their death and situations where family members might request assisted suicide for patients in vegetative states. It supports these arguments by emphasizing the importance of ensuring that the disease is indeed incurable and causes significant pain. The essay also addresses counterarguments, highlighting the fundamental right to live and the government's role in ensuring this right, even when families face economic burdens. Ultimately, the essay concludes that while euthanasia can be a person's right in certain circumstances, careful consideration of all factors is crucial in making such a profound decision. Desklib provides students access to a variety of resources and solved assignments to help them with their studies.

Running head: EUTHANASIA
xxx
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1
EUTHANASIA
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
Background of the Study.............................................................................................................2
Thesis Statement..........................................................................................................................2
Discussion........................................................................................................................................2
Argument 1..................................................................................................................................2
Argument 2..................................................................................................................................3
Support to Argument...................................................................................................................3
Counter Argument...........................................................................................................................3
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................3
References........................................................................................................................................4

2
EUTHANASIA
Introduction
Euthanasia is one of the most debated topics in the contemporary society. The individual
person tries to choose his own kind of death has been contemplated in the light of various
sociological underpinnings. In the long term, Euthanasia has been said to be one of the major
human rights of a person.
Background of the Study
There are a number of people who beg to differ from the uses of Euthanasia accepting
extreme cases. Assisted death alternation maybe of two kinds one being the cooling of life
support sustaining a person or by means of lethal intravenous chemicals being used to induce
death. Overall implication of this process is said to be very contradictory considering how can it
be made sure that a person is ready for that. In this scenario one of the major issues is the life
threatening diseases from which a person cannot be rescued (Kim 2018).
Thesis Statement
This is an important model question is it right to eat nice people who suffer from
incurable diseases. This again has a perspective depending on the person giving consent for the
death.
Discussion
Argument 1
A person suffering from the disease can always be held responsible for the decision that
he takes even of his own death.

3
EUTHANASIA
Argument 2
On the other hand there are situations where the family option warrants assisted suicide
when the patient is not in the condition to be reactive are in a vegetative state to shy away from
the extreme expenses and the emotional burden that it is gradually becoming (Trappe 2017).
Support to Argument
The two cases are very worried but both the scenarios there are a number of
considerations to be made. Firstly it has to be made sure that the disease in consideration is
incurable and it will cause pain and suffering to the patient in due time. Is there is a usual chance
of survival but the patient want you to be utilised because of the pain it might not be right to do
so (Walthour 2016).
Counter Argument
On the other hand at decision of witnesses will surely not be based on the economic
burden of the treatment of the patient. The right to live is one of the main fundamental rights and
if the family cannot afford it is the role of the government to ensure that the person has his rights
ensured.
Conclusion
Therefore it can be said that the sociological underpinnings and the implications of
Euthanasia have a much deeper essence into it then the society wishes to perceive. It is one of the
rights of a person to decide the day and time of his death if they are in pain but the other
considerations have to be kept in mind while making the decision.

4
EUTHANASIA
References
Kim, Y.J., 2018. Attitudes and Desires of Terminally Ill Patients Regarding Euthanasia and
Physician-Assisted Suicide. 50 Studies Every Palliative Care Doctor Should Know, p.292.
Trappe, H.J., 2017. Ethics in intensive care and euthanasia: with respect to inactivating
defibrillators at the end of life in terminally ill patients. Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und
Notfallmedizin, 112(3), pp.214-221.
Walthour, M., 2016. Competently, Knowingly, and Voluntarily Dying with Dignity: Why States
That Allow Defendants to Volunteer for Execution Should Allow Terminally Ill Patients to Die
in a Dignified and Humane Manner. Ariz. Summit L. Rev., 9, p.437.