Analyzing the Expense of Green IT: A Balanced Counter Argument

Verified

Added on 2023/06/11

AI Summary

This essay presents a counter-argument to the assertion that Green IT is excessively expensive. It acknowledges the initial high costs associated with Green IT, such as the need for specialized experts, lack of competition among providers, and reliance on clean energy sources. However, it argues that the long-term environmental benefits, including reduced emissions and water conservation, justify the initial investment. The essay highlights lifetime savings, potential tax credits, and increased property value as factors that offset the high upfront costs, concluding that the benefits of Green IT ultimately outweigh the expenses due to lower post-installation and maintenance charges. Desklib offers a variety of resources including past papers and solved assignments to aid students in understanding similar topics.

Running head: GREEN IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE
GREEN IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE
Name of the University
Name of the student
Author note

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

1GREEN IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE
Green IT is the latest innovation that is buzzing in the market right now. The hunt for
sustainability has given rise to these technologies that considers the environment first before its
applications. In this article, the first section, debates in favour of the topic (Green IT is too
expensive) while the next section, discusses against the mentioned topic.
The Green IT is too expensive to be adopted by the common people. Initially the
implementation costs are very high. As the technology is relatively new, the research process in
this area is very limited. The technology is still nascent and difficult to develop. Conventional
processes are changed from scratch so that the green technologies can stay environmental
friendly. As the technology is new, highly specialized experts need to be deployed whose
operational costs are high. A lot of researchers and other scientific minds are needed to move
forward with this technology. Hiring such experts adds with the final cost of the product. The
initial implementation cost deters it from utilizing commercially. Lack of proper development
in this field is another aspect why this technology is expensive (Sheldon 2017). Currently, the
organizations which are pursuing the technology are far too limited and rarely faces any
competition from each other. This allow them to price their products whatever they like and
hence the burden of the cost falls down on the shoulder of the consumer who is trying to adopt
the technology. Green IT has no alternative raw material and chemical as input (Noorman and
Uiterkamp 2014). Hence, the technologies has to perform only when the source of the clean
energy is available. For example, a solar panel can work only in daylight. At night, it stores the
energy in a power saver. If the power saver is empty then the power has to be drawn from the
conventional energy source which increases the cost overally. The technologies incorporated
are still at prototype stages and the uncertainties of the performance impacts contribute to the
high costs. Also, the lack of skill and human resources contribute to the high cost of Green IT.
The argument is in favour of the high cost of Green IT.
The green IT is not that expensive though as it provides environmental benefits in the
long run. In the long run, the cost which are wasted in reducing emissions and conserving water
are all saved thanks to the benefits provided by the technology. The high cost of the IT products
are justified in the long run (Gould and Lewis 2016). It can have lifetime property value and

2GREEN IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE
lifetime sustainability. Geothermal energy plants have a warranty of at least 45 years which
justifies the initial high instalments and maintenance charges. As per the requests by
Bloomington, as the green IT technologies require less money and maintenance charges, the IT
property value increases over time. Rental managers and commercial IT property owners
normally prefer Green IT technology. The lifetime savings justifies the high initial cost of the
Green IT Technology. In houses which incorporate Green IT technology, massive savings are
gained in utility bills Electricity bills are reduced by 88% due to these technologies (McKinnon
et al. 2015). Moreover, the cost of the Green IT technologies not that significant as in most
countries the people are eligible for tax credits from governments if they incorporate
environmental friendly technologies.
Thus, the technology has its own share of reason for justifying its high costs. But in the
long run, the benefits provided by the technology overrules the high initial costs and makes it
manageable due to less post installation and maintenance charges

3GREEN IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE
References
Gould, K.A. and Lewis, T.L., 2016. Green gentrification: Urban sustainability and the struggle
for environmental justice. Routledge.
McKinnon, A., Browne, M., Whiteing, A. and Piecyk, M. eds., 2015. Green logistics:
Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. Kogan Page Publishers.
Noorman, K.J. and Uiterkamp, T.S. eds., 2014. Green households: domestic consumers, the
environment and sustainability. Routledge.
Sheldon, R.A., 2017. The E factor 25 years on: the rise of green chemistry and sustainability. G
reen Chemistry, 19(1), pp.18-43.