Analysis of Justice and Legal Theories in ACT Magistrate Courts

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the ACT Magistrate Court's justice system, examining its ability to deliver justice. It begins with an introduction to the court's jurisdiction and the scope of the study. The report delves into the concepts of sanctions, punishments, and their consequences within the Australian criminal system, referencing relevant legal cases and regulatory frameworks. It then discusses key legal concepts and theories, evaluating the current legal system's effectiveness. Furthermore, the report explores potential improvements to the court system, addressing issues such as costs and transparency. The report draws on various sources, including books and journals, to support its findings and conclusions, offering a comprehensive overview of the ACT Magistrate Court's role in the pursuit of justice.

Article on Ability of our court
system to seek justice in the
ACT Magistrate Court

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
Sanctions punishment consequences...........................................................................................1
Discussion on legal concept and theories present evaluation of the legal system......................2
Suggestions to ways to improve the court system......................................................................3
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................3
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTION
Magistrate court in Australia any of the inferior courts with primarily criminal
jurisdiction covering a wide range of offense from minor traffic violations and public health
nuisances which is considered as the most serious crime. Present study will be base on the topic
of court system weather it is fairly solves the cases or not. So for that, study will further covers
the topic on punishments consequences and also discussed the legal concepts and theories
present evaluation of the legal system. Therefore, study also explains legislative framework of
the legal system which undertake the suggestions to ways to improve the court system
legislation.
Sanctions punishment consequences
Punishment has arisen when an individual has been convicted of breaking the law
through the Australian Criminal System (Burley, 2017). In other words, Australian system for
imposing sanctions for breaches the contract is apart from that, it makes the difficult system and
create inconvenience between the system. Apart from this, business and their executive officers
are being issues with warnings, bans penalties and sanctions for failure of laws and overall
system.
Like as a case of company where the company got received a feedback from EY clients
which indicates the case related new immigration monitoring activities by the Australian Border
force. By the fair work Ombudsaman. Along with that, it presently makes the things more clearly
effective or positive (Craig, 2017). Good governance requires executive officers of corporate
entities to be well executive effective performance. Businesses and their executive officers are
being issues which effectively mentioned the high growth system. Businesses and their executive
officers are being issues with warnings, bans, penalisation sanctions for failure to comply with
the sponsorship obligations and the illegal worker provisions. The civil penalty and criminal
offence provisions of the act that apply to Australian employees who employ foreign national in
Australian without a suitable visa. However, the crime has been done by the business is for
failing to the sponsorship obligations and that both civil and criminal penalties may apply. So it
has been defined that the main purpose of Penalties is to get the fair decision done by the
government (Firth and et.al., 2016). Sanctions enforcement is on the Australian Government
agenda. All businesses selling goods and services overseas which need to have sanctions breach
prevention measures in place.
1

Consequences of breaking legal laws
The Responsible party for creating these laws is Office of Foreign Assets Control (IFAC) is
creating a business case which implementing and enforcing the laws. As according to the
Sanction law trade or economic restrictions on activities is related to particular countries or
business entities. Usually such kinds of sanction imposed in the situation of international concern
over human rights (Heinrich, Kobayashi and Peterson, 2017). This basically evaluate the
systematic performance in different level. Apart from that, it helps to discover the best thing out
off the long lasting mode. Naturally these numbers vary considerably depending on the specific
crime committed and the number of times it occurred.
Discussion on legal concept and theories present evaluation of the legal system.
Laws are the effective legal system which is particularly manage the overall system and
make sure the effective working outcomes. The law of Australia comprises many levels of
codified and undignified forms of law. In other words, Australian constitution is the legal
foundation of the common wealth system which better understand the opportunity and task to
analyse the legal system and growth (Peter Jr, 2018). Australian government system is the
combination of Westminster and United States systems of government. The applied laws has to
followed by the Australian people into the best consideration. Australian government legal
system is also known as Commonwealth of Australia constitution act 1900.
Legal system has been described as a body of rules and should be focused on the laws
and regulations. The main purpose of regulation is to minimizes the conflict impact in the society
(Howe III and Scully, 2015). Since law is accepted by a community as binding. Business law As
a regulator business activities by advising businesses to be fair and ethical in their dealing with
consumers.
Australian legal system has two main sources which plays a most important role within
the country. Australian business found the basic reality and goals which clearly helps to identify
the goals and objectives (Pickett, Loughran and Bushway, 2016).
Statute law : Statute law is all about which focus on the Goods Act 1958 and crime act 1958.
Parliament. Besides, Parliament can have this power to control the overall system and growth.
Common law : The body of unenacted laws that emanate from the courts at federal state
territory system.
2

Suggestions to ways to improve the court system
It has been identified from the study that how Australian people eagerly wants to change
the system of the legal framework. As according to the survey of 20,000 Australian half of the
people experienced issue with the legal system. It has been identified that disability people, like
single parents, unemployed people has diverse background are more likely to have legal
problems (Katz, 2015). The main issue which has to be increased is costs. The Australian
government spends over $700 million each year. According to the viewers they want from the
government that it has to be more transparent with the people about their justice and also make
new regulations in the context of disabled person in order to make them support. Some legal
structure also generated for the people who cannot afford the prices (Pashukanis, 2017). There
has been many modification has been done by the government which makes the study more
inappropriate. Several modification had been done in the current political and fiscal environment.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of above report it has been clearly identified that how legal system and
performance can impact the country people. Besides, the present study identified the importance
of legal system and also mentioned the Australian working system in an systematic manner.
Study also explained the legal framework of the Australian legal system.
3

REFERENCES
Books & Journals
Burley, A. M. S., 2017. International law and international relations theory: a dual agenda.
In The Nature of International Law (pp. 11-46). Routledge.
Craig, P., 2017. Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework.
In The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (pp. 95-115). Routledge.
Firth, M. and et.al., 2016. Regulatory sanctions on independent directors and their consequences
to the director labor market: Evidence from China. Journal of business ethics. 134(4).
pp.693-708.
Heinrich, T., Kobayashi, Y. and Peterson, T. M., 2017. Sanction consequences and citizen
support: A survey experiment. International Studies Quarterly. 61(1). pp.98-106.
Howe III, W. J. and Scully, E. P., 2015. Redesigning the Family Law System to Promote Healthy
Families. Family Court Review. 53(3). pp.361-370.
Katz, J., 2015. A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic
fieldwork. Méthod (e) s: African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 1(1-2), pp.131-
146.
Pashukanis, E., 2017. The general theory of law and Marxism. Routledge.
Peter Jr, H., 2018. Courts and transition in Russia: The challenge of judicial reform. Routledge.
Pickett, J.T., Loughran, T.A. and Bushway, S., 2016. Consequences of legal risk communication
for sanction perception updating and white-collar criminality. Journal of Experimental
Criminology, 12(1), pp.75-104.
4