Analysis of Leadership Styles and Their Impact in Science

This research report examines the multifaceted impacts of leadership styles on scientific organizations and worker performance. It explores various leadership approaches, including democratic, autocratic, charismatic, laissez-faire, and transformational styles, analyzing their effects on employee satisfaction, productivity, and overall organizational success. The study highlights the importance of effective leadership in fostering innovation, collaboration, and the achievement of organizational objectives within the scientific context. It delves into key leadership theories, such as trait, functional, situational, and behavioral styles, to understand how leaders can influence the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of their teams. The report concludes by emphasizing the positive impact of participative leadership styles on long-term organizational performance and worker engagement, offering valuable insights for scientific leaders and organizations seeking to optimize their operations and achieve excellence.

Surname 1
EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP IN SCIENCE
Name of the student
Subject Name:
Date:

Surname 2
Abstract
The research paper sought to examine different impacts of leadership and its styles in the
science concerning different organizations along with their effect on the performance of workers.
The purpose of this investigation is to understand various impacts of different style of leadership
on science. The major target that guide thus study comprise of the idea that aims to investigate
the impacts of democratic leadership on science and to examine the effect of participative styles
of leadership on performance of workers in the organization. The limitation of leadership in
science consists of the use of simplistic models, the omission of relevant traits, concentration on
dyadic processes, assumption of heroic leadership, along with overreliance on weak techniques.
It is clear through the scientific concept that impacts of leadership are not only defined by tasks
and orientation of individuals, but also the communication between individuals. In most cases,
scientific administrators are expected to force the incorporation of science into global society in
the manner that sets science in the more prominent position to aid in changing globe for
enhanced operations. This research aims at addressing different impacts that leaders have in the
context of science. The study concludes by illustrating that participation style of leadership is
most important in an enduring term as well as in effect on workers is positive.
Introduction
Leadership and its styles is an aspect in management of different operations that has
received significant attention in scientific approach. Theories of transformational, as well as
charismatic leadership, offer essential insights concerning the nature of effective leadership,
although most of the hypotheses have weaknesses in the conceptualization together with the
measurement of process of leadership. Scientists that are skilled leaders have a great function in

Surname 3
operations of most organizations1. For instance, skilled leaders aid survey organizations by
driving projects to completion more efficiently, create the vision, fostering innovation alongside
collaboration, and through engaging and motivating different individuals to concentrate on
delivering on objectives of the organization. It takes a long duration of specialized training for
different scientists to become productive surveyors, let alone leaders who are successful. The
idea of examining how individuals become the influencer in the scientific setting requires
different techniques of understanding2. The leadership techniques are needed in science that are
rarely the concentration of their formal learning processes and certainly tough to get on the job.
In the past few decades, leadership has engaged as an advanced, efficient approach for
the management of scientific operations and organizations in general. The ancient ideas of
individual administration have gradually replaced with the management of the human resource.
The idea offers importance to the strategic integration of advanced style of leadership into an
efficient process of managing scientific operations as well as improving performances of
different workers. Different style of leadership has utilized that fit to workers on the foundation
of amount of directions, power of making decisions, and empowerment3. Therefore, leadership in
science has the responsibility to promote fields, not necessarily in journals and patents, but also
in popular view.
Impacts of leadership in science
1 Thu N. Impacts of Servant Leadership Style on Organizational Engagement of Employees.
Implications for Research on Leadership and Employee Engagement. VNU Journal of Science:
Policy and Management Studies. 2017;33(3).
2 Quick K. Locating and building collective leadership and impact. Leadership. 2015;13(4):445-
471.
3 Edmonstone J. Healthcare leadership: learning from evaluation. Leadership in Health Services.
2013;26(2):148-158.

Surname 4
Leadership can possess a negative or positive impact on science together with their
success. It is considered that the success of any scientific approach within operations of an
organization or an individual depend immensely on performance of the organization. Success
leadership approach also depends on satisfaction of job among workers and commitment worker
in operations4. Some surveyors have suggested that leaders in their operations are essential
elements in the science sector as they motivate and assist the workers in being competitive by
utilizing an effective style of leadership. Therefore, the use of effective approaches by the leader
is owing to different promoting principles of brilliance in the growth of professionalism of
associates of various organizations. Besides, effective leadership also comprise of motivation,
the inspiration of management, remuneration, together with analytical techniques. When all these
elements are present in any scientific organization, the organizations tend to record increment in
worker satisfaction that positively impacts the profit together with productivity.
Several researchers had measured the positive effects of leadership on performance of
science through human resources such as the rate of turnover and performance of the job. It had
also been measured through the effectiveness of organization that comprises of cost alongside
quality. Additionally, different researchers have been able to measure effect of leadership by
examining financial performance such as share of market, profit, together with return on
different assets during business operations. In order to enhance the performance of scientific
approach within an organization, manager must possess ability to enhance imagination as well as
modernism, stimulates subjects to confront their systems of values as well as enhance their
4 Balwant P. Transformational Instructor-Leadership in Higher Education Teaching: A Meta-
Analytic Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Leadership Studies. 2016;9(4):20-42.

Surname 5
operations5. Various studies on relation to leadership and science have recorded that the exercises
of different styles of headship have a constructive influence on the presentation of scientific
ideas within organizations such as those that deal with manufacturing.
Leadership Approaches
Key leadership theories in science are to develop an appropriate style as well as improving the
style of management.
Trait or qualities approach – leaders are born and not made around the scientific society. It
states that leadership in science comprise of particular inherited traits or qualities of
personalities.
Functional approach – here, leaders can be learned and developed to support different scientific
operations. The approach focuses on the responsibilities, accountabilities, and purposes of the
leader and the nature of the group in an organization6. The idea of examining the manner the
leader’s behavior affects and is impacted by the followers of the group.
Situational approach together with contingency models – the situational in itself is important
as it determines the style of leadership that will be most efficient. It is clear that no single
approach or style of leadership is effective for all situations. Some of the models of contingency
models comprise of Fielder, the competence of followers, path-goal hypothesis, and quality and
acceptance of decision of a leader.
5 Krause D. Four Types of Leadership and Orchestra Quality. Nonprofit Management and
Leadership. 2015;25(4):431-447.
6 Thu N. Impacts of Servant Leadership Style on Organizational Engagement of Employees.
Implications for Research on Leadership and Employee Engagement. VNU Journal of Science:
Policy and Management Studies. 2017;33(3).

Surname 6
Behavioral styles approach – it focuses on the individuals’ behaviors in a leadership position.
The importance of this approach in science remains to be the manner of how it affects the
performance of the group7. It can either increase or reduce operations of the individual in a given
organization.
Styles of leadership in science
It focuses on how leadership impact different individuals that are being led. The premise
is that subordinates are more probable to work efficiently for managers that adopt particular
styles of leadership more than others8. For instance, basic types of leadership comprise of
democratic, autocratic, and laissez-faire style.
Supportive leadership
Here, leaders delegate as well as assign different tasks to workers, but also offer workers
with the much-needed skills to complete the task. The leaders focus on working through different
issues and problems with workers. By such collaborations, this kind of leadership offers a high
degree of coaching and attention on as-needed fundamentals9. Besides, workers are able to
maintain autonomy, but the supportive leader in most cases step in and work through different
issues and problems with the workers s they arise.
Autocratic leadership
7 Quick K. Locating and building collective leadership and impact. Leadership. 2015;13(4):445-
471.
8 Gnambs T. Opinion leadership types or continuous opinion leadership traits?. International
Journal of Psychology. 2017;54(1):88-92.
9 Morrow E, Goreham H, Ross F. Exploring research impact in the assessment of leadership,
governance and management research. Evaluation. 2017;23(4):407-431.

Surname 7
These leaders who are autocratic are also referred to be authoritarian leaders. They
generally have the authority, power, as well as responsibility in operations of the organization.
There is rarely input or decision making on the section of the team or members of the group.
Instead, members of the team are tasked with ideas of implementing choices and decisions of
leaders. It is a type of leadership that is always rigid10. However, in situations that demand
policy, quick process of making decisions, and close supervision, it can be beneficial to the
operations of the organization.
Charismatic leadership
It is a type of leadership in science that can transform attitudes together with beliefs of
different workers and others within operations of the organization. Charismatic leadership has
the authority to impact and inspire individuals. It can also inspire goals of organization generally
reflecting on its vision11. It can have a greater change in operations of people leading to positive
or negative outcomes in their operations.
Laissez-faire leadership
Workers that use this kind of leadership have a high degree of autonomy. Leaders in most
cases are able to maintain a hands-off approach to managing employees by providing them with
the necessary devices to perform their duties without being directly involved in process of
making decisions, responsibilities, or daily operations12. However, this kind of leaders still takes
10 Deschamps J. Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies. Strategy &
Leadership. 2015;33(5):31-38.
11 He H. Participative Leadership and Follower Creativity: Do Different Types of Trust Play
Different Roles?. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013;2013(1):12324.

Surname 8
responsibility for the decision of the organization, even though the authority f this decision rests
on the hands of workers.
Democratic leadership
It is a kind of leadership style in science that is also referred to as the participative
leadership. In the case of democratic leadership, all or most members of the group are capable to
participate in processes of making decisions. The leadership emphasizes on equality together
with encouraging decisions alongside the flow of different ideas13. While the democratic style of
leadership in science tends to be an effective leadership style, it has the number of advantages.
For instance, it encourages creativity in operations, values intelligence, honesty, and fairness in
operations. Some of the drawbacks comprise of the idea that roles of workers may be less
defined that could develop problems of communication and failures.
Transformational leadership
Macgregor James established the transformational style of leadership in early days of
1978, and it is described by constructive, trustful, and optimistic influential that are sensitively
intelligent, motivate collaboration, set high prospects, and endorse innovations. In most cases,
this type of leadership tends to change the organizational culture of leaders by stirring the
intelligence of mission together with function concerning usefulness of set mission together with
purpose concerning the significance of the work of the group. It also stimulates advance
techniques of thinking together with elements of solving problems. The style of leadership of
12 Edmonstone J. Healthcare leadership: learning from evaluation. Leadership in Health Services.
2013;26(2):148-158.
13 Quick K. Locating and building collective leadership and impact. Leadership. 2015;13(4):445-
471.

Surname 9
transformational inspires persons within corporation to attain high presentation. According to a
study by14, the authors believed that transformational headship comprise of notion of emotional
bond, incentive, jointly beneficial targets, vision, and shared values. Transformational as style of
leadership in science is consisting of four different sections15. Such section that affects operations
o science comprise of inspiration, charisma, intellectual stimulation, together with consideration
of individuals.
Parts of leadership and their impact on science
Charisma and Inspiration
It remains to be middle to the transformational course because it creates the linkage
among subordinates along with leaders and common task of science. It comprises of achieving
respect, belief, along with the poise of others. The aspects of the charisma of a leader are
important as they aid in improving how individuals are able to achieve the set objective in their
scientific study as a team16. Furthermore, managers are motivated by being able to use different
standards of the organization with the confidence when they are developing different techniques
in their operations. Appropriate usage of different scientific operational values assists leaders in
improving how they conduct different operations within an organization. Leaders offer different
subordinates opportunity to do their work separately. They then utilize their creativity, skills, as
well as inspiration to attain their scientific operations.
Individualized consideration
14 Taffinder P. High impact leadership [leadership development]. Engineering Management.
2016;16(4):22-24.
15 Deschamps J. Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies. Strategy &
Leadership. 2015;33(5):31-38.
16 Quick K. Locating and building collective leadership and impact. Leadership. 2015;13(4):445-
471.

Surname 10
Leader pays much concentration to desires of various subordinate and tasks of delegates
with proper guidance, coaching, and mentoring. The leaders use such approaches to practice
diverse headship outlines and styles according to maturity of workers. Therefore, stage of
maturity of workers determines style of management to be utilized in every scientific operation
within manufacturing companies such as within Coca-Cola Corporation. Therefore, the leader
might use different styles of situational leadership that comprise of Telling or directing where the
leader uses one model of communication. The other style consists of selling and coaching that
ensures that a leader utilizes two-way communications. Bothe leaders together with subordinates
agree on what to perform. Participating is another style that can be used17. It ensures that the
leader is supportive and works with the subordinates. Besides, deviating is another style to be
used in science. It shows that there is little involvement from the section of the leader. The
subordinate in an organization that relies on scientific approaches such as Coca-Cola Corporation
work on their own and are left to be independent.
Leaders have the mandate of engaging their workers in different operations as a way of
achieving desired performance in science studies18. Leaders have the mandate of offering
ideological descriptions to help workers to be able to work effectively as required by the
management. The idea of creation of ideological description helps in the processes of enhancing
the intrinsic motivation of subordinates to perform their scientific duties. Leadership also assist
in articulating the essential concerns and task for organization by improving understanding of
subordinate on importance and values linked with preferred performance of an organization that
deals with scientific approaches. Hence, leadership is an essential element that increases the
17 Deschamps J. Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies. Strategy &
Leadership. 2015;33(5):31-38.
18 Neal P, Justice B, Barron K. How Ethical Leadership Impacts Student Success. New Directions
for Community Colleges. 2019;2019(185):97-105.

Surname 11
willingness of subordinates to exceed their self benefits in the title of the communal entity19.
Besides, ideas of offering intellectual inspiration, transformational managers tend to impact the
operations of scientific workers by encouraging them to defy their principles, beliefs, alongside
traditions.
Impact of leadership on organizational performance within scientific aspects
Performance of any organization that relies on scientific ideas may refer to the alteration
of different efforts into yields for attaining specific results. Nevertheless, performance tells about
relationships that exist among effective charge together with minimal financial system, between
useful charges and comprehend efficiency, and amongst output alongside attained result or
success of operations. There is lack of specific accord in different researches on the specific
criteria to be utilized in assessing the performance of the organization20. However, four different
major approaches of leadership affect the operations of science. These approaches consist of goal
method, system reserve technique, population method, with rival values technique approach.
The transformational style of leadership needs to attain outcomes beyond what is
standard by setting higher targets of business by inspiring intelligence of usefulness of mission of
the team. It also affect operations of science by stimulating workers to think innovatively
concerning the issue or task while placing the goals of group over individual self-interest21.
Therefore, transformational style of leadership is influential in motivating workers to be aware of
the outcome of scientific operations. The style of leadership also stimulates s order needs of
19 Zhao H, Zhou Q. Exploring the Impact of Responsible Leadership on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Leadership Identity Perspective. Sustainability.
2019;11(4):944.
20 He H. Participative Leadership and Follower Creativity: Do Different Types of Trust Play
Different Roles?. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013;2013(1):12324.
21 Aponte-Moreno M. Transformational Leadership: Lessons from the Venezuela's System of
Youth Orchestras. Journal of Leadership Studies. 2018;12(3):40-47.

Surname 12
workers and develops their self-interest in the performance of scientific operations. Additionally,
transformational leadership and the behaviors of such leaders are essential in motivating workers
to make them more aware of the outcomes of their operations. In the study by22 on the
transformational style of leadership, they recorded that there is a firm correlation between
transformational headship exercises together with presentation of corporation.
In healthcare facilities, leadership has huge impacts on ensuring that there is a high-
quality health care scheme. The leaders ensure such schemes that they consistently offer safe
together with safe and efficient care that is reinstated in various reports of governments. It has
been acknowledged that leadership in facilities such as clinics and hospitals are not restricted
sphere of any specific skilled association. However, all associates of team that deal with
healthcare provision are identified to be the prospect evaders23. It is important to think of diverse
techniques of management in the health care sector is conceptualized and presented in the
operations of healthcare practitioners. Leadership affects how healthcare worker handles workers
by following the set of regulations by different managers24. It also ensures that healthcare
workers can offer friends with sustainability and motivation by playing a task in ratifying
strategic track for operations of organizations that relies on scientific concepts.
Set a clear vision for operations of science
Leadership can influence workers to understand as well as accept the prospect scientific
state of workers. Effective leadership also gives workers in various departments of sciences the
22 Hutchinson M, Jackson D. Transformational leadership in nursing: towards a more critical
interpretation. Nursing Inquiry. 2015;20(1):11-22.
23 Gnambs T. Opinion leadership types or continuous opinion leadership traits?. International
Journal of Psychology. 2017;54(1):88-92.
24 Hamad H. Transformational Leadership Theory: Why Military Leaders are More Charismatic
and Transformational?. International Journal on Leadership. 2015;3(1).