Final Project: Farm Management System for Stud Farm - Analysis

This project report details the development of a Farm Management System for a stud farm, outlining the entire project lifecycle. It begins with an introduction and project overview, followed by an in-depth analysis of the Measurable Organizational Value (MOV), including impact areas and metrics. The project then defines its scope, both in and out, along with assumptions, constraints, and a scope management plan. A resource plan is presented, extracted from MS-Project. The report further delves into risk analysis, quality statements, and verification and validation activities. It concludes with an annotated bibliography, checklist, and evaluation criteria, providing a comprehensive view of the project's planning, execution, and evaluation. The project emphasizes the application of IT system development principles to improve farm operations, covering stock maintenance, customer registration, and payment processing, showcasing how technology can streamline farm management.

Student Name
ID Farm Management
System for Stud Farm

Table of Contents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................2
Project Overview...............................................................................................................................2
Project Background...........................................................................................................................2
1. Part One.............................................................................................................................................2
1.1 MOV - Measurable Organisational Value (5 Marks).....................................................................2
1.2 SUMMARISE THE MOV IN A CLEAR CONCISE STATEMENT..........................................................2
1.3 MOV Metrics................................................................................................................................3
2. Part Two:..........................................................................................................................................3
2.1 Scope...........................................................................................................................................3
2.2 Out of Scope................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Assumptions................................................................................................................................3
2.4 Constraints...................................................................................................................................3
2.5 Scope Management Plan.............................................................................................................4
2.6 Resource Plan (from MS-Project).................................................................................................4
3. Part Three..........................................................................................................................................6
4. Part Four..........................................................................................................................................12
4.1 Assumptions..............................................................................................................................12
4.2 Risk Analysis...............................................................................................................................12
5. Part Five...........................................................................................................................................12
5.1 Quality Statement......................................................................................................................12
5.2 Verification Activity....................................................................................................................12
5.3 Validation Activities...................................................................................................................12
6. Part Six.............................................................................................................................................13
6.1 Annotated Bibliography.................................................................................................................13
6.2 Checklist.....................................................................................................................................13
6.3 Evaluation Criteria.....................................................................................................................13
Bibliography.........................................................................................................................................14
Appendix: Annotated Bibliography......................................................................................................15

Introduction
Project Overview
The project is based on the principles of IT system development and it would involve the utilization
of the activities for forming the implication of the improved operation development. The
development of the management system has helped for the information processing and implication
of the improved activity development. The alignment of the operations would support the
implication of the operations for forming the utilization of the operations. The overview of the
project is formed for listing the alignment of effective integration tools. The development of the
operations is formed for listing the alignment of the activities for favouring the implication of the
successive development.
Project Background
The project of Farm Management System for Stud Farm is developed for the implication of the
activities and it would align for the implication of the activities. The development of the project plan
is formed due to the implication issues and the utilization of the operations for forming the
alignment of the activities. The integration of the project activities has been helpful for the
alignment of the successive alignment of the project activities. The project is developed for
supporting the implementation of the improved activities for the Stud Farm.
1. Part One
1.1 MOV - Measurable Organisational Value (5 Marks)
Area of Impact Rank (1 to 5)
Operational 1
Customer 2
Financial 3
Social 4
Strategy 5
1.2 SUMMARISE THE MOV IN A CLEAR CONCISE STATEMENT
The project is developed for forming an understanding of the activities and implication of the
successive alignment methods in listing the development of the farm activities like maintaining
stock, registering customers, and payment processing. The payment would be eased by the
deployment of the activities and using the effective implication of the operations.
Better –The development of the activities had supported the ease of integrating more
activities for the project is supportive for the integration of the activities
Faster – The activities of Stud farm would be increased and the utilization of the
operations would result in forming the alignment of the operations

Cheaper – The system would be helpful for the reduction of the cost for the project for
developing successive integration model
Do more – The Stud farm would assist the development of the improved functional
activities
1.3 MOV Metrics
Area of
Impact
Operational Customer Finan
cial
Social Strategy
Time Frame
(months)
4 6 12 3 5
Metrics Number of
possible
operations
Total number
of customers
Net
profi
t
People following
the organization
Marketing strategy
for the project
2. Part Two:
2.1 Scope
 Project plan can be aligned for the deployment of the operations
 Documentation process for the project would be completed
 System design is formed for the project system
 Database development for the system
 Management system would be developed
2.2 Out of Scope
The excluded items of the project are procurement agreement and transportation facilities so that
the project can be aligned successfully
2.3 Assumptions
 Project plan would be aligned for the development of the operations
 Documentation would be completed successfully for the alignment process
 Design developed for the management system would be aligned for the developed
 Database would be developed for the system
 Completed system would be developed effectively
2.4 Constraints
Time, budget, and quality are the constraints of the project of Farm Management System for Stud
Farm

Collect Requirements
Define Scope
Create WBS
Validate Scope
Control Scope
2.5 Scope Management Plan
Step 1: Collection of all the requirements for the project
Step 2: Defining the scope of the project scope
Step 3: Activities of the project would be formed with the implication of the work packages
Step 4: Integration of the project scope is validated for the development of the project plan
Step 5: Control of the project scope is implied for the utilization of the project development
2.6 Resource Plan (from MS-Project)
People

ID Resource Name Work
1 Analyst 24 hrs
Analysis of requirements 24 hrs
2 Documenter 72 hrs
Documenting 32 hrs
Submitting 16 hrs
Doumenting test results 24 hrs
3 Project Manager 40 hrs
Reviewing 8 hrs
Closing 32 hrs
4 Planner 40 hrs
Project Plan 40 hrs
5 HR manager 32 hrs
Communication Plan 32 hrs
6 Risk Analyst 48 hrs
Risk Response 48 hrs
7 Designer 72 hrs
Design 32 hrs
Mobile UI 40 hrs
8 Database Expert 104 hrs
Database 48 hrs
Formation 56 hrs
9 Developer 136 hrs
Development 64 hrs
Integration 72 hrs
10 Tester 48 hrs
Black Box 24 hrs
White Box 24 hrs
Details
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
Work
S S S S S S S S S
Jul 29, '18 Aug 26, '18 Sep 23, '18 Oct 21, '18 Nov 18, '18
8h 24h
8h
24h
8h 16h 16h
8h
16h 16h
40h
40h
24h 8h
24h 8h
48h
48h
24h 48h
24h 8h
40h
32h 72h
32h 16h
56h
8h 80h 48h
8h 56h
24h 48h
8h 40h
8h 16h
24h
Technology
Hardware System, Database, Testing tools, Design tools
Software Operating system
Network Database server
Facilities
Only system requirements for the project would be needed and it would form the implication of the
successive activities
Other
Travel Requirements NA
Training Requirements 15 days training would be required

3. Part Three

ID Task
Mode
WBS Task Name Duration
0 0 Farm Management
System for Stud Farm
80 days
1 1 Initialization 10 days
2 1.1 Analysis of requirements3 days
3 1.2 Documenting 4 days
4 1.3 Submitting 2 days
5 1.4 Reviewing 1 day
6 1.5 Sign off 0 days
7 2 Planning 15 days
8 2.1 Project Plan 5 days
9 2.2 Communication Plan 4 days
10 2.3 Risk Response 6 days
11 2.4 Approval 0 days
12 3 Developing 39 days
13 3.1 Design 4 days
14 3.2 Mobile UI 5 days
15 3.3 Database 6 days
16 3.4 Formation 7 days
17 3.5 Development 8 days
18 3.6 Integration 9 days
19 3.7 Developed 0 days
20 4 Testing 12 days
21 4.1 Simulating 3 days
22 4.2 Black Box 3 days
23 4.3 White Box 3 days
24 4.4 Doumenting test results3 days
25 4.5 Sign off 0 days
26 5 Closing 4 days
M T W
Jun 24, '18

ID Task
Mode
WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish
0 0 Farm Management
System for Stud Farm
80 days Wed 8/1/18 Tue
11/20/18
1 1 Initialization 10 days Wed 8/1/18 Tue 8/14/18
2 1.1 Analysis of requirements3 days Wed 8/1/18 Fri 8/3/18
3 1.2 Documenting 4 days Mon 8/6/18 Thu 8/9/18
4 1.3 Submitting 2 days Fri 8/10/18 Mon 8/13/18
5 1.4 Reviewing 1 day Tue 8/14/18 Tue 8/14/18
6 1.5 Sign off 0 days Tue 8/14/18 Tue 8/14/18
7 2 Planning 15 days Wed 8/15/18 Tue 9/4/18
8 2.1 Project Plan 5 days Wed 8/15/18 Tue 8/21/18
9 2.2 Communication Plan 4 days Wed 8/22/18 Mon 8/27/18
10 2.3 Risk Response 6 days Tue 8/28/18 Tue 9/4/18
11 2.4 Approval 0 days Tue 9/4/18 Tue 9/4/18
12 3 Developing 39 days Wed 9/5/18 Mon 10/29/18
13 3.1 Design 4 days Wed 9/5/18 Mon 9/10/18
14 3.2 Mobile UI 5 days Tue 9/11/18 Mon 9/17/18
15 3.3 Database 6 days Tue 9/18/18 Tue 9/25/18
16 3.4 Formation 7 days Wed 9/26/18 Thu 10/4/18
17 3.5 Development 8 days Fri 10/5/18 Tue 10/16/18
18 3.6 Integration 9 days Wed 10/17/18 Mon 10/29/18
19 3.7 Developed 0 days Mon 10/29/18 Mon 10/29/18
20 4 Testing 12 days Tue 10/30/18 Wed 11/14/18
21 4.1 Simulating 3 days Tue 10/30/18 Thu 11/1/18
22 4.2 Black Box 3 days Fri 11/2/18 Tue 11/6/18
23 4.3 White Box 3 days Wed 11/7/18 Fri 11/9/18
24 4.4 Doumenting test results3 days Mon 11/12/18 Wed 11/14/18
25 4.5 Sign off 0 days Wed 11/14/18 Wed 11/14/18
26 5 Closing 4 days Thu 11/15/18 Tue 11/20/18
Analyst
Documenter,Documents[1]
Documenter
Project Manager
8/14
Planner
HR manager
Risk Analyst
9/4
Designer,Design Tools[1]
Designer,Design Tools[1]
Database Expert,Database[1]
Database Expert
Developer,System Tools[1]
Developer
10/29
Tester
Tester,Testing tools[1]
Documenter,Documents[1]
11/14
Project Manager
S T M F T S W S T M F T S W S T
Jul 29, '18 Aug 26, '18 Sep 23, '18 Oct 21, '18 Nov 18, '18 Dec 16, '18 Jan 13, '19

August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018
$0.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
$8,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
$14,000.00
$9,570.00
$12,080.00
$13,000.00
$5,350.00
Cost

Analyst Documenter Project
Manager Planner HR manager Risk Analyst Designer Database
Expert Developer Tester
0 hrs
20 hrs
40 hrs
60 hrs
80 hrs
100 hrs
120 hrs
140 hrs
160 hrs
24 hrs
72 hrs
40 hrs 40 hrs 32 hrs
48 hrs
72 hrs
104 hrs
136 hrs
48 hrs

ID Task
Mode
WBS Task Name Cost
0 0 Farm Management
System for Stud Farm
$40,00...
1 1 Initialization $3,370.00
2 1.1 Analysis of requirements$840.00
3 1.2 Documenting $1,530.00
4 1.3 Submitting $640.00
5 1.4 Reviewing $360.00
6 1.5 Sign off $0.00
7 2 Planning $6,920.00
8 2.1 Project Plan $3,000.00
9 2.2 Communication Plan $1,760.00
10 2.3 Risk Response $2,160.00
11 2.4 Approval $0.00
12 3 Developing $24,360...
13 3.1 Design $2,520.00
14 3.2 Mobile UI $3,000.00
15 3.3 Database $4,280.00
16 3.4 Formation $3,640.00
17 3.5 Development $5,880.00
18 3.6 Integration $5,040.00
19 3.7 Developed $0.00
20 4 Testing $3,910.00
21 4.1 Simulating $0.00
22 4.2 Black Box $1,200.00
23 4.3 White Box $1,500.00
24 4.4 Doumenting test results$1,210.00
25 4.5 Sign off $0.00
26 5 Closing $1,440.00
S T
Dec 16, '18 Jan 13, '19