A Comparative Analysis: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Perspectives

This essay summarizes the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, who feared a strong central government and argued for states' rights, contrasting them with the Federalists, who believed a stronger central government was advantageous for stability and civil rights protection. The essay highlights Anti-Federalist objections to the Constitution, including concerns about the lack of a bill of rights and the potential for tyranny. It then outlines Federalist arguments in favor of a strong central government, emphasizing its ability to balance power, protect individual liberties, and ensure national security. Ultimately, the essay takes the position of the Federalist, advocating for a strong central government to address the instability and challenges facing the newly formed nation. Desklib provides access to a wealth of resources, including similar essays and solved assignments, to aid students in their studies.

Running head: ANCIENT HISTORY
ANCIENT HISTORY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1ANCIENT HISTORY
1. Summarize the concerns of the Anti-federalists.
Ans - As per the debates of the conventions of the several states towards the adoption of the
federal constitution, it has been stated that the anti federalist have some of the deepest
concern regarding the ongoing principles of the United States Constitutions. The Anti
federalist argued on the fact that the fate of the America does not depend on this since the
principles of the system prevailing are extremely impolitic, pernicious and dangerous
challenging the security of the liberty (Finkelman, 1984). The Anti Federalists furthermore
argues with the fact how the relinquishments of the trial by the jury and the terms of the
liberty of the press are not necessary for the terms of the liberty of the nation. As per the
statement by Richard Henry Lee towards his objection as an Anti Federalist to the
constitution on the year 1787, October 16, the federation were supposed to be a fundamental
Marxism and the various branches of the legislative systems needs to be unconnected
together with the separation of the executive and the legislative powers.
2. Summarize the reasons that the Federalists believed there were advantages to a stronger,
central government.
Ans - According to the Federalist, there have been certain advantages and good factors
regarding stronger central government in United States. A confederacy government adhere
the principles towards the alarming transitions targeting the association of the number of
independent states and the retention of individual sovereignty (Einhorn, 2002). Furthermore
the stronger and the central government, the security regarding the civil rights are same as the
religious rights and it furthermore consist of cases of multiplicity of the interests. The
stronger government is advantageous since it enables protection of the weak as well as
themselves with some of the more powerful factions. Furthermore stronger government are

2ANCIENT HISTORY
vigorous and are accused of imbecility towards the abandonment for the want of the energy.
They are strong with sufficient energy towards being compatible with the genius of the
republicanism. To summarize, the stronger and the central government are efficient as per the
federalist since they can rightly balance the different branches of the legislatures and the
separated executive powers.
3. Very briefly, take a side and explain why you favour one position over the other.
Ans -Within the numerous effective and advantages as promised by the newly developed
Union, none of them actually are developed accurately to prevent the tendency of the
breakage of the control of the violence of faction. The complaints heard from the citizens
regarding the public and the public liberty mirrors the instability of the government. Thus in
this context, I would take the position of the federalist for the introduction of the old system,
central and stronger government which is far more effective in the understanding and solving
of the issues and the problems faced by the citizens of the state. This will help in the
furnishing of proper checks and balances among the various departments. This will objectify
a clearer light and enable towards the formation of more correct judgements regarding the
principles and the structures as per the convention.

3ANCIENT HISTORY
Reference
Einhorn, R. L. (2002). Patrick Henry's case against the Constitution: The structural problem
with slavery. Journal of the Early Republic, 22(4), 549-573.
Finkelman, P. (1984). Complete Anti-Federalist.