Consolidation of Financial Statements for FinalHeadache Ltd.

This assignment focuses on the consolidation of FinalHeadache Ltd's financial statements with its subsidiary Solutions Ltd as of 30 June 2019. Students will apply AASB 10 standards to assess business combinations, considering both full and partial goodwill methods. The task involves preparing consolidated profit or loss and balance sheet statements, addressing intercompany transactions such as unrealized profits in inventories and dividends received. References include authoritative sources on accounting for business combinations and goodwill. This exercise aims to enhance understanding of financial consolidation processes and the application of relevant accounting standards.

Solution-1
Part (a)
Case - MC has a 25 per cent interest in the share capital of LBX Pty Limited (LBX), which is a company involved
in the same industry as MC. The remaining 75 per cent of the share capital is owned by LBX's founders, Mr and Mrs
T. Mr and Mrs T are unfamiliar with the industry and so have given MC three seats out of the five seats available on
the board of directors. MC takes all the lead on all decisions, but the business is closely monitored by Mr and Mrs T,
who hold the other two board positions.
Analysis –Control can be acquired by two means, one by holding more than 50% of share capital or another by
situations which shows that the company has the power and ability to control and lead the investee company’s
decisions. If any one of the two criteria is met, then it is said that the investor company holds the investee company.
In the current situation, the MC Ltd. has the power to control and lead the decisions by virtue of having 3 out of 5
seats in board of directors, in spite of the fact that MC Ltd. holds just 25% of share capital.
The relevant extract of para 10 of AASB 10, “Consolidation Financial Statements”, which supports above statement,
is as below:
“10. An investor has power over an investee when the investor has existing rights that give it the current ability to
direct the relevant activities, i.e. the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns.”
Further, as per the accounting standard if the power to control and lead the decisions lies with the company then it is
said to be Parent company and consolidation of financials is required. The relevant extract of para 20 is as below:
“20 Consolidation of an investee shall begin from the date the investor obtains control of the investee and cease
when the investor loses control of the investee.”
Part (b)
Case - MC has a substantial loan receivable from BBT Pty Ltd (BBT). BBT, as a result of the current economic
climate, has experienced significant trading problems. BBT has failed to make its regular payments under the loan
with the management of BBT that MC executives will take control of the company's finances for a period of five
years. An executive of MC has been given control of BBT's cheque book and makes all payments. MC has not
gained any seats on BBT's board of directors, which is still dominated by BBT shareholders.
Analysis – The control does not only arise from shareholding or having more seats in board of directors, it also
arises from the direction and controlling of relevant activities that affects the company’s business. In the given
situation, since the MC executives have control on the company’s finance, it is said that the company BBT is under
the control of MC as the MC has all rights and controls over the payments and cheques and other business finance
activities for a significant time period i.e. 5 years, so it is a good evidence which reflects that the power of
controlling is with MC. The relevant extract of para 12 of AASB 10 is reproduced below:
“12 An investor with the current ability to direct the relevant activities has power even if its rights to direct have yet
to be exercised. Evidence that the investor has been directing relevant activities can help determine whether the
investor has power, but such evidence is not, in itself, conclusive in determining whether the investor has power over
an investee.”
Since, the control is with MC, the MC needs to consolidate the financials of BBT as per para 20 of AASB 10.

Part (c)
Case - MC owns 50 per cent of Chatime Tea Ltd (CTL), with the other 50 per cent being owned by Boost Juice Ltd
(BJL). Both companies have equal voting rights and an equal share of seats on the board of directors. Under the
agreement with BJL, MC supplies the finance to the company on normal commercial terms. The loan is fully
secured against the assets of the company. BJL provides the management and entrepreneurial flair to CTL. under the
agreement forged, BJL will receive a management fee in respect of the net profits of CTL after allowing for interest
payments on the MC loan. In times of no profits, the interest payments will still be met, but BJL will not receive any
remuneration.
Analysis – For consolidation of financials, the control should be established. So, determining control is of utmost
priority. In the given situation, the 50% shareholding is with MC and another 50% is with BJL. Since, both holds the
equal % of shares then nobody is said to have control over CTL as for any decision making consent of both the
companies is required. But in additional to that, the company BJL has an agreement with CTL for providing
management and entrepreneurial flair and the compensation will be based on the net profits earned. Since, BJL has
the ability to control the managerial activities due to this agreement and its activities directly affect the profits of the
investee i.e. CTL, it is concluded that the power of controlling lies with BJL and not with MC. The para 13 of
AASB 10 supports the above view.
“13 If two or more investors each have existing rights that give them the unilateral ability to direct different
relevant activities, the investor that has the current ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the
returns of the investee has power over the investee.”
So, the MC does not consolidate the financials of CTL as it has no control over the company.
Part (d)
Case - MC, Coffee Club Ltd (CCL) and Gloria Jeans Ltd (GJL) are each 33.33 per cent shareholders of PGH Pty
Ltd, a small proprietary company that is involved in the music industry. CCL and GJL are passive shareholders with
the one board seat each out of a total of three. MC has one board seat and is also involved in the day-to-day running
of the business.
Analysis – In the given situation, all the three shareholders have equal % of shareholding, further they have equal
rights and power with respect to seats held in the board of directors. So, all the shareholders are on the same footing
and do not have any special power. Just merely by the fact that MC is involved in the day to day business of the
company and other two shareholders are passive shareholders, does not give MC the power to control the company,
i.e. PGH. As for establishing control both rights and ability should be established. In the given situation, only ability
to control is there and right to control is absent.
So, it is concluded that the MC has no control over PGH and hence no need to consolidate the financials.
Part (e)
Case - MC hold a 75 per cent interest in JB Wifi Pty Ltd. The interest was created when MC converted a substantial
loan it made to JB Wifi into equity at the invitation of JB Wifi when JB Wifi began to trade poorly and recovery of

the loan seemed uncertain. JB Wifi has a large deficiency in net assets and has been consolidated for many years.
MC is a passive investor, having no seats on the board of directors and no say in the financing or operating decisions
of JB Wifi.
Analysis – Power and rights go hand in hand. When an investor holds significant shareholding, i.e. more than 50%
then it is said that the investor has power to control the investee. As in the major decisions, the investor’s decision
will prevail due to large % of shareholding. In the given situation, the MC holds 75% of shares of JB Wifi and due
to this shareholding the MC has right to take conclusive decision of every transactions irrespective of the fact that he
is involved in the business of JB or not. The para 11 of AASB 10, also states that,
“11 Power arises from rights. Sometimes assessing power is straightforward, such as when power over an investee
is obtained directly and solely from the voting rights granted by equity instruments such as shares, and can be
assessed by considering the voting rights from those shareholdings. In other cases, the assessment will be more
complex and require more than one factor to be considered, for example when power results from one or more
contractual arrangements.”

Solution-2
Acquisition Analysis as on 30 June, 2018
Net fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities of TakeItEasy Ltd.
Share capital 500,000
Retained earnings 200,000
Fair Value
Property, Plant & Equipment ((530000-430000)*(1-30%)) 70,000
Net fair value 770,000
Net consideration paid 900,000
Goodwill 130,000
Consolidation Worksheet entries
1 Pre - Acquisition Entry as on 30 June, 2018
Share capital Dr 500,000
Retained earnings Dr 200,000
Business combination valuation reserve Dr 70,000
Goodwill Dr 130,000
To Shares in TakeItEasy Ltd. Cr (900,000)
(To record acquisition analysis)
2 Business Combination Valuation Entries as on 30 June, 2019
(a) Accumulated Depreciation - Property, Plant & Equipment Dr 270,000
To Property, Plant & Equipment Cr (170,000)
To Deferred tax liability Cr (30,000)
To Business combination valuation reserve Cr (70,000)
(To record fair valuation of equipment)
(b) Depreciation exp - Property, Plant & Equipment (100,000/10) Dr 10,000
To Accumulated Depreciation - Property, Plant & Equipment Cr (10,000)
(To record depreciation on fair valued amount of equipment)
(c) Deferred tax liability Dr 3,000
To Income tax expense Cr (3,000)
(To record tax expense on above depreciation)
(d) Impairment Loss - Goodwill Dr 70,000
To Accumulated Impairment Loss - Goodwill Cr (70,000)
(To record impairment of goodwill)
(e) Dividend Received Dr 40,000
To Retained earnings (30/06/18) Cr (40,000)
(Elimination of interim dividend)

Consolidation Worksheet as on 30 June, 2019
Particulars Challenge
Me Pty Ltd
TakeItEasy
Ltd Total Adjustments and Eliminations Consolidat
ed
amountsAssets $ $ Ref. Dr Cr Ref.
Cash 80,000 40,000 120,000 120,000
Accounts receivable 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000
Inventory 140,000 123,000 263,000 263,000
Land 600,000 400,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
Property, Plant & Equipment 900,000 700,000 1,600,000 170,000 2(a) 1,430,000
Accumulated depreciation (300,000) (313,000) (613,000) 2(a) 270,000 10,000 2(b) (353,000)
Goodwill 1 130,000 130,000
Accumulated Impairment Loss -
Goodwill 70,000 (70,000)
Investment in TakeItEasy Ltd. 900,000 - 900,000 900,000 1 -
Total Non-current assets 2,370,000 1,000,000 3,370,000 400,000 1,150,000 2,620,000
Liabilities
Accounts Payable 100,000 10,000 110,000 110,000
Dividend Payable 100,000 50,000 150,000 150,000
Loan 670,000 140,000 810,000 810,000
Deferred Tax Liability 2(c) 3,000 30,000 2(a) 27,000
Shareholder's Equity
Share Capital 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000 1 500,000 1,000,000
Retained Earnings 500,000 300,000 800,000 523,000
Business combination valuation
reserve 1 70,000 70,000 2(a) -
Total shareholder's equity 2,370,000 1,000,000 573,000 100,000 2,620,000
Reconciliation of opening and
closing retained earnings
Profit after tax 400,000 190,000
590,000
2(b)
2(d)
2(e) 120,000 3,000
2(c) 473,000
Retained earnings - 30 June, 2018 300,000 200,000 500,000 1 200,000 300,000
Interim Dividend (90,000) (40,000) (130,000) 2(e) 40,000 (90,000)
Final Dividend (110,000) (50,000) (160,000) (160,000)
Retained earnings - 30 June, 2019 500,000 300,000 800,000 360,000 3,000 523,000

ChallengeMe Pty Ltd
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
For the year ended on 30 June, 2019
(Amount in $)
Particulars As at
30 June, 2019
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 120,000
Trade and other receivables 100,000
Inventories 263,000
Total current assets 483,000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
- Land 1,000,000 1,000,000
- Property, plant and equipment 1,430,000
- Accumulated depreciation - Property, plant and
equipment
(353,000) 1,077,000
Intangible assets
- Goodwill 130,000
- Accumulated impairment loss (70,000) 60,000
Total non-current assets 2,137,000
Total assets - (a) 2,620,000
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 110,000
Dividend payable 150,000
Total current liabilities 260,000
Non-current liabilities
Loan 810,000
Deferred tax liability 27,000
Total non-current liabilities 837,000
Total liabilities - (b) 1,097,000
Net assets (a-b) 1,523,000
Equity
Share capital 1,000,000
Retained earnings 523,000 1,523,000
Total equity 1,523,000

Solution-3
Deferred Tax Worksheet
Particulars Carrying
Amount Tax Base
Taxable
Temporary
Difference
Deductible
Temporary
Difference
Assets
Cash 20,000 20,000
Inventory 100,000 100,000
Accounts Receivable 100,000 - 100,000
Prepaid Insurance 10,000 - 10,000
Plant (net of dep) 320,000 300,000 20,000
Total assets 550,000 420,000
Liabilities
Accounts Payable 80,000 80,000
Provision for Warranty Expense 20,000 - 20,000
Loan Payable 200,000 200,000
Provision for long service expense 20,000 - 20,000
Total Liabilities 320,000 280,000
Total Temporary Difference 30,000 140,000
DTL @ 30% 9,000
DTA @ 30% 42,000
Journal Entries
Account Titles Debit Credit
Income tax expense (refer WN-1) 96,000
To Income Tax Payable 96,000
(To record income tax payable)
Deferred tax asset 42,000
To Income tax expense 42,000
(To record deferred tax asset)
Income tax expense 9,000
To Deferred tax liability 9,000
(To record deferred tax liability)
Deferred tax liability 9,000
To Deferred tax asset 9,000
(To record set off liability as per para 74
of AASB 112)
Working Note-1

Calculation of taxable income for the year ended 30 June, 2017
Particulars Amount ($)
Profit before tax 300,000
Add:
Depreciation as per accounting 80,000
Provision for long service leave 20,000
Provision for warranty expense 30,000 130,000
Less:
Depreciation as per Tax 100,000
Warranty expense paid 10,000 110,000
Taxable income 320,000
Tax @ 30% 96,000

Solution-4
Part (a)
Amount that will be shown in the consolidated statement of financial position for goodwill is $4,285,714 calculated
as below.
Calculation of Goodwill Acquired assuming that any non-controlling interest in the acquirer is measured at
fair value
Consideration Paid by Parent company 10,000,000
Equivalent Share of NCI 4,285,714
14,285,714
Less: Fair value of net assets
Share capital 8,000,000
Retained Earnings 2,000,000 10,000,000
Goodwill 4,285,714
Part (b)
Amount that will be shown in the consolidated statement of financial position for goodwill is $3,000,000 calculated
as below.
Calculation of Goodwill Acquired assuming that any non-controlling interest in the acquirer is measured at
the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets
Share capital 8,000,000
Retained Earnings 2,000,000
Net fair value of assets 10,000,000
% of shareholding acquired 70%

Net fair value of assets acquired 7,000,000
Consideration Paid 10,000,000
Goodwill 3,000,000
Part (c)
The AASB 3 allows the company’s to use either of the two methods for recognizing goodwill on consolidation.
These are:
a) Full Goodwill method i.e. measuring the goodwill assuming that any non-controlling interest in the
acquirer is measured at fair value
b) Partial Goodwill method i.e. measuring the goodwill assuming that any non-controlling interest in the
acquirer is measured at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net
assets.
Although the standard gives the above two options but this leads in non-comparability of financials amongst
companies as these methods lead to complete change in accounting of acquisition. Due to non-comparability the
purpose of financial reporting standards to keep the financial statements of all the company comparable got failed
and further it leads to chaos and non- understandability amongst the investors who are layman and does not
understand the technicalities as the goodwill amount changes totally in the two method.
Further, under full goodwill method, the assets and equity remains on a higher side as compare to partial goodwill
method. Thus, the leverage is lower in full goodwill method as compared to partial goodwill method and return on
equity also remains lower in full goodwill method, due to higher equity as compare to partial goodwill method.

Solution-5
Acquisition Analysis as on 1 July, 2014
Net fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities of Solutions Ltd.
Share capital 200,000
Retained earnings 180,000
Net fair value of assets acquired 380,000
Net consideration paid 356,000
Gain from bargain purchase 24,000
Consolidation Worksheet entries
1 Pre - Acquisition Elimination Entry as on 1 July, 2014
Share capital Dr 200,000
Retained earnings Dr 180,000
To Gain from bargain purchase Cr (24,000)
To Shares in Solutions Ltd. Cr (356,000)
(To record acquisition analysis)
2 Intercompany eliminating entries
(a) Retained earnings (30/6/18) Dr 7,000
Income Tax expense Dr 3,000
To Cost of goods sold Cr (10,000)
(To record elimination of profit from opening inventory)
(b
) Sales Dr 33,000
To Cost of goods sold Cr (28,000)
To Inventory Cr (5,000)
(To record elimination of profit from closing inventory)
(c) Deferred tax asset (5,000*30%) Dr 1,500
To Income tax expense Cr (1,500)
(To record tax impact on above elimination)
(d
) Sales Dr 12,000
To Cost of goods sold Cr (10,000)
To Inventory Cr (2,000)
(To record elimination of profit from closing inventory)
(e) Deferred tax asset (2,000*30%) Dr 600
To Income tax expense Cr (600)
(To record tax impact on above elimination)
(f) Gain on sale of Plant (116,000-81,000) Dr 35,000

Plant Cr (35,000)
(To record elimination of gain on sale of plant)
(g
) Deferred tax asset (35,000*30%) Dr 10,500
To Income tax expense Cr (10,500)
(To record tax impact on above elimination)
(h
) Accumulated Depreciation - Plant (35,000/6) Dr 5,833
To Depreciation expense Cr (5,833)
(To record elimination of depreciation on excess amount)
(i) Management fee revenue Dr 26,500
To Management fee expenses Cr (26,500)
(To eliminate the management fee incomes and expenses)
(j) Dividends received from Solutions Ltd Dr 93,000
To Dividend Paid Cr (93,000)
(To record inter-company elimination of dividend)

Consolidated worksheet for FinalHeadache Ltd and its controlled entity for the period ending 30 June 2019
Reconciliation of opening and closing retained earnings
Particulars
FinalHeadache
Ltd
Solutions
Ltd Total Eliminations and adjustments Consolidate
d Amount
$ $ Ref. Dr Cr Ref.
Sales revenue 671,400 540,000 1,211,400 2(b),
2(d) 45,000 1,166,400
Cost of goods sold (464,000) (238,000) (702,000) 48,000
2(a),
2(b),
2(d)
(654,000)
Gross Profit 207,400 302,000 509,400 512,400
Dividends received from Solutions
Ltd 93,000 - 93,000 2(j) 93,000 -
Management fee revenue 26,500 - 26,500 2(i) 26,500 -
Gain on sale of plant 40,000 35,000 75,000 2(f) 35,000 40,000
Expenses
Administrative expenses (30,800) (38,700) (69,500) (69,500)
Depreciation (29,500) (56,800) (86,300) 5,833 2(h) (80,467)
Management fee expense - (26,500) (26,500) 26,500 2(i) -
Other expenses (101,100) (72,000) (173,100) (173,100)
Profit before tax 205,500 143,000 348,500 229,333
Tax expense (61,500) (42,200) (103,700) 2(a) 3,000 12,600
2(c),
2(e),
2(g)
(94,100)
Profit for the year 144,000 100,800 244,800 135,233
Retained earning -- 30 June 2018 319,400 239,200 558,600 1,
2(a)
187,00
0 371,600
463,400 340,000 803,400 506,833
Dividends paid (137,400) (93,000) (230,400) 93,000 2(j) (137,400)
Retained earnings at 30 June
2019 326,000 247,000 573,000 369,433
Statements of financial position
Particulars
FinalHeadache
Ltd
Solutions
Ltd Total Eliminations and adjustments Consolidated
Amount
$ $ Ref. Dr Cr Ref.
Shareholders' equity
Retained earnings 326,000 247,000 573,000 369,433
Share capital 350,000 200,000 550,000 1 200,00
0 350,000
Gain from bargain purchase - 24,000 1 24,000
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 54,700 46,300 101,000 101,000
Tax Payable 41,300 25,000 66,300 66,300

Non-Current Liabilities
Loans 173,500 116,000 289,500 289,500
Total Equity and Liabilities 945,500 634,300 1,579,800 1,200,233
Current Assets
Accounts Receivable 59,400 62,300 121,700 121,700
Inventory 92,000 29,000 121,000 7,000 2(b),
2(d) 114,000
Non-Current Assets
Land & Buildings 224,000 326,000 550,000 550,000
Plant at cost 299,850 355,800 655,650 35,000 2(f) 620,650
Accumulated depreciation - plant (85,750) (138,800) (224,550) 2(h) 5,833 (218,717)
Investment in Solutions Ltd 356,000 - 356,000 356,000 1 -
Deferred tax asset
2(c),
2(e),
2(g) 12,600
12,600
945,500 634,300 1,579,800 1,200,233

FinalHeadache Ltd
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss Account
For the year ended on 30 June, 2019
Particulars Amount ($)
Sales revenue 1,166,400
Less: Cost of goods sold (654,000)
Gross Profit 512,400
Add: Other Income
Gain on sale of plant 40,000
Less: Expenses
Administrative expenses (69,500)
Depreciation (80,467)
Other expenses (173,100) (323,067)
Net Profit 229,333
Less: Tax expense (94,100)
Profit for the year 135,233

FinalHeadache Ltd
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As on 30 June, 2019
(Amount in $)
Particulars As at
30 June, 2019
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 121,700
Inventories 114,000
Total current assets 235,700
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
- Land & Buildings 550,000 550,000
- Plant 620,650
- Accumulated depreciation - Plant (218,717) 401,933
Deferred tax assets 12,600
Total non-current assets 964,533
Total assets - (a) 1,200,233
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 101,000
Tax Payable 66,300
Total current liabilities 167,300
Non-current liabilities
Loan 289,500
Total non-current liabilities 289,500
Total liabilities - (b) 456,800
Net assets (a-b) 743,433
Equity
Share capital 350,000
Gain from bargain purchase 24,000
Retained earnings 369,433 743,433
Total equity 743,433

References:
1. Anon, (2017). [online] Available at:
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/AASB10_08-11.pdf [Accessed 28 Sep. 2017].
2. Accountingexplained.com. (2017). Full Goodwill Method | Business Combinations. [online]
Available at: http://accountingexplained.com/financial/business-combinations/full-goodwill-
method [Accessed 28 Sep. 2017].
3. Accountingexplained.com. (2017). Partial Goodwill Method | Business Combinations. [online]
Available at: http://accountingexplained.com/financial/business-combinations/partial-goodwill-
method [Accessed 28 Sep. 2017].
4. Pellarini, P. (2017). Method of Accounting | Commercial Associates | CAAA. [online]
Commercial Associates. Available at: https://www.caaa.biz/choose-method-accounting-goodwill-
combination/ [Accessed 28 Sep. 2017].
5. In, L. and CAT, F. (2017). full goodwill or partial goodwill method. [online] Opentuition.com.
Available at: http://opentuition.com/topic/full-goodwill-or-partial-goodwill-method/ [Accessed
28 Sep. 2017].