Analysis of Financial Accounting for Saracen Mineral: A Report

This report presents an evaluation of the accounting concepts, measurement issues, and qualitative criteria of financial reporting, using Saracen Mineral, an ASX-listed entity, as a case study. It demonstrates the company's adherence to standard accounting concepts, including going concern, busines...Read More

Advanced Financial Accounting
1

Executive Summary
This report has presented an evaluation of the accounting concepts, measurement issues
and understanding of qualitative criteria of financial reporting provided by the conceptual
framework. This has been done by providing examples from a selected ASX listed entity, that is,
Saracen Mineral. It has been illustrated that the company has prepared the financial reports as per
the standard accounting concepts. Also, it has adopted a missed model of accounting for
resolving the measurement issue and also tried to attain congruence between relevance and
representational faithfulness of financial information.
2

Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................4
Part 1: Accounting concepts description.........................................................................................4
Part 2: Measurement Issue as per the Conceptual Framework of Accounting Discussed in
Context of Selected Company.........................................................................................................6
Part 3: Understanding of Relevance and Representational Faithfulness Qualitative Characteristics
of Conceptual Accounting Framework in Context of Selected Company......................................8
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................10
References......................................................................................................................................11
3

Introduction
The business entities across the world are required to develop their financial reports in a
manner to provide useful information to the end-users and thus meeting the varying needs of the
different stakeholder groups. As such, there has been the emergence of various contemporary
issues in accounting related to improving the quality of financial reporting systems. In this
context, this report has emphasized on the need for business entities to comply with accounting
concepts and conceptual accounting framework qualitative principles for enhancing the integrity
in their financial reports. The overall analysis has been carried out in context of a selected ASX
listed entity, that is, Saracen Mineral, an ASX listed company involved in exploration and
production of gold.
Part 1: Accounting concepts description
Methods of accounting and techniques of valuation of accounts are present in different forms. To
make the data comparable it is significant for the accountant to record the accounting
transactions with some consistency and uniformity. For maintaining uniformity and consistency,
certain principles and rules are developed by the international bodies of accounting which are
considered as accounting concepts. Basic assumptions for accounting and the guiding principles
for developing financial statements are provided by the accounting concepts (Wolk, Dodd and
Rozycki, 2016). Some significant concepts of accounting which are compulsory for the company
to follow while financial reporting are discussed below:
Going concern concept
As per this concept, the company will continue to exist for an indefinite period of time
and its liquidation can only take place if in case there is an extreme requirement to do so. Based
on this concept, the assets and liabilities values of a company are calculated. One such example
is the charging the value of plant and machinery on depreciated amount instead of treating it as
an expense in the first year (Wahlen, Baginski and Bradshaw, 2017). For example, Saracen
Mineral has depicted in its financial report that it measures the subsequent costs related with its
fixed assets in the carrying amount on the basis of probability of realizing future economic
4

benefits. Also, deprecation is charged by the use of straight-line method on the useful lives of
assets measuring that is not charged in a single reporting period but will be incurred in the future
financial periods.
Business entity concept
According to this concept, the company and its owner are two separate entities and
therefore the business and personal transactions shall be treated separately. As such, the financial
report of Saracen Mineral has represented share capital in equity section of the balance sheet
which represents that both owners and entity are treated as separately by the company(Saracen
Mineral: Annual Report, 2018).
Accounting period concept
This concept signifies that accounting transactions for a specific time period are
considered for evaluation of company’s financial performance. Also, the accounting transactions
which do not have any relation with the specific time shall be adjusted by using adjusting entries
and should not be mentioned in the balance sheet for any reference in future. Through this
concept, the company’s actual performance or a specific period of time can be evaluated as well
as the tax for specified period can also be ascertained. As such, the company has reported the
transactions such as prepaid expenses, unrealized income and other items within the balance
sheet and not in the income statement (Sadowska, 2016).
Money measurement concept
According to this concept of accounting, it is compulsory on all companies to record only
monetary transactions and in the form of currency of the nation only. For instance, if a company
is established in USA then the transaction shall be recorded in the US dollar only. Saracen
Mineral has recorded the business transactions in Australian dollar only.
Accounting cost concept
Under this concept, the assets of the company shall be recorded at cost instead of market
value. For instance, the purchase price of plant and machinery shall only include transportation,
acquisition, and cost of installation. The market value of property and equipment and plant
5

cannot be recorded by the company in the balance sheet (Needles, Powers and Crosson, 2013).
As such, Saracen Mineral has recorded its buildings, plant and machinery on the cost basis with
the deduction of deprecation or amortization.
Realization concept
As per this concept, the company, Saracen Mineral, has recorded revenue in the books of
accounts post its realization instead of recording it at the time of transaction(Saracen Mineral:
Annual Report, 2018). The legal right for receiving the money is known as realization. For
instance, the goods sold are money realization but the receiving the orders cannot be considered
as realization.
Dual aspect concept
This can be known as complete process of accounting. As per this concept, two accounts
shall be impacted when a transaction takes place. This means that for every transaction, entries
shall be made in two different accounts (Wahlen, Baginski and Bradshaw, 2017). One account
will be debited and other will be credited. This concept is applied by Saracen Mineral in
recording of all its financial transactions including those for income, assets, expenses, liabilities
or any other account(Saracen Mineral: Annual Report, 2018).
Accrual concept
As per the concept, Saracen Mineral has accrued all the expenses and revenues which do
not have any significance in the current period and are outstanding in the current time period.
This concept is helpful in maintaining balance in the accounting books and also aid in recording
the financial transactions that have significance only for the current financial period (Mirza and
Knorr, 2011).
Part 2: Measurement Issue as per the Conceptual Framework of
Accounting Discussed in Context of Selected Company
The measurement method used in financial reporting have a large impact on the type of
financial information disclosed within the financial statements that is made available to the end-
users. The conceptual accounting framework has generally provided two major methods to be
6

sued during measurement of financial items such as assets and liabilities. These are historical
cost and fair value basis that has been provided by the accounting framework to be used for
identification, recognition and measuring of monetary values of different financial items
(International Accounting Standards Board, 2016). The decision taken by the preparers of
accounting statements regarding the measurement approach is dependent on the perceived costs
and benefits of different measurement bases. The use of mixed measurement approach for
measuring the value of different financial items has resulted in causing the problem related to
lack of consistency within the financial reports. This is because certain items are measured at fair
values and others at historical cost which can result in making the financial information less
comparable over the subsequent years (ICAEW, 2016). Also, the financial information lacks
comparability in case of competitors due to difference in measurement basis selected by them.
Thus, it can be said that selection of an adequate method of measurement to be used in
developing the financial reports is a key issue for business entities. The business entities tend to
differ from each other on basis of type of industry, ownership and governance structure. This
result in causing variability among the measurement approaches selected by different business
entities for financial reporting and makes the information less comparable (IFRS, 2017).
The measurement methods used in financial reporting as provided by the conceptual
accounting framework are associated with different strengths and limitations. The selection of
measurement approach is dependent on the legitimacy theory of accounting which has stated that
businesses need to disclose financial information in a regular manner for ensuring relevance and
reliability of the resulting measurements (Yip and Young, 2012). This is required to ensure that
businesses provide legitimate information to the end-users that is both relevance for some
purpose and reliable in other situations. This leads to improving legitimacy in the financial
reporting and thus protecting the interests of the end-users. The current measurement practices
provided by the conceptual framework are rather complex, diverse and inconsistent. As such,
there is increasing need for development of a single set of accounting standards to be used for
measurement during financial reporting to overcome the issue of inconsistency and uniformity in
reporting the value of different financial assets and liabilities (Anwer, Neel and Wang, 2013).
The accountants are gradually shifting from the use of traditional basis of measurement used,
that is, historical cost, towards the adoption of fair value measure of accounting. This is mainly
due to the limitations of historical cost basis for depicting actual profits or expenses incurred by
7

an entity over a selected time-period (Riedl, 2010). The method is not appropriate for providing
relevant information to the end-users as it is mainly based on measuring and interpreting the past
financial information. As such, the method fails to provide a depiction of the future cash flow
position of an entity and therefore not very useful for the end-users (Yuan and Brown, 2014).
This is causing the shift towards the use of fair value method of accounting which
provides a depiction of the actual value of assets and liabilities as per the active market. It
provides relevant information to the users that are able to provide an estimation of the future
financial performance of an entity on the basis of current market price of assets and liabilities.
However, the method of fair value of accounting is also associated with significant limitations as
has been illustrated during the occurrence of global financial crisis (Taplin, 2011). The method
of fair value accounting fails to depict the actual value of assets and liabilities during the
conditions of market volatility. The fluctuations in the market conditions can result in
manipulating the fair value of assets and liabilities and therefore inaccurate depiction of the
financial position of an entity that has resulted in causing the occurrence of global breakdown of
financial system during the time of financial crisis. Therefore, this has resulted in causing the
need for development of a unified system of measurement that records the value of assets and
liabilities in both reliable and relevant manner (Kythreotis, 2014).
At present, the developers are integrating the use of mixed model of accounting that is
integrating the use of historical method for financial items whose active market is not present
and fair value for the financial items that have the presence of active market. This is necessary
for maintaining reliability and relevancy in the financial reports. The same can be illustrated
from the financial reports of the selected company that is Saracen Mineral. The company has
accounted fixed assets such as building, plant and equipment at the historical cost which includes
expenses that are incurred during the acquisition of financial items. This is largely due to
inability to determine their fair value in the absence of their market. On the other hand, the
significant financial items such as ordinary share capital, financial assets and liabilities. The
items of income statement such as expenses and gains are realized at fair value less costs of
selling an asset (Saracen Mineral: Annual Report, 2018). The fair value system of measurement
has been applied as per the AASB 13 accounting standard for reporting the financial assets and
liabilities value as depicted below:
8

(Source: Saracen Mineral: Annual Report, 2018)
Part 3: Understanding of Relevance and Representational Faithfulness
Qualitative Characteristics of Conceptual Accounting Framework in
Context of Selected Company
The most fundamental qualitative concepts provided by the accounting framework of
IASB are relevancy and representational faithfulness. These two qualitative criteria need to be
integrated within the financial reports for achieving quality financial information that can assist
the decision-making of end-users such as investors. The relevancy qualitative criteria provided
by the framework have stated that it should be able to influence the economic decisions of the
users by evaluation of the past, present and future events. Therefore, the information needs to
have both predictive and confirmatory roles to be useful in decision-making (Bandyopadhyay,
Chen Huang and Jha, 2010). For example, the information about revenue and dividends can
provide an assessment of its future financial performance whereas information about fixed assets
that is based on past evaluation can provide confirmatory value. The second qualitative criteria
of the framework are faithful representation which has stated that the information needs to be
true and fair in all aspects to meet the end-users interests and expectations. This has caused the
need for financial information to be complete, neutral and materially correct in all aspects (Zeff,
2009).
It is highly important for the management of a company to balance the merits of
relevancy and faithful presentation in depiction of the financial information. There is a trade-off
9

between the two qualitative criteria’s provided by the conceptual framework that requires that
information should be reliable in some aspects and relevant in others. This is because increasing
reliability of information can result in undermining its relevancy and vice-versa (Anwer, Neel
and Wang, 2013). For example, the use of fair value method of accounting can result in making
financial information to be more relevant whereas historical method of accounting will make it
more reliable. Therefore, it is necessary to achieve a trade-off between the qualitative
characteristics for meeting the objective of financial statement preparation. The importance of
one concept over another cannot be stated as both are important in ensuring that the needs and
expectations of different users are adequately met. The accountants are therefore integrating the
use of mixed method approach that ensures the presence of both relevance and faithful
presentation within the financial information (Horton and Serafeim, 2010).
The fact can also be depicted from the financial statements of the selected company of
Saracen Mineral. The company has placed an emphasis on achieving a trade-off between the
relevance and representational faithfulness criteria of the framework. The income statement has
stated the monetary value of gains and expenses incurred that are measured at fair value to
providing relevant financial information to the users. These financial items are helpful in
predicting the future financial performance and also are able to confirm its past evaluations as
depicted below:
10

On the other hand, it has also provided complete, neutral and materially correct financial
information to meet the faithfulness criteria of qualitative accounting framework. The fixed
assets are measured at historical cost to ensure that information is reliable as the monetary value
obtained is not likely to change as per the market conditions as it is based on the historical cost
(Saracen Mineral: Annual Report, 2018). The items presented in the balance sheet are mainly
prepared for ensuring the faithful presentation of financial information as depicted below:
(Source: Saracen Mineral: Annual Report, 2018)
Conclusion
It can be stated from the overall analysis that accounting concepts and qualitative
principles of conceptual accounting framework are required to be followed by business entities
for meeting the objective of financial reports preparation. Their adequate adoption by a reporting
entity measures that the financial information provided meets the interests and expectations of
the users. It leads in improving the accountability and integrity in financial reports for the
investors and thus supports the sustainable growth and development of a reporting entity.
11

References
Anwer S. A., Neel, M. and Wang, D. 2013. Does Mandatory Adoption of IFRS improve
Accounting Quality? Preliminary Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 30 (4), pp.
1344–1372.
Bandyopadhyay, S., Chen, C., Huang, A. and Jha, R. 2010. Accounting Conservatism and the
Temporal Trends in Current Earnings’ Ability to Predict Future Cash Flows Versus Future
Earnings: Evidence on the Trade-Off Between Relevance and Reliability. Contemporary
Accounting Research, 27 (2), pp. 413-460.
Horton, J. and Serafeim, G. 2010. Market Reaction to and Valuation of IFRS Reconciliation
Adjustments: First Evidence from the UK. Review of Accounting Studies 15 (4), pp. 725-751.
ICAEW. 2016. Measurement in financial reporting. [Online]. Available at:
https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/financial-reporting/information-for-
better-markets/ifbm-reports/measurement-in-financial-reporting.ashx [Accessed on: 31 May
2018].
IFRS. 2017. Measurement uncertainty and the fundamental qualitative characteristics of useful
financial information. [Online]. Available at:
https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/meetings/2017/september/iasb/cf/ap10-conceptual-
framework.pdf[Accessed on: 31 May 2019].
International Accounting Standards Board. 2016. Measurement Bases for Financial Accounting.
[Online]. Available at: https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites
%2Fwebpublishing%2FProject%20Documents%2F53%2FDP%20Measurement%20on
%20Initial%20Recognition.pdf [Accessed on: 31 May 2018].
Kythreotis, A. 2014. Measurement Of Financial Reporting Quality Based On IFRS Conceptual
Framework’s Fundamental Qualitative Characteristics. European Journal of Accounting,
Finance & Business, 2(3), pp. 4-29.
12

Mirza, A. and Knorr, L. 2011. Wiley IFRS: Practical Implementation Guide and Workbook.
USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Needles, B.E., Powers, M. and Crosson, S.V. 2013. Principles of Accounting. UK: Cengage
Learning.
Riedl, E. 2010. Discussion of “Accounting Conservatism and the Temporal Trends in Current
Earnings' Ability to Predict Future Cash Flows versus Future Earnings: Evidence on the Trade-
off between Relevance and Reliability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(2), pp.461-467.
Sadowska, B. 2016. Measuring and valuation in accounting – theoretical basis and contemporary
dilemmas. World Scientific News 56, pp. 247-256.
Saracen Mineral. 2018. Annual Report. [Online]. Available at:
https://www.saracen.com.au/files/9715/3610/7606/SAR_AR2018_FULL_FINAL.pdf [Accessed
on: 31 May 2019].
Taplin, R. H. 2011. The Measurement of Comparability in Accounting Research. Abacus, 47(3),
pp. 383-409.
Wahlen, J., Baginski, S. and Bradshaw, M. 2017. Financial Reporting, Financial Statement
Analysis and Valuation. USA: Cengage Learning.
Wolk, H., Dodd, J.L. and Rozycki, J. 2016. Accounting Theory: Conceptual Issues in a Political
and Economic Environment. USA: SAGE Publications.
Yip, R. W. Y., and Young, D. 2012. Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information
Comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), pp.1767-1789.
Yuan, W., and Brown, A. 2014. The use of fair value and historical cost accounting for
investment properties in China. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 8(1),
pp. 101- 113.
Zeff, A. S. 2009. Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at
a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review, 39, pp.290-302.
13

14