LSBF Accounting and Managerial Finance: ASOS Financial Analysis Report
VerifiedAdded on 2022/08/12
|21
|5275
|12
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a comprehensive financial analysis of ASOS Plc, examining its financial health through various ratio analyses, including liquidity, profitability, activity, debt, and market value ratios. The report compares ASOS's performance with its competitor, Marks and Spencer, to assess its financial standing. The analysis delves into key financial aspects, such as working capital management, and the impact of market changes on ASOS's share price. The study evaluates ASOS's performance from 2017 to 2019, providing insights into its financial trends and strategic decision-making. The report also includes an evaluation of ASOS's new project, using different valuation methods to determine the most effective approach for assessing its value. The conclusion summarizes the financial condition and strategic recommendations for ASOS Plc.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.

Running Head: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Name of Student
Name of the University
Author notes
Word count
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Name of Student
Name of the University
Author notes
Word count
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

1FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Executive summary
The purpose of the study is to examine the financial condition of ASOS Plc through ratio
analysis. The liquidity, profitability, activity, debt and market value ratios are analysed to
find out the financial condition of ASOS compared to their competitor Mark and Spencer.
The interpretation of these ratios is analysed to estimate the financial situation of the firm.
ASOS Plc is in better financial condition than their competitor. The new project of ASOS Plc
is evaluated by using three methods. APV method is the most useful method amongst them
for valuation of their new project.
Executive summary
The purpose of the study is to examine the financial condition of ASOS Plc through ratio
analysis. The liquidity, profitability, activity, debt and market value ratios are analysed to
find out the financial condition of ASOS compared to their competitor Mark and Spencer.
The interpretation of these ratios is analysed to estimate the financial situation of the firm.
ASOS Plc is in better financial condition than their competitor. The new project of ASOS Plc
is evaluated by using three methods. APV method is the most useful method amongst them
for valuation of their new project.

2FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Table of Contents
Task 1.........................................................................................................................................4
ASOS Plc...................................................................................................................................4
Financial analysis.......................................................................................................................5
Ratio analysis.........................................................................................................................5
Liquidity Ratio...................................................................................................................5
Activity Ratio.....................................................................................................................6
Debt ratio............................................................................................................................6
Profitability Ratio...............................................................................................................6
Gross profit margin............................................................................................................7
Return on assets..................................................................................................................7
Interpretation of ASOS Plc’s performance................................................................................8
Liquidity ratio.........................................................................................................................8
Activity ratio..........................................................................................................................9
Debt ratio..............................................................................................................................10
Profitability ratio..................................................................................................................10
Market value ratios...............................................................................................................11
Working capital management..................................................................................................13
Task 2.......................................................................................................................................15
Conclusion................................................................................................................................17
References................................................................................................................................18
Table of Contents
Task 1.........................................................................................................................................4
ASOS Plc...................................................................................................................................4
Financial analysis.......................................................................................................................5
Ratio analysis.........................................................................................................................5
Liquidity Ratio...................................................................................................................5
Activity Ratio.....................................................................................................................6
Debt ratio............................................................................................................................6
Profitability Ratio...............................................................................................................6
Gross profit margin............................................................................................................7
Return on assets..................................................................................................................7
Interpretation of ASOS Plc’s performance................................................................................8
Liquidity ratio.........................................................................................................................8
Activity ratio..........................................................................................................................9
Debt ratio..............................................................................................................................10
Profitability ratio..................................................................................................................10
Market value ratios...............................................................................................................11
Working capital management..................................................................................................13
Task 2.......................................................................................................................................15
Conclusion................................................................................................................................17
References................................................................................................................................18

3FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Task 1
ASOS Plc
ASOS plc is an online e-commercial fashion platform providing retail accessories, fashion
clothing and footwear to their customers. This website primarily focuses on delivering its
products and services to young adults. ASOS Plc sells over 850 brands across 186 large
countries. ASOS Plc has approximately 75000 separate ranges of clothing including
menswear, women’s wear, footwear and accessories along with jewellery. ASOS has
fulfilment centres in the UK, US and EU which assist the company in delivering its services
across these countries. This company focuses on becoming the world largest fashion-clothing
provider in the e-market. ASOS Plc. was established in 2000 who is focused on providing
their customers with good quality, fashionable and comfortable clothing for nearly 20 years.
The recent changes in the global market affected the shares of the company. ASOS Plc’s
market shares started to reduce from 2016 till 2019. ASOS also maintains proper corporate
social responsibility program, which ensures sustainability, ethnicity and responsibility. The
financial issues will be described later after analysing the financial report of ASOS Plc.
ASOS Plc prioritises their investments in their infrastructures, which aid them to achieve
their target growth over the last few years. ASOS Plc. is focusing on providing more
sustainable clothing to their customers in the next five years. ASOS Plc also has offline
market place other than online websites which offer plenty of fashionable products to the
community. ASOS is primarily focused on expanding its services through the global market.
Digital marketing also aided the firm to expand its business. The online mobile app of ASOS
helped the users to get better service and experience.
Task 1
ASOS Plc
ASOS plc is an online e-commercial fashion platform providing retail accessories, fashion
clothing and footwear to their customers. This website primarily focuses on delivering its
products and services to young adults. ASOS Plc sells over 850 brands across 186 large
countries. ASOS Plc has approximately 75000 separate ranges of clothing including
menswear, women’s wear, footwear and accessories along with jewellery. ASOS has
fulfilment centres in the UK, US and EU which assist the company in delivering its services
across these countries. This company focuses on becoming the world largest fashion-clothing
provider in the e-market. ASOS Plc. was established in 2000 who is focused on providing
their customers with good quality, fashionable and comfortable clothing for nearly 20 years.
The recent changes in the global market affected the shares of the company. ASOS Plc’s
market shares started to reduce from 2016 till 2019. ASOS also maintains proper corporate
social responsibility program, which ensures sustainability, ethnicity and responsibility. The
financial issues will be described later after analysing the financial report of ASOS Plc.
ASOS Plc prioritises their investments in their infrastructures, which aid them to achieve
their target growth over the last few years. ASOS Plc. is focusing on providing more
sustainable clothing to their customers in the next five years. ASOS Plc also has offline
market place other than online websites which offer plenty of fashionable products to the
community. ASOS is primarily focused on expanding its services through the global market.
Digital marketing also aided the firm to expand its business. The online mobile app of ASOS
helped the users to get better service and experience.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

4FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Financial analysis
This report includes a full financial analysis of ASOS Plc providing detailed
information about the financial health of the company as well as will aid to understand the
financial health of its primary competitor. The financial analysis will aid to evaluate the
recent changes in the share price of the company. The working capital management will also
be provided in the analysis. The primary ratios which will be included in the analysis are
given below. This will strengthen the concepts of the report.
Ratio analysis
The ratio analysis will be including liquidity, Activity, debt ratio, profitability ratio
and market ratio (Roy, 2019). The financial ratios are discussed below, which will aid to
understand the financial position of the company. The balance sheet and cash flows will
assist the analysis.
Liquidity Ratio
The liquidity ratio assists the company in estimating their ability to pay off their short-
term obligation without the need to increase their any external financial capitals
(Abdelraheem & Serajeldin, 2017). The current ratios and quick ratio are the two types of
liquidity ratio.
Current Ratio
The current ratio aids the firm to evaluate the liquidity of the company. Current ratio
aid the investor to understand the position of the company regarding asset maximization to
pay off the debts and other payables (Mahmudin, Lau & Tandirerung, 2019).
Quick Ratio
Financial analysis
This report includes a full financial analysis of ASOS Plc providing detailed
information about the financial health of the company as well as will aid to understand the
financial health of its primary competitor. The financial analysis will aid to evaluate the
recent changes in the share price of the company. The working capital management will also
be provided in the analysis. The primary ratios which will be included in the analysis are
given below. This will strengthen the concepts of the report.
Ratio analysis
The ratio analysis will be including liquidity, Activity, debt ratio, profitability ratio
and market ratio (Roy, 2019). The financial ratios are discussed below, which will aid to
understand the financial position of the company. The balance sheet and cash flows will
assist the analysis.
Liquidity Ratio
The liquidity ratio assists the company in estimating their ability to pay off their short-
term obligation without the need to increase their any external financial capitals
(Abdelraheem & Serajeldin, 2017). The current ratios and quick ratio are the two types of
liquidity ratio.
Current Ratio
The current ratio aids the firm to evaluate the liquidity of the company. Current ratio
aid the investor to understand the position of the company regarding asset maximization to
pay off the debts and other payables (Mahmudin, Lau & Tandirerung, 2019).
Quick Ratio

5FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
The quick ratio indicates the financial position of the company, which evaluates
whether the company is able to meet its short term liabilities and debts. Acid test ratio
excludes the inventory from the analysis, which provides the company with better cash
management.
Activity Ratio
The activity ratio evaluates the operational efficiency and profitability of the firm
(Baraja & Yosya, 2019). Activity ratio includes account receivable turnover ratio and total
assets turnover ratio.
Account receivable turnover ratio
Account receivable turnover ratio assists the firm to evaluate its operational efficiency
as well as estimates that how effective the company is in collecting their receivable and
managing their debts (Atika, & Sukoco, 2019).
Total asset turnover ratio
The total asset turnover ratio helps the firm to understand its efficiency of generating
sales, which aids in measuring the profitability of the firm (Utami, 2017).
Debt ratio
Debt ratio aids the firm to estimate the total liability, which helps the investors and
outsiders of the firm to analyse the total debt of the company. This ratio also estimates the
economic position of the firm for the future (Otekunrin et.al., 2018).
Profitability Ratio
Profitability ratio assists the firm to evaluate the earning of the business based on the
revenue of the firm. By accessing the information about profitability ratio of a firm, the
investors can evaluate the firm’s ability in generating profit. Profitability ratio includes
The quick ratio indicates the financial position of the company, which evaluates
whether the company is able to meet its short term liabilities and debts. Acid test ratio
excludes the inventory from the analysis, which provides the company with better cash
management.
Activity Ratio
The activity ratio evaluates the operational efficiency and profitability of the firm
(Baraja & Yosya, 2019). Activity ratio includes account receivable turnover ratio and total
assets turnover ratio.
Account receivable turnover ratio
Account receivable turnover ratio assists the firm to evaluate its operational efficiency
as well as estimates that how effective the company is in collecting their receivable and
managing their debts (Atika, & Sukoco, 2019).
Total asset turnover ratio
The total asset turnover ratio helps the firm to understand its efficiency of generating
sales, which aids in measuring the profitability of the firm (Utami, 2017).
Debt ratio
Debt ratio aids the firm to estimate the total liability, which helps the investors and
outsiders of the firm to analyse the total debt of the company. This ratio also estimates the
economic position of the firm for the future (Otekunrin et.al., 2018).
Profitability Ratio
Profitability ratio assists the firm to evaluate the earning of the business based on the
revenue of the firm. By accessing the information about profitability ratio of a firm, the
investors can evaluate the firm’s ability in generating profit. Profitability ratio includes

6FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
analysis of Gross profit margin, return on assets, return on equity and price /earnings ratio
(Tamang, 2017).
Gross profit margin
The gross profit margin helps the firm to estimate their financial health. The gross
profit margin aids the firm to increase its area of operations by evaluating its financial
condition (Khamidah, Gagah, & Fathoni, 2018).
Return on assets
Return on assets shows the profitability of the firm, which is evaluated by net income
and shareholder’s fund. It measures the effectiveness of the firm in earning a return on its
investments in assets. A positive return on assets always indicates the profitability of the firm
(Bhatt & Verghese, 2018).
Return on equity
Return on equity is used to evaluate the financial profitability of a firm. This ratio
measures the effectiveness of management in the use of their assets to generate the
profitability of the company (Abraham, Harris, & Auerbach, 2017).
Market ratios
Market value ratios are used to evaluate the financial health of the company as well as
assists the investors to understand the position of the company in the share market
(Almumani, 2018). Market value ratios include the calculation of book value per share,
dividend yield, and earning per share.
Book value per share
analysis of Gross profit margin, return on assets, return on equity and price /earnings ratio
(Tamang, 2017).
Gross profit margin
The gross profit margin helps the firm to estimate their financial health. The gross
profit margin aids the firm to increase its area of operations by evaluating its financial
condition (Khamidah, Gagah, & Fathoni, 2018).
Return on assets
Return on assets shows the profitability of the firm, which is evaluated by net income
and shareholder’s fund. It measures the effectiveness of the firm in earning a return on its
investments in assets. A positive return on assets always indicates the profitability of the firm
(Bhatt & Verghese, 2018).
Return on equity
Return on equity is used to evaluate the financial profitability of a firm. This ratio
measures the effectiveness of management in the use of their assets to generate the
profitability of the company (Abraham, Harris, & Auerbach, 2017).
Market ratios
Market value ratios are used to evaluate the financial health of the company as well as
assists the investors to understand the position of the company in the share market
(Almumani, 2018). Market value ratios include the calculation of book value per share,
dividend yield, and earning per share.
Book value per share
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

7FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
The book value per share aid the firm to understand the share price of the company in the
market. The proper book value per share should be within 1.0.
Dividend yield
The dividend yield evaluates the amount of income received by the company from the
stock. This helps the investors to understand the position of the company; therefore; they can
make their decision regarding buying stock from that company (Baker, De Ridder, &
Råsbrant, 2019).
Earnings per share
Earnings per share indicate the profitability of the company. The higher earnings per
share indicate better profitability of a company (Kumar & Venoor, 2018).
Price/earnings ratio
Price to earnings ratio aids the company to evaluate their earning as well as estimates
whether the company is overvalued or undervalued in the market (Sha, 2017). The higher the
ratio, the better value the investors will pay for 1 dollar of their current earnings.
Interpretation of ASOS Plc’s performance
From the analysis of ratios, the financial condition can be observed. The interpretation
of the analysis is given below.
Liquidity ratio
The current ratio of ASOS was 0.95 in the year 2017. This was decreased in the
forthcoming years 2018 and 2019. The current ratio of 2018 and 2019 was 0.90 and 0.81
(Asosplc.com, 2020). ASOS Plc’s ability to generate cash has been decreased over the years.
This happened as the company purchased more stock, which affected the current ratio of the
The book value per share aid the firm to understand the share price of the company in the
market. The proper book value per share should be within 1.0.
Dividend yield
The dividend yield evaluates the amount of income received by the company from the
stock. This helps the investors to understand the position of the company; therefore; they can
make their decision regarding buying stock from that company (Baker, De Ridder, &
Råsbrant, 2019).
Earnings per share
Earnings per share indicate the profitability of the company. The higher earnings per
share indicate better profitability of a company (Kumar & Venoor, 2018).
Price/earnings ratio
Price to earnings ratio aids the company to evaluate their earning as well as estimates
whether the company is overvalued or undervalued in the market (Sha, 2017). The higher the
ratio, the better value the investors will pay for 1 dollar of their current earnings.
Interpretation of ASOS Plc’s performance
From the analysis of ratios, the financial condition can be observed. The interpretation
of the analysis is given below.
Liquidity ratio
The current ratio of ASOS was 0.95 in the year 2017. This was decreased in the
forthcoming years 2018 and 2019. The current ratio of 2018 and 2019 was 0.90 and 0.81
(Asosplc.com, 2020). ASOS Plc’s ability to generate cash has been decreased over the years.
This happened as the company purchased more stock, which affected the current ratio of the

8FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
company. The increase in inventory means the outflow of cash for the company. To increase
the current ratio of the company in the forecasted years, it is suggested to properly evaluate
receivables as well as the inventory, which will aid the farm to increase the cash inflow in the
business. Further, it can be analysed that the decrease in quick ratio occurred in the company
during 2017, 2018 and 2019. The quick ratio was 0.35, 0.17 and 0.11, respectively. The
decrease in the quick ratio indicates that the liquidity position of the company is getting
worse over the years. The company should increase sales and pay off the liabilities as early as
possible, which will aid them to increase their quick ratio in the upcoming years. The current
liabilities of the company is increasing; thereby, it is suggested that the authority should use
their investments to pay off the liabilities (Rashid, 2018). However, the company is in better
financial condition than their primary competitor, mark and spencer (Annualreports.com,
2020).
Activity ratio
The activity ratio is analysed to find out the efficiency of the operations in the
business. ASOS Plc made net credit sales amounted to 1923.6 in the financial year 2017,
which was increased in the upcoming years. The net credit sales of 2018 and 2019 are
estimated at 2417.3 and 2733.5, which affected the account receivable turnover ratio of the
company (Asosplc.com, 2020). The account receivable turnover ratio of the company was
65.65 in the year 2017, which was decreased to 48.44 in the year 2018 due to the problem in
the credit collection of the company. The account receivable turnover ratio again increased
massively in the previous year, indicating the boost of sales of the company. During the year
2019, the company collected its receivables in time, enhancing the efficiency of the company.
The total asset turnover ratios for the year 2017, 2018 and 2019 remained one, which
indicates that the company generating 1 dollar of sales for every dollar invested in the assets
of the company. The analysis of this ratio indicates that the company is efficiently generating
company. The increase in inventory means the outflow of cash for the company. To increase
the current ratio of the company in the forecasted years, it is suggested to properly evaluate
receivables as well as the inventory, which will aid the farm to increase the cash inflow in the
business. Further, it can be analysed that the decrease in quick ratio occurred in the company
during 2017, 2018 and 2019. The quick ratio was 0.35, 0.17 and 0.11, respectively. The
decrease in the quick ratio indicates that the liquidity position of the company is getting
worse over the years. The company should increase sales and pay off the liabilities as early as
possible, which will aid them to increase their quick ratio in the upcoming years. The current
liabilities of the company is increasing; thereby, it is suggested that the authority should use
their investments to pay off the liabilities (Rashid, 2018). However, the company is in better
financial condition than their primary competitor, mark and spencer (Annualreports.com,
2020).
Activity ratio
The activity ratio is analysed to find out the efficiency of the operations in the
business. ASOS Plc made net credit sales amounted to 1923.6 in the financial year 2017,
which was increased in the upcoming years. The net credit sales of 2018 and 2019 are
estimated at 2417.3 and 2733.5, which affected the account receivable turnover ratio of the
company (Asosplc.com, 2020). The account receivable turnover ratio of the company was
65.65 in the year 2017, which was decreased to 48.44 in the year 2018 due to the problem in
the credit collection of the company. The account receivable turnover ratio again increased
massively in the previous year, indicating the boost of sales of the company. During the year
2019, the company collected its receivables in time, enhancing the efficiency of the company.
The total asset turnover ratios for the year 2017, 2018 and 2019 remained one, which
indicates that the company generating 1 dollar of sales for every dollar invested in the assets
of the company. The analysis of this ratio indicates that the company is efficiently generating

9FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
their sales by using their assets. The company should focus on credit collection as the
accounting receivable is decreasing. This will increase the revenue of the company by
evaluating their business operational efficiency (Osazefua, 2019).
Debt ratio
From the analysis, it can be observed that the debt ratio of the company remained the
same throughout the past three years. The debt ratio remained one, which indicates that
ASOS is putting themselves at risk in paying the liabilities. The debt ratios should be 0.3 to
0.5, which indicates good financial position of the company. To reduce the debt ratio, the
company should purchase more assets using their cash and pay off the liabilities as early as
possible. The debt ratio reduction can mitigate interest costs (Nguyen, 2019). The debt to
equity ratio of the company was 2.93 in 2017, which was decreased to 2.29 in the year 2018.
This is due to the improvement of the financial capital of ASOS. However, during 2019, the
debt to equity ratio increased to 2.75, which indicates that the company is putting themselves
to the risk associated with debt capital.
Profitability ratio
The profitability ratio indicates that the revenue of the company is increasing
drastically over the years. The revenue of ASOS in 2017 was 1923.6, which increased to
2417.3 during the year 2018. The revenue of the company increased further during the year
2019. The revenue was estimated at 2773.5 million in 2019. This drastic change happened as
the company increases its market throughout these years. ASOS also offered different
promotions over their online and offline marketplace, which aid them to increase the revenue
of the company. The strategic decision-making aided the increase in revenue of the company.
The gross profit margin of the company was 49.82 in 2017 and 51.18 in 2018. This increase
in gross profit margin helped the company to get more investors, which increased its capital.
This also indicated that the company did well in managing their cost of sales (Uz Zaman et
their sales by using their assets. The company should focus on credit collection as the
accounting receivable is decreasing. This will increase the revenue of the company by
evaluating their business operational efficiency (Osazefua, 2019).
Debt ratio
From the analysis, it can be observed that the debt ratio of the company remained the
same throughout the past three years. The debt ratio remained one, which indicates that
ASOS is putting themselves at risk in paying the liabilities. The debt ratios should be 0.3 to
0.5, which indicates good financial position of the company. To reduce the debt ratio, the
company should purchase more assets using their cash and pay off the liabilities as early as
possible. The debt ratio reduction can mitigate interest costs (Nguyen, 2019). The debt to
equity ratio of the company was 2.93 in 2017, which was decreased to 2.29 in the year 2018.
This is due to the improvement of the financial capital of ASOS. However, during 2019, the
debt to equity ratio increased to 2.75, which indicates that the company is putting themselves
to the risk associated with debt capital.
Profitability ratio
The profitability ratio indicates that the revenue of the company is increasing
drastically over the years. The revenue of ASOS in 2017 was 1923.6, which increased to
2417.3 during the year 2018. The revenue of the company increased further during the year
2019. The revenue was estimated at 2773.5 million in 2019. This drastic change happened as
the company increases its market throughout these years. ASOS also offered different
promotions over their online and offline marketplace, which aid them to increase the revenue
of the company. The strategic decision-making aided the increase in revenue of the company.
The gross profit margin of the company was 49.82 in 2017 and 51.18 in 2018. This increase
in gross profit margin helped the company to get more investors, which increased its capital.
This also indicated that the company did well in managing their cost of sales (Uz Zaman et
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

10FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
al., 2019). Further, the gross profit margin decreased in 2019. The gross profit margin
reduced to 48.11 in 2019. This occurred as the freight and duty of the company is increased
thorough out the year. The gross profit and revenue increased in the year 2019 compared to
previous years. The revenue increased as the retail and online sales increased compared to
previous years. The net income of the company was 64.1 million in 2017, which was
increased massively in 2018. The net income of 2018 is estimated at 82.4 million. Further,
the net income in 2019 was 24.6 million, which indicates that the company has excessive
distribution and administrative expense of the company during 2019. The return on asset
remained 0.2 in 2017 and 2019. However, an increase during 2018 can be observed from the
report, which is favourable for the investors of the company. The ROA decreased as the
company failed to manage its assets effectively in 2019. The return on equity has also
decreased in 2019, massively. The return on equity was 0.22,019 and 0.05, respectively in
2017, 2018 and 2019. The ROE reduced as the company failed to utilize the resources
provided by the investors, and the company gathered its profits to generate income.
Market value ratios
As per the analysis, the market value ratios of ASOS indicates that the share price of
the company increased in 2019; however, in 2018, the company had the highest price per
share of 0.08. The directors of ASOS Plc does not declare any dividend in these three
consecutive years. The director made the above decision as they want to reinvest the amount
of profit in the business, and they generated a good amount of return from invested capital.
This will help the business to deliver better values to their shareholders. The share price of
the company continued to increase until March 13, 2018, when the share price becomes
highest. The share price of 2016 was 3 million in the month of January. During 2019, the
share price was between 3 to 4 million. The earning per share was also the highest in 2018
compared to the rest two years. The earning per share was 0.99 in 2017, 1.26 in 2018 and
al., 2019). Further, the gross profit margin decreased in 2019. The gross profit margin
reduced to 48.11 in 2019. This occurred as the freight and duty of the company is increased
thorough out the year. The gross profit and revenue increased in the year 2019 compared to
previous years. The revenue increased as the retail and online sales increased compared to
previous years. The net income of the company was 64.1 million in 2017, which was
increased massively in 2018. The net income of 2018 is estimated at 82.4 million. Further,
the net income in 2019 was 24.6 million, which indicates that the company has excessive
distribution and administrative expense of the company during 2019. The return on asset
remained 0.2 in 2017 and 2019. However, an increase during 2018 can be observed from the
report, which is favourable for the investors of the company. The ROA decreased as the
company failed to manage its assets effectively in 2019. The return on equity has also
decreased in 2019, massively. The return on equity was 0.22,019 and 0.05, respectively in
2017, 2018 and 2019. The ROE reduced as the company failed to utilize the resources
provided by the investors, and the company gathered its profits to generate income.
Market value ratios
As per the analysis, the market value ratios of ASOS indicates that the share price of
the company increased in 2019; however, in 2018, the company had the highest price per
share of 0.08. The directors of ASOS Plc does not declare any dividend in these three
consecutive years. The director made the above decision as they want to reinvest the amount
of profit in the business, and they generated a good amount of return from invested capital.
This will help the business to deliver better values to their shareholders. The share price of
the company continued to increase until March 13, 2018, when the share price becomes
highest. The share price of 2016 was 3 million in the month of January. During 2019, the
share price was between 3 to 4 million. The earning per share was also the highest in 2018
compared to the rest two years. The earning per share was 0.99 in 2017, 1.26 in 2018 and

11FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
0.38 in 2019. This indicates that the profitability of ASOS was highest in 2018 compared to
the rest of the two years. The earning per share increased as the revenue of ASOS increased
significantly over the years. The following is the share market graph of ASOS.
0.38 in 2019. This indicates that the profitability of ASOS was highest in 2018 compared to
the rest of the two years. The earning per share increased as the revenue of ASOS increased
significantly over the years. The following is the share market graph of ASOS.

12FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Working capital management
Working capital is one of the most important aspects related to the long-term financial
health of the organisation. The working capital evaluates the liquidity of the company.
Working capital is the indicator of the financial position of the company, which measures the
efficiency of the business. The working capital management aids in understanding the
Working capital management
Working capital is one of the most important aspects related to the long-term financial
health of the organisation. The working capital evaluates the liquidity of the company.
Working capital is the indicator of the financial position of the company, which measures the
efficiency of the business. The working capital management aids in understanding the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

13FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
liquidity, efficiency and profitability of the company (Singh, Kumar & Colombage 2017).
The working capital of ASOS for 2017, 2018 and 2019 is given below, which will be helpful
in understanding the financial position of the company.
The above analysis interprets that the working capital of the company is declining massively
over the years. The current liability of the company is increasing, which indicates that the
short term debts of the company are converting to long term debts. Working capital of ASOS
Plc was (29.7) in 2017 (Annualreports.com, 2020). This decreased further in 2018 and 2019.
The working capital reduced to (54.4) and (149), respectively. The cash outflow affected the
working capital of the company in these three years. The outflow was mainly caused by the
reduction of EBITDA. The excessive inventory caused the burden on the cash of the
business, which resulted in the negative working capital. The accounting payable and
receivable is also increased over the past years. Which indicates that the company is trying to
cover up their liabilities. To increase the working capital, ASOS is issuing their stocks to the
shareholders as well as they are earning additional profits. This indicates that the company is
too aggressive with its finances, and it is recommended that the company should properly
manage its working capital in order to improve the stability of the business and operations.
Moreover, ASOS Plc made some strategic changes which will help them to manage their
working capital more effectively.
liquidity, efficiency and profitability of the company (Singh, Kumar & Colombage 2017).
The working capital of ASOS for 2017, 2018 and 2019 is given below, which will be helpful
in understanding the financial position of the company.
The above analysis interprets that the working capital of the company is declining massively
over the years. The current liability of the company is increasing, which indicates that the
short term debts of the company are converting to long term debts. Working capital of ASOS
Plc was (29.7) in 2017 (Annualreports.com, 2020). This decreased further in 2018 and 2019.
The working capital reduced to (54.4) and (149), respectively. The cash outflow affected the
working capital of the company in these three years. The outflow was mainly caused by the
reduction of EBITDA. The excessive inventory caused the burden on the cash of the
business, which resulted in the negative working capital. The accounting payable and
receivable is also increased over the past years. Which indicates that the company is trying to
cover up their liabilities. To increase the working capital, ASOS is issuing their stocks to the
shareholders as well as they are earning additional profits. This indicates that the company is
too aggressive with its finances, and it is recommended that the company should properly
manage its working capital in order to improve the stability of the business and operations.
Moreover, ASOS Plc made some strategic changes which will help them to manage their
working capital more effectively.

14FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Task 2
Valuation of a new project
The capital budgeting project has been well evaluated with the help of the key
investment appraisal techniques like Adjusted Present Value (APV) and Net Present Value
(NPV). The Net Present Value of the project shows the maximum possible of wealth that
would be created from the project given all the cash inflows and cash outflows that would be
seen in the three years of project life. It is important to note that in the first case, the Adjusted
Present Value would be around £613.92, whereby the formula that has been applied is as
follows:
Adjusted Present Value (APV): Net Present Value (NPV) + PV (Issuance Cost of Debt and
Equity)-PV(Issuance Cost).
In order to well find out the Weighted Average Cost of Capital for the company, the
cost of both equity and debt finance has well been considered. In order to well consider the
debt cost, we have well considered the taxation rate that was applicable, which was around
18%. The post-tax cost of debt, on the other hand, has been calculated to be around 6.56%.
The WACC for the company was calculated to be around 12.32%. On the other hand, the tax
shield for the company has been around taken as a positive cash inflow (Valaskova & Bakes,
2017). The Adjusted Present Value for the project was calculated to be around £613.92.
On the other hand in option B if the initial outlay of machinery well changes to
around £4,000,000 then the recalculated APV for the project would be around £2,641.80 and
this would be well calculated by using the given set of numbers and data. The other key set of
data has been well kept constant using the debt rate and equity rate, and It is important to note
to estimate the cost of equity for the company we have well applied the help of Capital Asset
Pricing Model.
Task 2
Valuation of a new project
The capital budgeting project has been well evaluated with the help of the key
investment appraisal techniques like Adjusted Present Value (APV) and Net Present Value
(NPV). The Net Present Value of the project shows the maximum possible of wealth that
would be created from the project given all the cash inflows and cash outflows that would be
seen in the three years of project life. It is important to note that in the first case, the Adjusted
Present Value would be around £613.92, whereby the formula that has been applied is as
follows:
Adjusted Present Value (APV): Net Present Value (NPV) + PV (Issuance Cost of Debt and
Equity)-PV(Issuance Cost).
In order to well find out the Weighted Average Cost of Capital for the company, the
cost of both equity and debt finance has well been considered. In order to well consider the
debt cost, we have well considered the taxation rate that was applicable, which was around
18%. The post-tax cost of debt, on the other hand, has been calculated to be around 6.56%.
The WACC for the company was calculated to be around 12.32%. On the other hand, the tax
shield for the company has been around taken as a positive cash inflow (Valaskova & Bakes,
2017). The Adjusted Present Value for the project was calculated to be around £613.92.
On the other hand in option B if the initial outlay of machinery well changes to
around £4,000,000 then the recalculated APV for the project would be around £2,641.80 and
this would be well calculated by using the given set of numbers and data. The other key set of
data has been well kept constant using the debt rate and equity rate, and It is important to note
to estimate the cost of equity for the company we have well applied the help of Capital Asset
Pricing Model.

15FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
The adjusted present value is the net present value of a project if that project is
financed by equity plus the present value of any financial benefits. Using the APV method,
the projects are valued as if all of the equities are financed, and thereafter, the values are
adjusted to gain tax relief on debt capital. The APV method aids the project by adjusting its
side effects in investment and other financial options. APV method combines investment and
financial decision that allows having a positive financial effect on a specific project
(Pirogova, Gorin & Plotnikov, 2019). APV method is more useful in new projects where
different financial risks can be found. The advantages and disadvantages of the APV method
is as follows:
Advantages
APV method has many advantages over other methods which is noteworthy to mention.
The advantages of APV methods are discussed below.
APV method allows the management to understand the amount of debt in the
company which can increase the value of the project.
Like the WACC approach, the APV method does not require any constant proportion
of debt in the capital structure of the company( Kruschwitz & Löffler, 2020). APV
method aids in understanding the levels of debts in different stages of valuation.
APV method is useful to evaluate the financial side effects of a company such as cost
of issue of equity and cost of financial distress.
APV method can evaluate any type of financial package.
Disadvantages
The adjusted present value is the net present value of a project if that project is
financed by equity plus the present value of any financial benefits. Using the APV method,
the projects are valued as if all of the equities are financed, and thereafter, the values are
adjusted to gain tax relief on debt capital. The APV method aids the project by adjusting its
side effects in investment and other financial options. APV method combines investment and
financial decision that allows having a positive financial effect on a specific project
(Pirogova, Gorin & Plotnikov, 2019). APV method is more useful in new projects where
different financial risks can be found. The advantages and disadvantages of the APV method
is as follows:
Advantages
APV method has many advantages over other methods which is noteworthy to mention.
The advantages of APV methods are discussed below.
APV method allows the management to understand the amount of debt in the
company which can increase the value of the project.
Like the WACC approach, the APV method does not require any constant proportion
of debt in the capital structure of the company( Kruschwitz & Löffler, 2020). APV
method aids in understanding the levels of debts in different stages of valuation.
APV method is useful to evaluate the financial side effects of a company such as cost
of issue of equity and cost of financial distress.
APV method can evaluate any type of financial package.
Disadvantages
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

16FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Despite these advantages, the APV method has some disadvantages that should be
mentioned to clarify the concepts of this method. The disadvantages of the APV method is
mentioned below.
APV method follows the Modigliani and Miller hypothesis; therefore, this method
ignores risks related to bankruptcy, tax exhaustion and agency costs of the project.
Ignoring the costs of bankruptcy, this method can produce incorrect results about the
optimal debt ratio (Mari & Marra, 2018).
APV method assumes that the debt that is mentioned in the project is risk-free and
irredeemable.
Finally, if we well change the proportion of debt and equity, which would be well
used for the purpose of financing the project, then the WACC for the company would be
changing to around 10.67%. The change in the capital structure has well lowered down the
cost of capital for the company this in turn would be increasing the Net Present Value of the
project. The newly calculated set of Net Present Value for the project has been calculated to
be around £2,848.84 for the three-year project life. It is important to note that in all of the
given cases, the net present value for the project has been positive. The net present value of
this new project is positive, indicating that the revenue of the project is better than the cost.
The other risk factor which the company can well face is the changing discount rate which
can well alter the results of the project. Changing economic conditions and expected cash
flows from the project are some of the key risks that the project can face in this three year of
trend period.
Conclusion
From the above analysis, it can be perceived that the financial condition of ASOS Plc
is great compared to their competitor. However, the share price of the company fell from
Despite these advantages, the APV method has some disadvantages that should be
mentioned to clarify the concepts of this method. The disadvantages of the APV method is
mentioned below.
APV method follows the Modigliani and Miller hypothesis; therefore, this method
ignores risks related to bankruptcy, tax exhaustion and agency costs of the project.
Ignoring the costs of bankruptcy, this method can produce incorrect results about the
optimal debt ratio (Mari & Marra, 2018).
APV method assumes that the debt that is mentioned in the project is risk-free and
irredeemable.
Finally, if we well change the proportion of debt and equity, which would be well
used for the purpose of financing the project, then the WACC for the company would be
changing to around 10.67%. The change in the capital structure has well lowered down the
cost of capital for the company this in turn would be increasing the Net Present Value of the
project. The newly calculated set of Net Present Value for the project has been calculated to
be around £2,848.84 for the three-year project life. It is important to note that in all of the
given cases, the net present value for the project has been positive. The net present value of
this new project is positive, indicating that the revenue of the project is better than the cost.
The other risk factor which the company can well face is the changing discount rate which
can well alter the results of the project. Changing economic conditions and expected cash
flows from the project are some of the key risks that the project can face in this three year of
trend period.
Conclusion
From the above analysis, it can be perceived that the financial condition of ASOS Plc
is great compared to their competitor. However, the share price of the company fell from

17FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
2016 to 2019. The working capital of the company is decreased massively over the past three
years, indicating that the company is too aggressive with its finances. The changes in the
capital structure of the company reduced the cost of capital which increased the net present
value of their new project.
References
Abdelraheem, A. A. E., & Serajeldin, B. E. A. (2017). Impact of Liquidity Ratio Analysis on Financial
Data Quality (Field Study in Commercial Banks-West Kordofan-Sudan). International Journal
of Research in Social Sciences, 7(6), 263-271.
Roy, S. (2019). Accounting and Finance.
Mahmudin, M., Lau, E. A., & Tandirerung, B. (2019). THE EFFECT OF CURRENT RATIO (CR),
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO (DER), TOTAL ASSET TURNOVER (TAT) AND FIRMS SIZE (FS)
TO RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) IN MINING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA
STOCK EXCHANGE IN 2013-2018. Research Journal of Accounting and Business
Management, 3(2), 297-312.
Baraja, L. & Yosya, E.A., 2019. Analysis the Impact of Liquidity, Profitability, Activity and Solvency
Ratio on Change in Earnings. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research, 17(1),
pp.1-17.
Atika, L. N. W., & Sukoco, A. (2019, February). Effectiveness Analysis of Working Capital on MSME
Handycraft. In Proceeding of World Conference (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 127-133).
Utami, W. B. (2017). Analysis of Current Ratio Changes Effect, Asset Ratio Debt, Total Asset
Turnover, Return On Asset, And Price Earning Ratio In Predictinggrowth Income By
Considering Corporate Size In The Company Joined In Lq45 Index Year 2013-
2016. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research
(IJEBAR), 1(01).
2016 to 2019. The working capital of the company is decreased massively over the past three
years, indicating that the company is too aggressive with its finances. The changes in the
capital structure of the company reduced the cost of capital which increased the net present
value of their new project.
References
Abdelraheem, A. A. E., & Serajeldin, B. E. A. (2017). Impact of Liquidity Ratio Analysis on Financial
Data Quality (Field Study in Commercial Banks-West Kordofan-Sudan). International Journal
of Research in Social Sciences, 7(6), 263-271.
Roy, S. (2019). Accounting and Finance.
Mahmudin, M., Lau, E. A., & Tandirerung, B. (2019). THE EFFECT OF CURRENT RATIO (CR),
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO (DER), TOTAL ASSET TURNOVER (TAT) AND FIRMS SIZE (FS)
TO RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) IN MINING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA
STOCK EXCHANGE IN 2013-2018. Research Journal of Accounting and Business
Management, 3(2), 297-312.
Baraja, L. & Yosya, E.A., 2019. Analysis the Impact of Liquidity, Profitability, Activity and Solvency
Ratio on Change in Earnings. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research, 17(1),
pp.1-17.
Atika, L. N. W., & Sukoco, A. (2019, February). Effectiveness Analysis of Working Capital on MSME
Handycraft. In Proceeding of World Conference (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 127-133).
Utami, W. B. (2017). Analysis of Current Ratio Changes Effect, Asset Ratio Debt, Total Asset
Turnover, Return On Asset, And Price Earning Ratio In Predictinggrowth Income By
Considering Corporate Size In The Company Joined In Lq45 Index Year 2013-
2016. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research
(IJEBAR), 1(01).

18FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Otekunrin, A. O., Nwanji, T. I., Ajayi, S. A., Awonusi, F. D., & Eluyela, F. D. (2018). Relationship
between debt ratio and financial performance of Nigerian quoted companies. Journal of
Social Sciences and Public Policy, 10(1), 54-70.
Tamang, S. K. (2017). PROFITABILITY RATIO ANALYSIS OF NABIL BANK LIMITED (Doctoral
dissertation, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu).
Khamidah, A., Gagah, E., & Fathoni, A. (2018). Analysis Of The Effect Of Gross Profit Margin (GPM),
Earning Per Share (EPS), Debt To Equity Ratio (DER), Net Profit Margin (NPM) On Return
On Assets (ROA)(Study On Property and Real Estate Companies listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange Year 2012–2016). Journal of Management, 4(4).
Bhatt, S. & Verghese, N., (2018). Influence of Liquidity on Profitability: Evidence from Nepalese
Banks. Int. J. of Multidisciplinary and Current research, 6.
Abraham, R., Harris, J., & Auerbach, J. (2017). Earnings yield as a predictor of return on assets,
return on equity, economic value added and the equity multiplier. Modern Economy, 8(1), 10-
24.
Almumani, M. A. Y. (2018). An Empirical Study on Effect of Profitability Ratios & Market Value Ratios
on Market Capitalization of Commercial Banks in Jordan. International Journal of Business
and Social Science, 9(4).
Baker, H. K., De Ridder, A., & Råsbrant, J. (2019). Investors and dividend yields. The Quarterly
Review of Economics and Finance.
Kumar, S., & Venoor, M. A. (2018). ANALYSIS OF IMPACT OF EARNING PER SHARE, DIVIDEND
PER SHARE AND PRICE EARNINGS RATIO ON STOCK PERFORMANCE. International
Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences (IJRESS), 8(3).
Sha, T. L. (2017). Effects of Price Earnings Ratio, Earnings Per Share, Book to Market Ratio and
Gross Domestic Product on Stock Prices of Property and Real Estate Companies in
Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1).
Otekunrin, A. O., Nwanji, T. I., Ajayi, S. A., Awonusi, F. D., & Eluyela, F. D. (2018). Relationship
between debt ratio and financial performance of Nigerian quoted companies. Journal of
Social Sciences and Public Policy, 10(1), 54-70.
Tamang, S. K. (2017). PROFITABILITY RATIO ANALYSIS OF NABIL BANK LIMITED (Doctoral
dissertation, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu).
Khamidah, A., Gagah, E., & Fathoni, A. (2018). Analysis Of The Effect Of Gross Profit Margin (GPM),
Earning Per Share (EPS), Debt To Equity Ratio (DER), Net Profit Margin (NPM) On Return
On Assets (ROA)(Study On Property and Real Estate Companies listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange Year 2012–2016). Journal of Management, 4(4).
Bhatt, S. & Verghese, N., (2018). Influence of Liquidity on Profitability: Evidence from Nepalese
Banks. Int. J. of Multidisciplinary and Current research, 6.
Abraham, R., Harris, J., & Auerbach, J. (2017). Earnings yield as a predictor of return on assets,
return on equity, economic value added and the equity multiplier. Modern Economy, 8(1), 10-
24.
Almumani, M. A. Y. (2018). An Empirical Study on Effect of Profitability Ratios & Market Value Ratios
on Market Capitalization of Commercial Banks in Jordan. International Journal of Business
and Social Science, 9(4).
Baker, H. K., De Ridder, A., & Råsbrant, J. (2019). Investors and dividend yields. The Quarterly
Review of Economics and Finance.
Kumar, S., & Venoor, M. A. (2018). ANALYSIS OF IMPACT OF EARNING PER SHARE, DIVIDEND
PER SHARE AND PRICE EARNINGS RATIO ON STOCK PERFORMANCE. International
Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences (IJRESS), 8(3).
Sha, T. L. (2017). Effects of Price Earnings Ratio, Earnings Per Share, Book to Market Ratio and
Gross Domestic Product on Stock Prices of Property and Real Estate Companies in
Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

19FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Rashid, C. A. (2018). Efficiency of Financial Ratios Analysis for Evaluating Companies’
Liquidity. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(4), 110-123.
Osazefua, I. J. (2019). Operational efficiency and financial sustainability of listed manufacturing
companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 11(1), 17-31.
Nguyen, T. V. (2019). The Impact of Product Market Competition on Debt Ratio in Vietnam Stock
Market. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal.
Uz Zaman, S., Zaki, D., Rehman, A., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2019). Financial Leverage and Its Impact on
Profit Margin in Pakistan’s Textile Industry. Zaman, S., Zaki, AR, and Siddiqui, DA (2019).
Financial Leverage and Its Impact on Profit Margin in Pakistan’s Textile Industry. European
Journal of Business and Management, 11(12), 109-113.
Singh, H. P., Kumar, S., & Colombage, S. (2017). Working capital management and firm profitability:
a meta-analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.
Annualreports.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from
http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/LSE_ASOS_2017.pdf
Asosplc.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from https://www.asosplc.com/~/media/Files/A/Asos-
V2/reports-and-presentations/annual-strategic-report-2019-24102019.pdf
Asosplc.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from https://www.asosplc.com/~/media/Files/A/Asos-
V2/reports-and-presentations/26-10-2018-ar-v2.PDF
Annualreports.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from
http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/m/OTC_MAKSF_2017.pdf
Valaskova, K., & Bakes, V. (2017, July). Calculation of Tax Shields Using the Method of Adjusted
Present Value. In International Conference on Applied Economics (pp. 553-562). Springer,
Cham.
Pirogova, O., Gorin, E., & Plotnikov, V. (2019). The algorithms for the environmental finance based on
adjusted present value models. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 91, p. 08021). EDP
Sciences.
Rashid, C. A. (2018). Efficiency of Financial Ratios Analysis for Evaluating Companies’
Liquidity. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(4), 110-123.
Osazefua, I. J. (2019). Operational efficiency and financial sustainability of listed manufacturing
companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 11(1), 17-31.
Nguyen, T. V. (2019). The Impact of Product Market Competition on Debt Ratio in Vietnam Stock
Market. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal.
Uz Zaman, S., Zaki, D., Rehman, A., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2019). Financial Leverage and Its Impact on
Profit Margin in Pakistan’s Textile Industry. Zaman, S., Zaki, AR, and Siddiqui, DA (2019).
Financial Leverage and Its Impact on Profit Margin in Pakistan’s Textile Industry. European
Journal of Business and Management, 11(12), 109-113.
Singh, H. P., Kumar, S., & Colombage, S. (2017). Working capital management and firm profitability:
a meta-analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.
Annualreports.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from
http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/LSE_ASOS_2017.pdf
Asosplc.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from https://www.asosplc.com/~/media/Files/A/Asos-
V2/reports-and-presentations/annual-strategic-report-2019-24102019.pdf
Asosplc.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from https://www.asosplc.com/~/media/Files/A/Asos-
V2/reports-and-presentations/26-10-2018-ar-v2.PDF
Annualreports.com. (2020). Retrieved 1 March 2020, from
http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/m/OTC_MAKSF_2017.pdf
Valaskova, K., & Bakes, V. (2017, July). Calculation of Tax Shields Using the Method of Adjusted
Present Value. In International Conference on Applied Economics (pp. 553-562). Springer,
Cham.
Pirogova, O., Gorin, E., & Plotnikov, V. (2019). The algorithms for the environmental finance based on
adjusted present value models. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 91, p. 08021). EDP
Sciences.

20FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ASOS
Kruschwitz, L., & Löffler, A. (2020). Corporate Income Tax: WACC, FTE, TCF, APV. In Stochastic
Discounted Cash Flow (pp. 47-140). Springer, Cham.
Mari, C., & Marra, M. (2018). Valuing Firms Under Default Risk and Bankruptcy Costs: A WACC-
Based Approach. International Journal of Business, 23(2), 111-130.
Kruschwitz, L., & Löffler, A. (2020). Corporate Income Tax: WACC, FTE, TCF, APV. In Stochastic
Discounted Cash Flow (pp. 47-140). Springer, Cham.
Mari, C., & Marra, M. (2018). Valuing Firms Under Default Risk and Bankruptcy Costs: A WACC-
Based Approach. International Journal of Business, 23(2), 111-130.
1 out of 21
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.