This report provides a comparative analysis of the sustainability reports of Ford Motors Canada and Nestle Canada, examining their core business activities, values, and approaches to sustainability reporting. The report identifies the social reporting issues relevant to each company, such as carbon emissions for Ford and product packaging impacts for Nestle. It further compares the strengths and weaknesses of their reporting, considering factors like realism and depth of analysis. The report also explores the sustainable development goals relevant to each company, including climate commitment and electrification of cars for Ford, and zero waste and reduced emissions for Nestle. The analysis applies Dunphy, Griffiths & Benn's sustainability phases to each company and examines the alignment of sustainability practices with their core values and mission statements. Finally, the report includes a discussion of group findings and a conclusion on the effectiveness of the companies' sustainability strategies.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
