An Essay on Foreign Direct Investment and Emerging Markets - Analysis
VerifiedAdded on 2023/01/13
|10
|3732
|67
Essay
AI Summary
This essay delves into the multifaceted realm of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and its implications within emerging markets. It begins by applying the Resource Based View (RBV) to identify key ownership advantages for Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) from advanced economies, using course ...
Read More
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.

Foreign Direct Investment
and Emerging Markets
and Emerging Markets
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
Using the Resource Based View (RBV, sometimes referred to as the VRIN framework)
identify the most important factors underlying ownership advantages for Multinational
Enterprises (MNEs) from advanced economies locating in emerging markets. Use the cases
from the course to illustrate your answer. Explain how these ownership advantages may help
these MNEs overcome the liability of foreignness they face in emerging economies................3
“Corruption is the most important factor facing MNES from advanced economies as they enter
emerging markets.” Do you agree? Use the cases from the course to develop your answer.......4
Discuss the relationship between international trade and investment and the way it is changing
because of the growth of global value chains. Distinguishing between tariff and non-tariff
barriers, explain how barriers to international trade impact the MNEs decision to
internationalise through trade versus foreign direct investment? Please illustrate your answer
with case examples......................................................................................................................7
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................9
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................10
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
Using the Resource Based View (RBV, sometimes referred to as the VRIN framework)
identify the most important factors underlying ownership advantages for Multinational
Enterprises (MNEs) from advanced economies locating in emerging markets. Use the cases
from the course to illustrate your answer. Explain how these ownership advantages may help
these MNEs overcome the liability of foreignness they face in emerging economies................3
“Corruption is the most important factor facing MNES from advanced economies as they enter
emerging markets.” Do you agree? Use the cases from the course to develop your answer.......4
Discuss the relationship between international trade and investment and the way it is changing
because of the growth of global value chains. Distinguishing between tariff and non-tariff
barriers, explain how barriers to international trade impact the MNEs decision to
internationalise through trade versus foreign direct investment? Please illustrate your answer
with case examples......................................................................................................................7
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................9
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................10

INTRODUCTION
Foreign Direct Investment can be referred to as investment which is made in terms of a
controlling ownership in one nation by a company based in another nation. This is distinct from a
foreign portfolio investment when seen from the point of view of notion of direct control.
Besides this, emerging market can be defined as a developing nation which is progressing
towards growth and development by undertaking effective course of action.
Using the Resource Based View (RBV, sometimes referred to as the VRIN framework) identify
the most important factors underlying ownership advantages for Multinational Enterprises
(MNEs) from advanced economies locating in emerging markets. Use the cases from the
course to illustrate your answer. Explain how these ownership advantages may help these
MNEs overcome the liability of foreignness they face in emerging economies.
MNEs can be referred to as organisations which run their operations within more than a
single nation. A corporation or an overseas venture is not regarded to be MNE until it possesses
significant investment within the confines of foreign markets and proactively does management
of such business operations. It is important that those operations are considered as the integral
part of organisation in a strategic context. Another important term within the statement is
emerging market which does not hold any particular definition (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston,
2020). As per some authors or researchers, emerging market is a developing market as their
growth patterns are quite quick, extensive and stable. In usual sense, there are certain
characteristics which are held by emerging markets. The first one is economic development as
per average GDP per capita. The second one is relative speed of economic development
expressed in terms of GDP growth rate. The last one is that it is a free market system.
As per the Resource Based View approach, an entity encompasses a wide array of
tangible as well as intangible resources. These are not perfectly mobile within the premise of a
company and are transmissible across the globe within the territory of an organization (Estrin,
Mickiewicz and Wright, 2019). The transfer of such resources is monitored via the integration of
hierarchical governance structures, as laid down under the internationalization theory. It implies
that multi-nationality of an enterprise can be illustrated with the help of decision making
executed by a company, to enable value increment by internalizing marketplaces for several
intangible assets across the national territory.
Foreign Direct Investment can be referred to as investment which is made in terms of a
controlling ownership in one nation by a company based in another nation. This is distinct from a
foreign portfolio investment when seen from the point of view of notion of direct control.
Besides this, emerging market can be defined as a developing nation which is progressing
towards growth and development by undertaking effective course of action.
Using the Resource Based View (RBV, sometimes referred to as the VRIN framework) identify
the most important factors underlying ownership advantages for Multinational Enterprises
(MNEs) from advanced economies locating in emerging markets. Use the cases from the
course to illustrate your answer. Explain how these ownership advantages may help these
MNEs overcome the liability of foreignness they face in emerging economies.
MNEs can be referred to as organisations which run their operations within more than a
single nation. A corporation or an overseas venture is not regarded to be MNE until it possesses
significant investment within the confines of foreign markets and proactively does management
of such business operations. It is important that those operations are considered as the integral
part of organisation in a strategic context. Another important term within the statement is
emerging market which does not hold any particular definition (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston,
2020). As per some authors or researchers, emerging market is a developing market as their
growth patterns are quite quick, extensive and stable. In usual sense, there are certain
characteristics which are held by emerging markets. The first one is economic development as
per average GDP per capita. The second one is relative speed of economic development
expressed in terms of GDP growth rate. The last one is that it is a free market system.
As per the Resource Based View approach, an entity encompasses a wide array of
tangible as well as intangible resources. These are not perfectly mobile within the premise of a
company and are transmissible across the globe within the territory of an organization (Estrin,
Mickiewicz and Wright, 2019). The transfer of such resources is monitored via the integration of
hierarchical governance structures, as laid down under the internationalization theory. It implies
that multi-nationality of an enterprise can be illustrated with the help of decision making
executed by a company, to enable value increment by internalizing marketplaces for several
intangible assets across the national territory.

Hereby, it is analyzed that that there are a number of important factors underlying
ownership advantages for Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) which aim to move from advanced
economies to gain access into emerging markets. Such factors are identified to be the
international experience of company, size of corporation, age of entity and tangible as well as
intangible assets held by the firm (Nazlioglu, Gormus and Soytas, 2019). All of these provide
assistance to multinational enterprises to gain entry into emerging markets and thereby facilitate
their growth and expansion within its confines. In this regard, it is identified that by opening a
store or outlet in emerging market, multinational enterprises strive to establish proper networking
with the citizens belonging to that region. This provides assistance to the business organisations
in appealing to the people pertaining to emerging market place in an effective manner and taking
effective measures by way of which they can be retained for a rather long period of time. In this
relation, it can be said that by establishing a healthy relation with customers, multinational
enterprises gain ownership advantage (Wu and Deng, 2020). By leveraging ownership
advantage, a large number of multinational enterprises are able to deal with the liability of
foreignness that they encounter during the execution of their operations within the confines of
emerging economies. This is done by organisations by capitalising upon the positive
environment provided by emerging markets to come up with new and innovative products. Also,
it assists in developing new capabilities of the firm to ensure their sustainability in market place
for a long period of time.
“Corruption is the most important factor facing MNES from advanced economies as they enter
emerging markets.” Do you agree? Use the cases from the course to develop your answer.
It is usually seen that emerging markets encompass some sort of political instability
together with ongoing growth. Even though there is no fixed list of emerging markets, however,
it is identified that China, India, Indonesia and South Korea in Asia; Poland and Turkey in
Europe; Brazil, Mexico and Argentina in South America and South Africa in Africa are regarded
to be emerging market (Nazlioglu, Gormus and Soytas, 2019). MNEs carrying out their
operations within emerging market possess golden chance to gain growth, development and
establish their name within the mindset of people. Emerging markets strive to become better with
each year. Thus, MNEs leverage upon the development of these regions to facilitate their
prosperity. However, it is important for such organisations to also bear in mind that emerging
markets are characterized by instability and other substantial challenges.
ownership advantages for Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) which aim to move from advanced
economies to gain access into emerging markets. Such factors are identified to be the
international experience of company, size of corporation, age of entity and tangible as well as
intangible assets held by the firm (Nazlioglu, Gormus and Soytas, 2019). All of these provide
assistance to multinational enterprises to gain entry into emerging markets and thereby facilitate
their growth and expansion within its confines. In this regard, it is identified that by opening a
store or outlet in emerging market, multinational enterprises strive to establish proper networking
with the citizens belonging to that region. This provides assistance to the business organisations
in appealing to the people pertaining to emerging market place in an effective manner and taking
effective measures by way of which they can be retained for a rather long period of time. In this
relation, it can be said that by establishing a healthy relation with customers, multinational
enterprises gain ownership advantage (Wu and Deng, 2020). By leveraging ownership
advantage, a large number of multinational enterprises are able to deal with the liability of
foreignness that they encounter during the execution of their operations within the confines of
emerging economies. This is done by organisations by capitalising upon the positive
environment provided by emerging markets to come up with new and innovative products. Also,
it assists in developing new capabilities of the firm to ensure their sustainability in market place
for a long period of time.
“Corruption is the most important factor facing MNES from advanced economies as they enter
emerging markets.” Do you agree? Use the cases from the course to develop your answer.
It is usually seen that emerging markets encompass some sort of political instability
together with ongoing growth. Even though there is no fixed list of emerging markets, however,
it is identified that China, India, Indonesia and South Korea in Asia; Poland and Turkey in
Europe; Brazil, Mexico and Argentina in South America and South Africa in Africa are regarded
to be emerging market (Nazlioglu, Gormus and Soytas, 2019). MNEs carrying out their
operations within emerging market possess golden chance to gain growth, development and
establish their name within the mindset of people. Emerging markets strive to become better with
each year. Thus, MNEs leverage upon the development of these regions to facilitate their
prosperity. However, it is important for such organisations to also bear in mind that emerging
markets are characterized by instability and other substantial challenges.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

It is immensely important for such corporations to gain adequate comprehensibility of the
challenges so as to deal with them in a strategic manner. Gaining understanding of the
constraints of emerging markets would make it easier for MNEs to operate in a stable as well as
comfortable manner in those regions (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). By leveraging the
knowledge gained of these challenges, MNEs strive to enhance their scale of business operations
and thereby attain the attention of larger base of customers. This inflates the opportunity for them
to fulfil the needs and demands of a bigger base of individuals prevailing in market so that they
can be retained for a long period of time in future (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). This
ensures that such corporations are able to build their effective image in the eyes of customers and
gain support from them in the long run.
The large number of people of world lives in emerging market in which they are moving
from basic need to consumption oriented era. With the rise in current trends, there is increase in
corruption that is faced by MNEs whenever they enter into emerging market to expand their
business in appropriate manner. Corruption is an inseparable element of the emerging markets as
they hold political instability. To get things done in a rapid and easy manner within a region
having such complexities, it is easier for corporations to take advantage of money and thereby
get indulged in corrupt activities. This inflates the chances of completion of difficult business
tasks within due course of time (Estrin, Mickiewicz, Stephan and Wright, 2019). However, all of
this holds negative outcomes for corporations. It is analysed that this leads to decline in the brand
value and goodwill of MNEs at market place. It is also not easy to remove corruption from
emerging markets as this is created by people and businesses themselves. This issue is faced by
each and every organisation operating their business operations or emerging into new market for
attainment of profits and large level of revenues. Corruption gains the attention of people as it
largely guarantees completion of those activities and practices also which otherwise seem almost
impossible for multinational enterprises. Thus, this acts as a strong force which influences the
ethics and functioning of organisations while expanding from developed economies into a range
of emerging markets for the facilitation of growth and development in rapid course of time.
In context of given case study on Sherritt Goes to Cuba (A): Political Risk in Unchartered
Territory, they have gone through many issues and problem while entering into emerging
market. As per scenario, risk is something which cannot be identified by people. There is risk in
each and every factor (Ge, Carney and Kellermanns, 2019). During the time of Canadian
challenges so as to deal with them in a strategic manner. Gaining understanding of the
constraints of emerging markets would make it easier for MNEs to operate in a stable as well as
comfortable manner in those regions (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). By leveraging the
knowledge gained of these challenges, MNEs strive to enhance their scale of business operations
and thereby attain the attention of larger base of customers. This inflates the opportunity for them
to fulfil the needs and demands of a bigger base of individuals prevailing in market so that they
can be retained for a long period of time in future (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). This
ensures that such corporations are able to build their effective image in the eyes of customers and
gain support from them in the long run.
The large number of people of world lives in emerging market in which they are moving
from basic need to consumption oriented era. With the rise in current trends, there is increase in
corruption that is faced by MNEs whenever they enter into emerging market to expand their
business in appropriate manner. Corruption is an inseparable element of the emerging markets as
they hold political instability. To get things done in a rapid and easy manner within a region
having such complexities, it is easier for corporations to take advantage of money and thereby
get indulged in corrupt activities. This inflates the chances of completion of difficult business
tasks within due course of time (Estrin, Mickiewicz, Stephan and Wright, 2019). However, all of
this holds negative outcomes for corporations. It is analysed that this leads to decline in the brand
value and goodwill of MNEs at market place. It is also not easy to remove corruption from
emerging markets as this is created by people and businesses themselves. This issue is faced by
each and every organisation operating their business operations or emerging into new market for
attainment of profits and large level of revenues. Corruption gains the attention of people as it
largely guarantees completion of those activities and practices also which otherwise seem almost
impossible for multinational enterprises. Thus, this acts as a strong force which influences the
ethics and functioning of organisations while expanding from developed economies into a range
of emerging markets for the facilitation of growth and development in rapid course of time.
In context of given case study on Sherritt Goes to Cuba (A): Political Risk in Unchartered
Territory, they have gone through many issues and problem while entering into emerging
market. As per scenario, risk is something which cannot be identified by people. There is risk in
each and every factor (Ge, Carney and Kellermanns, 2019). During the time of Canadian

divisions of US firms, there have been changes taken place in different aspects. Sherritt has to
evaluate each and every aspect for positive outcomes.
According to the given case study of Hard Choices: Best Buy and Five Star in China (A),
there is growth and increase in Chinese market (Nazlioglu, Gormus and Soytas, 2019). As there
is difference in culture, tradition, consumer behaviour of Chinese market from those of other. It
is very important for MNEs to adopt and localised necessary steps for surviving in China. This
lead global customer electronics retailer is about to open their branded stores in China. In this
context, Best Buy Brand has to shut down their stores due to lack of facing competition with
such market. In this context, global has brought all stores of best buy brand stores to expand their
market. Global has followed corruption path to survive and sustain at Chinese market and
expanded their business.
On the other hand, the scenario given in case study of APPLE INC.: MANAGING A
GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN says that this is the largest business at market place. It has
manufactured several products and services for their consumers. While the time of doing product
assembly, it has faced that worker were laid off (Sauvant, 2019). Public were treated in unfair
manner where Apple has clearly mentioned their policies governing different practices like
involuntary labour, harassment, human trafficking. This has impact on Apple's inventory
projection. There is decline in output which leads to increase high cost and debt servicing
obligations. They were following unethical practices while manufacturing products for their
consumers which lead them to decline in sales and profit.
There are various aspects which can be faced by organisation while emerging their
business at marketplace (Donaubauer, Neumayer and Nunnenkamp, 2019). Main issue is related
with corruption which is increasing day by day that create problem in proper survival and sustain
of business at competitive market. From the above, there are different case study which has been
analysed that faces problems for survival and sustainability of their business at emerging market.
Therefore, it is very important to determine each and every factor which is creating problem for
operating business.
evaluate each and every aspect for positive outcomes.
According to the given case study of Hard Choices: Best Buy and Five Star in China (A),
there is growth and increase in Chinese market (Nazlioglu, Gormus and Soytas, 2019). As there
is difference in culture, tradition, consumer behaviour of Chinese market from those of other. It
is very important for MNEs to adopt and localised necessary steps for surviving in China. This
lead global customer electronics retailer is about to open their branded stores in China. In this
context, Best Buy Brand has to shut down their stores due to lack of facing competition with
such market. In this context, global has brought all stores of best buy brand stores to expand their
market. Global has followed corruption path to survive and sustain at Chinese market and
expanded their business.
On the other hand, the scenario given in case study of APPLE INC.: MANAGING A
GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN says that this is the largest business at market place. It has
manufactured several products and services for their consumers. While the time of doing product
assembly, it has faced that worker were laid off (Sauvant, 2019). Public were treated in unfair
manner where Apple has clearly mentioned their policies governing different practices like
involuntary labour, harassment, human trafficking. This has impact on Apple's inventory
projection. There is decline in output which leads to increase high cost and debt servicing
obligations. They were following unethical practices while manufacturing products for their
consumers which lead them to decline in sales and profit.
There are various aspects which can be faced by organisation while emerging their
business at marketplace (Donaubauer, Neumayer and Nunnenkamp, 2019). Main issue is related
with corruption which is increasing day by day that create problem in proper survival and sustain
of business at competitive market. From the above, there are different case study which has been
analysed that faces problems for survival and sustainability of their business at emerging market.
Therefore, it is very important to determine each and every factor which is creating problem for
operating business.

Discuss the relationship between international trade and investment and the way it is changing
because of the growth of global value chains. Distinguishing between tariff and non-tariff
barriers, explain how barriers to international trade impact the MNEs decision to
internationalise through trade versus foreign direct investment? Please illustrate your
answer with case examples.
International trade and investment both plays significant role in the economic growth of
each and every nation. International trade is mainly considered as the exchange of products and
services among different nation (Carter, Wellhausen and Huth, 2019). Trading activities
performed at international scale directly provides opportunity to individual to use and explore
range of products which are not available in their home country. Along with this, many a times it
has been analysed international trade allows customers in buying products at cheaper rate which
are expensive in their domestic market. On the contrary foreign direct investment is determined
as the investment made by one company in another nations with the motive of enhancing their
control of ownership. This is also seen as the indirect form through which company focuses on
maximising their control in non native nation (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). The
terms investment or foreign direct investment and international trade are highly related to one
another. Apart from this, their relationship can be understood effectively by making use of one
example (Koepke, 2019). For instance: If one company invests in one another country in the
form of expanding their business in different nation then it can be directly considered as the part
of international trade. This is so because, this kind of investment will also lead to future
integration in business activities that ultimately promotes international trade.
It has also been seen that relationship between international trade and investment is quite
positive as if FDI will enhance with the passing time then it will also increase international trade.
With changing time, it has been analysed companies are emphasizing on enhancing their
profitability (Cerutti, Claessens and Puy, 2019). For this, they tries increase their trading
activities in different nations so that they can easily approach international customers and
enhance their sales performance. This connection with the international customer can easily
develop with the medium of investment in the new nation. For executing this effectively, large
scale company establishes their firm in the new nation. In this, they performs all activities
associated to the business type. This directly improves their control over another nation in terms
of ownership.
because of the growth of global value chains. Distinguishing between tariff and non-tariff
barriers, explain how barriers to international trade impact the MNEs decision to
internationalise through trade versus foreign direct investment? Please illustrate your
answer with case examples.
International trade and investment both plays significant role in the economic growth of
each and every nation. International trade is mainly considered as the exchange of products and
services among different nation (Carter, Wellhausen and Huth, 2019). Trading activities
performed at international scale directly provides opportunity to individual to use and explore
range of products which are not available in their home country. Along with this, many a times it
has been analysed international trade allows customers in buying products at cheaper rate which
are expensive in their domestic market. On the contrary foreign direct investment is determined
as the investment made by one company in another nations with the motive of enhancing their
control of ownership. This is also seen as the indirect form through which company focuses on
maximising their control in non native nation (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). The
terms investment or foreign direct investment and international trade are highly related to one
another. Apart from this, their relationship can be understood effectively by making use of one
example (Koepke, 2019). For instance: If one company invests in one another country in the
form of expanding their business in different nation then it can be directly considered as the part
of international trade. This is so because, this kind of investment will also lead to future
integration in business activities that ultimately promotes international trade.
It has also been seen that relationship between international trade and investment is quite
positive as if FDI will enhance with the passing time then it will also increase international trade.
With changing time, it has been analysed companies are emphasizing on enhancing their
profitability (Cerutti, Claessens and Puy, 2019). For this, they tries increase their trading
activities in different nations so that they can easily approach international customers and
enhance their sales performance. This connection with the international customer can easily
develop with the medium of investment in the new nation. For executing this effectively, large
scale company establishes their firm in the new nation. In this, they performs all activities
associated to the business type. This directly improves their control over another nation in terms
of ownership.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Global value chain is mainly seen as the sharing of production activities at international
scale. In this, the overall production is bifurcated into two main sub sections that is activities and
task in different nations. In other words it can be said that global value chain is determined as the
integration of several activities and people associated with the production team who manages
overall supply, distribution as well as post sales activities while having transactions at
international scale (Jin, GarcĂa and Salomon, 2019). It has been determined that growth of global
value chain is growing day by day. This is so because business are now a days focusing on
maximising their business output by bifurcating their activities associated with production
department. In addition to this, the influence of global value chain's growth can also be on
international trade and investment in positive manner. This is so because, businesses are now a
days going towards international expansion in order to ease their business non-functioning and
enhancing its output effectively. This thing is mainly done by going for global value chain in
effective manner . The rapid growth observed in global value chain, directly improvises core
relationship between international trade and investment (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020).
This improvement is beneficial for the customers too as they are now getting facilities to buy
their favourite products at cheaper prices. In addition to this, it also contributes in enhancement
of national economy too as employment is expanding with more international trading.
Trade Barrier is basically seen as obstacles which are faced by companies while
performing their business activities at international scale in effective manner. In addition to this,
it has been analysed trade barriers are mainly of two types that is Tariff and non tariff barriers
(Lien, Lo and Bojanic, 2019). Tariff barrier basically includes custom tariffs that are imposed by
government as well as legal authorities on goods which importing in the nation. On the other
hand, non tariff barriers are the one which could directly place impact over exporting goods and
services. This includes all kind of goods and services no matter belongs to which category. It can
be basically seen from food related items to the digital services.
Both the kind of tariffs are basically applied on international trade that is export and
import (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). But, at the same time they have many kind of
differences between them. Few of the differences among them are stated as below:-
ď‚· From tariffs governments is mainly getting revenue which is further used by them nations
development. On the contrary, non tariffs measures does not provides any kind of
benefits to the government in terms of revenue (Bishop, 2019).
scale. In this, the overall production is bifurcated into two main sub sections that is activities and
task in different nations. In other words it can be said that global value chain is determined as the
integration of several activities and people associated with the production team who manages
overall supply, distribution as well as post sales activities while having transactions at
international scale (Jin, GarcĂa and Salomon, 2019). It has been determined that growth of global
value chain is growing day by day. This is so because business are now a days focusing on
maximising their business output by bifurcating their activities associated with production
department. In addition to this, the influence of global value chain's growth can also be on
international trade and investment in positive manner. This is so because, businesses are now a
days going towards international expansion in order to ease their business non-functioning and
enhancing its output effectively. This thing is mainly done by going for global value chain in
effective manner . The rapid growth observed in global value chain, directly improvises core
relationship between international trade and investment (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020).
This improvement is beneficial for the customers too as they are now getting facilities to buy
their favourite products at cheaper prices. In addition to this, it also contributes in enhancement
of national economy too as employment is expanding with more international trading.
Trade Barrier is basically seen as obstacles which are faced by companies while
performing their business activities at international scale in effective manner. In addition to this,
it has been analysed trade barriers are mainly of two types that is Tariff and non tariff barriers
(Lien, Lo and Bojanic, 2019). Tariff barrier basically includes custom tariffs that are imposed by
government as well as legal authorities on goods which importing in the nation. On the other
hand, non tariff barriers are the one which could directly place impact over exporting goods and
services. This includes all kind of goods and services no matter belongs to which category. It can
be basically seen from food related items to the digital services.
Both the kind of tariffs are basically applied on international trade that is export and
import (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020). But, at the same time they have many kind of
differences between them. Few of the differences among them are stated as below:-
ď‚· From tariffs governments is mainly getting revenue which is further used by them nations
development. On the contrary, non tariffs measures does not provides any kind of
benefits to the government in terms of revenue (Bishop, 2019).

ď‚· It has been seen that non tariffs holds huge price differences among two countries as flow
of import is not all free where price differentiation in tariff will remain equivalent as cost
of transportation is approximately equivalent while importing and exporting products and
services between different countries (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020).
The specified information clearly depicts that tariff and non tariff barriers are different
from one another. It has been further seen barriers in international trade are directly placing
impact over the decision making of multinational enterprises decisions. This is so because, it
becomes obstacle for the company to expand their business in another countries because of tariff
barriers (Chhabra and Popli, 2019). Along with this, management team of the companies are
required to take decisions according to these barriers and restrictions only that whether they
should enter into the nation or not. Also, it also influences companies to analyse all barriers in
detailed manner which helps them in taking decision that whether they should go for
internationalisation through foreign direct investment or by international trade.
CONCLUSION
From the above discussion, it can be inferred that there are several factors underlying
ownership advantages for MNEs while moving from advanced to emerging markets. Further, it
is analysed that there is effective relationship between investment and international trade. This
relation is constantly altering owing to the development of the global value chains.
of import is not all free where price differentiation in tariff will remain equivalent as cost
of transportation is approximately equivalent while importing and exporting products and
services between different countries (Dau, Purkayastha and Eddleston, 2020).
The specified information clearly depicts that tariff and non tariff barriers are different
from one another. It has been further seen barriers in international trade are directly placing
impact over the decision making of multinational enterprises decisions. This is so because, it
becomes obstacle for the company to expand their business in another countries because of tariff
barriers (Chhabra and Popli, 2019). Along with this, management team of the companies are
required to take decisions according to these barriers and restrictions only that whether they
should enter into the nation or not. Also, it also influences companies to analyse all barriers in
detailed manner which helps them in taking decision that whether they should go for
internationalisation through foreign direct investment or by international trade.
CONCLUSION
From the above discussion, it can be inferred that there are several factors underlying
ownership advantages for MNEs while moving from advanced to emerging markets. Further, it
is analysed that there is effective relationship between investment and international trade. This
relation is constantly altering owing to the development of the global value chains.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Chhabra, A. and Popli, M., 2019. Impact of top management team sociodemographic faultlines
on speed of foreign direct investment expansion: An emerging market
perspective. Strategic Change, 28(3), pp.209-215.
Jin, B., GarcĂa, F. and Salomon, R., 2019. Inward foreign direct investment and local firm
innovation: The moderating role of technological capabilities. Journal of International
Business Studies, 50(5), pp.847-855.
Lien, D., Lo, M. and Bojanic, D., 2019. Asymmetric effects of cultural institutes on trade and
foreign direct investment. The World Economy, 42(5), pp.1520-1553.
Bishop, B., 2019. Foreign direct investment in Korea: The role of the state. Routledge.
Sauvant, K. P., 2019. Trade and foreign direct investment in data services. Routledge.
Donaubauer, J., Neumayer, E. and Nunnenkamp, P., 2019. Financial market development in host
and source countries and their effects on bilateral foreign direct investment. The World
Economy.
Carter, D. B., Wellhausen, R. L. and Huth, P. K., 2019. International Law, Territorial Disputes,
and Foreign Direct Investment. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), pp.58-71.
Koepke, R., 2019. What drives capital flows to emerging markets? A survey of the empirical
literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), pp.516-540.
Cerutti, E., Claessens, S. and Puy, D., 2019. Push factors and capital flows to emerging markets:
why knowing your lender matters more than fundamentals. Journal of International
Economics, 119, pp.133-149.
Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, A. and Soytas, U., 2019. Oil prices and monetary policy in emerging
markets: structural shifts in causal linkages. Emerging Markets Finance and
Trade, 55(1), pp.105-117.
Ge, J., Carney, M. and Kellermanns, F., 2019. Who fills institutional voids? Entrepreneurs’
utilization of political and family ties in emerging markets. Entrepreneurship Theory
and Practice, 43(6), pp.1124-1147.
Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., Stephan, U. and Wright, M., 2019. Entrepreneurship in emerging
markets. The Oxford Handbook of Management in Emerging Markets, pp.457-494.
Dau, L. A., Purkayastha, S. and Eddleston, K.A., 2020. Who does it best? Family and nonfamily
owners and leaders navigating institutional development in emerging markets. Journal
of Business Research, 107, pp.197-210.
Wu, B. and Deng, P., 2020. Internationalization of SMEs from emerging markets: An
institutional escape perspective. Journal of Business Research, 108, pp.337-350.
Books and Journals
Chhabra, A. and Popli, M., 2019. Impact of top management team sociodemographic faultlines
on speed of foreign direct investment expansion: An emerging market
perspective. Strategic Change, 28(3), pp.209-215.
Jin, B., GarcĂa, F. and Salomon, R., 2019. Inward foreign direct investment and local firm
innovation: The moderating role of technological capabilities. Journal of International
Business Studies, 50(5), pp.847-855.
Lien, D., Lo, M. and Bojanic, D., 2019. Asymmetric effects of cultural institutes on trade and
foreign direct investment. The World Economy, 42(5), pp.1520-1553.
Bishop, B., 2019. Foreign direct investment in Korea: The role of the state. Routledge.
Sauvant, K. P., 2019. Trade and foreign direct investment in data services. Routledge.
Donaubauer, J., Neumayer, E. and Nunnenkamp, P., 2019. Financial market development in host
and source countries and their effects on bilateral foreign direct investment. The World
Economy.
Carter, D. B., Wellhausen, R. L. and Huth, P. K., 2019. International Law, Territorial Disputes,
and Foreign Direct Investment. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), pp.58-71.
Koepke, R., 2019. What drives capital flows to emerging markets? A survey of the empirical
literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), pp.516-540.
Cerutti, E., Claessens, S. and Puy, D., 2019. Push factors and capital flows to emerging markets:
why knowing your lender matters more than fundamentals. Journal of International
Economics, 119, pp.133-149.
Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, A. and Soytas, U., 2019. Oil prices and monetary policy in emerging
markets: structural shifts in causal linkages. Emerging Markets Finance and
Trade, 55(1), pp.105-117.
Ge, J., Carney, M. and Kellermanns, F., 2019. Who fills institutional voids? Entrepreneurs’
utilization of political and family ties in emerging markets. Entrepreneurship Theory
and Practice, 43(6), pp.1124-1147.
Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., Stephan, U. and Wright, M., 2019. Entrepreneurship in emerging
markets. The Oxford Handbook of Management in Emerging Markets, pp.457-494.
Dau, L. A., Purkayastha, S. and Eddleston, K.A., 2020. Who does it best? Family and nonfamily
owners and leaders navigating institutional development in emerging markets. Journal
of Business Research, 107, pp.197-210.
Wu, B. and Deng, P., 2020. Internationalization of SMEs from emerging markets: An
institutional escape perspective. Journal of Business Research, 108, pp.337-350.
1 out of 10
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.