Analysis of Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) in Aviation Industry
VerifiedAdded on 2023/04/10
|13
|3038
|396
Report
AI Summary
This report examines the critical role of Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS) in the aviation industry, highlighting the increasing concerns around pilot fatigue due to the rapid growth of the aviation sector and the shortage of skilled pilots. It references historical crash analyses where fatigue was identified as a contributing factor, emphasizing the need for stricter implementation of FRMS. The report delves into the evolution of FRMS, the challenges companies face in its implementation, and its potential to reduce mishaps and strengthen existing security guidelines. It explores the need for FRMS in aviation by discussing the dangers associated with air travel, the impact of jet lag on pilots, and the pressure from employers to maximize workload while minimizing costs. Furthermore, the report analyzes the effectiveness of FRMS by emphasizing shared responsibilities between employers and pilots, the importance of creating fatigue-minimizing working conditions, and the challenges in defining 'safe' and 'acceptable' risk levels. Finally, it underscores the importance of fatigue awareness among employees and managers in aviation maintenance, advocating for awareness campaigns and the development of fatigue measurement tools. The report concludes by noting the limited implementation of FRMS in aviation organizations and highlighting the potential for improvements in well-being, personal health, cost savings, and safety through effective FRMS implementation.

NEED, EFFE
CTIVENESS, AND
AWARENESS ABOUT
Fatigue Risk
Management System
(FRMS) IN AVIATION
INDUSTRY
CTIVENESS, AND
AWARENESS ABOUT
Fatigue Risk
Management System
(FRMS) IN AVIATION
INDUSTRY
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

Introduction:
Aviation safety is an important issue because air traffic is increasing by each day.
Aviation sector across the world is growing rapidly and causing an acute shortage of highly
skilled pilots. This is why the majority of the pilots are overworked and fatigue is emerging
as a major problem and giving rise to a complicated situation. The presence of the fatigue in
a pilot can slow down his reflexes and reaction time and invite accidents. Concerned
organizations like Aviation Organization (ICAO) issued fresh guidelines related to the
Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) in the year 2008. Agencies like the International
Air Transport Association are constantly busy in collecting data with an intention to improve
the guidelines associated with the fatigue.
Let’s have a look at one of the crash analysis that was written in the year 1993 this analysis
reads. “The impaired judgment, failure to execute an immediate action, improper assessment
of landing conditions and improper decision making” This analysis was written for “DC-8-61
aircraft” crash in Cuba (Cook, 2018). This crash analysis report became a part of aviation
history because of the mention of a new word Fatigue. It was the first ever reported case in
the history of aviation where fatigue was diagnosed as a reason behind a crash. November 17,
2009, aircraft Pel-Air Westwind II VH-NGA, met with an accident, the crew claimed that
their reflexes were down because they were suffering from fatigue. This again is an important
report because the pilots himself confessed that they were under the influence of fatigue
(B.Cook, 2018). This crash analysis report became a part of aviation history because of the
mention of a new word Fatigue.
Aviation safety is an important issue because air traffic is increasing by each day.
Aviation sector across the world is growing rapidly and causing an acute shortage of highly
skilled pilots. This is why the majority of the pilots are overworked and fatigue is emerging
as a major problem and giving rise to a complicated situation. The presence of the fatigue in
a pilot can slow down his reflexes and reaction time and invite accidents. Concerned
organizations like Aviation Organization (ICAO) issued fresh guidelines related to the
Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) in the year 2008. Agencies like the International
Air Transport Association are constantly busy in collecting data with an intention to improve
the guidelines associated with the fatigue.
Let’s have a look at one of the crash analysis that was written in the year 1993 this analysis
reads. “The impaired judgment, failure to execute an immediate action, improper assessment
of landing conditions and improper decision making” This analysis was written for “DC-8-61
aircraft” crash in Cuba (Cook, 2018). This crash analysis report became a part of aviation
history because of the mention of a new word Fatigue. It was the first ever reported case in
the history of aviation where fatigue was diagnosed as a reason behind a crash. November 17,
2009, aircraft Pel-Air Westwind II VH-NGA, met with an accident, the crew claimed that
their reflexes were down because they were suffering from fatigue. This again is an important
report because the pilots himself confessed that they were under the influence of fatigue
(B.Cook, 2018). This crash analysis report became a part of aviation history because of the
mention of a new word Fatigue.

In order to prevent such conditions, tools like FRMS can be introduced more strictly
in this sector. The evolution of FRMS, hardships that companies are facing in the process of
the implementation of FRMS, the role of FRMS in bringing down the number of the mishaps,
are few questions that need an answer. A collective study of various secondary sources can
help anyone in understanding the crux of the issue and deliver a status report that can act as a
vital document for this industry sector.
FRMS implementation, evolution, and hardships that companies are facing in the
process of the implementation, its role in bringing down the number of the mishaps, how it
can add a new strength in the existing security guidelines of the aviation sector. The current
implementation of FRMS is adequate or room for improvement is present are the few
questions that demand an answer. A collective study of various secondary sources can help
anyone in understanding the crux of the issue and deliver a status report that can act as a vital
document for this industry sector.
Officially, it has been acknowledging that pilots and crew member’s poor
performance was an outcome of fatigue. It was the first ever reported case in the history of
aviation where fatigue was diagnosed as a reason behind a crash. November 17, 2009, aircraft
Pel-Air Westwind II VH-NGA, met with an accident, the crew claimed that their reflexes
were down because they were suffering from fatigue. This again is an important report
because the pilots himself confessed that they were under the influence of fatigue (B.Cook,
2018).
Need for FRMS in Aviation:
in this sector. The evolution of FRMS, hardships that companies are facing in the process of
the implementation of FRMS, the role of FRMS in bringing down the number of the mishaps,
are few questions that need an answer. A collective study of various secondary sources can
help anyone in understanding the crux of the issue and deliver a status report that can act as a
vital document for this industry sector.
FRMS implementation, evolution, and hardships that companies are facing in the
process of the implementation, its role in bringing down the number of the mishaps, how it
can add a new strength in the existing security guidelines of the aviation sector. The current
implementation of FRMS is adequate or room for improvement is present are the few
questions that demand an answer. A collective study of various secondary sources can help
anyone in understanding the crux of the issue and deliver a status report that can act as a vital
document for this industry sector.
Officially, it has been acknowledging that pilots and crew member’s poor
performance was an outcome of fatigue. It was the first ever reported case in the history of
aviation where fatigue was diagnosed as a reason behind a crash. November 17, 2009, aircraft
Pel-Air Westwind II VH-NGA, met with an accident, the crew claimed that their reflexes
were down because they were suffering from fatigue. This again is an important report
because the pilots himself confessed that they were under the influence of fatigue (B.Cook,
2018).
Need for FRMS in Aviation:

The danger that is associated with an aircraft that comes out of the nature of its own:
it is merely so dangerous because it is flying. The pilots cannot stop in the mid of the air, and
they have not the ability for changing (not counting boosted and doubled crews), that also
have the responsibility for every single passenger who is travelling on the aircraft (Dawson et
al., 2014). In the cases of, long distance flights, the pilots are influenced by the variable time
zones which are known as jet lag. Furthermore, the pilots of the aircraft are always under
pressure from the employers of them that try to increase the profits of them through applying
the maximum possibility of workload that can be taken on their crews and fleets while
keeping the cost down. During the booming of aviation, the work of the pilots was respected
and highly rated (Reason & Hobbs 2017). Currently, the pilots are considered only as a
simple mean for gaining a tremendous amount of money for the organisations related to
aviation. Due to all these factors, the workload of the pilots is inadequately increasing as well
as thereby increasing some high level risks related to fatigue.
Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) is defined by ICAO as, the meaning of a
data that is driven is monitoring continuously as well as managing the risks that are involved
in fatigue-related safety, based on the scientific knowledge and principles as well as the
experience that is operational, that aim for ensuring the relevant personnel that are
performing at the level of adequate of the alertness (Caldwell & Caldwell, 2016).
It is described by the functioning of the entire fatigue risk management system as the
picture that is given below. The fatigue risk management system is nothing but a cycle that
involves the modelling, measurement process as well as the assessment of the present
conditions and the analysing of risk if the fatigue, mitigating and managing the risks that are
involved in evaluations and fatigue and feedback.
it is merely so dangerous because it is flying. The pilots cannot stop in the mid of the air, and
they have not the ability for changing (not counting boosted and doubled crews), that also
have the responsibility for every single passenger who is travelling on the aircraft (Dawson et
al., 2014). In the cases of, long distance flights, the pilots are influenced by the variable time
zones which are known as jet lag. Furthermore, the pilots of the aircraft are always under
pressure from the employers of them that try to increase the profits of them through applying
the maximum possibility of workload that can be taken on their crews and fleets while
keeping the cost down. During the booming of aviation, the work of the pilots was respected
and highly rated (Reason & Hobbs 2017). Currently, the pilots are considered only as a
simple mean for gaining a tremendous amount of money for the organisations related to
aviation. Due to all these factors, the workload of the pilots is inadequately increasing as well
as thereby increasing some high level risks related to fatigue.
Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) is defined by ICAO as, the meaning of a
data that is driven is monitoring continuously as well as managing the risks that are involved
in fatigue-related safety, based on the scientific knowledge and principles as well as the
experience that is operational, that aim for ensuring the relevant personnel that are
performing at the level of adequate of the alertness (Caldwell & Caldwell, 2016).
It is described by the functioning of the entire fatigue risk management system as the
picture that is given below. The fatigue risk management system is nothing but a cycle that
involves the modelling, measurement process as well as the assessment of the present
conditions and the analysing of risk if the fatigue, mitigating and managing the risks that are
involved in evaluations and fatigue and feedback.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

Figure 1: The FRMS process
(Source: Caldwell & Caldwell, 2016, pp:145)
Apart from managing and mitigating the risks that are involved in the fatigue, the primary
advantages of fatigue risk management are, Reduction in a total number of accidents and
incidents that is related to the mistakes that are caused by the fatigue that should be connected
with the financial relate costs or the impact on the reputation of the operators. Reduction of
the cost of insurance since some companies who deal with the protection might lower the
premium of the security in the cases where it is proved by the operators that there is an
existence of Fatigue risk management system. That is functional in the organisation of them,
reduction in the crew numbers absences that are connected to the fatigue, keeping and
recruiting a member of the crew by using the fatigue friendly list to provide a working
condition that is more better.
(Source: Caldwell & Caldwell, 2016, pp:145)
Apart from managing and mitigating the risks that are involved in the fatigue, the primary
advantages of fatigue risk management are, Reduction in a total number of accidents and
incidents that is related to the mistakes that are caused by the fatigue that should be connected
with the financial relate costs or the impact on the reputation of the operators. Reduction of
the cost of insurance since some companies who deal with the protection might lower the
premium of the security in the cases where it is proved by the operators that there is an
existence of Fatigue risk management system. That is functional in the organisation of them,
reduction in the crew numbers absences that are connected to the fatigue, keeping and
recruiting a member of the crew by using the fatigue friendly list to provide a working
condition that is more better.

The effectiveness of fatigue:
The Fatigue risk management system which is an organisational system that allows
the responsibilities related to the management of all the parties (employers and pilots) who
are participating, then they are well aware of the duties as well as the commitments of them.
Regulatory approach has been embraced by the aviation industry for the prevention of fatigue
by the restriction of the flight service length that is also known by flight time limitations.
One of the significant attributes of the Fatigue risk management system approach is that, all
the parties that are involved are sharing their responsibilities for the minimisation of the risks
and for increasing safety which is the new approach for the security. Therefore it is the duty
of the management for creating the working conditions that also minimise the risks that are
related to fatigue (Rangan et al., 2013). Simultaneously, the employees are responsible for
ensuring that the employees get the most out of the free time of them. A significant advantage
for thinking about the fatigue is introduced by from the entire idea (Sneddon, Mearns & Flin,
2013). In the past, the responsibilities that are mentioned above lied upon to a regulator who
prescribed the safety level that is based on the limitations of the flight time.
Each party who is participating – regulator, as well as the employers and the operators of the
operator, have the own duties of them in The Fatigue risk management. The matters that are
related to self-management are intimately connected with these points. Such conditions
should be created by each of the pilots that are having an effect that is positive on the fatigue
such as the lower it or not to increase that steeply. The duties of the employees are, to get an
amount that is sufficient for sleep and to report the occurrences when the employees felt tired
due to not having enough sleep. The duties of the employer or the operator are, to provide
The Fatigue risk management system which is an organisational system that allows
the responsibilities related to the management of all the parties (employers and pilots) who
are participating, then they are well aware of the duties as well as the commitments of them.
Regulatory approach has been embraced by the aviation industry for the prevention of fatigue
by the restriction of the flight service length that is also known by flight time limitations.
One of the significant attributes of the Fatigue risk management system approach is that, all
the parties that are involved are sharing their responsibilities for the minimisation of the risks
and for increasing safety which is the new approach for the security. Therefore it is the duty
of the management for creating the working conditions that also minimise the risks that are
related to fatigue (Rangan et al., 2013). Simultaneously, the employees are responsible for
ensuring that the employees get the most out of the free time of them. A significant advantage
for thinking about the fatigue is introduced by from the entire idea (Sneddon, Mearns & Flin,
2013). In the past, the responsibilities that are mentioned above lied upon to a regulator who
prescribed the safety level that is based on the limitations of the flight time.
Each party who is participating – regulator, as well as the employers and the operators of the
operator, have the own duties of them in The Fatigue risk management. The matters that are
related to self-management are intimately connected with these points. Such conditions
should be created by each of the pilots that are having an effect that is positive on the fatigue
such as the lower it or not to increase that steeply. The duties of the employees are, to get an
amount that is sufficient for sleep and to report the occurrences when the employees felt tired
due to not having enough sleep. The duties of the employer or the operator are, to provide

enough time or opportunities for sleeping or resting and embracing the actions should be
taken whenever an employee is not fit for the exhausted or work.
The connection between safety and fatigue is so much challenging for defining. One
of the biggest challenges is the assessment of risk as the definition of ‘safe’ and ‘acceptable’
level is so much complicated (Müller, Wittmer & Drax, 2014). The acceptability of that risks
are deepened on the type of operation that is concrete in nature; therefore it differs for every
person and each organisation.
Fatigue awareness:
The employees and the managers who maintain aviation have to be made bit more
aware about the risks that is associated with the fatigued specialist and workers in the
maintenance of aviation human factors such as calling for development for one necessary
campaign for awareness as one of the most critical step in the workplace of aviation-related
to fighting (Gander, 2015). As the awareness is increased for the problem is also likely to be
the fuel effort for the development of a means of the fatigue measurement. Some significant
actions related to Anti-fatigue are, enhance worker and the employer fatigue awareness,
expand and continue the education related to the fatigue countermeasure, regulate and
support for the fatigue risk management system (FRMS), regulate hours for the limits of the
services, quantify operational and safety efficiency for the impact of fatigue, integrate the
awareness of fatigue management into the safety culture, ensure that fatigue risk management
is considered in the programs that are related to the safety management system, establishment
of the baseline data of the risk with the existing systems that are connected to the event,
taken whenever an employee is not fit for the exhausted or work.
The connection between safety and fatigue is so much challenging for defining. One
of the biggest challenges is the assessment of risk as the definition of ‘safe’ and ‘acceptable’
level is so much complicated (Müller, Wittmer & Drax, 2014). The acceptability of that risks
are deepened on the type of operation that is concrete in nature; therefore it differs for every
person and each organisation.
Fatigue awareness:
The employees and the managers who maintain aviation have to be made bit more
aware about the risks that is associated with the fatigued specialist and workers in the
maintenance of aviation human factors such as calling for development for one necessary
campaign for awareness as one of the most critical step in the workplace of aviation-related
to fighting (Gander, 2015). As the awareness is increased for the problem is also likely to be
the fuel effort for the development of a means of the fatigue measurement. Some significant
actions related to Anti-fatigue are, enhance worker and the employer fatigue awareness,
expand and continue the education related to the fatigue countermeasure, regulate and
support for the fatigue risk management system (FRMS), regulate hours for the limits of the
services, quantify operational and safety efficiency for the impact of fatigue, integrate the
awareness of fatigue management into the safety culture, ensure that fatigue risk management
is considered in the programs that are related to the safety management system, establishment
of the baseline data of the risk with the existing systems that are connected to the event,
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

improvement in collaboration with the fatigue risk management across and within the
organizations, creation as well as the implementation of the tools that are related to the
fatigue assessment.
The Fatigue risk management system has not been implemented widely in the
organisations that are related to aviation (Borghini et al., 2014). Although, the problem has
become one of the significant common issues in the commercial and railroad trucking
industries as well as for the flight crews. Where a fatigue risk management system is in the
place the improvements of it, have been gathered and also noted in well being, personal
health and cost and safety (Stolzer, (2017). As an example, it can be said one trucking firm
that is international has reported that they have saved millions of dollars for the health care
related cost.
The Fatigue risk management system has to be designed primarily for every organisation.
For the maintenance of aviation for Fatigue risk management system, the first task is to
reduce the fatigue-related risks to a level that can be acceptable by using the interventions of
the fatigue reduction such as scientific scheduling, the limits of duty time, napping, excused
absences, education as well as in some instances like treatment and medical testing (Filtness
& Naweed, 2017). The second target to reduce and fix the errors related to fatigue.
Among the data that is needed by the government as well as the financial effects that is
related to the fatigue and also the damage that is caused by fatigue, are estimated by the
aviation industry and the extent risk for safety in flight because of the maintenance for
fatigue, the implementation cost of FRMSs, as well as the probability that is having one
FRMS, could be able to prevent an event that is related to the fatigue (Darwent et al., 2015).
After the industry has data that is related to the safety and financial risks of the fatigue, the
organizations, creation as well as the implementation of the tools that are related to the
fatigue assessment.
The Fatigue risk management system has not been implemented widely in the
organisations that are related to aviation (Borghini et al., 2014). Although, the problem has
become one of the significant common issues in the commercial and railroad trucking
industries as well as for the flight crews. Where a fatigue risk management system is in the
place the improvements of it, have been gathered and also noted in well being, personal
health and cost and safety (Stolzer, (2017). As an example, it can be said one trucking firm
that is international has reported that they have saved millions of dollars for the health care
related cost.
The Fatigue risk management system has to be designed primarily for every organisation.
For the maintenance of aviation for Fatigue risk management system, the first task is to
reduce the fatigue-related risks to a level that can be acceptable by using the interventions of
the fatigue reduction such as scientific scheduling, the limits of duty time, napping, excused
absences, education as well as in some instances like treatment and medical testing (Filtness
& Naweed, 2017). The second target to reduce and fix the errors related to fatigue.
Among the data that is needed by the government as well as the financial effects that is
related to the fatigue and also the damage that is caused by fatigue, are estimated by the
aviation industry and the extent risk for safety in flight because of the maintenance for
fatigue, the implementation cost of FRMSs, as well as the probability that is having one
FRMS, could be able to prevent an event that is related to the fatigue (Darwent et al., 2015).
After the industry has data that is related to the safety and financial risks of the fatigue, the

interventions that are appropriate can be further implemented as well as the effects that will
come from those interventions can also be assessed.
Risk-based approach:
Definitions of the safety and acceptability are in an area where the operational
security is addressed by the safety management system (SMS) that might be sent as a
package of the defined responsibilities, relations and the procedures that are used by the
organizations that are related to the aviation for assessing the hazard effects as well as for risk
management (Clothier & Walker, 2015). The tools are connected with two of the
fundamental processes that are related to safety management, risk management, identification
of hazard as well as provide them with the support that is complex. The SMS is actually
focused on the improvement of the level of the safety that is constant as well as it also
introduces hazard identification process into the everyday operations of the operators with
collecting the data related to security as well as the analysis of them, implementation of the
mitigating strategies and assessment of the risks (Wang & Chuang, 2014).
According to the safety management system, the risk management includes the development
of the protection that is complex against the fatigue risk that is based on the evolution of a
chance which is formal (Sampigethaya & Poovendran, (2013). The scale of the FRM entirely
lies on to the organisation.
come from those interventions can also be assessed.
Risk-based approach:
Definitions of the safety and acceptability are in an area where the operational
security is addressed by the safety management system (SMS) that might be sent as a
package of the defined responsibilities, relations and the procedures that are used by the
organizations that are related to the aviation for assessing the hazard effects as well as for risk
management (Clothier & Walker, 2015). The tools are connected with two of the
fundamental processes that are related to safety management, risk management, identification
of hazard as well as provide them with the support that is complex. The SMS is actually
focused on the improvement of the level of the safety that is constant as well as it also
introduces hazard identification process into the everyday operations of the operators with
collecting the data related to security as well as the analysis of them, implementation of the
mitigating strategies and assessment of the risks (Wang & Chuang, 2014).
According to the safety management system, the risk management includes the development
of the protection that is complex against the fatigue risk that is based on the evolution of a
chance which is formal (Sampigethaya & Poovendran, (2013). The scale of the FRM entirely
lies on to the organisation.

Methodology:
The risk based approaches for the functioning of the identifies of the FRMS that is
mentioned on the above, identifies all the risks by using proactive, predictive and the reactive
methods where the best way for the identification is the dynamic method. At the time of
planning as well as an effort for predicting a level of the own fatigue experience of them is
being explored consistently, those might be brought by planning or operation that is totally
new. The process that is predictive has to determine the risks that are associated with the
fatigue through the control of the crew planning as well as the consideration of the factors
that are known, affecting sleep, fatigue as well as an effect of them on the performance
(Endsley, 2016). The methods might include however not limited to, operational experience
of the industry or the operators and the data collection from the activities that are similar,
biomathematical models and planning about the methods that are based on the records.
The first two methods are an approach that is common which can be used by anyone.
Because they are just too much simple for the implementation as well as depend on a data
type which can be accessible for any of the operators.
Conclusion:
Thus is it can be concluded that the aim of the FRMS is to mitigate the risks that are
related to fatigue at each of the observed level. For achieving those goals, the experts exploit
their knowledge about the fatigue for concrete situations. However, it is no possible to
The risk based approaches for the functioning of the identifies of the FRMS that is
mentioned on the above, identifies all the risks by using proactive, predictive and the reactive
methods where the best way for the identification is the dynamic method. At the time of
planning as well as an effort for predicting a level of the own fatigue experience of them is
being explored consistently, those might be brought by planning or operation that is totally
new. The process that is predictive has to determine the risks that are associated with the
fatigue through the control of the crew planning as well as the consideration of the factors
that are known, affecting sleep, fatigue as well as an effect of them on the performance
(Endsley, 2016). The methods might include however not limited to, operational experience
of the industry or the operators and the data collection from the activities that are similar,
biomathematical models and planning about the methods that are based on the records.
The first two methods are an approach that is common which can be used by anyone.
Because they are just too much simple for the implementation as well as depend on a data
type which can be accessible for any of the operators.
Conclusion:
Thus is it can be concluded that the aim of the FRMS is to mitigate the risks that are
related to fatigue at each of the observed level. For achieving those goals, the experts exploit
their knowledge about the fatigue for concrete situations. However, it is no possible to
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

eliminate fatigue. Generally, it is very difficult for assessing own level of the exhaustion of
own. But there are so many different tools for reducing the fatigue risks. The fatigue should
also be treated as a risk that is operational. That is a complicated task, and the main reason
behind this is, it is so hard for managing something, which is impossible to measure
(Waclawski & Noone, 2017). With the gradual development in the science for the matter of
the fatigue, within the scope of biomathematical models as well as FRMS, new development
can be expected. The outcomes of the model might be used for the improvement of the crew
planning for confirming the accuracy of the plans that have already been prepared, for the
establishment of the predictions of each fatigue, for training, for measurement of performance
and during the investigation. It has been acknowledging officially, that the pilots and the poor
performance of the crew members were an outcome of fatigue.
own. But there are so many different tools for reducing the fatigue risks. The fatigue should
also be treated as a risk that is operational. That is a complicated task, and the main reason
behind this is, it is so hard for managing something, which is impossible to measure
(Waclawski & Noone, 2017). With the gradual development in the science for the matter of
the fatigue, within the scope of biomathematical models as well as FRMS, new development
can be expected. The outcomes of the model might be used for the improvement of the crew
planning for confirming the accuracy of the plans that have already been prepared, for the
establishment of the predictions of each fatigue, for training, for measurement of performance
and during the investigation. It has been acknowledging officially, that the pilots and the poor
performance of the crew members were an outcome of fatigue.

Bibliography
B.Cook. (2018). FATIGUE AND THE PEL-AIR WESTWIND DITCHING. Australian
Aviation, https://australianaviation.com.au/2018/06/fatigue-and-the-pel-air-westwind-
accident/.
Borghini, G., Astolfi, L., Vecchiato, G., Mattia, D., & Babiloni, F. (2014). Measuring
neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of
mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral
Reviews, 44, 58-75.
Caldwell, J. A., & Caldwell, J. L. (2016). Fatigue in aviation: A guide to staying awake at
the stick. Routledge.
Clothier, R. A., & Walker, R. A. (2015). Safety risk management of unmanned aircraft
systems. Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, 2229-2275.
Cook, B. (2018). THE HUMAN FACTOR: UNDERSTANDING FATIGUE. Aviation,
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/07/human-factor-understanding-fatigue/.
Darwent, D., Dawson, D., Paterson, J. L., Roach, G. D., & Ferguson, S. A. (2015). Managing
fatigue: It really is about sleep. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 82, 20-26.
Dawson, D., Searle, A. K., & Paterson, J. L. (2014). Look before you (s) leep: evaluating the
use of fatigue detection technologies within a fatigue risk management system for the
road transport industry. Sleep medicine reviews, 18(2), 141-152.
Endsley, M. R. (2016). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered
design. CRC press.
B.Cook. (2018). FATIGUE AND THE PEL-AIR WESTWIND DITCHING. Australian
Aviation, https://australianaviation.com.au/2018/06/fatigue-and-the-pel-air-westwind-
accident/.
Borghini, G., Astolfi, L., Vecchiato, G., Mattia, D., & Babiloni, F. (2014). Measuring
neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of
mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral
Reviews, 44, 58-75.
Caldwell, J. A., & Caldwell, J. L. (2016). Fatigue in aviation: A guide to staying awake at
the stick. Routledge.
Clothier, R. A., & Walker, R. A. (2015). Safety risk management of unmanned aircraft
systems. Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, 2229-2275.
Cook, B. (2018). THE HUMAN FACTOR: UNDERSTANDING FATIGUE. Aviation,
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/07/human-factor-understanding-fatigue/.
Darwent, D., Dawson, D., Paterson, J. L., Roach, G. D., & Ferguson, S. A. (2015). Managing
fatigue: It really is about sleep. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 82, 20-26.
Dawson, D., Searle, A. K., & Paterson, J. L. (2014). Look before you (s) leep: evaluating the
use of fatigue detection technologies within a fatigue risk management system for the
road transport industry. Sleep medicine reviews, 18(2), 141-152.
Endsley, M. R. (2016). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered
design. CRC press.

Filtness, A. J., & Naweed, A. (2017). Causes, consequences and countermeasures to driver
fatigue in the rail industry: The train driver perspective. Applied ergonomics, 60, 12-
21.
Gander, P. H. (2015). Evolving regulatory approaches for managing fatigue risk in transport
operations. Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, 10(1), 253-271.
Müller, R., Wittmer, A., & Drax, C. (2014). Aviation risk and safety management. Cham:
Springer, 45-48.
Rangan, S., Bowman, J. L., Hauser, W. J., McDonald, W. W., Lewis, R. A., & Van Dongen,
H. P. (2013). Integrated fatigue modeling in crew rostering and operations. Canadian
Aeronautics and Space Journal, 59(01), 1-6.
Reason, J., & Hobbs, A. (2017). Managing maintenance error: a practical guide. CRC Press.
Sampigethaya, K., & Poovendran, R. (2013). Aviation cyber–physical systems: Foundations
for future aircraft and air transport. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(8), 1834-1855.
Sneddon, A., Mearns, K., & Flin, R. (2013). Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in
offshore drilling crews. Safety Science, 56, 80-88.
Stolzer, A. J. (2017). Safety management systems in aviation. Routledge.
Waclawski, E., & Noone, P. (2017). Are aviation industry fatigue risk management strategies
needed in healthcare?. Anaesthesia, 72(11), 1417-1419.
Wang, T. C., & Chuang, L. H. (2014). Psychological and physiological fatigue variation and
fatigue factors in aircraft line maintenance crews. International Journal of Industrial
Ergonomics, 44(1), 107-113.
fatigue in the rail industry: The train driver perspective. Applied ergonomics, 60, 12-
21.
Gander, P. H. (2015). Evolving regulatory approaches for managing fatigue risk in transport
operations. Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, 10(1), 253-271.
Müller, R., Wittmer, A., & Drax, C. (2014). Aviation risk and safety management. Cham:
Springer, 45-48.
Rangan, S., Bowman, J. L., Hauser, W. J., McDonald, W. W., Lewis, R. A., & Van Dongen,
H. P. (2013). Integrated fatigue modeling in crew rostering and operations. Canadian
Aeronautics and Space Journal, 59(01), 1-6.
Reason, J., & Hobbs, A. (2017). Managing maintenance error: a practical guide. CRC Press.
Sampigethaya, K., & Poovendran, R. (2013). Aviation cyber–physical systems: Foundations
for future aircraft and air transport. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(8), 1834-1855.
Sneddon, A., Mearns, K., & Flin, R. (2013). Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in
offshore drilling crews. Safety Science, 56, 80-88.
Stolzer, A. J. (2017). Safety management systems in aviation. Routledge.
Waclawski, E., & Noone, P. (2017). Are aviation industry fatigue risk management strategies
needed in healthcare?. Anaesthesia, 72(11), 1417-1419.
Wang, T. C., & Chuang, L. H. (2014). Psychological and physiological fatigue variation and
fatigue factors in aircraft line maintenance crews. International Journal of Industrial
Ergonomics, 44(1), 107-113.
1 out of 13

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.