PSY3041 - Global Emotional Intelligence Test (GEIT) Evaluation

This report presents a psychometric evaluation of the Global Emotional Intelligence Test (GEIT), examining its reliability and validity through various statistical analyses. The study involved 287 participants who completed the GEIT, along with the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) and the Big Five Inventory (BFI). The research explores the factor structure of the GEIT, its internal consistency, and its correlations with other measures of emotional intelligence and personality traits. Key findings include a Cronbach's alpha of 0.72 for the GEIT, indicating acceptable reliability, and the identification of four factors through principal component analysis. The report discusses the implications of these findings for the use of the GEIT in assessing emotional intelligence and highlights the importance of considering the relationships between trait EI, personality, and other relevant constructs. The results are compared with previous research, and suggestions for future studies are offered. Desklib provides access to this report and other solved assignments for students.

Psychometric evaluation of the
Global Emotional Intelligence Test
(GEIT)
Student Name: Student ID:
Subject Name: Subject ID:
Due Date:

Abstract
A prologue to the hypothesis and psychometric properties of the Global trait emotional
intelligence (GTEI) score had been examined. Analysis for the need of conceptualizing the
expanding number of false intelligences as identity characteristics, as opposed to as
intellectual capacities was conducted. The research work has a reasonable and replicable
factor structure involving four unmistakable, yet interrelated, measurements. Self-Awareness
(SA), Self-Management (SM), Social Awareness (SocA) and Relationship Management
(RM) factors are four attractive psycho-metric attributes and had been used to obtain Global
Emotional Intelligence Test (GEIT) scores. This experiment centres prevalently around the
validity and reliability of GEIT scores. In spite of the fact that there are concrete
psychometric focal points of the TEIQue over the plenty of self-report EI surveys, the most
noteworthy is the hypothesis that backs it. The essentials of attribute EI hypothesis were
produced in Petrides (Petrides and Furnham, 2001) and the most recent rundown was given in
Petrides, Furnham, and Mavroveli (2007). Examinations researched the connection between
total GEIT scores, and between big five scores. The consequences of these investigations
demonstrated that higher passionate insight was related with naturally positive state of mind
and higher confidence.
Table of Contents

Psychometric evaluation of the.............................................................................................................1
Global Emotional Intelligence Test (GEIT)..............................................................................................1
Abstract.................................................................................................................................................2
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................4
Method..................................................................................................................................................5
Participants........................................................................................................................................6
Design................................................................................................................................................6
Procedure..........................................................................................................................................6
Data Analysis.....................................................................................................................................7
Results...................................................................................................................................................8
Discussion............................................................................................................................................10
Reference............................................................................................................................................12
Appendix.............................................................................................................................................13

Introduction
Enthusiastic insight (EI) has been proposed both as a vital expansion to the scene of human
individual contrasts and as a key determinant of genuine results, for instance accomplishment
in work and individual connections. The possibility that individuals vary in their enthusiastic
aptitudes is an engaging one which has pulled in much late open consideration Research on
the psychometrics of EI is however still in its beginning periods, leaving various uncertain
research issues which should be tended to.
The most fitting technique for estimating EI is presently a zone of debate. EI has been
described by a few specialists as an intellectual capacity including the psychological handling
of passionate data which ought to be estimated by capacity composes tests. An elective way
to deal with EI suggests that it is a dispositional propensity which can along these lines be
estimated without anyone else's input report survey. The principle supporters of the capacity
and dispositional approaches are Mayer, Caruso, and Salovey (2000). It is important to deal
with the relations between trait EI and its putative outcomes. For example it is frequently
proposed that the high interpersonal skills associated with EI should also be associated with
career success and evidence for associations between EI and occupational success have been
reported by Bar-On (2000).
Academic progress in students might also be expected to be related to EI since emotional and
social skills in dealing with a university environment could contribute to overall achievement.
Schutte et al. (1998) reported that trait EI was positively related to grade point average but
this finding was not replicated in a larger study by Newsome, Day, and Catano (2000). Other
proposed outcomes of particular interest in the present study include success in social and
personal relationships and general measures of life quality. The general expectation is that
those aspects of emotional intelligence associated with intra-personal and interpersonal

emotional facility would be expected to lead to positive associations with happiness/life
satisfaction and quality and extent of social interactions and negative associations with
loneliness. Because mood regulation is a subcomponent of EI, it would be expected to be
negatively associated with measures of depression. There are some findings in this area but
further work is required. Trait EI has been found to be positively correlated with life
satisfaction (Martinez-Pons, 1997).
A progression of investigations of attribute EI have discovered direct and sometimes
extensive connections between's these measures and identity qualities. Attribute EI measures
for the most part indicate expansive critical correlations with Extraversion (E) and
Neuroticism (N) with positive and negative signs, individually, while littler huge positive
connections with Openness (O), Agreeableness (An) and Conscientiousness (C) have
likewise been discovered (Dawda and Hart, 2000; Petrides and Furnham, 2001; Schutte et al.,
1998). One approach to evaluate the issue of the uniqueness of attribute EI is to analyze its
incremental legitimacy in the expectation of life results, i.e. its capacity to anticipate out-
comes when the influences of identity are controlled for. There are as of now not very many
outcomes here yet attribute EI has been appeared to have incremental legitimacy in the
forecast of life (Palmer et al., 2014).
Methodology

Stage-I: Participants
To estimate the psychometric properties of an online emotional intelligence questionnaire
with forty questions, 326 participants were enrolled by Qualtrics, a professional examining
association who spends significant time in surveying research. They were enlisted from
existing on the web boards possessed by Qualtrics, from the individuals who have concurred
in the past to sociological surveying research. Participants were informed about the
experiment procedure and allowed to leave at any stage of the conducted workshop
conducted by the ethical committee of the university. 287 participants mostly in the age
bracket of 20 years were finally selected with 68 male and 214 females after the workshop
session. Ethical form designed by ethical committee was provided to the participants and was
returned by putting their signature. There was no control group for this study as no
hypothetical testing was done.
Stage-II: Design
Emotional Intelligence (EI) questionnaire, titled the Global Emotional Intelligence test –
GEIT (http://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.html) was used to assess the EI
scores. University laboratory was used for the purpose of conducting the test. The
investigator collected the answers from online survey and organised according to the GEIT40
components.
Stage-III: Procedure
Sample matching and sorting were done in few stages, starting with distinguishing some
objective populace with a characterized set of qualities. In the present examination, the
parameters such as age, sexual orientation were distinguished. Second, utilizing their online
answers a separation work was then ascertained based on the numerical score separation of
every individual. The questionnaire asked to respond to the questions related to emotional
intelligence, personality traits and self-esteem. The examinees were guided for the content of

the questionnaire distressing them and the Monash University counsellors were available for
assistance.
Stage-IV: Participant’s demographic
Sample data was categorised demographically in two sections based on gender with 24.1 %
male and 74.6 female participants. Average age was 21.84 years (S.D =3.76 years) and was
considered as a categorical variable.
Table 1: Participant Demographic Statistics
Age Range 19-48
Mean Age for all Participants 21.84
Standard Deviation for all Participants 3.76
Total Number of Participants (N) 287
Split By Sex
Mean Age for all Women 21.54
Standard Deviation for all Women 2.95
Total Number of Women (N) 282
Mean Age for all Men 22.42
Standard Deviation for all Men 4.64
Total Number of Men (N) 68
Results & Findings
Examination of Data
Frequency Analysis
Five GEI scores were more than 90% valid and excess validity was cross checked. GEI
question numbers (components) 4, 8, 9, 12, 20, 27, 37 did not differentiated between the
people as validity scores were equally distributed.

The average global total EI score was 27.18 (S.D was 4.99), TEIQue was 146.66 (S.D was
20.61), BFI extraversion was 25 (S.D was 6.81), BFI agreeableness was 34.48 (S.D was
5.94), BFI conscientiousness was 31.42 (S.D was 6.15), BFI neuroticism was 25.35 (S.D was
6.06) and BFI openness was 35.03 (S.D 5.94).
Table 2: Descriptive values for GEI & BFI scores
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
GEIT_Total 287 2.00 38.00 27.1847 4.98992
TEIQue 287 91.00 200.00 146.6620 20.61436
BFI_Extraversion 287 10.00 40.00 25.0000 6.81063
BFI_Agreeableness 287 11.00 45.00 34.4843 5.94429
BFI_Conscientiousness 287 15.00 45.00 31.4216 6.15760
BFI_Neuroticism 287 9.00 38.00 25.3519 6.06418
BFI_Openness 287 20.00 50.00 35.0314 5.94577
Valid N (listwise) 287
GEIT_Total
TEIQue
BFI_Extraversion
BFI_Agreeableness
BFI_Conscientiousness
BFI_Neuroticism
BFI_Openness
Valid N (listwise)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Comparison of GEIT total with Big Five
Mean Scores
Figure 1: Mean scores of different scales

Internal Consistency
The Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.72 for 40 items of GEIT, and the data of the scores were found
to be acceptably reliable as the alpha value was between 0.7 and 0.8
Table 3: Reliability Measure
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
.723 .728 40
Factor Analysis
The 40 things of the GEIT were subjected to corroborative important segments investigation
(PCA). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin esteem was 0.68 which was more noteworthy than the
suggested estimation of .60 and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was huge, supporting
factorability of the grid. A four factor arrangement was determined, and to help translation
Verimax pivot was performed.
Table 4: KMO & Baetlett’s test values
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .679
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Approx. Chi-Square 1767.996
df 780
Sig. .000
Correlation Matrix
Correlations between all 40 items were calculated. The significance levels of the inter
correlations were also noted. Inter correlation was also found between GEIT total and TEQue
score and between GEIT total score and big five scores. Not all of them were greater than 0.3

to be significantly related. TEQue had significant correlation with big five measures of
personality traits. GEI total had low positive correlation with BFI Conscientiousness and
negative correlation with BFI neuroticism.
Total Variance Explained and Scree Plot
The variance explained by the 40 items was recorded and percentage explanation was taken
into account for effect size. The Scree plot for the fraction of total variance was explained by
figure1. Four distinct contrasts were observed in total variance explained matrix and hence
four factors were studied in Verimax rotational matrix.
Figure 2: Scree plot of GEIT scores
Component Matrix
This matrix exhibited the un-rotated factor loadings of each of the items on the four
components obtained from factor analysis. The absolute value of correlation was greater than
0.4 between the rotated components (appendix table 13).
Rotated Component Matrix
For four components, not all the rotated factors loaded well. Factor one and two with
correlation values greater than 0.5 loaded well in component 4. In component 1 factors 9, 10,
and 20 loaded well with significant correlations (appendix table 23).

From factor analysis existence of four factors was well supported. The effect size was found
to be satisfactory. Forty item GEIT scores were correlated in accordance with earlier results.
TEQue score and total big five scores were compared with total GEIT score and was found to
be in line with earlier research works (appendix table 24).
Discussion
The after effects of exploratory and corroborative factor investigation of the attribute EI size
of Schutte et al. (1998) introduced here presents a reproduction of the four-factor structure
acquired by Petrides and Furnham (2000). The discoveries are additionally in concurrence
with the reasonable system of EI as a multidimensional build. The elements demonstrate
some cover with the applied model of John D. Mayer (1996). Such a progressive model
would be normal on the premise that self-reports of different areas of passionate aptitudes
would be required to be emphatically correlated. The example of connections of quality EI
with identity and different measures found in the present investigation is by and large as per
the desires depicted in the presentation and with discoveries from different examinations
(Newsome et al., 2000). Relationships between's quality EI scores and different measures
were additionally examined. Add up to GEI scores was observed to be correlated with add up
to TEQui score and with the verbal and execution sub-scales, recommending that
characteristic EI as characterized by this specific measure is unmistakable from psychometric
knowledge, affirming past discoveries of feeble or non significant relationship between
quality EI and insight (Derksen et al., 2002). As discussed above and talked about in more

detail somewhere else (Petrides, Pita et al., 2007), an attention on area particular parts of
identity will be helpful for hypothetically determined research that accentuates replication
and clarification. This objective isn't best served by imagination about that happily relapse
criteria on five wide, thoughtfully inconsequential variables (Big Five).
Feelings are yet a solitary, yet major, space of identity, and it will be important to stretch out
attribute EI hypothesis to envelop other vital areas such as social, individual, and Meta
cognitive areas. The acknowledgment of this point holds guarantee for the mix of self-idea,
self-adequacy, and false knowledge models into the standard scientific classifications of
identity. The TEIQue has been intended to give far reaching scope of the sampling space of
characteristic EI that is of the feeling related parts of identity
There are a few confinements to this investigation that ought to be considered. The first is the
example estimate utilized as a part of the present examination and the way they were directed
crosswise over statistic subgroups. Moreover, factor investigation normally requires
substantial test sizes to accomplish dependability in assessing the models. Future research
should in this manner reproduce these discoveries on bigger examples to guarantee the
dependability of the models, and therefore the discoveries.
Second, despite the fact that GEIT was utilized as a part of the present investigation to
inspect the structure of the BFI for reasons for having the capacity to contrast it with different
examinations utilizing comparative techniques (Schmitt and Allik, 2005), different strategies
ought to be used.

Reference
C. Stough, D. H. Saklofske, and J. D. Parker, Advances in the assessment of emotional intelligence.
New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-88370-0_5
Derksen, J., Kramer, I., & Katzko, M. (2002). Does a self-report measure for emotional intelligence assess
something different than general intelligence?. Personality and individual differences, 32(1), 37-48.
Harary, F., & Palmer, E. M. (2014). Graphical enumeration. Elsevier.
Martinez-Pons, M. (1997). The relation of emotional intelligence with selected areas of personal
functioning. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 17(1), 3-13.
Mayer, J. D., & Geher, G. (1996). Emotional intelligence and the identification of
emotion. Intelligence, 22(2), 89-113.
Petrides, K. V., Pita, R., & Kokkinaki, F. (2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor
space. British journal of psychology, 98(2), 273-289.
Saklofske, D., Austin, E., & Minski, P. (2003). Factor structure and validity of a trait emotional

intelligence measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 707- 721.doi:
10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00056-9
Schutte, N., Malouff, J., Simunek, M., Mckenley, J., & Hollander, S. (2002). Characteristic
emotional intelligence and emotional well-being. Cognition & Emotion, 16(6), 769- 785. doi:
10.1080/0269993014300
Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53
nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of
personality and social psychology, 89(4), 623.
Van der Zee, K., Thijs, M., & Schakel, L. (2002). The relationship of emotional intelligence with
academic intelligence and the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 16(2), 103-125.

Appendix
Table 5: The Global Emotional Intelligence Test – GEIT 1

Question SA SM SocA RM Question SA SM SocA RM
1. My emotions generally have a strong impact on the way I
behave. 1 21. Group differences
are always
causing difficulties and
unrest. 0
little or no impact on the way I
behave. 0 understood and valued. 1
2. I am generally guided by my goals and values. 1 22. When I see bias and
intolerance I always
challenge the initiating
people. 1
others goals and values. 0 turn a blind eye and
ignore it. 0
3. When I am under pressure, I
generally have changed behaviours from normal. 1 23. I always help out
based on
the tasks others need
help with. 0
behaviours that remain unchanged. 0 understanding others
needs and feelings. 1
4. I generally learn most by actively doing activities. 0 24. I always listen to the important
words being said. 0
from reflecting on past
experiences. 1
listen well and am
attentive to emotional
cues.
1
5. I generally have a good sense of humour
about myself. 1 25. Others perspectives
are always
understood and
sensitivity shown. 1
take myself seriously. 0 clouding the issues and
getting us off track. 0
6. I present myself with self-assurance and having
"presence". 1
26. I always find social
networks in the
organisation
get in the way of
delivering performance. 0
with some confidence and
cautiousness. 0 help create better
decision networks. 1
7. Where there are uncertainties
and pressures, I am always
decisive and make sound
decisions. 1 27. I always use
informal key power
relationships to get what
I need.
1
cautious about making the right
decision. 0
formal decision
networks to get what I
need.
0
8. I always voice views that are unpopular and go out on a limb
for what is right. 1 28. I always give people what they
ask for. 0
most others agree with and
support. 0
understand people’s
needs and match my
response.
1
9. I always like to take on new challenges. 1 29. I always act as a trusted advisor
to friends. 1
maintain the status quo. 0 tell friends what they
want to hear. 0
10. I generally inspire confidence in others. 1 30. Increasing customers
satisfaction and loyalty
is always part of the way
I work 1
rely on others confidence. 0 is not important in
achieving the sale. 0

Table 6: The Global Emotional Intelligence Test – GEIT 2
Question SA SM SocA RM Question SA SM SocA RM
11. I generally allow my emotions and moods to
impact on my behaviours. 0 31. The vision and
mission are always
given to people so they
know where we are
going.
0
keep my disruptive emotions and
impulses under control. 1 used to inspire groups
and individuals. 1
12. When I am under pressure I get easily distracted in other
things. 0 32. I always let people know of the
behaviours expected. 0
I think clearly and stay focused 1 model the behaviours
expected of others. 1
13. I always do as I say I will do. 1 33. I always give tasks to
people who
can get the job done and
do it well. 0
do only what I have to do. 0 will grow and develop as
a result of the challenge 1
14. Trust by others is automatically given to me. 0 34. Winning people over
is something that I find difficult to do. 0
is built through reliability and
authenticity. 1 I am very good at. 1
15. I am always flexible in how I see events. 1 35. I always
communicate in a way
that everyone
understands what I am
saying.
0
able to see events for what they
are. 0
that seeks mutual
understanding and full
information sharing.
1
16. During changing situations, I
always
work hard to try and keep up with
the demands. 0 36. I always
go along with the
changes being driven by
others.
0
smoothly handle multiple demands
and shifting priorities. 1
recognise the need for
changes and remove
barriers.
1
17. I always set myself challenging goals. 1 37. I always handle
difficult people
in a straight forward and
direct manner. 0
complete the goals that are set for
me. 0 with diplomacy and tact. 1
18. When obstacles and setbacks
occur in pursuing my goals, I
always
readjust the goals and/or
expectations. 0 38. I always seek out
relationships that are mutually beneficial. 1
persist in seeking the goals despite
what has happened. 1 will help me achieve my
end goal. 0
19. Generally, I pursue goals beyond what is
required or expected of me. 1 39. I generally have a stronger focus on tasks
rather than relationships 0
pursue goals only as far as is
required of me. 0 balanced focus on tasks
and relationships. 1
20. When I Identify opportunities,
I am always
uncertain about whether to pursue
the opportunity. 0 40. When I work with
teams, I always
make it clear what I
expect members to do. 0
proactive in pursuing the
opportunity. 1 draw all members into
enthusiastic participation. 1
SA= Self-Awareness; SM = Self-Management; SocA = Social Awareness; RM =
Relationship Management

Table 7: Descriptive for gender
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Male 68 23.7 24.1 24.1
Female 214 74.6 75.9 100.0
Total 282 98.3 100.0
Missing System 5 1.7
Total 287 100.0
Table 8: Descriptive for gender and age
Descriptive Statistics
N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic
Age 287 29.00 19.00 48.00 21.8432 3.75841
Gender 282 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.7589 .42853
Valid N (listwise) 282

Table 9: Descriptive Values for GEIT40
Question
Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
N Valid 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00
Missing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 0.84 0.91 0.76 0.56 0.79 0.38 0.20 0.51 0.58 0.61
Median 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mode 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Std. Deviation 0.37 0.28 0.43 0.50 0.41 0.49 0.40 0.50 0.49 0.49
Range 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maximum 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Question
Number 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N
Valid 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00
Missing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 0.59 0.54 0.63 0.92 0.70 0.33 0.64 0.39 0.63 0.52
Median 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Mode 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Std. Deviation 0.49 0.50 0.48 0.28 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.48 0.50
Range 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maximum 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Question
Number 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
N
Valid 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00
Missing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 0.84 0.80 0.79 0.86 0.93 0.84 0.54 0.86 0.91 0.96
Median 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mode 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Std. Deviation 0.36 0.40 0.41 0.34 0.25 0.36 0.50 0.35 0.29 0.20
Range 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maximum 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Question
Number 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
N
Valid 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00 287.0
0 287.00 287.00
Missing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 0.63 0.79 0.34 0.64 0.73 0.70 0.55 0.89 0.78 0.79
Median 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Mode 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Std. Deviation 0.48 0.41 0.47 0.48 0.45 0.46 0.50 0.32 0.41 0.41
Range 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maximum 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Table 10: Frequency table for the missing value and validity check 1
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 46 16 16 16 0 25 8.7 8.7 8.7
1 241 84 84 100 1 262 91.3 91.3 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 70 24.4 24.4 24.4 0 125 43.6 43.6 43.6
1 217 75.6 75.6 100 1 162 56.4 56.4 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 61 21.3 21.3 21.3 0 179 62.4 62.4 62.4
1 226 78.7 78.7 100 1 108 37.6 37.6 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 231 80.5 80.5 80.5 0 142 49.5 49.5 49.5
1 56 19.5 19.5 100 1 145 50.5 50.5 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 120 41.8 41.8 41.8 0 112 39 39 39
1 167 58.2 58.2 100 1 175 61 61 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 117 40.8 40.8 40.8 0 132 46 46 46
1 170 59.2 59.2 100 1 155 54 54 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 107 37.3 37.3 37.3 0 24 8.4 8.4 8.4
1 180 62.7 62.7 100 1 263 91.6 91.6 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 87 30.3 30.3 30.3 0 192 66.9 66.9 66.9
1 200 69.7 69.7 100 1 95 33.1 33.1 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 103 35.9 35.9 35.9 0 175 61 61 61
1 184 64.1 64.1 100 1 112 39 39 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 107 37.3 37.3 37.3 0 137 47.7 47.7 47.7
1 180 62.7 62.7 100 1 150 52.3 52.3 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Q19
Valid
Q20
Valid
Q16
Valid
Q17
Valid
Q18
Valid
Q13
Valid
Q14
Valid
Q15
Valid
Q10
Valid
Q11
Valid
Q12
Valid
Q7
Valid
Q8
Valid
Q9
Valid
Q4
Valid
Q5
Valid
Q6
Valid
Q1
Valid
Q2
Valid
Q3
Valid

Table 11: Frequency table for the missing value and validity check 2
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 45 15.7 15.7 15.7 0 57 19.9 19.9 19.9
1 242 84.3 84.3 100 1 230 80.1 80.1 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 61 21.3 21.3 21.3 0 39 13.6 13.6 13.6
1 226 78.7 78.7 100 1 248 86.4 86.4 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 19 6.6 6.6 6.6 0 45 15.7 15.7 15.7
1 268 93.4 93.4 100 1 242 84.3 84.3 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 132 46 46 46 0 40 13.9 13.9 13.9
1 155 54 54 100 1 247 86.1 86.1 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 26 9.1 9.1 9.1 0 12 4.2 4.2 4.2
1 261 90.9 90.9 100 1 275 95.8 95.8 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 106 36.9 36.9 36.9 0 61 21.3 21.3 21.3
1 181 63.1 63.1 100 1 226 78.7 78.7 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 190 66.2 66.2 66.2 0 104 36.2 36.2 36.2
1 97 33.8 33.8 100 1 183 63.8 63.8 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 78 27.2 27.2 27.2 0 86 30 30 30
1 209 72.8 72.8 100 1 201 70 70 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 129 44.9 44.9 44.9 0 33 11.5 11.5 11.5
1 158 55.1 55.1 100 1 254 88.5 88.5 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
0 63 22 22 22 0 60 20.9 20.9 20.9
1 224 78 78 100 1 227 79.1 79.1 100
Total 287 100 100 Total 287 100 100
Q40
Valid
Q37
Valid
Q38
Valid
Q39
Valid
Q34
Valid
Q35
Valid
Q36
Valid
Q31
Valid
Q32
Valid
Q33
Valid
Q28
Valid
Q29
Valid
Q30
Valid
Q25
Valid
Q26
Valid
Q27
Valid
Q22
Valid
Q23
Valid
Q24
Valid
Q21
Valid

Table 12: Reliability Summary
N %
Cases
Valid 287 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 287 100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
.723 .728 40
Table 13: Item statistics
Item Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviatio
n
N
Q1 0.8397 0.36751 287
Q2 0.9129 0.28249 287
Q3 0.7561 0.43018 287
Q4 0.5645 0.49669 287
Q5 0.7875 0.40982 287
Q6 0.3763 0.4853 287
Q7 0.1951 0.39699 287
Q8 0.5052 0.50085 287
Q9 0.5819 0.49411 287
Q10 0.6098 0.48866 287
Q11 0.5923 0.49226 287
Q12 0.5401 0.49926 287
Q13 0.6272 0.4844 287
Q14 0.9164 0.27731 287
Q15 0.6969 0.46042 287
Q16 0.331 0.4714 287
Q17 0.6411 0.48051 287
Q18 0.3902 0.48866 287
Q19 0.6272 0.4844 287

Q20 0.5226 0.50036 287
Q21 0.8432 0.36424 287
Q22 0.8014 0.39965 287
Q23 0.7875 0.40982 287
Q24 0.8641 0.34327 287
Q25 0.9338 0.24907 287
Q26 0.8432 0.36424 287
Q27 0.5401 0.49926 287
Q28 0.8606 0.34694 287
Q29 0.9094 0.28753 287
Q30 0.9582 0.20051 287
Q31 0.6307 0.48347 287
Q32 0.7875 0.40982 287
Q33 0.338 0.47385 287
Q34 0.6376 0.48152 287
Q35 0.7282 0.44565 287
Q36 0.7003 0.45891 287
Q37 0.5505 0.49831 287
Q38 0.885 0.31956 287
Q39 0.7805 0.41464 287
Q40 0.7909 0.40735 287
Table 14: Inter factor correlation matrix 1
Que
s Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
Q1 1.00 -0.03 0.26 0.04 -0.11 0.01 -0.05 0.10 -0.04 0.02 -0.27 -0.14 0.00 -0.06 0.04 -0.08 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.00
Q2 -0.03 1.00 -0.06 0.00 -0.01 0.06 0.03 -0.01 0.24 0.08 0.07 0.11 0.22 0.09 0.01 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.15
Q3 0.26 -0.06 1.00 0.03 -0.04 0.02 -0.09 -0.03 0.01 -0.07 -0.27 -0.17 0.00 0.09 0.12 -0.14 -0.07 -0.01 -0.02 -0.07
Q4 0.04 0.00 0.03 1.00 -0.08 0.04 -0.06 0.02 -0.19 -0.01 -0.01 -0.13 -0.07 -0.04 0.03 -0.10 -0.07 -0.03 -0.02 -0.07
Q5 -0.11 -0.01 -0.04 -0.08 1.00 0.03 -0.02 0.00 -0.01 0.02 0.04 -0.05 -0.05 -0.03 0.20 0.09 0.04 -0.09 -0.05 -0.05
Q6 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.03 1.00 0.25 0.04 0.13 0.19 0.02 0.13 0.12 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.12
Q7 -0.05 0.03 -0.09 -0.06 -0.02 0.25 1.00 0.12 0.08 0.14 0.02 0.17 0.11 -0.01 0.04 0.14 0.13 0.09 0.03 0.17
Q8 0.10 -0.01 -0.03 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.12 1.00 0.11 0.15 -0.03 -0.12 0.00 0.05 0.03 -0.04 0.06 -0.04 0.10 0.05
Q9 -0.04 0.24 0.01 -0.19 -0.01 0.13 0.08 0.11 1.00 0.31 0.07 0.15 0.19 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.15 0.22 0.25 0.36
Q10 0.02 0.08 -0.07 -0.01 0.02 0.19 0.14 0.15 0.31 1.00 0.15 0.22 0.20 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.24 0.11 0.21 0.29
Q11 -0.27 0.07 -0.27 -0.01 0.04 0.02 0.02 -0.03 0.07 0.15 1.00 0.10 0.05 -0.02 0.04 0.10 0.16 -0.01 0.09 0.07
Q12 -0.14 0.11 -0.17 -0.13 -0.05 0.13 0.17 -0.12 0.15 0.22 0.10 1.00 0.26 -0.03 -0.11 0.25 0.23 0.18 0.24 0.18
Q13 0.00 0.22 0.00 -0.07 -0.05 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.20 0.05 0.26 1.00 -0.03 -0.04 0.04 0.23 0.17 0.27 0.17
Q14 -0.06 0.09 0.09 -0.04 -0.03 0.03 -0.01 0.05 0.03 0.02 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 1.00 -0.04 0.00 -0.02 0.01 0.00 -0.04
Q15 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.03 0.20 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.04 -0.11 -0.04 -0.04 1.00 0.16 0.11 -0.09 0.06 0.04
Q16 -0.08 0.06 -0.14 -0.10 0.09 0.05 0.14 -0.04 0.24 0.17 0.10 0.25 0.04 0.00 0.16 1.00 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.23

Table 15: Inter factor correlation matrix 2
Que
s Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40
Q1 -0.03 0.04 0.10 0.22 -0.04 0.02 0.15 0.04 0.03 -0.04 0.02 -0.13 0.01 -0.01 0.12 -0.10 -0.01 -0.04 0.07 0.06
Q2 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 -0.09 0.13 0.20 0.06 -0.06 0.14 0.01 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.07 0.04 0.02 -0.01
Q3 0.00 -0.02 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.11 0.08 -0.04 0.00 -0.03 0.00 0.08 -0.16 0.05 -0.04 0.06 -0.03 0.03 0.11
Q4 -0.07 -0.02 0.09 0.08 0.08 -0.05 0.05 -0.03 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.00 -0.12 0.06 -0.10 -0.02 -0.05 -0.02 -0.05
Q5 -0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.09 0.04 0.15 -0.01 0.08 -0.04 0.14 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.11 0.10 0.15
Q6 -0.04 0.10 0.12 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.15 -0.03 0.05 -0.02 -0.04 0.11 0.09 -0.01 0.05 -0.01 0.03 0.05 0.12
Q7 -0.01 0.11 -0.05 -0.04 -0.05 0.02 0.07 0.10 0.06 -0.07 -0.04 -0.07 0.06 0.10 -0.08 0.15 -0.07 0.07 -0.04 -0.01
Q8 0.05 0.21 0.00 -0.09 -0.07 -0.04 0.12 -0.14 0.10 0.04 -0.04 -0.11 0.10 -0.04 -0.01 0.01 -0.14 -0.03 -0.02 -0.13
Q9 0.12 0.16 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.08 -0.02 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.17 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.12 0.26 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.07
Q10 0.11 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.36 0.11 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.15 0.13
Q11 0.09 -0.04 0.02 0.06 -0.02 -0.05 -0.14 0.08 0.01 0.08 0.04 0.16 -0.04 0.10 -0.06 0.08 0.09 0.03 -0.03 0.10
Q12 0.03 0.00 0.05 -0.02 0.09 0.06 -0.15 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.06 0.08 -0.02 0.16 -0.08 0.18 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.06
Q13 0.06 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.24 -0.02 0.13 0.06 0.08 0.03 -0.02
Q14 0.15 0.07 -0.07 0.03 0.12 0.11 -0.03 -0.01 0.17 0.19 -0.10 -0.07 0.06 -0.04 0.04 0.05 -0.02 0.17 -0.04 0.00
Q15 -0.06 -0.06 0.14 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.17 0.13 -0.02 0.09 0.08 0.18 0.20 0.02 0.19 0.18 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.15
Q16 0.00 0.09 -0.02 0.00 -0.02 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.02 0.04 0.12 0.04 0.03 0.11 0.03 0.25 0.07 0.05 0.16 0.07
Que
s Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
Q17 0.03 0.08 -0.07 -0.07 0.04 0.03 0.13 0.06 0.15 0.24 0.16 0.23 0.23 -0.02 0.11 0.08 1.00 0.12 0.40 0.17
Q18 0.06 0.10 -0.01 -0.03 -0.09 0.07 0.09 -0.04 0.22 0.11 -0.01 0.18 0.17 0.01 -0.09 0.08 0.12 1.00 0.26 0.16
Q19 0.02 0.09 -0.02 -0.02 -0.05 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.25 0.21 0.09 0.24 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.40 0.26 1.00 0.22
Q20 0.00 0.15 -0.07 -0.07 -0.05 0.12 0.17 0.05 0.36 0.29 0.07 0.18 0.17 -0.04 0.04 0.23 0.17 0.16 0.22 1.00
Q21 -0.03 0.11 0.00 -0.07 -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 0.05 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.03 0.06 0.15 -0.06 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.14
Q22 0.04 0.06 -0.02 -0.02 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.21 0.16 0.12 -0.04 0.00 0.14 0.07 -0.06 0.09 0.07 -0.03 0.05 0.14
Q23 0.10 0.05 0.14 0.09 0.04 0.12 -0.05 0.00 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.05 0.11 -0.07 0.14 -0.02 0.13 0.08 0.04 0.02
Q24 0.22 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.04 -0.04 -0.09 0.06 0.12 0.06 -0.02 0.14 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.17 0.07 0.09 -0.05
Q25 -0.04 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.03 -0.05 -0.07 0.03 0.07 -0.02 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.01 -0.02 0.12 0.04 0.09 0.00
Q26 0.02 0.07 0.00 -0.05 0.10 0.02 0.02 -0.04 0.08 0.09 -0.05 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.03 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.01
Q27 0.15 -0.09 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.12 -0.02 0.08 -0.14 -0.15 0.00 -0.03 0.17 0.07 -0.06 -0.04 -0.13 0.06
Q28 0.04 0.13 0.08 -0.03 0.09 0.15 0.10 -0.14 0.21 0.17 0.08 0.11 0.13 -0.01 0.13 0.09 0.14 0.22 0.13 0.08
Q29 0.03 0.20 -0.04 0.04 0.04 -0.03 0.06 0.10 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.10 0.13 0.17 -0.02 0.02 0.12 0.08 -0.07 0.11
Q30 -0.04 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.15 0.05 -0.07 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.12 0.06 0.19 0.09 0.04 0.03 -0.01 0.02 0.01
Q31 0.02 -0.06 -0.03 0.01 -0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 0.17 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.08 -0.10 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.08 0.10 0.09
Q32 -0.13 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.08 -0.04 -0.07 -0.11 0.08 0.06 0.16 0.08 0.06 -0.07 0.18 0.04 -0.02 0.05 0.11 -0.05
Que
s Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40
Q17 0.08 0.07 0.13 0.17 0.12 0.06 -0.06 0.14 0.12 0.03 0.20 -0.02 0.20 0.07 0.15 0.18 0.16 0.03 0.01 0.13
Q18 0.05 -0.03 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.03 -0.04 0.22 0.08 -0.01 0.08 0.05 -0.01 0.13 0.04 0.20 0.03 -0.09 -0.01 -0.12
Q19 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.02 -0.13 0.13 -0.07 0.02 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.19 0.07 -0.03 -0.04 0.05
Q20 0.14 0.14 0.02 -0.05 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.01 0.09 -0.05 0.14 0.21 0.08 0.30 -0.05 -0.02 0.03 -0.10
Q21 1.00 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.27 0.21 -0.03 0.02 0.10 0.05 0.09 0.03 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.24 0.03 0.09
Q22 0.03 1.00 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.11 0.11 -0.06 0.07 0.10 0.00
Q23 0.01 0.15 1.00 0.34 0.24 0.08 0.07 0.23 0.10 0.15 0.13 0.06 0.12 0.05 0.28 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.16 0.09
Q24 0.05 0.11 0.34 1.00 0.26 0.05 -0.02 0.28 0.12 0.17 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.12 0.22 0.05 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.02
Q25 0.27 0.11 0.24 0.26 1.00 0.16 -0.05 0.10 0.16 0.08 0.12 0.03 0.04 0.12 0.18 0.16 0.10 0.34 0.13 0.07
Q26 0.21 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.16 1.00 0.03 0.10 0.03 0.15 0.13 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.15 0.24 0.10 0.27
Q27 -0.03 0.01 0.07 -0.02 -0.05 0.03 1.00 -0.03 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.08 -0.04 -0.10 -0.03 0.14 0.02
Q28 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.28 0.10 0.10 -0.03 1.00 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.16 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.14 0.08 0.15 0.14
Q29 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.08 1.00 0.18 0.06 -0.08 -0.01 0.09 0.05 0.17 -0.09 0.12 0.07 -0.04
Q30 0.05 0.07 0.15 0.17 0.08 0.15 0.02 0.12 0.18 1.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 -0.05 0.03 0.02 -0.08 0.09 0.02 0.02
Q31 0.09 0.07 0.13 0.08 0.12 0.13 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.02 1.00 0.11 0.12 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.10
Q32 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.16 -0.08 0.02 0.11 1.00 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.07 0.08 0.05 -0.03 0.09

Que
s Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
Q33 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 -0.04 0.11 0.057 0.103 0.16 0.09 -0.04 -0.02 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.03 0.20 -0.01 0.12 0.14
Q34 -0.01 0.20 -0.16 -0.12 0.14 0.09 0.097 -0.04 0.24 0.36 0.10 0.16 0.24 -0.04 0.02 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.14 0.21
Q35 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.07 -0.01 -0.08 -0.01 0.12 0.11 -0.06 -0.08 -0.02 0.04 0.19 0.03 0.15 0.04 0.11 0.08
Q36 -0.10 0.20 -0.04 -0.10 0.05 0.05 0.149 0.007 0.26 0.24 0.08 0.18 0.13 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.30
Q37 -0.01 0.07 0.06 -0.02 0.03 -0.01 -0.07 -0.14 0.03 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.06 -0.02 0.11 0.07 0.16 0.03 0.07 -0.05
Q38 -0.04 0.04 -0.03 -0.05 0.11 0.03 0.067 -0.03 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.17 0.07 0.05 0.03 -0.09 -0.03 -0.02
Q39 0.07 0.02 0.03 -0.02 0.10 0.05 -0.04 -0.02 0.08 0.15 -0.03 0.09 0.03 -0.04 0.05 0.16 0.01 -0.01 -0.04 0.03
Q40 0.06 -0.01 0.11 -0.05 0.15 0.12 -0.01 -0.13 0.07 0.13 0.10 0.06 -0.02 0.00 0.15 0.07 0.13 -0.12 0.05 -0.10
Que
s Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40
Q33 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.03 0.04 0.09 0.04 0.08 -0.01 0.00 0.12 0.10 1.00 0.02 0.17 0.18 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.13
Q34 0.07 0.15 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.02 0.12 0.09 -0.05 0.05 0.10 0.02 1.00 0.05 0.24 0.02 0.05 0.14 0.08
Q35 0.02 0.11 0.28 0.22 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.05 1.00 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.13 0.21
Q36 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.05 0.16 0.05 -0.04 0.18 0.17 0.02 0.15 0.07 0.18 0.24 0.13 1.00 0.05 0.03 0.20 0.09
Q37 0.03 -0.06 0.18 0.13 0.10 0.15 -0.10 0.14 -0.09 -0.08 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.13 0.05 1.00 0.07 0.13 0.10
Q38 0.24 0.07 0.11 0.14 0.34 0.24 -0.03 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.07 1.00 0.05 0.19
Q39 0.03 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.10 0.14 0.15 0.07 0.02 0.14 -0.03 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.20 0.13 0.05 1.00 0.16
Q40 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.27 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.10 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.21 0.09 0.10 0.19 0.16 1.00 1.00

Table 16: Cronbach's alpha for each factor
GEIT(S)
Scale
Mean if
Item
Deleted
Scale
Variance if
Item
Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlatio
n
GEIT(S)
Scale
Mean if
Item
Deleted
Scale
Variance if
Item
Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlatio
n
Q1 26.3449 24.681 0.023 Q21 26.3415 24.107 0.184
Q2 26.2718 24.192 0.226 Q22 26.3833 23.909 0.213
Q3 26.4286 24.777 -0.015 Q23 26.3972 23.436 0.326
Q4 26.6202 25.027 -0.075 Q24 26.3206 23.855 0.276
Q5 26.3972 24.415 0.078 Q25 26.2509 24.154 0.279
Q6 26.8084 23.673 0.21 Q26 26.3415 23.946 0.23
Q7 26.9895 24.15 0.152 Q27 26.6446 24.412 0.048
Q8 26.6794 24.491 0.032 Q28 26.324 23.604 0.348
Q9 26.6028 22.758 0.402 Q29 26.2753 24.291 0.185
Q10 26.5749 22.609 0.442 Q30 26.2265 24.553 0.154
Q11 26.5923 24.242 0.086 Q31 26.554 23.563 0.235
Q12 26.6446 23.552 0.227 Q32 26.3972 24.114 0.153
Q13 26.5575 23.22 0.31 Q33 26.8467 23.48 0.26
Q14 26.2683 24.714 0.039 Q34 26.547 23.214 0.313
Q15 26.4878 23.719 0.216 Q35 26.4564 23.487 0.281
Q16 26.8537 23.545 0.247 Q36 26.4843 22.88 0.412
Q17 26.5436 22.969 0.369 Q37 26.6341 23.946 0.145
Q18 26.7944 23.723 0.197 Q38 26.2997 24.19 0.193
Q19 26.5575 23.171 0.32 Q39 26.4042 23.773 0.236
Q20 26.662 23.134 0.315 Q40 26.3937 23.855 0.221

Table 17: Cronbach's Alpha values
GEIT(S)
Cronbach'
s Alpha if
Item
Deleted
GEIT(S)
Cronbach'
s Alpha if
Item
Deleted
Q1 0.726 Q21 0.719
Q2 0.718 Q22 0.717
Q3 0.729 Q23 0.712
Q4 0.735 Q24 0.715
Q5 0.724 Q25 0.716
Q6 0.718 Q26 0.717
Q7 0.72 Q27 0.728
Q8 0.729 Q28 0.712
Q9 0.706 Q29 0.719
Q10 0.703 Q30 0.721
Q11 0.725 Q31 0.716
Q12 0.717 Q32 0.72
Q13 0.712 Q33 0.715
Q14 0.724 Q34 0.711
Q15 0.717 Q35 0.714
Q16 0.715 Q36 0.706
Q17 0.708 Q37 0.722
Q18 0.718 Q38 0.719
Q19 0.711 Q39 0.716
Q20 0.711 Q40 0.717
Table 18: Scale Statistic
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
27.1847 24.899 4.98992 40

Table 19: Factor analysis summary Correlation Matrix
GEITs Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
Q1 1 -0.03 0.261 0.038 -0.11 0.006 -0.05 0.1 -0.04 0.02 -0.27 -0.14 -0 -0.06 0.042 -0.08 0.03 0.057 0.017 0.001
Q2 -0.03 1 -0.06 0.003 -0.01 0.061 0.027 -0.01 0.239 0.082 0.071 0.112 0.222 0.085 0.011 0.06 0.078 0.095 0.094 0.15
Q3 0.261 -0.06 1 0.025 -0.04 0.022 -0.09 -0.03 0.012 -0.07 -0.27 -0.17 -0 0.092 0.12 -0.14 -0.07 -0.01 -0.02 -0.07
Q4 0.038 0.003 0.025 1 -0.08 0.044 -0.06 0.016 -0.19 -0.01 -0.01 -0.13 -0.07 -0.04 0.032 -0.1 -0.07 -0.03 -0.02 -0.07
Q5 -0.11 -0.01 -0.04 -0.08 1 0.034 -0.02 -0 -0.01 0.021 0.037 -0.05 -0.05 -0.03 0.195 0.094 0.037 -0.09 -0.05 -0.05
Q6 0.006 0.061 0.022 0.044 0.034 1 0.253 0.035 0.134 0.194 0.015 0.125 0.123 0.027 0.09 0.05 0.026 0.072 0.019 0.123
Q7 -0.05 0.027 -0.09 -0.06 -0.02 0.253 1 0.118 0.079 0.142 0.015 0.172 0.107 -0.01 0.038 0.139 0.13 0.093 0.034 0.171
Q8 0.1 -0.01 -0.03 0.016 -0 0.035 0.118 1 0.108 0.151 -0.03 -0.12 0.001 0.054 0.03 -0.04 0.059 -0.04 0.102 0.045
Q9 -0.04 0.239 0.012 -0.19 -0.01 0.134 0.079 0.108 1 0.307 0.073 0.153 0.194 0.025 0.04 0.236 0.146 0.215 0.252 0.364
Q10 0.02 0.082 -0.07 -0.01 0.021 0.194 0.142 0.151 0.307 1 0.15 0.222 0.196 0.016 0.001 0.168 0.235 0.113 0.21 0.294
Q11 -0.27 0.071 -0.27 -0.01 0.037 0.015 0.015 -0.03 0.073 0.15 1 0.102 0.05 -0.02 0.039 0.101 0.163 -0.01 0.094 0.073
Q12 -0.14 0.112 -0.17 -0.13 -0.05 0.125 0.172 -0.12 0.153 0.222 0.102 1 0.257 -0.03 -0.11 0.248 0.228 0.179 0.243 0.182
Q13 -0 0.222 -0 -0.07 -0.05 0.123 0.107 0.001 0.194 0.196 0.05 0.257 1 -0.03 -0.04 0.037 0.234 0.174 0.27 0.172
Q14 -0.06 0.085 0.092 -0.04 -0.03 0.027 -0.01 0.054 0.025 0.016 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 1 -0.04 -0 -0.02 0.009 0.001 -0.04
Q15 0.042 0.011 0.12 0.032 0.195 0.09 0.038 0.03 0.04 0.001 0.039 -0.11 -0.04 -0.04 1 0.158 0.107 -0.09 0.056 0.037
Q16 -0.08 0.06 -0.14 -0.1 0.094 0.05 0.139 -0.04 0.236 0.168 0.101 0.248 0.037 -0 0.158 1 0.079 0.075 0.052 0.228
Q17 0.03 0.078 -0.07 -0.07 0.037 0.026 0.13 0.059 0.146 0.235 0.163 0.228 0.234 -0.02 0.107 0.079 1 0.122 0.4 0.172
GEITs Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40
Q1 -0.03 0.044 0.098 0.215 -0.04 0.021 0.149 0.044 0.028 -0.04 0.02 -0.13 0.011 -0.01 0.117 -0.1 -0.01 -0.04 0.067 0.056
Q2 0.105 0.063 0.051 0.058 0.067 0.071 -0.09 0.125 0.204 0.059 -0.06 0.142 0.012 0.204 0.006 0.203 0.069 0.044 0.015 -0.01
Q3 0.001 -0.02 0.141 0.083 0.077 0.001 0.111 0.076 -0.04 0.003 -0.03 0.002 0.08 -0.16 0.054 -0.04 0.058 -0.03 0.032 0.107
Q4 -0.07 -0.02 0.093 0.082 0.077 -0.05 0.049 -0.03 0.041 0.097 0.012 0.025 0.004 -0.12 0.064 -0.1 -0.02 -0.05 -0.02 -0.05
Q5 -0.01 0.04 0.042 0.018 0.101 0.104 0.016 0.086 0.044 0.147 -0.01 0.084 -0.04 0.14 0.066 0.051 0.027 0.106 0.095 0.152
Q6 -0.04 0.098 0.122 0.035 0.033 0.018 0.067 0.146 -0.03 0.054 -0.02 -0.04 0.114 0.092 -0.01 0.053 -0.01 0.032 0.047 0.116
Q7 -0.01 0.113 -0.05 -0.04 -0.05 0.019 0.066 0.097 0.064 -0.07 -0.04 -0.07 0.057 0.097 -0.08 0.149 -0.07 0.067 -0.04 -0.01
Q8 0.052 0.206 -0 -0.09 -0.07 -0.04 0.122 -0.14 0.1 0.037 -0.04 -0.11 0.103 -0.04 -0.01 0.007 -0.14 -0.03 -0.02 -0.13
Q9 0.12 0.162 0.078 0.056 0.03 0.081 -0.02 0.21 0.003 0.035 0.171 0.078 0.158 0.243 0.117 0.263 0.029 0.049 0.08 0.068
Q10 0.107 0.121 0.056 0.12 0.074 0.087 0.079 0.173 0.171 0.011 0.083 0.056 0.088 0.363 0.105 0.241 0.067 0.003 0.145 0.133
Q11 0.091 -0.04 0.02 0.064 -0.02 -0.05 -0.14 0.076 0.01 0.075 0.041 0.158 -0.04 0.097 -0.06 0.076 0.091 0.034 -0.03 0.097
Q12 0.025 -0 0.05 -0.02 0.092 0.064 -0.15 0.113 0.098 0.122 0.062 0.084 -0.02 0.162 -0.08 0.175 0.066 0.084 0.085 0.059
Q13 0.064 0.14 0.11 0.136 0.113 0.064 -0 0.127 0.133 0.055 0.082 0.057 0.063 0.243 -0.02 0.125 0.057 0.084 0.026 -0.02
Q14 0.147 0.07 -0.07 0.027 0.122 0.112 -0.03 -0.01 0.168 0.188 -0.1 -0.07 0.056 -0.04 0.042 0.05 -0.02 0.167 -0.04 -0
Q15 -0.06 -0.06 0.139 0.07 0.007 0.028 0.167 0.129 -0.02 0.089 0.076 0.176 0.199 0.023 0.194 0.181 0.105 0.071 0.053 0.146
Q16 -0 0.09 -0.02 -0 -0.02 0.079 0.07 0.091 0.016 0.036 0.124 0.04 0.03 0.114 0.03 0.25 0.07 0.045 0.158 0.07
Q17 0.077 0.065 0.126 0.17 0.122 0.057 -0.06 0.139 0.118 0.025 0.195 -0.02 0.197 0.071 0.147 0.177 0.156 0.026 0.007 0.133
GEITs Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
Q18 0.057 0.095 -0.01 -0.03 -0.09 0.072 0.093 -0.04 0.215 0.113 -0.01 0.179 0.174 0.009 -0.09 0.075 0.122 1 0.262 0.164
Q19 0.017 0.094 -0.02 -0.02 -0.05 0.019 0.034 0.102 0.252 0.21 0.094 0.243 0.27 0.001 0.056 0.052 0.4 0.262 1 0.215
Q20 0.001 0.15 -0.07 -0.07 -0.05 0.123 0.171 0.045 0.364 0.294 0.073 0.182 0.172 -0.04 0.037 0.228 0.172 0.164 0.215 1
Q21 -0.03 0.105 0.001 -0.07 -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 0.052 0.12 0.107 0.091 0.025 0.064 0.147 -0.06 -0 0.077 0.05 0.084 0.144
Q22 0.044 0.063 -0.02 -0.02 0.04 0.098 0.113 0.206 0.162 0.121 -0.04 -0 0.14 0.07 -0.06 0.09 0.065 -0.03 0.05 0.136
Q23 0.098 0.051 0.141 0.093 0.042 0.122 -0.05 -0 0.078 0.056 0.02 0.05 0.11 -0.07 0.139 -0.02 0.126 0.084 0.04 0.015
Q24 0.215 0.058 0.083 0.082 0.018 0.035 -0.04 -0.09 0.056 0.12 0.064 -0.02 0.136 0.027 0.07 -0 0.17 0.067 0.094 -0.05
Q25 -0.04 0.067 0.077 0.077 0.101 0.033 -0.05 -0.07 0.03 0.074 -0.02 0.092 0.113 0.122 0.007 -0.02 0.122 0.041 0.085 -0
Q26 0.021 0.071 0.001 -0.05 0.104 0.018 0.019 -0.04 0.081 0.087 -0.05 0.064 0.064 0.112 0.028 0.079 0.057 0.031 0.024 0.01
Q27 0.149 -0.09 0.111 0.049 0.016 0.067 0.066 0.122 -0.02 0.079 -0.14 -0.15 -0 -0.03 0.167 0.07 -0.06 -0.04 -0.13 0.056
Q28 0.044 0.125 0.076 -0.03 0.086 0.146 0.097 -0.14 0.21 0.173 0.076 0.113 0.127 -0.01 0.129 0.091 0.139 0.219 0.127 0.079
Q29 0.028 0.204 -0.04 0.041 0.044 -0.03 0.064 0.1 0.003 0.171 0.01 0.098 0.133 0.168 -0.02 0.016 0.118 0.078 -0.07 0.112
Q30 -0.04 0.059 0.003 0.097 0.147 0.054 -0.07 0.037 0.035 0.011 0.075 0.122 0.055 0.188 0.089 0.036 0.025 -0.01 0.019 0.009
Q31 0.02 -0.06 -0.03 0.012 -0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 0.171 0.083 0.041 0.062 0.082 -0.1 0.076 0.124 0.195 0.079 0.097 0.093
Q32 -0.13 0.142 0.002 0.025 0.084 -0.04 -0.07 -0.11 0.078 0.056 0.158 0.084 0.057 -0.07 0.176 0.04 -0.02 0.049 0.11 -0.05
Q33 0.011 0.012 0.08 0.004 -0.04 0.114 0.057 0.103 0.158 0.088 -0.04 -0.02 0.063 0.056 0.199 0.03 0.197 -0.01 0.124 0.137

GEITs Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40
Q18 0.05 -0.03 0.084 0.067 0.041 0.031 -0.04 0.219 0.078 -0.01 0.079 0.049 -0.01 0.128 0.039 0.196 0.034 -0.09 -0.01 -0.12
Q19 0.084 0.05 0.04 0.094 0.085 0.024 -0.13 0.127 -0.07 0.019 0.097 0.11 0.124 0.138 0.112 0.188 0.071 -0.03 -0.04 0.047
Q20 0.144 0.136 0.015 -0.05 -0 0.01 0.056 0.079 0.112 0.009 0.093 -0.05 0.137 0.208 0.075 0.304 -0.05 -0.02 0.032 -0.1
Q21 1 0.026 0.01 0.053 0.271 0.209 -0.03 0.02 0.098 0.054 0.087 0.034 0.106 0.074 0.017 0.094 0.034 0.235 0.026 0.085
Q22 0.026 1 0.147 0.108 0.113 0.098 0.014 0.001 0.025 0.071 0.071 0.04 0.06 0.152 0.108 0.113 -0.06 0.067 0.095 0.002
Q23 0.01 0.147 1 0.341 0.238 0.08 0.067 0.234 0.103 0.147 0.132 0.063 0.119 0.051 0.276 0.181 0.181 0.106 0.157 0.089
Q24 0.053 0.108 0.341 1 0.262 0.053 -0.02 0.281 0.123 0.171 0.076 0.018 0.025 0.124 0.215 0.051 0.132 0.144 0.158 0.021
Q25 0.271 0.113 0.238 0.262 1 0.155 -0.05 0.095 0.16 0.084 0.116 0.033 0.042 0.12 0.184 0.162 0.097 0.343 0.13 0.07
Q26 0.209 0.098 0.08 0.053 0.155 1 0.025 0.103 0.031 0.149 0.127 0.01 0.085 0.094 0.124 0.053 0.15 0.235 0.095 0.273
Q27 -0.03 0.014 0.067 -0.02 -0.05 0.025 1 -0.03 0.025 0.017 0.047 0.05 0.039 0.017 0.081 -0.04 -0.1 -0.03 0.136 0.024
Q28 0.02 0.001 0.234 0.281 0.095 0.103 -0.03 1 0.083 0.117 0.088 0.16 0.075 0.115 0.093 0.176 0.142 0.076 0.151 0.139
Q29 0.098 0.025 0.103 0.123 0.16 0.031 0.025 0.083 1 0.177 0.06 -0.08 -0.01 0.09 0.053 0.165 -0.09 0.115 0.067 -0.04
Q30 0.054 0.071 0.147 0.171 0.084 0.149 0.017 0.117 0.177 1 0.02 0.019 0.002 -0.05 0.029 0.015 -0.08 0.088 0.015 0.021
Q31 0.087 0.071 0.132 0.076 0.116 0.127 0.047 0.088 0.06 0.02 1 0.114 0.119 0.054 0.149 0.146 0.034 0.086 0.135 0.104
Q32 0.034 0.04 0.063 0.018 0.033 0.01 0.05 0.16 -0.08 0.019 0.114 1 0.101 0.104 0.161 0.069 0.078 0.053 -0.03 0.089
Q33 0.106 0.06 0.119 0.025 0.042 0.085 0.039 0.075 -0.01 0.002 0.119 0.101 1 0.018 0.172 0.178 0.083 0.096 0.112 0.132
GEITs Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
Q34 0.097 -0.04 0.243 0.363 0.097 0.162 0.243 -0.04 0.023 0.114 0.071 0.128 0.138 0.208
Q35 -0.08 -0.01 0.117 0.105 -0.06 -0.08 -0.02 0.042 0.194 0.03 0.147 0.039 0.112 0.075
Q36 0.149 0.007 0.263 0.241 0.076 0.175 0.125 0.05 0.181 0.25 0.177 0.196 0.188 0.304
Q37 -0.07 -0.14 0.029 0.067 0.091 0.066 0.057 -0.02 0.105 0.07 0.156 0.034 0.071 -0.05
Q38 0.067 -0.03 0.049 0.003 0.034 0.084 0.084 0.167 0.071 0.045 0.026 -0.09 -0.03 -0.02
Q39 -0.04 -0.02 0.08 0.145 -0.03 0.085 0.026 -0.04 0.053 0.158 0.007 -0.01 -0.04 0.032
Q40 -0.01 -0.13 0.068 0.133 0.097 0.059 -0.02 -0 0.146 0.07 0.133 -0.12 0.047 -0.1
GEITs Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40
Q34 0.074 0.152 0.051 0.124 0.12 0.094 0.017 0.115 0.09 -0.05 0.054 0.104 0.018 1 0.045 0.235 0.018 0.046 0.143 0.076
Q35 0.017 0.108 0.276 0.215 0.184 0.124 0.081 0.093 0.053 0.029 0.149 0.161 0.172 0.045 1 0.13 0.125 0.074 0.13 0.206
Q36 0.094 0.113 0.181 0.051 0.162 0.053 -0.04 0.176 0.165 0.015 0.146 0.069 0.178 0.235 0.13 1 0.051 0.027 0.204 0.094
Q37 0.034 -0.06 0.181 0.132 0.097 0.15 -0.1 0.142 -0.09 -0.08 0.034 0.078 0.083 0.018 0.125 0.051 1 0.07 0.13 0.104
Q38 0.235 0.067 0.106 0.144 0.343 0.235 -0.03 0.076 0.115 0.088 0.086 0.053 0.096 0.046 0.074 0.027 0.07 1 0.046 0.191
Q39 0.026 0.095 0.157 0.158 0.13 0.095 0.136 0.151 0.067 0.015 0.135 -0.03 0.112 0.143 0.13 0.204 0.13 0.046 1 0.162
Q40 0.085 0.002 0.089 0.021 0.07 0.273 0.024 0.139 -0.04 0.021 0.104 0.089 0.132 0.076 0.206 0.094 0.104 0.191 0.162 1

Table 20: KMO & Baetlett’s test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .679
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Approx. Chi-Square 1767.996
df 780
Sig. .000
Table 21: Communalities
GEIT Initial Extraction GEIT Initial Extraction
Q1 1 0.387 Q21 1 0.248
Q2 1 0.181 Q22 1 0.177
Q3 1 0.302 Q23 1 0.346
Q4 1 0.082 Q24 1 0.307
Q5 1 0.132 Q25 1 0.436
Q6 1 0.109 Q26 1 0.217
Q7 1 0.179 Q27 1 0.232
Q8 1 0.267 Q28 1 0.248
Q9 1 0.377 Q29 1 0.299
Q10 1 0.36 Q30 1 0.177
Q11 1 0.307 Q31 1 0.142
Q12 1 0.357 Q32 1 0.216
Q13 1 0.262 Q33 1 0.174
Q14 1 0.265 Q34 1 0.253
Q15 1 0.314 Q35 1 0.328
Q16 1 0.222 Q36 1 0.326
Q17 1 0.244 Q37 1 0.226
Q18 1 0.177 Q38 1 0.361
Q19 1 0.254 Q39 1 0.168
Q20 1 0.409 Q40 1 0.293

Table 22: Total Variance Explained
Total % of
Variance
Cumulativ
e % Total % of
Variance
1 4.157 10.393 10.393 4.157 10.393
2 2.477 6.193 16.586 2.477 6.193
3 1.915 4.788 21.374 1.915 4.788
4 1.81 4.524 25.898 1.81 4.524
5 1.714 4.284 30.182
6 1.474 3.684 33.867
7 1.402 3.506 37.372
8 1.31 3.275 40.648
9 1.278 3.195 43.843
10 1.201 3.003 46.846
11 1.12 2.801 49.646
12 1.098 2.745 52.391
13 1.071 2.678 55.069
14 1.039 2.598 57.667
15 0.976 2.439 60.106
16 0.943 2.359 62.465
17 0.922 2.305 64.77
18 0.899 2.248 67.018
19 0.886 2.216 69.233
20 0.876 2.19 71.423
21 0.798 1.994 73.417
22 0.785 1.963 75.38
23 0.764 1.91 77.29
24 0.746 1.864 79.154
25 0.722 1.804 80.958
26 0.688 1.72 82.678
27 0.66 1.65 84.327
28 0.621 1.552 85.88
29 0.593 1.483 87.363
30 0.577 1.442 88.805
31 0.554 1.384 90.189
32 0.518 1.294 91.483
33 0.495 1.238 92.721
34 0.492 1.229 93.95
35 0.463 1.158 95.109
36 0.441 1.102 96.211
37 0.405 1.014 97.224
38 0.382 0.954 98.179
39 0.373 0.932 99.11
40 0.356 0.89 100
Compone
nt
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of
Squared Loadings

Table 23: Factor loading data
Extraction
Sums of
Squared
Loadings
Cumulativ
e % Total % of
Variance
Cumulativ
e %
1 10.393 3.501 8.752 8.752
2 16.586 2.578 6.446 15.197
3 21.374 2.221 5.553 20.75
4 25.898 2.059 5.148 25.898
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Compone
nt
Rotation Sums of Squared
Loadings

Table 24: Component Matrix
Component 1 2 3 4
Q1 0.536
Q2
Q3 0.428
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8 0.425
Q9 0.544
Q10 0.543
Q11 -0.432
Q12 0.413
Q13 0.442
Q14 0.486
Q15
Q16
Q17 0.484
Q18
Q19 0.443
Q20 0.447
Q21
Q22
Q23 0.446
Q24 0.412
Q25
Q26
Q27 0.433
Q28 0.444
Q29 0.484
Q30
Q31
Q32
Q33
Q34 0.465
Q35 0.437
Q36 0.553
Q37
Q38
Q39
Q40

Table 25: Rotated Component Matrix
1 2 3 4
Q1 0.621
Q2
Q3 0.509
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9 0.603
Q10 0.586
Q11 -0.51
Q12 0.431
Q13 0.465
Q14 0.483
Q15 0.501
Q16
Q17 0.429
Q18 0.418
Q19 0.487
Q20 0.631
Q21 0.474
Q22
Q23 0.415
Q24
Q25 0.619
Q26
Q27 0.452
Q28 0.405
Q29 0.479
Q30 0.418
Q31
Q32 0.41
Q33
Q34 0.461
Q35 0.465
Q36 0.513
Q37 0.459
Q38 0.55
Q39
Q40 0.535
Rotated Component Matrix

Table 26: Component Transformation Matrix
Component 1 2 3 4
1 .803 .470 .366 -.029
2 -.498 .606 .356 .508
3 .327 -.234 -.351 .846
4 -.002 -.598 .785 .161
Table 27: Correlations of major fields
Correlation GEIT_Tota
l Grade TEIQue BFI_Extrav
ersion
BFI_Agree
ableness
BFI_Cons
cientiousn
ess
BFI_Neuro
ticism
BFI_Open
ness
N 287 287 287 287 287 287 287 287
GEIT_Total Pearson Correlation 1 .203** .590** .488** 0.423 .276** -.319** 0.425
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade Pearson Correlation .203** 1 .146* 0.033 .068** 0.295 -.013* .102**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001 0.013 0.579 0.247 0 0.829 0.084
TEIQue Pearson Correlation .590** .146* 1 .550** .486** .522* -0.614 .348**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.013 0 0 0 0 0
BFI_Extraversion Pearson Correlation .488** 0.033 .550** 1 .229** 0.209 -.335** .338**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.579 0 0 0 0 0
BFI_Agreeableness Pearson Correlation .423** 0.068 .486** .229** 1** 0.338 -.253** .172**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.247 0 0 0 0 0.003
BFI_Conscientiousness Pearson Correlation .276** .295** .522** .209** .338** 1** -.339** .033**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.576
N 287 287 287 287 287 287 287 287
BFI_Neuroticism Pearson Correlation -.319** -0.013 -.614** -.335** -.253** -0.339 1** -.043**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.829 0 0 0 0 0.466
N 287 287 287 287 287 287 287 287
BFI_Openness Pearson Correlation .425** 0.102 .348** .338** .172** 0.033 -.043** 1**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.084 0 0 0.003 0.576 0.466