Essay: Gender Diversity Considerations in Nobel Prize Nominations

This essay explores the increasing demand for Nobel committees to consider gender diversity alongside work quality when nominating scientists. It argues that the historical underrepresentation of women in science prizes is a significant issue, highlighting the systematic biases and conventional stereotypes that contribute to this imbalance. The essay references the Nobel Prize's history, where women have won only a small percentage of science prizes, and discusses the slow pace of change despite efforts to tweak nomination processes. It emphasizes the importance of female role models and equal opportunities based on talent and ability, rather than gender, to encourage more women in STEM fields. The essay concludes by advocating for initiatives that promote gender equality in science and acknowledging the progress being made while recognizing the long journey ahead.

Running Head: GENDER DIVERSITY 1
GENDER DIVERSITY

GENDER DIVERSITY 2
Gender diversity is a wide topic which means and equalization of men and women in
every aspect may it be the workplace. The news also talks about the gender diversity in the
corporate boardrooms and the other areas are also traditionally dominated by men. The absolute
most basic industry territories that see a predominance in male representatives over female is in
figuring, designing, drug and science, space and engineering (Nature Index, 2018).
While the vast majority of us concur that so as to have a reasonable and equality in
workplace, an equivalent parity of people is required, more usually than not, this isn't the
situation notwithstanding the advanced age that we live in. Gender diversity tends to be decent
variety in a work place implies that people are employed at a comparative and reliable rate, are
paid similarly and are given similar working open doors with the equivalent limited time
openings. From the text given below it can be stated that the gender imbalance is enhancing day
by day and much of it has been vouched while giving the awards. In the awards’ history when
women received only 3% of the prices in comparison to men it feels shameful. The agreement
with the opinion goes strong enough as women despite being talented are not given the fair share
of reward of what they deserve due to male dominating society. The systematic bias is also one
of the crucial elements as people are not ready to drop the conventional methods and thinking
(Wired, 2018).
The whole pricing thing is a crucial problem that which ought to be the reason of gender
diversity. The selection of multiple candidates have not been a way earlier and the things and the
thoughts are changing but at the slow pace. Due to the biasness of the selection committee the
world could not see women empowerment (BBC, Future, 2018).

GENDER DIVERSITY 3
Thereafter there were several changes which have been made across with regards to the
nomination process. The situation have been improved when the organizations that award the
prizes regarding the field of science began to tweak their nomination in order to bring the
diversity while distributing the prize but yet the effects are vague as they cannot be felt. For the
first time women who are readily eligible for nominations are given a chance and the selection of
women has just doubled with respect to earlier years. In terms of mathematics, there was an
increase of 25%, but such figure has no proof yet. In the field of physiology and medicine since
women have already marked their position, this indicates that gender diversity has been
acknowledged on the serious basis. Observing all this gives an idea that a change can bring a
new environment, however it will take time and energy to implement these efforts so that it can
be seen as well. The larger perspective gives an idea of how women are not given the support as
there is a pure biasness (Wired, 2018).
The concern for the same has been started with this particular year only, as it can be seen
that organizations are willing to change but the truth is different from what it is in reality. Maybe
it's the channel of potential female good examples that have the right to win the Nobel Prize,
however neglect to get science's definitive honor. Kids long for good examples. In music and
motion pictures, sports and legislative issues, champions (and saints) can catalyze early interests
and flash deep rooted desire (Rathi, 2017). Awards catch consideration in any field, and the
Nobel Prize passes on unmatched position both inside and outside of science. Inside the lobbies
of the scholarly world, Nobelists get expanded subsidizing, references, and different prizes.
Customary and conventional stereotypes, those ladies 'don't care for math' and 'aren't acceptable
at science'. The two people report these perspectives – however analysts have observationally
contested them. Studies show that young ladies and ladies maintain a strategic distance from

GENDER DIVERSITY 4
Stem instruction not in view of intellectual failure, but since of early introduction and
involvement in Stem, instructive arrangement, social setting, generalizations and an absence of
presentation to good examples.
Hence, from the overall analysis the opinion so formed roots towards the encouragement
of women scientists. The organizations must take initiatives to bring equal opportunities for both
men and women on the basis of talent and ability, rather than on the basis of gender.

GENDER DIVERSITY 5
References
BBC, Future, (2018). Why more women don’t win Nobel prizes in science. Retrieved from
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20181008-why-dont-more-women-dont-win-nobel-
prizes-in-science
Nature Index, (2018). The Nobel gender gap is worse than you think. Retrieved from
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/the-nobel-gender-gap-is-worse-than-you-think
Rathi, A., (2017). The Nobel Prize committee explains why women win so few prizes. Retrieved
from https://qz.com/1097888/the-nobel-prize-committee-explains-why-women-win-so-
few-prizes/
Wired, (2018). There's Nothing Noble about Science’s Nobel Prize Gender Gap. Retrieved from
https://www.wired.com/story/theres-nothing-noble-about-sciences-nobel-prize-gender-
gap/