Opinion Editorial: Challenges of Community Fragmentation Globally

This essay examines the fragmentation of communities, a critical issue in contemporary society, analyzing its challenges at both local and global levels. It defines fragmentation as the breakdown of connections between groups due to differences in culture, language, income, and other factors. The essay highlights the unintended consequences of well-intentioned actions, inefficiency, and the commoditization of essential services, particularly in healthcare. It explores how fragmented healthcare systems often overlook vulnerable populations and are impacted by deprofessionalization and depersonalization. Furthermore, it discusses the emergence of implicit communities and the impact of information technology on community formation. The essay concludes by underscoring the need for addressing these challenges to foster a more cohesive and equitable society. The assignment references relevant academic sources to support its arguments.

Running head: THE FRAGMENTATION OF COMMUNITIES
THE FRAGMENTATION OF COMMUNITIES
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1THE FRAGMENTATION OF COMMUNITIES
In worldwide, people change their community which is the main element of civil society.
This paper is based on the brief concept and principles of the fragmentation and its challenges in
local and global communities (Bregman, Sekercioglu and Tobias 2014). Fragmentation defines
the connection difficulties between the society and the culture of some groups based on a mutual
culture, language, nationality, occupation, race, belief, level of income and other common goods
(Ibáñez et al. 2014). The gap between the particular group and their society represent poor
relationships with each other.
There are so many challenges in fragmentation of communities with realising aspirations
of the common good. The most crucial challenge is the unintended consequences of well-
intentioned actions because fragmentation takes good-intentioned activities that sometimes make
unintentional consequence which is not good. Inefficiency is also a challenging factor of
fragmentation (Bregman, Sekercioglu and Tobias 2014). Efficient health care involves an ability
to illustrate and compute, based on the “an acquaintance with the particulars,” which is found in
the people background, communities and cultures (Ibáñez et al. 2014). Thirdly, ineffectiveness
fragmented healthcare sector and also criticisms of fragmented disease-by-disease which is
developed by the World Health Organization (Damschen et al. 2014). Presently the efforts of
healthcare sector and philanthropists are conducted at narrow programs using lack of attention
which is affected. In the fragmented scheme, they easily ignore poor people.
Doctors treat their patients who are come their clinic, but sometimes there are some
barriers to entry the clinic. Commoditization is also the challenging issue which handling
healthcare system as a commodity to diminish health care system incidentally (Damschen et al.
2014). Disease management systems are purchased and sold and then concern about the patient’s
illnesses. Commercialisation is the part of challenges in fragmentation in communities (Zelli and

2THE FRAGMENTATION OF COMMUNITIES
Van Asselt 2013). Today, financial breakdown shows the remarkable advantages in the
marketplace which is well-adjusted by incentives towards the greater societal good. Sometimes
internal facility of healthcare services motivates accessibility and fulfillment to access their
services, also internal financing of healthcare system harm by the others for overdoing of
marginal services (Fischer-Lescano and Teubner 2019). Deprofessionalization even the
significant challenges which concern about their role carefully especially technical skills,
procedure, and healthcare experts are completed one portion of their agreement with society. But
carefully concentrating on their ability without meet their responsibility to the person and also
community, healthcare workers have acknowledged the rewards of their occupation without
accepting difficulty complete responsibility (Zürn and Faude 2013). Depersonalization affects
the poor peoples; those have contact with simple medical care until their problems are created
difficulties. Patients are not satisfied with the fragmented systems of healthcare. Still, back to
back failure of fragmented attempts to solve the issues and sometimes they are hopeless (Zelli
and Van Asselt 2013).
There are some of the communities will definite; for example one of the community is
AIEd Society. This type of communities will implicit because they evolving with the informal
forms of their interaction on social media and connected with the internet (Fischer-Lescano and
Teubner 2019). Some of the community will develop their particular communities in future, rest
will fade away, and still some of them will stay in the virtual form. Memberships in an implicit
community will fluid with members of the community joining and going with simplicity. Though
every community will be spread geographically, it will concentrate theoretically around some
problems; such as the community of societies who have faith in a flat earth, (Zürn and Faude
2013) this community consisting of followers of a particular portion of software, Canadian

3THE FRAGMENTATION OF COMMUNITIES
Computer Science Department Heads, the HO-gauge model railroad enthusiasts and the
international AIEd research community (Bregman, Sekercioglu and Tobias 2014). That demand
for information technology will not take a view of worldwide and in universal culture. The exact
opposite is information technology is probably to be a force for localization (Fischer-Lescano
and Teubner 2019). Staying in a world with ubiquitous and unavoidable access to information
defines that people will progressively have restricted on access to this particular information, to
rule of their daily lives. They will only permit to access the information that interconnects with
their own personal and professional interests (Zelli and Van Asselt 2013).

4THE FRAGMENTATION OF COMMUNITIES
Ibáñez, I., Katz, D.S., Peltier, D., Wolf, S.M. and Connor Barrie, B.T., 2014. Assessing the
integrated effects of landscape fragmentation on plants and plant communities: the challenge of
multiprocess–multiresponse dynamics. Journal of Ecology, 102(4), pp.882-895.
Bregman, T.P., Sekercioglu, C.H. and Tobias, J.A., 2014. Global patterns and predictors of bird
species responses to forest fragmentation: implications for ecosystem function and
conservation. Biological Conservation, 169, pp.372-383.
Damschen, E.I., Baker, D.V., Bohrer, G., Nathan, R., Orrock, J.L., Turner, J.R., Brudvig, L.A.,
Haddad, N.M., Levey, D.J. and Tewksbury, J.J., 2014. How fragmentation and corridors affect
wind dynamics and seed dispersal in open habitats. Proceedings of the national academy of
sciences, 111(9), pp.3484-3489.
Zelli, F. and Van Asselt, H., 2013. Introduction: The institutional fragmentation of global
environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global environmental
politics, 13(3), pp.1-13.
Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G., 2019. Regime-collisions: the vain search for legal unity in
the fragmentation of global law. In Critical theory and legal autopoiesis. Manchester University
Press.
Zürn, M. and Faude, B., 2013. Commentary: On fragmentation, differentiation, and
coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), pp.119-130.