Global Debates: Evaluating Eco-tourism's Environmental Pros and Cons

This assignment presents a debate on the environmental impact of eco-tourism. The student argues that eco-tourism, as a growing industry, can be beneficial by not harming the environment, emphasizing its role in preserving natural habitats, vegetation, and air quality. The premise highlights eco-tourism's focus on studying natural habitats to protect human life from disasters and benefit the economy, environment, and biodiversity. The student addresses counterarguments by acknowledging potential harm from human activities rather than eco-tourism itself. The debate also touches upon the need for environmental protection and awareness, government schemes, and the importance of local involvement. The rebuttal section reinforces the positive aspects of eco-tourism, its role in protecting future generations, and the importance of government perceptions. The assignment covers key points on the benefits of eco-tourism, its role in protecting natural habitats and wildlife, and the importance of government perceptions.

Title: “Eco tourism is not bad for the environment’
Introductory statement:
As the most growing tourism industry, Eco tourism is taking a lead by not harming the
environment. It is safe for most valuable reasons.
Premise 1:
Eco tourism is the most amazing an adventurous thing that an individual can perform
while enjoying natural habitats without destroying or harming to natural plantation and wildlife.
Travellers are keen to visit the places where they could experience the world from so close. Eco
tourism is not bad as it contains natural and not destroyed places , natural vegetation and polluted
free air. Eco tourism involve study of natural habitats and it's heterogeneity to protect human life
and make there future save from unwanted disasters like storm Tsunami and other harmful
activities that Earth takes around it. Therefore, Eco tourism is considered to be best for saving
the planet. Give benefit to economy , environment and flora and fauna. people are now a days
could not differentiate Eco tourism and conventional tourism is it become an at of fun. it become
more of local widgets that are supported by guidance. People are not taking it seriously and
making it a normal aspect so that government make their perceptions differently for Travellers
who adopt Eco tourism positively and make their contribution in avoiding exploitation and
destructive activity from the planet. Eco tourism is all about convert supporting managed
environment. There it is supported by nature. Wildlife, green tourism, bioterrorism and
ecological tourism. Therefore, the problem come when not all individual towards safety and
security of ecosystem in order to stable future generation
Premises 2:
There are no natural substances are left for future generation to adore and make use of it.
The travel and tourism industry are taking the lead in every sector and all places. Eco-friendly
tourism is one of the fastest growing get constant welfare as well as biodiversity. It is not
harming the environment rather it protect the world from being unsafe into present in future
scenario so that generations could live their life peacefully and we thankful for such a beautiful
natural spaces given. It has assure that generation will need to face many difficulties and
exploitation of environment which will be the reason for an healthy treatment and high death
rate. The significance an eco friendly environment consists which is not replaceable with any of
modern technology or innovation. People love to travel which is mandatory and beneficial for
them but it needs to be beneficial for the environment too. So that, government started the
schemes for eco tourism and make efforts to enhance it in a global level. It boosts awareness and
dignity towards culture human rights and self protection from natural disasters. Eco tourism
basically known for it's vital factors which are beneficial for human life to live a Healthy lifestyle
because of eco friendly environment schemes. The issues arises when local people does not met
with the environment protection requirement and harm it with human life activities. So that
ecotourism could get harm but it is then gift of nature that could not be destroy on or remain

harmful for longer period. Therefore Eco tourism is not typical or worst; it’s the human activities
that harm the environment not the environment harm the human life.
Counter agreement:
As far as concerned about the agreement given by the opposition part, it has argued that
eco tourism It is find out that many people think of having Eco tourism in their lifestyle and
some are likely to support the argument of having bad impact of environment friendly tourism.
These both arguments are entitled with different culture of different people some of are supposed
to get benefit from environment like farmers and Travellers who make money by finding out the
most amazing facts about environment and lead it to whole of the world to get aware about the
beauty of nature. Many people who agreed with this statement give positive response get excited
to travel the world with tourism facility. Is the research is not fully opposed to other party as Eco
tourism may harm the environment is least possible ways maybe some of them are people in
activity seasonal flow weather inconsistency.
Key points on rebuttals:
 Eco tourism is immensely loved by most of generation
 It is required to protect future generation by saving natural habitats and wildlife.
 People are not taking it seriously and making it a normal aspect so that
government make their perceptions differently
 . As in the recent years it has seen there are limited Wildlife sanctuaries and
natural habitats are left or else Dai true natural calamities.