Good Handover: Evidence-Based Practice and SBAR Implementation

This report investigates the effectiveness of handover communication and strategies in nursing, particularly focusing on the Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) framework within the context of evidence-based practice. The research highlights the significance of effective communication in healthcare, addressing the impact of poor communication on patient safety and the NHS. It explores the application of SBAR in bedside handover to standardize the process, enhance patient-centered care, and improve multidisciplinary teamwork. The report draws upon various sources, including academic databases, library resources, and real-world practice, to support the argument for SBAR implementation. It discusses leadership models, change management strategies, and the importance of staff training and resources in facilitating successful implementation. The report emphasizes the importance of addressing potential challenges like medical jargon and interruptions while underscoring the need for continued improvement in healthcare communication practices.

Surname 1
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
WHAT MAKES A GOOD HANDOVER
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) refers to evidence involving the utilization of reliable,
conscientious, explicit and judicious evidence in making decisions about care and or “doing the
right things right”.

Surname 2
In EBP, the scientist has distinctive proposal to demonstrate what development of proof
what formation and evidence is. The latter can be a hindrance to wellbeing experts, on this issue,
it is still dependent upon the medical attendants to assemble and evaluate the proof on where
they will base their consideration. The expert directing body; The Nursing Midwifery Council
figure of comportment obviously states nursing experts ought to consistently rehearse in
accordance with preeminence available substantiation to guarantee a viable information and
practice is kept up and executed. Hence, any guidance and given data that identifies with
medicinal services items or administrations must be proof based (NMC 2015). Furthermore,
Noyes (2010) likewise refers to prove on the side of a thought that the various sorts of proof can
be helpful in a specific setting.
The watchwords utilized in this examination are evidence, communication, conscientious,
evaluation, and precise.
This task will audit the adequacy of hand over correspondence and strategies utilizing
Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR). Disappointment of
correspondence was as yet the contributing element in NHS and it harmed NHS picture and costs
because of the deferred releases or genuine episode. Changes will at present be required to help
settle the issue. By changing hand over at the bedside with the mix of SBAR design this will
structure and institutionalize hand over to create a progressively engaged and successful
methodology towards medicinal services progress. This procedure will verify the security of the
patient and will offer help to an all-encompassing methodology. On this proposition, it will
express authority speculations, change of the board model, evacuating repeating obstructions and
execution of changes by the coordinated effort of administration and cooperation in choice

Surname 3
makings. The Lewin's 3 - step model will be in used to change conduct and bolster change
(Bakari et al, 2017).
This exploration got to from UWE library, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library with a
mix of eBooks, book, site, diaries database and from genuine practice in the ward.
Correspondence is a basic factor in the medicinal services setting. In Fitzpatrick (2018) 'The
Prominence of Communiqué and Professional Standards that identify with nursing', Sheldon
(2009) contributed and depicted correspondence as an all-inclusive word with numerous
definitions as it moves of data between a source and collector. A hand over is a correspondence
used to move care, obligation and responsibility. Dougherty et al., (2015) argued that dependent
on the proof, operational correspondence is widely essential to build up patient satisfaction,
submission and recovery. However, Boyd et al., (2014) believes that communiqué can take
many models to be effective, there has to be a sender of the information, the receiver, the
feedback and the message to ensure that there is a coordination of information between involved
parties, these skills will be very efficient in the operation of handing over valuable information.
The first application of correspondence inside nursing is the accumulation of important
data about patients. Medical caretakers assume a substantial job in medicinal services framework
particularly in giving over clinical data about the patient.
Fruitful correspondence is one of the key factors in nursing to convey the nonstop quality
of care and safe practice (Fitzpatrick 2018). This author talked about expert qualities that ensure
the patient and this proof can be found in the Nursing and Midwifery Council. The NMC is the
controller of the code for expert principles and conduct for enrolled nurture in the United
Kingdom. Merten et al (2017) argued that hand over is a style of correspondence utilized in the

Surname 4
passing of expert obligation and answerability for the patient from an individual or a gathering to
another that includes all aspects of update for a patient, to another individual, for example, the
clinician, nurse and other multidisciplinary groups. Petersen (2013) proposed that hand over is a
sharing or handing-off of data and information alongside the sender.
Gregory, S., et al. (2014) argued that proof on bedside hand over is seen as a chance to
diminish mistakes. The writer likewise communicated that nurses move reports and attendant
hand-over are two (2) of the most hazardous action in patient consideration that can give help for
the prosperity and to diminish therapeutic mistakes. These thoughts of the creator give a bit of
clear proof and direction among various countries for the point of the affectivity of the
correspondence in the handover.
As per Eggins and Slade (2015) it was argued that hand over completed more than 100
million times in England for every year. Thusly, hand overs must be exact and sufficient as this
is viewed as the most widely recognized main driver of genuine blunders in the medical clinics
(NHS England 2010). There were 10,000 reports between 2012-2013 in the National Reporting
and Learning System (NRLS) announced by the NHS and poor correspondence is responsible for
around 33%. The UK Parliament (2017) detailed, that it is costing the NHS millions to suit the
expanding medicinal services requests. A piece of the entire of this expense was from postponed
releases in which bombed correspondences are contributing conditions (Smeulers, et al., 2014).
These can be avoided by modifying procedures and guaranteeing institutionalization that will
help diminish the event of a similar occurrence (NHS England 2014; Merten, et al., 2017).
Bedside handover is basic to improve wellbeing in the emergency clinics. Unexpectedly,
(Smeulers, et al., 2014) referenced that it has four (4) columns; wellbeing and dependability, care
group essentialness, quiet focused consideration, and worth included procedures. Bedside

Surname 5
handover is the opportunity for the patients to be increasingly mindful and has a contribution for
their own consideration as patients can get blunders; explain plans and data (Chaboyer et al.,
2010). Notwithstanding, Chaboyer et al (2009) found there is breaking issues around security
and privacy. This is a genuine worry as it disregards the medical caretaker code (NMC 2015).
This can make the patient feel defenseless and restless as private data are being shared ( Roslan
and Lim, 2017). In spite of the fact that this can be controlled through discreet information away
from bedside ( Kerr et al., 2014). Therefore, using these plans of action will not violate the
nursing code of ‘priorities people, practice effectively, preserve safety, and promote
professionalism and trust’ (NMC 2015). Obviously, this strategy has some other issues such as
medical jargon, time-consuming, handling irrelevant information, and interruptions (Spinks et
al., 2010).
Changing nursing handover at the bedside is one of the adjustments in the proposition to
advance a more individual focused way to deal with patient consideration and better nursing
condition (Roslan and Lim, 2017; Iles, V and Sutherland S., (2012); Chaboyer et al., 2009).
What's more, utilizing SBAR (addendum 5) to hand off patient will make simpler to build up
increasingly organized and equipped handover.
This is a simple framework to practice the staff to move care unquestionably and
effectively as SBAR deflects the hit and miss movement of 'hinting and trusting' (NHS England
2010). This can direct hand over technique as it has four phases in which it can incite the medical
attendant to convey, envision and having articulate data in detail. There are four key steps to
execute SBAR, to Act, Plan, Study and Do something (NHS Institute of Novelty and
Improvement 2010). In addition, SBAR avoids the utilization of speculating and lessen
unclearness that may happen (NHS 2010). Moreover, this structures a typical language for

Surname 6
correspondence which lessens hindrances between the multidisciplinary groups. A precise survey
of SBAR, confirm demonstrate that executing SBAR has improved patient wellbeing particularly
when is utilized via telephone or to eye to eye handoff. This survey was in accordance with
Cochrane Collaborations guidelines utilizing a systematic device for quality appraisal which
supports authenticity.
Changes are difficult as it challenges its motivation. In any case, wellbeing association,
for example, NHS face changes to give better support in light of the developing wellbeing
requests in consideration. Rutherford et al., 2004; Sexton et al., 2004; Chaboyer et al., (2009)
found that bedside hand over is useful to patients, medical attendants and multidisciplinary group
with respect to patient's wellbeing, treatment and progress. Roslam and Lim (2017)
communicated that patients become mindful because of its progressively engaged methodology
towards care, encouraging a viable environment, which gives a choice to medical attendants to
instruct and share ability to patients, relatives, and staff. This could help with new staff just as an
understudy during their matriculation (Iles, V and Sutherland, S., 2012).
In actualizing bedside hand over utilizing SBAR it will require assets like teaching staff,
time, account and staffing. To teach staff with this proposition, will need set spaces for
presentation. In addition, shared learning will be critical, as Jackson and Bruegmann (2009)
clarify that this lifts partners’ certainty, information, potential and experience. Proposing SBAR
with bedside hand over inside the group and association will require preparing and it will require
some investment and exertion to actualize this methodology, especially ranking staff (NHS
2010). Therefore, preparing must be adaptable and rehashed to offer staff the chance to adjust the
changes. Referencing about staffing in the assets, this is the most significant asset of NHS, thus it
is essential that staff be given adequate help and be esteemed to evade pressure and to make this

Surname 7
improvement practical (Care Quality Commission (CQC 2016). With the NHS greater challenge,
fantastic, merciful and improving consideration must be supported. The way to continuing and
forming societies is authority.
There are a couple of leadership models yet the theories that suit this course of action
would be a mixture of gathering and participative management West et al., (2014) explained that
these reports with the Center for Creative Leadership (CCL), was built to work in advancing the
protection for shared leadership as the best approach to open social alteration via the NHS. It
both explains that total organization is the key pieces of a total initiative methodology. The
authors argued that the draw on the joined aptitudes of staff purposes of assisting NHS
relationship to push past strange condition of starts and to set up the rational exercises expected
to make and brace administration from the board to the front lines of thought. Supportive
headship social orders, obligation and responsibility follow up on both explicit and total levels.
Additionally, this preparation tirelessly makes a definitive affinity for canny practiced revolve
around frustration, learning and improvement, thus encouraging thoughts for progression.
Pondering this, it will in like manner redesign the key use of SBAR in bedside hand over and can
provoke new improvement. As shown by Gibbons (2012) and West et al (2014), this activity
empowers the plausibility of followership that incorporates support from everyone to pass on
perfect nature of thought.
With the group of balanced activity, it will focus on opinions, tendencies and progressing
intemperate decision essential leadership. Gill (2018) communicated that the more prominent
affiliation and impetus to people lead to help, motivation and obligation. Regardless, limits can
be seen, the fear of advancement.

Surname 8
The thoughts of Grimm (2010) that the pioneers must be facilitators instead of absolutist when
conferring data. With a well-created initiative between individuals, trusts will profit by heading,
arrangement and responsibility (Drath et al., 2008; West M., et al., 2014).
In light of the ordinary arrangement at work, bedside hand over is rehearsed, three times
each day while SBAR is somewhat presented. In standard arrangement, this instrument SBAR
has just executed in the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) this strategy is the method for
seeing whether there has been a positive reaction to treatment, or whether a patient needs a
change to a progressing treatment plan (Abbott et al., 2015).
Conclusion
Fusing SBAR with bedside handover will help structure the procedure and become
additionally affective. It will bolster medical caretakers to give precise data. And furthermore,
tolerant participation helps get to greater quality data of care. Careful techniques are helpful for
taking care of delicate issue and data. The ramifications of these advances patient centered care
and wellbeing. Authority blend style will be useful for the progressing improvement. In the end,
Lewin's 3 stage models is as yet powerful in achieving changes and will be helpful and valuable
for the proposition. For this situation, regular gatherings for further improvement two times
every year, quiet review and input, SBAR publications and bedside handover pamphlets
accessible in the wards, yearly episode reports and yearly preparing and instruction are the
suggestions.

Surname 9
References
Bakari, H., et al. (2017) How Dares Authentic Leadership Influenced Planned Organization
Change? The role of Employees’ Perceptions: Integrated Theory of Planned Behaviour and
Lewin’s Three Steps Model. Journal of Change Management (online). Volume 17 no. 2, pp.
155-187. [Accessed 29 January 2019].
Bate, A (2017). Delayed transfers of care in the NHS. House of Commons Library [online]. No.
7415. pp. 4-19. [Accessed 29 January 2019).
Boyd, C., et al. (2014) Communication Skills for Nurses [online]. First Edition. John Wiley and
Sons Ltd. [Accessed 13 January 2019]
Chaboyer W., et al (2010) Bedside Handover a Case: International Journal of Nursing Practice
[online]. 16(1) pp.27-34. [Accessed 13 January 2019].
Chaboyer, W(1) et al., (2009) Bedside Handover: One quality improvement strategy to
Transform care at the bedside'. J Nurs Qual.. [online]. Volume 24 (2), pp. 136-142. [Accessed 28
January 2019].
CQC (2016). The state of care in NHS acute hospitals: 2014 to 2016. Findings from the end of
CQC’s programme of NHS acute comprehensive inspections. [online] pp. 3-100. [Accessed 26
January 2019].
Dawes, M., et al. (2005). Sicily Statement on Evidence Base-Practice. BMC Medical Education
(online). 5:1, pp. 1-7.
Dougherty, L., Lister, S., and West-Oram A. (2015). The Royal Marsden Manual Clinical
Nursing Procedures. Ninth Edition. West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

Surname 10
Drath, W. et al., (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology
of leadership. The leadership Quarterly. [online]. pp. 635-653. [Accessed 28 January 2019].
Eggins, S. & Slade, D., (2015). Communication in Clinical Handover: Improving the Safety and
Quality of the Patient Experience. J Public Health Res.[online] 4 (3). p. 666. [Accessed 28
January 2019].
Fitzpatrick, L.(2018) The importance of communication and professional values relating to
nursing practice. Links to Health and Social Care [online]. Vol 3 (1), pp. 27-32 [Accessed 14
January 2018].
Gibbons, A., (2012). Followership: the forgotten part of doctors’ leadership. BMJ. [online] p.
345. [Accessed 28 January 2019].
Gill, E., (2018). What is democratic/participative leadership? How collaboration can boost
morale. STU. (online). [Accessed 28 January 2018].
Jackson, C. and Bruegman, E. (2009). Teaching Students and Teaching Each Other: The
Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers. American Economic Association [online]. Vol.1 no.4,
pp. 85-108. [Accessed 30 January 2019].
Kerr, D. et al (2014). Towards patient-centred care: perspectives of nurses and midwives
regarding shift-to-shift bedside handover. Int J Nurse Pract. [oline]. Volume 20 (3). pp. 250-257.
[Accessed 28 2019].
Lu S, et al. (2014) Bedside nursing handover: Patients’ opinions. International Journal of
Nursing Practice [online]. 20. pp. 451-454. {Accessed 4 January 2019}
Merten, H., Galen, L. & Wagner, C., (2017). Safe Handover. BMJ Open [online]. p. 359.
[Accessed 28 January 2019].
Muller, M. et al., (2018). Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on
patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open (online). Volume 8.

Surname 11
[Access 29 January 2019).
National Nursing Research Unit (NNRU), (2012). What are the benefits and challenges of
‘bedside’ nursing handovers, London: King's College London: National Nursing Research Unit
[online]. Issue 36. pp 1-2. [Accessed 29 2019].
NHS England (2010). How can SBAR help me?. Prevents “hinting and hoping” (online). p5.
[Accessed 11 January 2019].
NHS England, (2010). Safer Care: Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation
(SBAR). NHS Institute of Innovation and Improvement [online]. pp. 6-27. [Accessed 29 January
2019].
NHS Institute of Innovation and Improvement (2010). Safe Care. SBAR - Situation, Background,
Assessment, Recommendation Implementing and Training guide[online]. pp 1-27. [Accessed 11
January 2019].
NMC, (2015). The Code. In: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and
midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council,. pp. 3-6. [Accessed 29 January 2019].
Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2015) Practice Safety. Recognise and work within the limits of
your competence [online]. 13.4. page 13. [Accessed 10 January 2019].
Petersen, M. A.and Michelle Blackmer. (2013). Risk Management. What makes handover
communication effective?. Nursing Management 15. p.2. [Accessed 15 January 2019].
Roslan, S. and Lim, M. (2017). Nurses Perception of bedside clinical handover in a Medical and
Surgical unit. An interpretive Descriptive Study (online) Volume 26 (3), pp 150-157. [Accessed
11 January 2019].

Surname 12
Smeulers, M., et al (2014) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Effectiveness of Different
Nursing Handover Styles For Ensuring Continuity of Information in Hospitalised Patients
[online]. [Accessed 13 January 2019].
Spinks, J. et al., (2015). Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover - using preferences to
inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol. BMJ Open [online]. pp 1-7. [Accessed 11
January 2019).
West, M., et al (2014). Developing collective leadership for healthcare. The King’s Fund Centre
of Creative Leadership [online]. pp. 2-8. [ Accessed 29 January 2019).