In-depth Reflection and Analysis: Good Samaritan Parable Essay

This essay provides a detailed reflection on the Parable of the Good Samaritan, focusing on the paradigm of guilt and innocence. The essay examines the story's context within Catholic education and the teachings of Jesus, highlighting the importance of mercy, compassion, and selfless behavior. It explores the actions of the Samaritan, contrasting them with the behaviors of the priest and Levite, and analyzes the significance of the parable's message regarding who constitutes one's neighbor. The essay references supporting literature, including works by Leeson, Ruiz-Martinez, and Cannon, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the parable's themes and implications. The essay also explores the historical and social context of the parable, including the relationship between Jews and Samaritans, and the impact of the story on modern society.

Assessment

The following discussion is based on the reflection on one of the chapter of
Jesus in Bible known as the parable of the Good Samaritan. Out of three
paradigms, the most certain paradigm selected in this discussion is Guilt and
innocence (Ruiz-Martinez and et. Al., 2019).
In science and philosophy, the word paradigm is a symbol or a distinct set
through patterns, including theories, postulates, and research methods and so on.
Guilt and innocence is one of the paradigms, is quiet explainable and logically
reasoning is such in their own minds. Therefore, innocent and guilt oriented
reflective essay is represented below.
Catholic education and the most sort of chapter in Bible which has been written
by Jesus is nothing but “Mercy that loves” or can be stated as Parable of the
Good Samaritan. The month January has been reflected out to be the most
designated and the Parable of the Good Samaritan is one of the passage which is
scripted is recognizably suggested for the pondering.
The major idea given by the Good Samaritan is own life. Someone dignity,
selfless behaviour, helpful behaviour and charm nature is a symbol of a Good
Samaritan written in the Bible is something which is danger, rid of personal risk
and distress behaviour. There are major number of hospitals and churches
named after this Gospel hero, as well as major philanthropic agencies and civic
organisations which provide a huge support in terms of family aid societies,
need, shelters and many more. It can be majorly suggested that the parable of
the Good Samaritan is found only in Luke’s Gospel. It is Jesus’ reply to the
question put to him by a lawyer: “Who is my neighbour?” The parable runs as
follows

A man was coming to Jericho from Jerusalem and he fell the robbers, who beat
him and stripped him and leaving him half dead. And suddenly the priest was
going down to that particular road and he saw that man on the other side of the
road. Likewise, a Samaritan came from the place, suddenly saw him, had a great
compassion, But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, came to where he was; went him
and bound his wounds pouring on oil and wine; then he set him on his own
beast and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And the next day he took
out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, ‘Take care of him; and
whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I come back.’
One of the great story reflected that Pompey has to wipe out the “strongholds of
brigands” near Jericho. He has been beaten, left deadly and robbed. He lied and
without the signs of social status and nationality, it indicates the clothes of
people.
The story also tells about a priest and a Levite which came along and
reflectively saw the naked man who crossed and passed on the other side.
Jerusalem, one of the priesthood, noted about the upper urban classicism and the
Jewish nobility. The priest is one of the representatives in the Jewish piety. He
is from the lower clergy such as gatekeepers, musicians, teachers, janitors and
many others. The Levite and Priest are the ultimate insiders. Also, those who
are quiet efficiently listening about the Jesus story will surely experience the
love and mercy. The two religious leaders, instead of showing brilliant love,
efficiently walked past a man dying on the side of the road. The story, as David
Garland points out in his monumental Commentary on Luke, “presents the
failure of religious leaders to be humane and follow the dictates of Scripture.

If it can be suggested as the priest and the Levite is the neighbour then it was a
duty to save him. That is what Leviticus told them: “You shall not stand by the
blood of your neighbour”. But then, there were those laws forbidding them to
touch a corpse. If the half-dead man died in their hands, they would be defiled
for seven days. Mercy can be a risky business, and they knew it.
The Samaritan story is the next one to be appearing. One might have expected a
Jewish layperson. After all, the traditional triad at the time of Christ was
“priests, Levites, and all the people of Israel.” These were the three categories
of the social hierarchy that dominated Judaism after the Babylonian Exile.
Maybe one of claimed has been suggested that the people” would come along
and show the mercy by the priest and Levite. But the story shocks its hearers by
bringing on scene, instead, a Samaritan. Before Christ, 2 hundreds years, the
writer of the book called the Samaritans; they were excluded from the temple
cult in Jerusalem.
The Samaritan “then set the man on his own beast and brought him to an inn,
and took care of him. Again in the next day, And the next day he took out two
denarii and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, “Take care of him, and
whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I come back.” The Samaritan
not only saved the victim’s life, he saved his dignity.
The account of Samaritan is seems out to be the longest part of the parable. For
the parable, it is not about a significant desire but it is seems out to be the
longest part of the Samaritan. Go and do likewise is a metaphor for the god’s
kingdom and it is amazingly brought by the Jesus, in which God has been
constantly surprising. The jolting reminder of the story stated that wisdom and
the grace of God is much bigger than the pretty understanding of the human.
The god’s grace is not only for the persons and places.

It is made for every single thing which has its great demand and purpose of
living. A challenging story to the Church is not about a reflection of the
institution but also a prideful distinction between clergy and laity. Pope Francis
would states that the story is quiet challenging and an institution has been built
on the prideful distinction between laity and clergy.
Travelling amazingly to Jericho from Jerusalem is appropriately wonderful. The
Samaritan is extremely vulnerable because they called as Samaritan. However,
the vulnerability like this, gave a wonderful rise on the compassion. He saw
neither Jew nor Samaritan lying wounded on the road. He saw a naked fellow
human being. After many years, the author of American James Carroll wrote a
moving little book titled Contemplation ( Cannon, B.Q., 2018).
But without lawyer things are not just possible to be properly exempted, the
special question to be asked to the Jesus “who is my neighbour?” that evoked
this parable in the first place. He innocently states and asked to the Jesus to test
him on the basis of the eternal life. Jesus simply asked back the questions to him
the law stated that the god will always have a heart for all the humans and he
gives strength and peace in mind.
Then the Luke states to him and justify accordingly that there is no neighbour of
mine. In returns Jesus states and in a very straight forward way he suggested
that “legalism, the minimalism, the quest for a loop-hole”. So the Jesus replied
that by answering such questions I cannot be able to re-functioning the
temptation to get paraphrase. The Jesus also stated that if you genuinely want to
know that who is your neighbour is then let me tell you that go and ask the poor
devil who was completely left for dead in a ditch on the road to Jericho.

References
Leeson, R., 2019. Shooting in Cold Blood. In Hayek: A Collaborative
Biography (pp. 453-495). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Ruiz-Martinez and et. Al., 2019. Data-Driven Control of LVDC Network
Converters: Active Load Stabilization. IEEE Transactions on Smart
Grid, 11(3), pp.2182-2194.
Cannon, B.Q., 2018. “To Buy Up the Lamanite Children as Fast as They
Could”: Indentured Servitude and Its Legacy in Mormon Society. Journal of
Mormon History, 44(2), pp.1-35.