Ethical Analysis of Google's Drone Program: A Detailed Case Study
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/09
|7
|1769
|107
Case Study
AI Summary
This case study delves into the ethical considerations surrounding Google's decision to provide artificial intelligence for the Pentagon's Project Maven drone program, which aimed to expedite the analysis of drone footage through automated image classification. The decision led to employee resignations driven by ethical concerns regarding the use of AI in warfare. The study applies four classical ethical theories—utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and contract theory—to analyze the situation, revealing that the project is unethical under each framework. Utilitarianism finds the project ethically wrong due to the misuse of AI in warfare; deontology deems Google's decision immoral; virtue ethics highlights Google's failure to uphold moral virtues; and contract theory points to the broken legal and ethical contract between Google and its employees. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of ethics in guiding behavior and offers recommendations for ethical decision-making, such as refraining from using drone programs for warfare and maintaining legal contracts with employees. Desklib provides students with access to this and many other solved assignments and past papers.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 7