Analyzing Second Amendment: Gun Rights, Control, and Public Safety

This essay delves into the complexities surrounding the Second Amendment in the United States, examining the ongoing debate between gun rights advocates and those who support stricter gun control measures. It explores the historical context of the Second Amendment, arguments for and against individual gun ownership, and the impact of firearms on public safety. The essay also considers alternative strategies to reduce gun violence, drawing comparisons with other countries and discussing potential policy changes. Ultimately, it emphasizes the need for a balanced approach that respects constitutional rights while addressing the pressing issue of gun violence in America. Desklib offers a platform for students to access this essay and other valuable study resources.

SECOND AMENDMENT
STUDENT DETAILS:

ESSAY 1
Why we do need the Second Amendment?
The discussion about the Second Amendment and right to have gun in USA was reignited
when the federal appeals court hit down the hardest law related to gun control in the nation.
The challengers of gun control keep that Second Amendment assurance the people’s right to
have weapons. The supporters of gun control say that the second amendment exemplifies
only the communal rights of the state to preserve soldiers. The lawyers of the gun control say
that having the firearms enhances the gun violence and consequently control of possession of
gun would save the lives. Challengers of the gun control say that these limitations violate the
personal liberty assured by the Constitution and mention requirement for equipped self-
defence. Is second amendment is good for state and can be used for security against
government?
There are many ways to look at need of the second amendment. The second amendment has
become the symbol and mega-label, the security for gun protestors and scriptures for much of
the rights of USA. However, similar to more valued statements, it is not as vibrant as various
create it out to be. The second amendment contains only one judgment: “the well-controlled
Paramilitaries, being essential to the safety of the Free State, the rights of individuals to
possess and accept arms, should not be trespassed.” It is stated by a law professor, Adam
Winkler, the citizens of USA have considering in respect of the second amendment as the
personal rights for the generation (Squires, Peter 133-148).
What is the need of having firearms or guns by the citizens? The individuals in the central
are vulnerable to the second amendment weakness. It is essential to make discussion and
educate the people over this topic (Bleich, Erik 283-300). There are some people in the USA,
who have the personal gun. The reason is that it is right of citizens of USA to have the guns.

ESSAY 2
If people acted on things simply because it was the personal right, at that time voter turnout
for election will be vast. The people possess guns because they want security and complete
protection. It is the principle of having the guns and reason for which the citizens of USA
have ownership of guns. It is the desire, which the citizens of USA require to share with
others that are on the boundary (Rice, Eric 29).
Are citizens safe without guns? Hemenway David mentions in the discussion that the
Americans have the gun for numerous reasons. However, the main reason is personal
security. Eventually, the individuals are liable for the personal security of themselves and
close ones. It is required that law should have obligations to provide security to the citizens of
the United States. This is not out of meanness but due to logistic. It is also the reason that the
police team cannot be available every time everywhere to give the security to Americans
(Leon Paloma 69-74). The police cannot secure the citizens of the nation from the
viciousness. The firearms permit the people to secure from the danger. It is stated by Centre
for Disease Control that approximately two millions citizens of America possess the guns
personally to protect himself or herself, or the special one per year. This is significant
because people live in the world risks and threats. If any one individual does not have
experience of serious crime, in this case, it does not mean that it cannot occur in the
upcoming period. In consequence, the firearms are the insurance policy to face the fears and
dangers of the real world. The people are always required to be ready for their worst. This is
the valid and considerable reason, where it is appropriate to consider the possession of the
guns by citizens of the nation.
It is believed that the bill of rights is interconnected background where one right my not
present without other people. Spitzer Robert states in the discussion that ‘why do we need the
Second amendment? The first amendment among the ten amendments is critical however
should be secured by the second amendment and vice versa. The second amendment is

ESSAY 3
proposed to permit the people of USA to have weapons or guns. The main aim is to make
sure the protection of Free State. Whereas some will highlight the only soldierly having gun,
this is particularly planned to permit each day citizens the capacity to secure themselves and
their nation. The owners of the firearms and lawyers in the USA are the guardians of the
Second Amendment. It is not only in our best interest, but it is our duty as citizens. There is
an active attempt underway to slowly diminish many of the liberties set forth in the Bill of
Rights. The Second Amendment is in the forefront right now (Nusbaum Neil 1267-1269).
Of the factors Johnson Nicholas listed, To the side from making the people secure, the
argument that is not accurate and has gone reliability for the majority of citizens due to the
dreadful number of firearms accidents each year, owners of guns require guns so that they
may conquer the American governments if it imposes on the right or people require firearms
so that government can be stopped from being defeated. As per the maters of individual
rights, people have the system of the court to secure personal rights (Blocher, Joseph, and
Darrell AH, Miller 295). In recent times, though, people see groups of people who challenge
government authorities if it is believed by people that it imposes on the rights, as in a matter
of Cliven Bundy (Wodarz and Komarova). The self-governing society may only work when
the people join for the ordinary goods. When people keep the rights over that of the mass,
people have vigilante fairness.
Based on all the presented evidence, it seems like prohibit the citizens in bearing guns is
always not a good idea. The government may compare with the policies of Switzerland to
stop the firearms related death instead of having the guns. It is argued by various researchers
that there are various states like Switzerland, which have very few cases or deaths related to
gun but majority of residents of Switzerland bear arms for security. Instead of restricting the
citizens to own guns, USA should make the strategies to stop gun violence. According to the
second argument of keeping firearms to secure the nation if the government is deposed, it is

ESSAY 4
proved that the nation’s army engaged in the matters by the military, needed external
assistance from Great Britain, United State and Russia to recover organize (Behne, Kevin
1343). Conversely, 21st century gives the new, distinct models for opposing the individual
government, peaceful revolution, which do well exactly because the army will not fire on
personal unprotected population. It means that the owners of a gun are required to give up the
firearms. However, it does not mean that people require searching the correct information, the
citizens require the secure nation, people require going down the few life to the gun. The
people require to expend fewer on the price of firearms accident in sorrow (Mann, Christina
and Michel). The people require cooperation, not oppression of alternative hidden as
“creating the people secure” when the numbers prove the reverse, not vigilante fairness when
people have a judicial system to plea to, not the dream of equipped people saving the nation
when 21st century has stated that peaceful revolution is great. The globe has changed
radically since 1778; the people are required to move in the upcoming period.
What other strategies can be used to minimize gun violence? Elvin Ron stated that, the only
way to stop firearms crimes and unintentional death is to get rid of firearms. Not just attack
the firearms, however handgun too. The one-year buyback programs will be required then
strict implementation with strict fines (Parker, Megan). In the same discussion, Zimmerman
makes a distinction that there should be the provision of 5 years obligatory for ownership, the
life sentence for making the crime when having the gun. All of the liable ownership and
intellectual health care cannot prevent death as long as people have firearms. As per this, it is
essential to withdraw the second amendment. It will not stop the right to buy guns. It proves
that having the firearm is not a constitutional right. It is also required to check the complete
background check for each gun to buy. Further, it is also essential to kick out the abnormal
purchase. America must check the policies related to a gun in various nations with a low rate
of gun death. In the case when these policies disagree with the second amendment, then the

ESSAY 5
government may check at creating alterations to the Second Amendment. The owners of the
gun must be approved, and all registries available by the police officers. Like it is required to
have the driving license for a vehicle, people should have the gun license for the gun.
Moreover, the USA constitution did not specify the guns for everyone; it was for the private
army. The regulations of the gun are required to make sure the gun purchaser is liable. As per
the above analysis, it is recommended that the purchasers of the gun must be minimum
eighteen years old and have engaged and approved the gun security class. The component of
the classes must state the proper use like hunting, shooting not person hunting and murdering
mechanical gun type of guns required to be restricted along with automatic enabler for the
weapons (Bachmann). The education and training are needed for everyone at the national
level to have guns. These strategies will not work in the case where common law and central
law implementation agencies such as FBI do not do the job as Parkland case. In this way, it is
not possible to eliminate human error but it is possible to improve it by the training and make
the people accountable.
As per the above discussion, it can concluded that as per the opinions of opponents and
supporters, it is clear that second amendment is good for state but the possession of firearms
by the citizens may increase the gun violence. Both sides similarly applied facts and common
sense to this problem then the common people will be aware of the real tendencies in gun
violence. The government should adopt the alternative strategies to reduce the gun violence.

ESSAY 6
References
Bachmann, H. “The Swiss Difference: A Gun Culture that Works." Times. Web. 9 November
2018 < http://world.time.com/2012/12/20/the-swiss-difference-a-gun-culture-that-works/>
Behne, Kevin. "Packing Heat: Judicial Review of Concealed Carry Laws under the Second
Amendment." S. Cal. L. Rev.89 (2015): 1343.
Bleich, Erik. "Freedom of expression versus racist hate speech: Explaining differences
between high court regulations in the USA and Europe." Journal of Ethnic and Migration
Studies 40.2 (2014): 283-300.
Blocher, Joseph, and Darrell AH Miller. "What Is Gun Control: Direct Burdens, Incidental
Burdens, and the Boundaries of the Second Amendment." U. Chi. L. Rev. 83 (2016): 295.
Elvin, Ron. “Repeal the Second Amendment? That’s Not So Simple. Here’s What It Would
Take.” Npr, 2018. < https://www.npr.org/2018/03/01/589397317/repeal-the-second-
amendment-thats-not-so-simple-here-s-what-it-would-take>
Hemenway, David. Private guns, public health. Michigan: University of Michigan Press,
2017.
Johnson, Nicholas J., Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and
Policy. USA: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2017.
Leon, Paloma, "No-tillage and sugar beet foam amendment enhanced microbial activity of
degraded acidic soils in South West Spain." Applied Soil Ecology 109 (2017): 69-74.
Mann, J., Christina, M. and Michel, B. “Prevention of Firearms Suicide in the United States:
What Works and What is Impossible." Am J Psychiatry 173:10, October 2016. Web. 9
November 2018 < https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010069>

ESSAY 7
Nusbaum, Neil "Holding manufacturers of defective firearms to account: does restricting
liability lawsuits violate the Second Amendment?." Journal of community health 42.6 (2017):
1267-1269.
Parker, Megan. “Why Do We Need The Second Amendment?" Odyssey. Web. 9 November
2018 < https://www.theodysseyonline.com/need-second-amendment>
Rice, Eric. "The Second Amendment and the Struggle Over Cryptography." Hastings Sci. &
Tech. LJ 9 (2017): 29.
Spitzer, Robert J. Politics of gun control. New York: Routledge, 2015.
Squires, Peter. "Mr Gingrich’s bequest: globalising the Second Amendment?." The Second
Amendment and Gun Control. Routledge, 2017. 133-148.
Wodarz, D. and Komarova, N. “Dependence of the Firearm-Related Homicide Rate on Gun
Availability: A Mathematical Analysis.” PLoS ONE 8(7): e71606, 2013. <
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0071606>
Zimmerman, E. “What can the Swiss Teach the US about Guns?" Swissinfo.ch, 2018. Web. 9
November 2018 < https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/florida-school-shooting_what-can-the-
swiss-teach-the-us-about-guns-/43923350>