The History and Impact of Mathematics on the UK National Curriculum

This research project delves into the historical evolution and impact of mathematics on the UK national curriculum. It begins with an introduction outlining the consistent efforts for change and the limited observed progress in secondary school mathematics education since the early twentieth century. The project explores the background of the study, problem statement, rationale, research objectives and questions, followed by an extensive literature review. The literature review examines the key influences on contemporary mathematics national curriculum. The methodology section outlines the research approach, including research philosophy, design, approach, data type, collection methods, and ethical considerations. The discussion section analyzes the findings and their implications, leading to conclusions and recommendations for future curriculum development. The project highlights key changes in the curriculum and their impact on students and the education system. The project also includes an analysis of the role of teachers and various factors that influence the mathematics curriculum in the UK. The research utilizes secondary data and literature review as a methodology to explore the development and key changes in the mathematics curriculum.

History and impact of mathematics on the national curriculum of UK
History and impact of mathematics on national curriculum of UK
1

Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................3
Background of the study.............................................................................................................................4
Problem Statement.....................................................................................................................................5
The rationale of the study...........................................................................................................................6
Research Objectives....................................................................................................................................6
Research Questions.....................................................................................................................................6
Literature Review........................................................................................................................................6
Methodology.............................................................................................................................................17
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................17
Research philosophy..............................................................................................................................17
Research design.....................................................................................................................................17
Research approach................................................................................................................................18
Datatype................................................................................................................................................19
Data Collection method.........................................................................................................................20
Research Ethics......................................................................................................................................21
Discussion..................................................................................................................................................22
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................26
Recommendations.....................................................................................................................................28
References.................................................................................................................................................29
2

Introduction
There has been consistent effort for change however very little change has been observed in
secondary school mathematics educational programs since the foundation of mathematics study
as an expert field of study in the United Kingdom at the turn of the twentieth century. Before that
time, there were critical changes in school mathematics as, number-crunching and afterward
progressively polynomial math, geometry, trigonometry, and even, in a couple of schools,
analytics turned out to be a piece of the educational modules. These subjects did less change the
mathematics educational modules as give the first educational modules structure which was to
turn into the theme of much exchange and a wellspring of dissatisfaction for reformers.
Moreover, regardless of worries about school mathematics communicated by instructors, for
example, Warren Colburn amid the mid-nineteenth century, educational modules change was not
a significant issue as long as not many school-age kids went school. As the division of the
school-age populace going to class climbed significantly starting amidst the nineteenth century,
educational programs change turned into a significant piece of the expert and open plans. These
new understudies were more a wellspring of dread than fervor for most instructors, who, in the
expressions of Hodgen (2010), considered them to be an "incredible armed force of incapables."
It was in these setting endeavors to change the mathematics educational programs took on more
desperation, particularly since mathematics had turned out to be one of the best wellsprings of
disappointment in schools and colleges.
In other words, since a very long time the mathematical curriculum of the country has gone
through rigorous changes which has often failed to yield satisfactory results. Among the regular
changes implemented in mathematics curriculum, two such changes emerged to be of paramount
importance – the first was when the changes were implemented according to the educational
curriculum which unnecessarily depended on each other and connected mathematics were the
centers, the other coming amid the 1960s when present-day mathematics was the center of
change endeavors. Others referring to these equivalent minute have recommended that they
happened when the hole between the mathematics educated in school and mathematics as a
logical control appeared to be extraordinarily expansive and when the perspectives on
mathematics on the most proficient method to close the hole appeared to set the terms of
3

discussion. Mathematicians did to be sure to assume a focal job amid each change exertion. That
job, in any case, was not the equivalent, and in the two instances, mathematicians were just a
piece of a star grouping of powers. The two periods speak to "separation points" in the field of
mathematics instruction – not given the progressions they created in the educational programs,
but since of the outcomes they had for a network of expert mathematics instructor. Both change
endeavors left individual deposits in the educational modules. However, it was not in a general
sense improved. Indeed, the two attempts propagated the world-class status of the individuals
who as of now profited by school understanding and had their most contorted impacts on low-
accomplishing understudies. At last, the narrative of mathematics education programs change
isn't the account of nonstop movement toward an educational programs that are best for
understudies, instructors, and society nor even the tale of various belief systems consistently
supplanting each other's effect on school mathematics; instead, it is the tale of a creating network
distracted with a constrained and poorly characterized motivation.
Background of the study
Arithmetic was instructed yet was not that widespread in the secondary schools; that was
relevant in that era. Step by step, notwithstanding, arithmetic moved into the secondary schools
but it was soon notices that students were struggling with it as they were not in their native
language. The curriculum of Latin language structure school did not work at first which made
incorporating arithmetic extremely difficult and a daunting task. However, a few were
acquainted after 1700 accordingly with a common interest. As the eighteenth century advanced,
the curriculum of the developing number of institutes and those tuition-based schools with an
increasingly viable introduction came to incorporate arithmetic however algebra, geometry,
trigonometry, and even a little analytics. In numerous cases, the scientific educating in the non-
public school was celebrated as though worse than that found in a portion of the universities".
Arithmetic and geometry had been taught at Harvard since the seventeenth century yet here, and
there were reasonably ignored because they were viewed as functional subjects". Starting in the
mid-1800s universities required arithmetic for confirmation. As universities kept on raising their
affirmations prerequisites, arithmetic continuously lost its favored position in the auxiliary
school, with algebra and geometry supplanting it as the highlight of mathematics guidance.
4

Algebra was required for school entrance as right on time as 1815, trailed by geometry a very
long while later. It isn't clear why algebra was required at passageway such a significant amount
of sooner than geometry. In 1786, arithmetic and geometry were in the Harvard school
curriculum sometime before the end the lesser year, and algebra came in the senior year. In 1787,
Oxford's curriculum was composed to place arithmetic in the first year and "algebra and different
parts of mathematics" in the sophomore year. Besides, the multiplication of reading the material
in algebra, while geometry stayed with a couple of options in contrast to Euclid, may represent a
portion of the postponement in stamping geometry a secondary school course. Like algebra and
geometry, trigonometry was being instructed in British universities in the first quarter of the
eighteenth century, yet dissimilar to them, it never turned into a school entrance necessity after
moving into the secondary school curriculum. In both secondary school and school, trigonometry
some of the time showed up as a different course and some of the time as a piece of a propelled
algebra course. Diagnostic geometry and analytics started as school courses that steadily moved
to the fringe between secondary school and school. Albeit some private academy had long shown
the fundamentals of these subjects to their further developed understudies, diagnostic geometry
and analytics remained school subjects. Numerous secondary schools today show an early on
course in analytics in the senior year, however math regardless it saw as a school course.
Understudies can get school credits for analytics as a significant aspect of the College Board's
Advanced Placement program. The United Kingdom did not pursue Germany and other
European nations, affected by Felix Klein, in a change development around 1900 that built up
investigative geometry and math solidly in the auxiliary school. Instead, motivated by the 1902
presidential location of Eliakim Hastings Moore to the American Mathematical Society and
influenced by crafted by John Perry in England.
Problem Statement
The two noteworthy change endeavors in mathematics instruction varied in significant ways;
however, they were indistinguishable in their inability to accomplish their expected results. What
makes this different from others is that it offers a suitable pathway which can decrease the
impact of change which often hampers the adoption of the curriculum, yet the impact it had on
the mathematics instruction network, especially the piece of the network at foundations of
5

advanced education. The foundation and revival of the field of mathematics instruction could be
viewed as either noteworthy achievements of caring reformers or egotistical results that came to
the detriment of the instructors and understudies the developments mirror the principal oddity of
instructive change: That is, reformers are in the situation of accepting and go about as if they
have the last responses for inquiries that can have no last answers.
The rationale of the study
The point of mathematics training can't be bound just to the information and expertise necessary
for regular daily existence. Information and expertise in mathematics are requirements for
learning other significant subjects. Creating intelligent reasoning with intriguing numerical
exercises ought to be likewise one of the points of essential mathematics training. The degree to
which these points are granted through the curriculum in any nation is a noteworthy inquiry. The
itemized investigation of the mathematics curriculum at all dimensions in any nation would
address this inquiry. Correlation of mathematics curriculum at essential dimension will empower
the analyst to consider the degree to which above points are incorporated into the essential
mathematics curriculum in the United Kingdom and transmitted in schools at the essential
dimension. The related writing illuminates holes existing in essential training and low qualities
of curriculum and its suggestion in the United Kingdom. Standard of training relies upon the
standard and exertion of the instructors and educators' execution relies upon standard curriculum.
Research Objectives
Some of the secondary objectives of this study are as follows:
 Identify the teaching process of secondary mathematics that takes place in classes of UK
 Identify the significant strengths and weaknesses of the national mathematics curriculum
in the UK
 Critically examine the national curriculum of mathematics for secondary education in the
UK
Research Questions
What are the various factors which influence mathematics curriculum in UK?
6

How important is the role of teachers in the nation mathematics curriculum of UK?
Literature Review
Cooper (2014) conducted a study entitled, “The teaching of history in secondary schools:
Implementing the revised national curriculum" with the following objectives. They were: (i) to
measure some selected competencies from the prescribed skills in mathematics for grade II
students; (ii) to measure the level of achievement of the selected skills between boys and girls;
(iii) to measure the level of performance of the selected competency between urban and rural
students. The sample of the study consisted of 100 students from secondary schools of Salisbury.
They were categorized as boys and girls and rural or urban and were based on the stratified
proportionate random sampling technique. The data were analyzed with the help of the
percentage. Some of the findings of the study were as follows: (i) The level of achievement of
grade II students were found of average standard regarding some selected competencies of the
prescribed attainable competency in mathematics, (ii) The achievement level of female students
excelled than those of male students from urban areas, (iii) The achievement level of rural female
students was more than rural male students, (iv) Urban students excelled in comparison with
rural students regarding achievement of competency.
A study was conducted by Bishop (2013) entitled, “Cultural conflicts in mathematics education:
Developing a research agenda. For the learning of mathematics”, with the following objectives:
(i) to measure the attainable competencies in grade-IV mathematics, in grade-V students of urban
and rural Government secondary schools; (ii) to compare the attainable competencies in grade-
IV mathematics, in grade-V urban and rural, male and female students; (iii) to compare the
attainable competencies in grade-IV mathematics, in grade-V male students of urban and rural
areas, (iv) to compare the attainable competencies in grade-IV mathematics, in grade-V female
students of urban and rural areas. The data were collected from eight Government secondary
schools from and around Manchester, having a total of 338 students. The data were analyzed
using the t-test. Attainable competencies of urban and rural students, male and female students
were found to have a significant difference.
7

A study was conducted by Jones (2010) entitled, “Future Curricular Trends in School Algebra
and Geometry: Proceedings of a Conference" to measure the achievement of selected
competencies in the mathematics of the students of class V. The required data for the study was
collected from 20 secondary schools around London. Forty teachers (two from each school) and
400 students, ten boys and girls from each school were randomly selected. Some of the findings
of the study were as follows: (i) The achievement level in mathematics of class V students was
47.59%. (ii) The performance of male students was found better than female students in the area
of mathematics, (iii) comparatively, the level of achievement in mathematics of urban students
was found higher than that of rural students, (iv) Comparatively, the level of success in
mathematics competency of Government secondary school students was found more elevated
than that of rural students. This study is often used as a benchmark by historians to depict the
impact that mathematics had on the students in the late 1900s.
A study was conducted by Braun et al. (2010) entitled, “Policy enactments in the UK secondary
school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning" with the following objectives: (i) to
measure the performance of the learners regarding their achievement of the attainable
competencies in 3rd grade mathematics; (ii) to identify the difficulties of students in 3rd grade
mathematics on the basis of achievement test; (iii) to compare the results of the achievement test
on urban and rural students; (iv) to compare the results of male and female students. The data
were collected from 6 High schools of Hampshire. The sample of the study was 224 students.
The significant findings were: (i) The level of achievement of students were found satisfactory,
(ii) No significant differences in performance were found between urban and rural students, male
and female students.
A study was conducted by Harris and Haydn (2012) entitled, “A study of secondary school
history in the UK” with the following objectives: (i) to measure and compare the attainable
competencies in the mathematics ofstudents of Government secondary schools and schools run
by NGOs. (ii) To measure and compare the attainable competencies in mathematics between
male and female students ofboth kinds ofschools. The data were collected from 4 colleges, and 4
NGO ran schools. The sample comprised of 299 students. The data were analyzed using mean,
percentage and standard deviation. The following were the main findings: (i) The level of
8

achievement in mathematics of Government secondary school students were found satisfactory
compared to NGO school students; (ii) The results of the achievement test for both types
ofschool students were found to be satisfactory.
Cai and Howson, (2012) directed an investigation entitled, "Toward an international
mathematics curriculum" with the accompanying targets: (I) to recognize different assignment
levels and secondary descriptors for each dimension; (ii) to distinguish different learning issues
identified with arithmetic troubles; (iii) to distinguish the kinds of arithmetic blunders and
explicit mistake designs. The example of the examination involved 300 students of classes I and
II, concentrating in the country and urban multi-grades with poor scholastic accomplishment in
mathematics. The significant discoveries were: (I) The exhibition of students at illustrative
dimension was superior to their presentation at unique dimensions, (ii) Students performed
higher at stable dimension than portrayal and conceptual dimensions, (iii) The accompanying
learning issues were distinguished identified with arithmetic challenges: (a) memory issues, (b)
perusing issues, (c) language issues, (d) friendliness issues, (e) image disarray, (f) failure to
amass sets, (g) usually issues, (h) absence of the idea of spot esteems, (I) powerlessness to
subtract, and (j) absence of dominance of computational aptitudes (Gueudet et al., 2011).
Clements and Sarama, (2011) led an examination entitled, "Early childhood mathematics
intervention" with the accompanying targets: (I) to evaluate the dimension of learning of
educators in showing mathematics; (ii) to survey the student's dimension of learning in
mathematics instructing; (iii) to evaluate the status of mathematics instructing in various
classifications of schools and FGAs; (iv) to contemplate the conduct changes in instructors
concerning mathematics educating towards student-focused action based system and student. 30
out of 292 schools (for example about 10%) were chosen following stratified irregular inspecting
strategy from different regions in the UK, covering different center gatherings. A sum of 56
educators was met, and ten young men and young ladies of class I and II from each school chose
for accomplishment test. The information was investigated utilizing rates, mean, standard
deviation and t-test. The real discoveries were: (I) No critical distinction was seen between the
accomplishment dimensions of prepared and unprepared educators, (ii) The accomplishment
dimensions of class I and II were 61.21% and 72.4% separately. The accomplishment dimension
9

of class II students demonstrated a noteworthy distinction among young men and young ladies
with at-estimation of 2.12 at 0.05 dimensions, (iii) Students of the two classes accomplished a
low dimension of capability in subtraction, showing that the point should have been focused on
more while educating, (iv) The fun-loving encouraging movement was valued by all areas in the
FGA. TLM was sparingly utilized (Hanna. and De Villiers, 2012).
Gill et al., (2010) examined Identification and cure of challenges in learning divisions with
customized instructional material, with the accompanying significant destinations: (I) to create
modified instructional material on parts for students of class V; (ii) to utilize customized
instructional material as a therapeutic apparatus; (iii) to test the viability of modified
instructional material in study hall educating for students of class five. An example of 50
students was chosen from two secondary schools in Salisbury (twenty-five students from each
school). The gathered information was treated by utilizing mean, SD, and t-test. The significant
discoveries were: (I) Teaching and learning through customized guidance could support the two
students and instructors, (ii) Students accepting the modified instructional material improved in
post-test when contrasted with the other gathering, (iii) The modified instructional material
worked adequately as a therapeutic device (Hodgen et al., 2010).
Prestage and Perks, (2013) led an investigation entitled, "Adapting and extending secondary
mathematics activities" with the accompanying destinations: (I) to evaluate the capabilities of
MLLs for chose units; (ii) to consider the effect of sex on accomplishment of MLLs of first
standard students; (iii) to distinguish most troublesome and least demanding skills in chose units.
The examination was led by study strategy. Analyst had chosen five schools in Birmingham and
125 students arbitrarily. A test was dependent on the 28 capabilities distinguished from the
standard one mathematics reading material and at first, this test comprised of 15 questions
having 50 things. The last test contained 15 inquiries of 64 things on similar learning results. The
real discoveries were: (I) First standard students had not comprehended the thought of zero, (ii)
Order of number was not comprehended by them, (iii) Numbers from 1 to 9 were not seen
appropriately, (iv) The utilization of the images '>' and '<' were likewise not comprehended in its
legitimate sense, (v) Students couldn't include on a level plane, in spite of the fact that they could
10

do a similar movement vertically, (vi) The students couldn't look at two numbers, (vii) There was
no distinction in the exhibition of young men and young ladies (Koenig, 2011).
Remillard et al. (2011) led the examination, "Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting
curriculum materials and classroom instruction" with the accompanying targets: (I) to
contemplate the current status of MLLs in mathematics for class III student in the territory of
Camden; (ii) to ponder the current status of MLLs in mathematics for class III student with
reference to urban and country student; (iii) to think about the current status of MLLs in
mathematics for class III student with reference to innate and non-ancestral student. 836 class III
students concentrating in 36 secondary schools of Orissa establish the example for the
examination. The real discoveries were: (I) Only 15.3 percent class III student of Camden
achieved MLLs in mathematics as against the base wanted dimension of 80 percent. The percent
of student under various classifications, viz., Intelligent, excellent, normal and beneath normal
were 9.68, 24.41, nil and 10.74, separately, (ii) The contrast between class IX student
concentrating in urban schools of Camden and class IX student concentrating in provincial
schools of Camden with respect to accomplishment of MLL in mathematics is enormous. The
rates of the student in urban and country schools who accomplished MLL were 21.52 and 7.18,
individually, (iii) The contrast between class III ancestral student of Camden and class III non-
inborn student of Camden as to the fulfillment of MLL in mathematics is critical. The rates of an
innate and non-inborn student who achieved MLLs were 4.23 and 19.10, individually (Santos-
Trigo, 2014).
Dickinson and Hough, (2012) led the examination, "Using realistic mathematics education in
UK classrooms" with the accompanying destinations: (I) to assist students with understanding
the idea of the four major tasks; (ii) to assist students with solving the issues individually; (iii) to
assist students with solving the issues rapidly; (iv) to build up a preference for mathematics in
students. The agent separated every activity into sub-parts. These sub-parts were orchestrated in
the various leveled request. One sub-part was clarified in the class pursued by five inquiries for
the class work, and the appropriate responses were checked. At that point, five inquiries were
given for homework and checked the following day. A test dependent on a similar kind of
inquiries was led to test the exactness, flawlessness, and speed of the students on a specific sub-
11

part. The discoveries were: (I) 90 of the students had the option to take care of the issues
accurately without anyone else. (ii) The rest of the ten couldn't get flawlessness in all the four,
however, could do straightforward expansion and subtraction. The reason was they couldn't learn
augmentation tables up to five, (iii) As the idea of the four essential activities turned out to be
evident to the students of class II it was seen that the students turned out to be increasingly
inspired by the subject, (iv) They delighted in the mathematics time frame since they could do
the activities exceptionally quick. There was an improvement in their speed (Chiu and
Whitebread, 2011).
Ellis (2014) examined Socio-economic slopes in mathematics accomplishment: Findings for
Canada from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Understanding the
procedures that enable all students to effectively learn mathematics has been a significant target
for most instruction frameworks incorporating those in Canada. The instructive framework, in
any case, has not accomplished this objective the same number of students with low financial
status, females, and minority students neglect to accomplish sufficient learning of mathematics.
A significant part of the talk in regards to this absence of accomplishment concerns study hall
assets and practices, school arrangements inside instructive frameworks, and the particular area
of mathematics accomplishment. This examination conceptualized an effective mathematics
homeroom regarding its dimension of mathematics accomplishment and how fairly
accomplishment was disseminated. The examination utilized staggered models and the Canadian
information from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study to address three
fundamental research issues: (I) the degree to which contrasts in mathematics accomplishment is
inferable from sexual orientation, family foundation, homerooms, and the region where a student
goes to school; (ii) regardless of whether the variety in accomplishment is explicit to a
mathematics area; and (iii) whether the variety among six regions (New discovered land, New
Brunswick, Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, and Quebec) in the dimensions of their
mathematics accomplishment is related with different parts of school strategy and practices. The
investigation demonstrated a slight male favorable position in mathematics accomplishment and
a substantial, massive hole in accomplishment related to the financial status (SES) of the
students' families. Students from low SES foundations were distraught as they would, in general,
have moderately low accomplishment in mathematics inside study halls, particularly in
12

proportionality, estimation, and divisions. The best homerooms were those in which students
from hindered foundations exceed expectations in mathematics (Atweh and Singh, 2011).
Pound and Lee (2010) examined a culturally diverse examination concerning the advancement of
spot esteem ideas of the student in Taiwan and the United States. This examination based on past
examinations that had looked at the mathematics accomplishment of Asian and American
students by breaking down the arithmetical learning settings of the student in Taiwan and in the
United States. Meetings were directed with guardians and instructors to recognize social
convictions about learning arithmetic, and ten exercises were video-recorded in one study hall in
every nation to distinguish study hall social cooperation examples and meetings were led with
the student to distinguish the dimension of refinement of their arithmetical ideas. Predictable
with past research, the arithmetical understandings of the Chinese student were observed to be
commonly further developed than those of their American partners (Hoyles and Lagrange, 2010).
Ndlovu (2011) contemplated Shape and structure in secondary mathematics Lessons: a relevant
report in the Northeast of UK and St. Petersburg, Russia - a few ramifications for the day by day
mathematics exercise. The exploration centered upon an investigation of the shape and structure
of mathematics exercises in the two nations and distinguished essential highlights and trademark
schedules. These proposed a difference between the open communication standard of Russian
Lessons and the single idea of much connection in the center period of English Lessons. While
Russian Lessons were made out of a unique number of shorter areas, English exercises had a
trademark long segment amid which understudies work freely and have a more outstanding
obligation regarding controlling the pace of the learning. It was recommended that a relative
investigation of the two models could conveniently invigorate contemplating types of social
constructivism by Hoyles and Lagrange, (2010).
Huntly et al. (2012) led a relevant report on mathematics training in various social customs
directed in 2001. An investigation endeavoring a correlation between mathematics training in
various customs will be useful to comprehend this marvel in detail and to abuse it for
mathematics instruction. From this, ways will be found prompting sufficient and successful
utilization of contrasts, just as, correspondence in national and global situations. Because of the
extent of an ICMI think about, in labor and in time, this endeavor must be restricted to just a
13

determination of social conventions. Those situated in East Asia and the West appear to be
especially encouraging for a correlation since comparable interests in contrasts and
correspondences have existed for quite a while and encounter in the same research have been
accumulated. A rich assortment of parts of mathematics training is to be considered in this
similar investigation, running from the host of social, monetary and different settings,
educational program, instructors, students, objectives, substance, procedure, media and so on to
the idea of mathematics and the fate of mathematics just as mathematics instruction. Conventions
of instructing and discovering that are profoundly inserted in history and culture should be
analyzed, with a thought of the rich experience becoming out of them just as their protection
from change. In the meantime, this near investigation must think about innovation just as morals;
changing demeanors between ages are impacting the instructor-student relationship, similar to
the new data and correspondence advances (Hopkinson and James, 2010).
Selinger (2013) examined International co-activity in mathematics instruction. This investigation
analyzed the change from instruction for growing abnormal state labor to complete secondary
training; what had been the suggestions for mathematics instruction; and what universal co-task
in mathematics instruction had been accomplished. Decolonization changed the lives of the vast
majority of the world's occupants, enabling them to request instruction. The relatively little level
of students contemplating school mathematics changed to most of the school-matured student
being in school. The mathematics programs were never again sufficient and should have been
improved. The work in mathematics training of UNESCO, ICMI and its members, and different
mathematics instruction gatherings and organizations is inspected. Their job in universal co-
activity is inspected, giving a case of the connections of this co-task in one nation in Africa. At
long last, a sentiment is given of the probable eventual fate of overall co-activity in mathematics
training (März and Kelchtermans, 2013).
Muller (2012) considered an examination of the reasoning procedures of numerically progressed
and regular students, age 10 to 11 occupied with mathematics critical thinking. The examination
was to investigate the contrasts between the reasoning procedures connected by numerically
propelled students when contrasted with regular students of fourth or fifth grade while taking
care of a similar issue. Three segments of issues were utilized to gather the information. Each
14

area of issues was built to watch the manners of thinking of the issue solver in an alternate
setting so as to make determinations regularities about by and deep critical thinking approaches.
In looking at the exhibition of the two gatherings, the most interesting contrast between the
critical thinking methodologies of the two gatherings was seen with the issues concentrating on
rationale and application territories (Atweh and Goos, 2011).
Li and Lappan, 2014 examined a cross-national examination of fourth-grade mathematics
guidance in the United States and China. The preliminary foundation encounters, individual
adequacy, an impression of impact on students learning of 79 fourth-grade instructors in China
and 29 educators in the United States was contrasted through an overview managed with
educators in Beijing, China, and Spokane, Washington. The examination of preliminary
encounters uncovered that U.S. instructors have more post-secondary preparing. A correlation of
Chinese and U.S. instructors' self-impression of nations' fitness in mathematics guidance showed
that educators from the two nations trust that student achievement is firmly identified with
educator capability, contrasted with different instructors in their school, U.S. educators appraised
their capability in mathematic guidance more prominent than Chinese instructors, while Chinese
educators announced that their exertion in mathematics guidance greatly affected student
accomplishment in mathematics. Chinese educators trusted their diligent work positively
affected students' learning and resultant achievement in math, and that an absence of diligent
work on their part detrimentally affected student learning. While U.S. educators likewise detailed
a special connection between the instructor's diligent work and students' accomplishment, the
relationship was less reliable. U.S. educators wanted more joint effort with friends and expanded
arranging and planning time for mathematics exercises. U.S. instructors were more eager than
Chinese educators to attempt new instructional techniques, with Chinese educators inclining
toward progressively commonplace strategies. U.S. educators' instructional strategies were
watched like the full Asian exercise position, with U.S. educators posing more significant
amount inquiries to the entire class, and urging students to self-right mistakes by reevaluating
their reactions (Ayalon and Even, 2010).
Macintyre and Hamilton, (2010) concentrated on inspecting the impacts of formative guidance in
general number computational capacities and scientific dispositions of secondary school
15

students. The examination structured both the attitudinal scale and intellectual capacities test
which were given both when the instructional treatment. The example for the examination
comprised of 62 secondary school students tried out four half-day classes in one grade school.
Four speculations were defined and tried at the 0.05 dimension of importance. There was no
noteworthy distinction between the whole number of computational capacities and scientific
dispositions of students accepting formative guidance of secondary school students getting
customary guidance.
Ye (2010) examined an examination of the reasoning procedures of scientifically progressed and
regular students, age 10 to 11 occupied with mathematics critical thinking. The examination was
to investigate the contrasts between the reasoning procedures connected by scientifically
propelled students when contrasted with regular students of fourth or fifth grade while taking
care of a similar issue. Three segments of issues were utilized to gather the information. Each
segment of issues was developed to watch the manners of thinking of the issue solver in an
alternate setting so as to reach determinations regularities about generally speaking critical
thinking approaches. In looking at the presentation of the two gatherings, the most emotional
distinction between the critical thinking methodologies of the two gatherings was seen with the
issues concentrating on rationale and application territories (Fan et al., 2013).
Young (2011) contemplated why they fall behind in math: An investigation of hidden intellectual
variables of second-grade high-math achievers and low-math achievers in Taiwan. The
investigation inspected Chinese second-grade high-math achievers (HMAs) and Low-math
achievers (LMAs) who are in danger of creating numerical learning incapacities (MLD). The two
gatherings had regular or better than expected insight, typical tangible working, and no
enthusiastic issue. This investigation expected to distinguish why LMAs are weak in math. The
outcome demonstrates that, when contrasted with HMAs, LMAs demonstrated a broad scope of
shortcoming in the regions of transient memory, working memory and long haul memory. LMAs
were slower to settle number realities than HMAs. What's more, they would, in general, utilize
less develop and less productive procedures to tackle these issues (for example they utilized
"checking all" or "depending on"), and their place esteem ideas were additionally less full grown
and complete (Inglis et al., 2012).
16

White-Fredette (2010) considered Computer-helped guidance contrasted with a conventional
technique for showing portions in basic mathematics. The motivation behind this examination
was to look at student accomplishment in mathematics on the idea of divisions. The students in
the two gatherings were from an urban territory. The analyst accumulated information and broke
down student accomplishment by controlling the California Achievement Test to the two
gatherings as a pre and post evaluation. The real discoveries of this investigation were as per the
following: (I) The aftereffects of the examination uncovered that no huge distinction was found
in accomplishment between the two gatherings or between the gathering implies, (ii) When
legitimately contrasting PC supported guidance with customary guidance for showing divisions,
no huge contrast was found between the two showing strategies or between the gathering
implies, (iii) In correlation of male/female outcomes inside each showing strategy on the idea of
parts, no huge contrasts were found in pass on pre and posttest (Brown et al., 2014).
Methodology
Introduction
There are different types of research methods and techniques that have been applied by the
researchers to conduct a successful research dissertation. In this manner, this research
methodology chapter consists of a wide range of research processes by which a researcher can
formulate an effective research dissertation. This research paper is based on Total Quality
Management in the UK education industry, and the researcher needs to select an appropriate
method to collect measure and analyze the information of the journal.
Research philosophy
As put forwarded by Wahyuni (2012), a research philosophy is a set of beliefs considering the
nature of the reality that is being investigated. Through the assumptions generated by a research
philosophy, significant justification could be attained for how the entire research would be
undertaken. In addition, research philosophies could be distinct in relation to the aim of the
research as well as the most acceptable procedure that would certainly assist in achieving the
desired goals. The type of research philosophy chosen for a project entirely relies on the kind of
knowledge being examined in the research project. In relation to the research onion, there are
three kinds of research philosophy positivism, interpretivism, and realism.
17

Research design
As stated by Terrell (2012), the research design is one of the significant aspects of research
methodology which support to depict an appropriate structure of the research. There are three
distinct categories associated with a research design that is widely used by researchers based on
the scope of the study.
Exploratory research design- In this research design, income proclamations and financial
information are used based on the secondary resources. Furthermore, this design supports
researchers to generate a compelling idea in relation to the set of quantitative data. As stated by
Snyder (2012), an exploratory research study offers flexibility at an elevated rate as it is based on
a new situation or phenomenon. It critically eliminates abstract theories and concepts and focuses
on the utilization of focus group, survey and case studies for forming functional theories. On the
other hand, it does not offer the background to test the hypothesis but assist in developing them
explicitly.
Descriptive research design- In this design, the appropriate profile of events, people or situations
is depicted through in-depth analysis. It is utilized by the researchers who intend to explain and
clarify the personal properties and relationships of a specific phenomenon. On the other hand, a
descriptive research design assists in defining people examined, assist in framing an appropriate
method of analysis and setting research questions before the beginning of the data collection
procedure. This assists in making a significant modification.
Explanatory research design- In this research design, the cause and effect relationships of the
study could be analyzed. As stated by Smith (2015), the explanatory research design is used to
identify the effect of changes in one variable on another variable explicitly. In addition, it depicts
the reasons behind a particular situation or phenomenon. Furthermore, it has also been analyzed
that the changes that have been induced to the dependent variable are due to the external forces
that critically results in the rigid interpretation of causation.
Research approach
As put forwarded by Short et al. (2012), the research approach is also a significant part in a
research methodology that assists in building a strong basis of analysis. In addition, it assists to
foreseen learning outcomes based on the study as well as provides a basis for future directions.
18

This the reason due to which it is significant to integrate an appropriate research approach. There
are two types of research approach- inductive and deductive.
Deductive approach- As put forwarded by Pierre (2012), the deductive approach builds the
hypotheses based on pre-existing theory and then moves forward with the research approach in
order to test it. In addition, this approach is suitable when the research project is focused on the
examination of an observed phenomenon in relation to previous researches. This approach could
be considered suitable for a positivist approach as it permits the generation of hypothesis and
statistical testing of presumed results in relation to the level of probability expected. The
applicability of the qualitative theory is very limited in this approach and this process based on
test and examination.
Inductive approach- In relation to the inductive approach, the research questions are utilized in
order to narrow down the aim and objective of the study. Furthermore, Miller et al. (2012) stated
that this particular approach concentrated towards the qualitative part of the study which is
critically attained through past research studies including pre-published journals, books, articles,
and websites. By using such resources, the qualitative part of the research study would be
established that in turn fulfills the scope of the entire study in a detailed manner.
Datatype
As put forwarded by Merriam (2015), data type and analysis is dependent on the methodological
approach utilized by the researcher based on the scope of the study. The process utilized in this
stage of the study highly contributes towards the validity and reliability of the entire study.
Without considering the research approach utilized in the project, the data type can be segregated
into two kinds, such as secondary and secondary.
Secondary data type- As stated by Kumar and Phrommathed (2015), secondary data are the
information that is derived from 1st hand sources. It could be data derived from participants from
the interview and survey or historical sources. In contrary, it is not essential that the data that has
been gathered has to be produced by the research that would be undertaken. In addition, the data
that are collected from other researchers could also be utilized as secondary data or could be
represented by text under observation. It could be information attained from the meeting and
study or authentic sources. It isn't necessary that the information that has been assembled must be
19

created by the examination that would be embraced. Hence, it can be stated that secondary data
is significantly comprehended as the data that is being analyzed as for its own.
Secondary data type- Secondary data is the information that is derived from the opinions or work
of other researchers. As put forwarded by Kuada (2012), analyses that are conducted through a
statistical survey would constitute secondary data. However, there is a specific limitation by
which the data could be defined by its utilization, rather than its derivative nature. It includes
data based on attained through past research studies including pre-published journals, books,
articles, and websites. Hence, it can be well stated that the significant distinction between the two
types of data is the relative use of it in the study rather than its inherent characteristic.
In this paper secondary data analysis method will be considered as this paper is following the
case study analysis method.
Data Collection method
As stated by Kothari (2014), data collection methods are one of the essential parts of conducting
a research study as it enhances the validity and credibility of the results at a higher level.
Furthermore, the data collection methods can be divided into significant categories- survey,
experiment, case study, grounded theory, ethnography, action research method, and experiment.
Experiment- This data collection method integrates the definition of theoretical hypothesis along
with planned changes and experimental conditions based on the chosen samples. In addition, this
method is essential in the area of social sciences, natural sciences, and psychology. As stated by
Kolb (2012), experimental research refers to the procedure of producing a research process that
investigates the results of an experiment compared to the expected results. The relationships
between the factors that are investigated and judged against the expectation of the results are
highly induced in this data collection method. However, it involves the consideration of a limited
number of factors.
Case study analysis- This data collection method is significant in analyzing a particular fact or
concept by including several sources of evidence. As stated by Grove et al. (2012), the case
study analysis offers in-depth understanding and knowledge based on the research topic as well
20

as delivers intrinsic data of organizations and individuals in a detailed manner. It is based on
qualitative assumptions and data.
Survey- This data collection method is significant and applicable in conducting business research
and analysis. It is quantitative in nature. The survey method develops quantitative information
which could be significantly analyzed empirically. It is most generally utilized to analyze
causative variables amongst the distinct type of data. As put forwarded by Green et al. (2012),
this method helps to achieve a large amount of data from large population size. Furthermore, it
helps to conduct comparison amongst variables at ease. The significant instruments of survey
method are the use of a questionnaire for analyzing the answers or vie of the respondents.
Grounded theory- In relation to the grounded theory the data collection method initiates without
the consideration of any technical architecture. In addition, it is one of the notable examples of
inductive approach as it is based on a series of observations. It is qualitative in nature.
Action research method- This method is represented as a practical approach based on a particular
research problem in relation to a community of practice. It integrates analyzing practice for
developing the best and suitable approach. It tends to integrate reflective practice as it a
systematic process that accesses the professional experience and practice of the researcher. It is
used in specific fields including nursing or teaching by which the practitioner would be able to
analyze the ways to enhance professional understanding and approach.
Ethnography- This data collection method integrates close observation of people by analyzing
their cultural interaction in order to deduce their meaning. The observer in this process of
research performs the research based on the perspective of the people that are being observed. It
aims to comprehend the differences of importance and meaning or behaviors from clear
perception.
In this paper case study analysis method will be followed.
Research Ethics
As stated by Easterby-Smith et al. (2012), it is a significant obligation of the researchers to
prevent any disclosure of confidential information or data of any respondents or participants in
order to uphold ethicalness of the research. In relation to the present study, the techniques and
21

data that have been gathered are highly confidential, and it is significant for the researcher to
maintain confidentiality explicitly. In addition, while conducting the research methodology and
data collection methods, it is essential to maintain ethicalness appropriately for maintaining the
confidentiality of data and prevent any exposure. The data that has been gathered from secondary
resources including journals and websites and other confidential data based on total quality
management for its justification should not be disclosed or shared. The data that has been
gathered using secondary resources have been performed with moral contemplations so as to
maintain a strategic distance from any logical inconsistencies to moral rules. In relation to the
scope of the present study, the researcher has significantly maintained each ethical guideline for
attaining and verifying the data pertaining to secondary data.
Discussion
After going through the findings of all the studies mentioned in the literature review the
following findings were recorded which were in accordance with the research questions and
research objectives.
The teacher is responsible for transacting mathematics curriculum effectively in classroom
situations. For the effective implementation of the curriculum, both; the content of mathematics
and teaching method; are essential. The findings of this investigation strongly indicate that Tack
of mastery in a conceptual understanding of mathematics subject by the teachers' is a similar type
of problem faced by teachers in classrooms of both countries. This is also supported by the
curriculum specialists from the UK mentioning that the teachers' lack of proficiency in
mathematics subjects contributes towards the weaknesses of the implementation of mathematics
curriculum in the UK. The reason behind this is that no secondary teacher is exclusively
categorized as mathematics teacher as a result of this during the recruitment of secondary
teachers; enough care is not taken to give due weight-age for the selection of teachers with a
mathematics background. In the previous section, enough discussion is given along this line.
Thus, main problems and obstacles in the implementation of the curriculum in the UK are
unavailabilities of teachers with a strong mathematical background, shortage of mathematics
teachers due to recruitment policy of the UK government and shortage of training programs in
the UK (Dickinson et al., 2010). So; for overcoming these problems and obstacles, there is a
22

great need of in-service training programs (incorporating content, methodology and various
approaches for teaching mathematics) for secondary teachers in the UK for valid implementation
of the curriculum. Compared to this scenario of UK, in the UK the situations are far better in
terms of the qualifications, mathematical background of secondary teachers and the in-service
training programs. The teacher provides an important link between the students and the
curriculum. To be useful in the teaching of mathematics, in addition to the up-to-date knowledge
of the teacher and active communication; the regular presence of students in the classroom is
equally important. The finding based on responses of academic supervisors indicates that
‘irregular attendance of learners' is one of the common problems to transact mathematics
curriculum in the UK. Even though the ‘irregular attendance' is a significant hurdle in the
implementation of the curriculum in both the countries, the intensity of this aspect is more in the
UK compared to other countries of Europe. The efforts should be made by the teachers to find
out the reasons for the irregularity of students in the classroom so that proper measures could be
taken to increase the regularity of students. The observations made by the investigator in actual
classroom situations indicate that ‘insufficient use of teaching aids' create the problem in the
valid implementation of mathematics curriculum more in the UK compared to that in the UK.
The same is supported by secondary teachers and academic supervisors; hence the same is not
repeated here. Anderson in his study found that students achieve significantly when the class size
is reasonably small, and the teacher has a less work load. According to academic supervisors, it
was found that ‘inappropriate teacher-student ratio' is found more in UK classrooms than that of
UK. According to teachers from the UK; it was found that classrooms were overcrowded
especially in the urban areas which contribute towards the weakness of the secondary
mathematics curriculum of the UK. The investigator found the same from classroom observation.
It seems that overcrowded classroom and the inappropriate ratio of teachers and students cause
obstacles for valid implementation of mathematics curriculum (Jaworski and Matthews, 2011).
National Committee (UK) on Education Policy, 1997 recommended that the ratio of teacher and
learner should not be more than 1: 35 by any means in order to raise the standard of secondary
education. The class size in the UK is too large having 70 to 75 students on an average for grades
one and two, 45 to 50 children for grades three to five. Subject specialists from the UK suggested
that teacher-student ratio should be appropriate, i.e., no section should contain more than 40
23

students. Government of UK (1981) recommended that the ratio of teacher and learner should
not be more than 1: 40 by any means in order to raise the standard of secondary education. So it
seems that no measures are taken in both the countries to maintain the scientific ratio between
teachers and students at the secondary level in a real classroom situation to facilitate the effective
implementation of curriculum; even though the educational policy and documents in both the
countries highlight the need for the same (Wenjun and Qiquan, 2012).
Majority of the teachers from the UK indicated that the allotted periods are not enough for the
teaching of mathematics. They suggest for an additional period for grade-wise mathematics
teaching. The investigator has found from observations that on an average in UK mathematics
teachers get more time for the teaching of mathematics (each period of 35 minutes duration in
grades I-II level and 40 minutes duration in grades III-V level) compared to the UK mathematics
teachers for teaching mathematics subject. In spite of this; the finding shows that almost half of
the teachers from the UK wished for more time duration to justify their teaching (Riley et al.,
2015).
UNICEF (1993) reported that the total number of instructional hours in grades I-II in the UK is
meager compared to that in other Asian countries. Students are taught on an average of 444
hours in the UK compared to 1100 in Indonesia and 1235 in China. National Committee on
Education Policy in the UK(1997) proposed the minimum contact hours in classes one and two,
and in classes, three to five, assuming 230 working days in a year, should be at least 690 and
1,265 hours respectively (with half an hour's break for the last-quoted classes). Government of
UK in 1981 recommended 228 working days for grades I-V in a year with minimum contact
hours 646 for grades I &II, and 636 for grades III to V in a year. UK government recommended
a minimum of 180 days in a year should be available for effective instruction. A secondary
school should function for five hours a day out of which four hours may be set aside for
instruction. The duration of a class period may be around 40 minutes (Perkin et al., 2013).
Academic supervisors are one of the essential key factors to monitor and help the valid
implementation of secondary mathematics curriculum in classroom situations. Academic
supervisors are involved directly for supervising, monitoring and training of secondary teachers.
Their alertness in this task has a direct impact on the quality of secondary education. Looking to
24

this fact and the findings based on responses of academic supervisors; it seems that only 38% of
academic supervisors from the UK and 60% of academic supervisors from the UK organize the
in-service training programme for mathematics teachers. Thus the vast majority of academic
supervisors from the UK do not organize any in-service training programme, while the academic
supervisors from the UK organize enough in-service training programs for teachers. This
scenario raises the question of concern for academic supervisors of UK for the demand for more
in-service training programs for quality education at the secondary level (Atweh et al., 2011).
Infrastructure facilities, punctuality of teachers and planning are essential aspects to transact
mathematics curriculum effectively. The findings indicate that infrastructure facilities, i.e.
adequate classroom facilities were inadequate in the UK with comparison to the UK. During
classrooms observations, the investigator has also found that a small number of classrooms in the
UK (especially in rural areas) than that of the UK. The finding also indicates that teachers of UK
are more systematic and regular than that of teachers of UK with respect to use of lesson plan for
teaching, prior preparation for class. It may be concluded that infrastructure related problems are
more in the UK than that of UK. Punctuality and prior preparation related problems were found
more in the UK than that of the UK (Hernandez-Martinez et al., 2011).
Content analysis of the textbooks shows that the organization of content in the textbook of UK
and UK are a combination of both the topical methods and spiral methods. From the responses of
academic supervisors in both the countries, it was found that the collective strengths of
mathematics curriculum for both the countries are skills development in mathematics, suitable
content-areas distributed grade-wise spirally (in the textbooks) and sequencing the content from
concrete to abstract with the appropriate evaluation procedure. The same is also supported by
experts of both countries. According to 25% of teachers from the UK, the strengths of
mathematics curriculum and its implementation are due to the class wise attainable
competencies; content integration with ' the socio-cultural aspects; evaluation procedure and
developing clear concept of the topics such as ‘FFO', ‘fractions', ‘numbers and numerals',
‘unitary method', ‘mean', ‘LCM and HCF', ‘measurement', ‘percentage', ‘capital-expenditure',
‘graph' and ‘time' and their applications to daily life. On the other hand, 63% of teachers from
the UK indicated that innovative teaching, chalk and talk policy used minimally in the
25

classroom, stimulates the learners' logical thinking, content sequentially arranged class-wise, use
of low-cost materials for teaching-learning activities, helpful in the application of mathematics in
real life situations, helpful for children to develop an understanding from the specific to general,
plays a crucial role in integrating science with other subjects and scientific base of existing
mathematics curriculum are the strengths of mathematics curriculum and its implementation
(Huh and Seo, 2014).
The academic supervisors, curriculum specialists and subject specialists agreed upon
unanimously that content integration with socio-cultural aspects and its presentation through the
textbooks form one of the significant strengths of the curriculum (Lowrie and Jorgensen, 2011).
In addition to above-mentioned strengths, it is found that pictorial presentation of the content,
emphasis on necessary learning skills such as listening, speaking, reading and writing; and
programs adopted to promote current curriculum are the significant strengths of mathematics
curriculum of UK (Hemmi et al., 2013).
In the UK other significant strengths of mathematics curriculum are introductory discussion, the
inclusion of revision chapter related to previous grades of the textbook, up-to-date textbooks,
exercise at the end-of-chapter and word problems involving four fundamental operations from
numeric to statement and vis-à-vis (Kaur, 2019).
Sarama et al. (2012) mentioned that Standard of education depends on the standard and effort of
the teachers and teachers' performance depend on the standard curriculum. Academic supervisors
from the UK identified areas of the mathematics curriculum which contributes towards weakness
of the curriculum such as resources (mathematics teachers and time for teaching the syllabi); lack
of appropriate methodology, techniques, and activities utilized by the teachers for the
implementation of the curriculum. Curriculum specialists' opined that due to teachers' lack of
proficiency in mathematics, give fewer illustrations in the classroom; as a result, the mathematics
curriculum is not being appropriately implemented. Subject specialists from the UK opined that
lack of content articulation from grade-II to III is the significant weaknesses of the mathematics
curriculum. From this, it seems that academic supervisors and experts of UK also point out at
teaching methodology, techniques, appropriate use of resources and requirement of sufficient
time for the valid implementation of the mathematics curriculum which is not the case in present
26

situations. All these aspects (methodology, resources, etc.) that contribute towards weaknesses in
the implementation of the mathematics curriculum in UK are closely related to the training
programs of secondary mathematics teachers. Hence from this point of view; the conduction of a
sufficient number of in-service teacher's training programs is significant (Hoyles et al., 2010).
Conclusion
On the basis of the above discussion the following conclusion can be drawn:
 Content-regions incorporated into mathematics reading material of both the nations are
practically comparable, straightforward and given in local dialects yet the evaluation
savvy circulation of points vary in the course books of UK than that of different nations
of Europe.
 The set of goals recommended by UK Education Ministry is superior to anything the
arrangement of destinations endorsed by other European nations as far as learning,
abilities, understanding and plain bearing to the course book scholars and instructors. Be
that as it may, none of these arrangements of goals are at standard with the standard
arrangement of destinations as endorsed by the specialists of other created nations like
USA, Russia and so on.
 Inclusions of initial talk, learning goals/reason and the activities given in every
exercise/unit in the reading material of other European nations are exhibited methodically
and more successful than that of the UK. Anyway, the pictorial introduction of substance
in the reading material of the UK is more contrasted with that of other European nations.
 Word issues incorporated into reading the material at evaluation I level reason the
understanding issues for the understudies in the UK and Other European nations as per
the perspectives introduced by the educators, scholarly directors and specialists in both
the nations.
 In resentment of enough number of in-administration preparing programs for secondary
mathematics instructors in other European nations, the educators requested all the more
such projects which would incorporate the most recent encouraging systems utilized for
instructing mathematics.
27

 Secondary mathematics educators of other European nations are utilizing an exercise plan
to the more remarkable degree in all respects deliberately and routinely than the
instructors of UK.
 Teaching forms in the real mathematics study halls (did by instructors) of other European
nations are much better, logical, methodical and compelling than that of UK.
 Sufficient data's are given in the educators' manual of UK urging the instructors to utilize
it for powerful educating while incomplete data's are given into instructors' manual of
Other European nations disheartening the instructors to utilize the manual for viable
instructing.
 The utilization of training helps by the instructors in Other European nations for helping
the student for speedier and better understanding of scientific ideas is similarly more than
that in the UK.
 Teachers of both the nations utilized various strategies, (for example, question-answer
strategy, critical thinking technique, dialog technique, and so forth.) with the exception of
revelation approach.
 Problems and obstructions are discovered more in exchange of mathematics educational
modules in the UK than that of other European nations because of less qualified
educators, absence of scientific foundation of secondary instructors and the deficiency of
in-administration preparing programs in the UK.
 The power of unpredictable participation' of students in the study hall is more in the UK
contrasted with Other European nations which additionally makes an issue for
compelling exchange of mathematics educational modules at the secondary dimension.
Recommendations
Based on the above findings the following recommendations can be made:
 Secondary mathematics instructors of the UK need to get ready exercise plan preceding
the real educating in the study halls, and similar should be observed by the scholastic
administrators for improving the nature of instructing.
28

 UK educators need to improve their practices in genuine homerooms for showing
mathematics adequately with the proper utilization of showing help and appropriate
procedure of instructing mathematics.
 Implementation of more 'contact hours,' and 'little educator understudy proportion' in
certain study hall circumstances of both the nations are required for dominant exchange
of mathematics education programs.
 The endeavors ought to be made by the educators of both the nations to discover the
reasons of abnormality of understudies in the study hall with the goal that appropriate
measures could be taken to expand the consistency of students in the homeroom for
learning mathematics.
 Teachers of UK may consolidate revelation strategy at the second dimension for
mathematics educating as it is a standout amongst the best techniques appropriate for
instructing of mathematics which encourages the student to create creative energy and
comprehend the unique scientific ideas.
 Sufficient data ought to be fused in instructors' manual of Other European nations to help
and energize the educators for making the utilization of the manual for successful
educating.
 In hate of enough number of in-administration preparing programs in the UK, looking to
the need of secondary mathematics educators and the most recent improvement and
modernization, a most recent system of instructing with IT could be incorporated into the
available preparing projects of UK.
 The more pictorial introduction ought to be incorporated into the reading material of UK
national educational modules to make the adapting additionally fascinating and
straightforward.
29

References
Atweh, B. and Goos, M., 2011. The Australian mathematics curriculum: A move forward or
back to the future?. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), pp.214-228.
Atweh, B. and Singh, P., 2011. The Australian curriculum: Continuing the national
conversation. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), pp.189-196.
Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W. and Valero, P. eds., 2011. Mapping equity and quality in
mathematics education. New York, NY: Springer.
Ayalon, M. and Even, R., 2010.mathematics educators’views on the role of mathematics
learning in developing deductive reasoning. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 8(6), pp.1131-1154.
Bishop, A.J., 2013. Cultural conflicts in mathematics education: Developing a research
agenda. For the learning of mathematics, 14(2), pp.15-18.
Braun, A., Maguire, M., and Ball, S.J., 2010. Policy enactments in the UK secondary school:
Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4),
pp.547-560.
Brown, N.C., Sentance, S., Crick, T. and Humphreys, S., 2014. Restart: The resurgence of
computer science in UK schools. ACM Implementations on Computing Education
(TOCE), 14(2), p.9.
Cai, J. and Howson, G., 2012. Toward an international mathematics curriculum.In Third
international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 949-974).Springer, New York, NY.
Chiu, M.S., and Whitebread, D., 2011. Taiwanese teachers' implementation of a new
‘constructivist mathematics curriculum': How cognitive and affective issues are addressed —
International Journal of Educational Development, 31(2), pp.196-206.
Clements, D.H. and Sarama, J., 2011. Early childhood mathematics
intervention. Science, 333(6045), pp.968-970.
30

Clements, D.H., 2010. Linking research and curriculum development.In Handbook of
international research in mathematics education (pp. 603-639).Routledge.
Cooper, H., 2014. The teaching of history in secondary schools: Implementing the revised
national curriculum. Routledge.
Dickinson, P. and Hough, S., 2012.Using realistic mathematics education in UK
classrooms. Centre for Mathematics Education, Manchester Metropolitan University,
Manchester, UK.
Dickinson, P., Eade, F., Gough, S. and Hough, S., 2010.Using Realistic Mathematics
Education with low to middle attaining pupils in secondary schools.In Proceedings of the
British Congress for Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 34-46).
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Jackson, P.R., 2012. Management research. Sage.
Ellis, A.K., 2014. Exemplars of curriculum theory.Routledge.
Fan, L., Zhu, Y. and Miao, Z., 2013. Textbook research in mathematics education:
development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), pp.633-646.
Gill, O., Mac anBhaird, C. and Ni Fhlionn, E., 2010. The origins, development, and
evaluation of mathematics support services. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 66(2),
pp.51-63.
Green, J.L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P.B. eds., 2012. Handbook of complementary methods
in education research. Routledge.
Grove, S.K., Burns, N. and Gray, J., 2012. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal,
synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B. and Trouche, L. eds., 2011. From text to'lived' resources:
Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (Vol. 7). Springer Science &
Business Media.
31

Hanna, G. and De Villiers, M. eds., 2012. Proof and proving in mathematics education: The
19th ICMI study (Vol. 15). Springer Science & Business Media.
Harris, R. and Haydn, T., 2012. What happens to a subject in a ‘free market’curriculum? A
study of secondary school history in the UK. Research Papers in Education, 27(1), pp.81-
101.
Hemmi, K., Koljonen, T., Hoelgaard, L., Ahl, L. and Ryve, A., 2013. Analyzing mathematics
curriculum materials in Sweden and Finland: Developing an analytical tool. In Proceedings
of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Antalya, Turkey. Feb 6th-Feb 10th.
Hernandez-Martinez, P., Williams, J., Black, L., Davis, P., Pampaka, M. and Wake, G.,
2011. Students' views on their transition from school to college mathematics: rethinking
‘transition as an issue of identity. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), pp.119-130.
Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Sturman, L. and Ruddock, G., 2010. Is the UK an outlier. London:
Nuffield Foundation.
Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Sturman, L. and Ruddock, G., 2010. Is the UK an outlier. London:
Nuffield Foundation.
Hopkinson, P. and James, P., 2010. Practical pedagogy for embedding ESD in science,
technology, engineering and mathematics curricula. International Journal of Sustainability
in Higher Education, 11(4), pp.365-379.
Hoyles, C. and Lagrange, J.B., 2010. Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the
terrain. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P. and Bakker, A., 2010. Improving mathematics at work: The
need for techno-mathematical literacies.Routledge.
Huh, J.H. and Seo, K., 2014. Development of competency-oriented social multimedia
computer network curriculum. The Journal of Multimedia Information System, 1(2), pp.133-
142.
32

Huntly, I., Kaiser, G. and Luna, E., 2012. International comparisons in mathematics
education.Routledge.
Inglis, M., Croft, T., and Matthews, J., 2012.Graduates’ views on the undergraduate
mathematics curriculum.
Jaworski, B. and Matthews, J., 2011.Developing teaching of mathematics to first-year
engineering students. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of
the IMA, 30(4), pp.178-185.
Jones, K., 2010, June. Linking geometry and algebra in the school mathematics curriculum.
In Future Curricular Trends in School Algebra and Geometry: Proceedings of a Conference.
Charlotte: Information Age Pub. Inc (pp. 203-216).
Kaur, B., 2019. Evolution of Singapore’s school mathematics curriculum.In School
Mathematics Curricula (pp. 21-37).Springer, Singapore.
Koenig, J., 2011. A survey of the mathematics landscape within bioscience undergraduate
and postgraduate UK higher education (p. 22). Leeds: UK Centre for Bioscience.
Kolb, S.M., 2012. Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research
strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy
Studies, 3(1), p.83.
Kothari, C.R., 2014. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age
International.
Kuada, J., 2012. Research methodology: A project guide for university students.
Samfundslitteratur.
Kumar, S. and Phrommathed, P., 2015. Research methodology (pp. 43-50). Springer US.
Li, Y. and Lappan, G. eds., 2014. Mathematics curriculum in school education.Springer.
33

Lowrie, T. and Jorgensen, R., 2011.Gender differences in students’ mathematics game
playing. Computers & Education, 57(4), pp.2244-2248.
Macintyre, T. and Hamilton, S., 2010. Mathematics learners and mathematics textbooks: a
question of identity? Whose curriculum? Whose mathematics?. The Curriculum
Journal, 21(1), pp.3-23.
März, V. and Kelchtermans, G., 2013.Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of
educational reform.A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 29, pp.13-24.
Merriam, S.B., 2015. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education.
Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers,
350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M. and Jessop, J. eds., 2012. Ethics in qualitative research.
Sage.
Muller, J., 2012. Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum, and education
policy.Routledge.
Ndlovu, M.C., 2011. University-school partnerships for social justice in mathematics and
science education: the case of the SMILES project at IMSTUS. South African journal of
education, 31(3), pp.419-433.
Perkin, G., Croft, T., and Lawson, D., 2013.The extent of mathematics learning support in
UK higher education—the 2012 survey. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An
International Journal of the IMA, 32(4), pp.165-172.
Pierre, E.A.S., 2012. Post qualitative research. Collecting and interpreting qualitative
materials, 3.
Pound, L., and Lee, T., 2010. Teaching mathematics creatively.Routledge.
Prestage, S. and Perks, P., 2013. Adapting and extending secondary mathematics activities:
New tasks for old. David Fulton Publishers.
34

Remillard, J.T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B.A. and Lloyd, G.M. eds., 2011. Mathematics teachers
at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. Routledge.
Riley, N., Lubans, D.R., Morgan, P.J. and Young, M., 2015. Outcomes and process
evaluation of a programme integrating physical activity into the secondary school
mathematics curriculum: The EASY Minds pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of
science and medicine in sport, 18(6), pp.656-661.
Santos-Trigo, M., 2014.Problem-solving in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of
mathematics education, pp.496-501.
Sarama, J., Lange, A.A., Clements, D.H., and Wolfe, C.B., 2012. The impacts of an early
mathematics curriculum on oral language and literacy. Early Childhood Research
Quarterly, 27(3), pp.489-502.
Selinger, M., 2013. Teaching mathematics.Routledge.
Short, M.B., Black, L., Smith, A.H., Wetterneck, C.T. and Wells, D.E., 2012. A review of
Internet pornography use research: Methodology and content from the past 10
years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), pp.13-23.
Smith, J.A. ed., 2015. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage.’
Snyder, C., 2012. A case study of a case study: Analysis of a robust qualitative research
methodology. The Qualitative Report, 17(13), pp.1-21.
Terrell, S.R., 2012. Mixed-methods research methodologies. The qualitative report, 17(1),
pp.254-280.
Wahyuni, D., 2012. The research design maze: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods
and methodologies.
Wenjun, Z. and Qiquan, Z., 2012. International Trends of Teacher Education Curriculum
Reform [J]. Research in Educational Development, 10.
35

White-Fredette, K., 2010. Why not philosophy? Problematizing the philosophy of
mathematics in a time of curriculum reform. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2).
Ye, H.E., 2010.Reform of Teacher’s Education Curriculum in the UK & Its Enlightenment
[J]. Theory and Practice of Education, 3.
Young, M., 2011. The return to subjects: A sociological perspective on the UK coalition
government's approach to the 14–19 curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), pp.265-278.
36