Analyzing Japan through Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions: Case Study

This case study examines Japan through the lens of Geert Hofstede's cultural dimensions. It explores key aspects of Japanese culture, including its collectivist nature, respect for tradition, and the importance of harmony. The analysis delves into Japan's scores on dimensions such as individualism, powe...Read More

Running Head: CASE STUDY
HOFSTEDE
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1HOFSTEDE
1. A very popular symbol from Japan will be their national tree, the Sakura or cherry
blossom trees. This symbol is the representation of the fact that life is extremely
fragile yet beautiful.
2. Japan is a country where culture and tradition is given extreme importance. One such
cultural norm is the norm of bowing as a form of greeting.
3. Japan has a score of 46 when it comes to the individualism dimension and the shows
Japan is primarily a very collectivist society and tends to put harmony of people living
together above the importance of expression when it comes to the opinions of an
individual (Hofstede, 2-3). However when this particular dimension is compared with
those of deviation neighbors of Japan it is evident that Japan is clearly the most
individual listed when it comes to the Asians. However when seen from very Western
perspective Japan is a collectivist society. When compared to the United States of
America which has a score of 91 it comes to the individualism dimension, Japan is far
less individualistic. Most people in the USA tend to be very self-reliant and they have
a tendency to display initiative in the business sector. The society in the USA is
extremely individual is taken they tend to look after themselves and only their family,
however that to in exchange of unquestionable loyalty (Bergiel, Bergiel & Upson, 69-
79). Everybody in the society is equal and communication is extremely informal and
direct.
4. When it comes to the dimension of power distance Japan has a score of 54 which
shows that it is almost a borderline hierarchical society. This we can see that power is
mostly an equally distributed and the people of Japan are always conscious about
where they belong in society and the position they hold in various settings because
they act accordingly. This Hierarchical kind of society makes the decisions within the

2HOFSTEDE
business extremely slow and the idea that nobody is born equal is often propagated
even in education systems (Rinne, Steele & Fairweather, 91-108). If compared to the
United States of America which has an extremely low power distance score of 40, it is
evident that Japan is a far more hierarchical society than USA. USA usually believes
in equality for all and that all the members are independent and equal and does not
share the characteristics of a hierarchical society like Japan. Thus it is evident that in
USA power is not distributed unequally and equality prevails for everybody however
in Japan hierarchy is taken rather seriously and people tend to accept the fact that not
everybody in the society is placed equally and that they must act according to how
they are placed.
5. When it comes to the masculine dimension it is very evident that Japan is extremely
masculine with the score of 95. It is technically one of the most masculine societies in
the world despite their mild collectivism. Individual behavior is extremely
competitive in nature and this masculine country is extremely motivated to win
(Hofstede & Willem, 7-9). This sort of masculine drive is extremely evident in the
business they do because of their constant struggle to achieve perfection. The United
States of America is also a masculine society with 62 on this dimension. Business in
America is extremely individualistic and masculine in nature because the people are
constantly trying to emerge victorious and constantly prove themselves by taking up
challenge

3HOFSTEDE
References:
Bergiel, Erich B., Blaise J. Bergiel, and John W. Upson. "Revisiting Hofstede’s dimensions:
examining the cultural convergence of the United States and Japan." American
Journal of Management 12.1 (2012): 69-79.
Hofstede, Geert, Geert H. Hofstede, and Willem A. Arrindell. Masculinity and femininity:
The taboo dimension of national cultures. Vol. 3. Sage, 1998.
Hofstede, Geert. "Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions." (2009).
Rinne, Tiffany, G. Daniel Steel, and John Fairweather. "Hofstede and Shane revisited: The
role of power distance and individualism in national-level innovation success." Cross-
cultural research 46.2 (2012): 91-108.