English 101: Demetrius Jenkins' Essay on Nacirema and Anthropology

This argumentative essay analyzes Horace Miner's 'Body Ritual among the Nacirema,' exploring its satirical critique of anthropological writing and cultural biases. The essay, written by Demetrius Jenkins, examines how Miner presents American society in an unfamiliar way, prompting readers to question their own cultural assumptions. It discusses the paper's impact on how we read anthropological studies, emphasizing the importance of avoiding judgment and approaching different cultures with an open mind. The essay concludes that anthropological papers should be read with the goal of understanding, not judging, other cultures. It references Miner's original work and related studies by Burde and DeVita to support its arguments, highlighting the paper's effectiveness in making readers consider the influence of their own cultural perspectives when analyzing others.

Demetrius Jenkins Sr.
Professor Yvonne Turner
201801 English 101_OL1
30 July 2017
Introduction
The following argumentative essay is an attempt to understand the authors perspective
towards writing an anthropology paper and our perspective as a reader towards the reading the
same paper. This essay will put some light on article written by Horace Miner titled as “Body
Ritual among the Nacirema” that is anthropology paper which presents American society and its
daily rituals in an unrecognized strange way. In this regard, the thesis statement of the following
can be stated as “Whether the description provided by anthropology papers should be written
and read with the purpose of judging any culture or not.”
Body Ritual among the Nacirema
The article "Body Ritual among the Nacirema" written by Horace Miner is a satirical
anthropology paper on other anthropology papers that describe "others" culture after considering
their own culture as superior. Miner has explained Nacirema culture as strange in a manner
similar to other anthropology papers but reveals the twist to us in the end. The description
provided is actually about American society spelled backward as Nacirema in such a manner that
we do not recognize it until it is revealed to us in the end (Miner 503).
The arguments given by Miner describe the regular everyday habits of the people of the
tribe in ways which are unfamiliar and weird to us. This impression provided by Horace Miner
about Nacirema makes us judge the tribe as strange without any logic. Moreover, this makes the
paper a satire on the society where we easily overlook the similarities and judge others only on

Body Ritual among the Nacirema1
the basis of dissimilarities. The buildings and familiar objects are described on the basis of their
use and materials without using any familiar adjectives so that these things remain unrecognized
until the end (Burde 549). The paper makes fun of American’s grooming habits and has
genuinely expressed the insufficiently enlightened American values.
Horace Miner has excellently made us think illogical about ourselves only without letting
us know about the twist until we reach the end of the paper. There are arguments that are in favor
that the paper makes us look at our own culture with a different perspective that is from the
perspective of a foreigner. Further, it can be considered as a reasonable evaluation of the modern
American culture. For us as the reader who likes reading about others’ cultures or study cultural
anthropology, this paper changes our way of reading the anthropologic explanations of different
foreign cultures. While reading any anthropological paper, we always have a pre-assumption
about the superiority of our own culture over others. Generally, we are not aware of this pre-
assumption as it comes to us naturally (DeVita, 2015). This may affect our understanding of the
anthropological study as Horace Miner’s paper makes us aware about this pre-assumption to
improve our further readings. It has also been argued that reading of the paper might even
change our way of understand own cultural behaviors and beliefs. We can start considering
different perspectives of looking at others' societal beliefs and norms.
Conclusion
On the basis of the arguments discussed above, it can be concluded that Horace Miner
has successfully proven his point of reading the anthropology papers without any will to judge
others’ cultures. We should read the anthropology papers with the objective of gathering
knowledge about their daily rituals and the reasons behind them. Hence, our thesis statement can

Body Ritual among the Nacirema2
be restated as “the description provided by anthropology papers should not be written and read
with the purpose of judging any culture.”

Body Ritual among the Nacirema3
Works Cited
Miner, Horace. "Body ritual among the Nacirema." American anthropologist58.3 (1956): 503-
507.
Burde, Mark. "Social‐Science Fiction: The Genesis and Legacy of Horace Miner's “Body Ritual
among the Nacirema”." American Anthropologist 116.3 (2014): 549-561.
DeVita, Philip R. Distant mirrors: America as a foreign culture. Waveland Press, 2015.