Analysis of Authoritarian Management Style in Tourism and Hospitality

Desklib provides past papers and solved assignments for students. This report analyzes authoritarian leadership in tourism and hospitality.

Tourism and Hospitality Management
1

Table of Contents
Identification of Management Style............................................................................................................3
References...................................................................................................................................................4
2

Identification of Management Style
Authoritarian management style is when a project leader decides the goal and controls all over
the activities. Leaders have full power to control the team. It is to identify that Monitor role gain
maximum trade points i.e. 5.2. For this role, I analyze data from outside and inside from my
respective area of responsibilities. The parameter of this management style is authority, power,
control and supervise the people who are under me.
In the leadership profile, I had done my job in an organized way. I managed people who are
under my guidance. I supervised them and monitor all the activities. I give my full potential
towards the work where I fulfilled all the parameters of the leadership style. Power of making a
goal is an easy task but accomplishes or achieving that predetermined task was very difficult.
An aspect of leadership style: There are several types of leadership style in which some are
positive and others are negative. These are the different approach to achieving their goals. I
monitor all the activities from the initial stage and controlled until the last stage. I composed
choices after combining the ideas which generate during the survey. I accept the advice of the
survey members (Mayseless, 2018).
As a hospitality manager, my leadership skills are always motivated me for problem-solving
skills which carry out in tourism. My responsibility is coordinating and promoting the activities
where I successfully meet customer needs. As evidence, my survey report proves that my
monitor role is appreciable (Kim, 2017).
3

References
 Mayseless, O. and Popper, M., 2018. Attachment and leadership: review and new
insights. Current opinion in psychology.
 Kim, Y., Kim, M. and Mattila, A.S., 2017. Corporate social responsibility and equity-
holder risk in the hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(1), pp.81-93.
4