The Role of HRM in Driving Gender Equality in the UK Workplace

This report examines the critical role of Human Resource Management (HRM) in driving gender equality within UK workplaces. It identifies key workplace issues that hinder women's career progression, including gender bias in pay, skill development, and work flexibility. The report advocates for cultural restructuring to address these issues and emphasizes the UK government's role in enforcing relevant legislation. It encourages women to embrace challenging careers, particularly in STEM fields, and highlights the need for HRM practitioners to provide career consultation and address stereotypes. The report further discusses factors contributing to gender inequality in recruitment, training, reward systems, and performance appraisals, and offers HRM strategies for mitigation, such as promoting micro-affirmations and supporting talent from the grassroots.

Running head: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Human Resource Management
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author note:

1HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Executive summary
The main purpose of this study is to identify how the HRM practitioners can drive workplace
equality in the United Kingdom. In course of doing so the paper identifies a number of
workplace issues, which prevent women to attain a progressive and lasting career. Some of these
issues include gender bias or discrimination in regards to pay gap, development of professional
skills and work flexibilities. The paper suggests a restructuring of culture to repair more of such
workplace issues. It also discusses the importance and role of the UK government in ensuring
that related legislations are effectively obeyed in the workplace. Moreover, the paper encourages
women to come out of their traditional frame of mind and open up towards the world of
opportunities by opting to a challenging career. Indeed, women should have their increased
interest in becoming a part of STEM fields.

2HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Table of Contents
1. Introduction:................................................................................................................................3
2. Why gender equality is a fundamental challenge to many researchers.......................................4
3. Recruitment and Selection:..........................................................................................................5
3.1 Factors contributing to the gender inequality:.......................................................................5
3.2 The role of the HRM in mitigating the factors identified:.....................................................8
4. Training and Development:.......................................................................................................10
4.1 Factors contributing to the gender inequality:.....................................................................10
4.2 The role of the HRM in mitigating the factors identified:...................................................10
Case study:.................................................................................................................................11
5. Reward and Recognition/Flexible working hours:....................................................................12
5.1 Factors contributing to the gender inequality:.....................................................................12
5.2 The role of the HRM in mitigating the factors identified:...................................................14
6. Performance appraisal:..............................................................................................................15
6.1 Factors contributing to the gender inequality:.....................................................................15
6.2 The role of the HRM in mitigating the factors identified:...................................................16
Case study:.................................................................................................................................17
7. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................17
References......................................................................................................................................19

3HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
1. Introduction:
The main purpose of this study is to identify the role that HRM can play in driving
gender equality in the workplace. Employment Relations Adviser, Rachel Suff argues that the
government interventions have not been very effective in discouraging gender-based inequality
in the workplace in the United Kingdom. Rachel Suff feels that a deeper intervention by the UK
government is required to mitigate or control these challenges. Rachel Suff also feels the need
for a wider shift in organisational culture for an encouragement towards promoting genuine
gender equality (Cipd.co.uk 2019). Edmunds et al. (2016) agree to this fact and state that the
societal, and organisational contexts and cultures have an impact on women’s selection for their
careers in academic medicine.
Gender equality in the workplace is achieved when people irrespective of their gender
classification, are able to enjoy the same resources, opportunities and rewards (Wgea.gov.au
2019). However, as observed by de Vries, J.A., (2015), leadership positions are significantly
dominated by male. The leadership capability of women is somehow undermined. They are not
given sufficient amount of opportunities to help them explore their capabilities. This indicates
the existence of gender-based inequality in the workplace. Amis et al. (2018) supports the views
of de Vries, J.A., (2015) on the gender inequality issue with further emphasis on it. The author
say that gender inequality is a growing fact in many organisations and institutions. The authors
further say that some of the HRM practices are now male-biased. These include like hiring,
reward, promotion, and others. Sarvaiya and Eweje (2016) disagrees to Amis et al. (2018) and
Vries, J.A., (2015) by highlighting the importance of HRM practices in driving gender equality
in the workplace. The argument is on the basis of their observations of the data from interviews
being conducted with 29 HR and CSR professionals from large organisations in New Zealand.

4HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Sarvaiya and Eweje (2016) found that HR professionals drive equality and diversity. However,
CSR works even more than HRM and extend equality and diversity even beyond the mandatory
action.
2. Why gender equality is a fundamental challenge to many researchers
There are many complexities that define gender equality as a fundamental challenge to
many scholars. The complexities is there at the institutional, governmental, organisational as
well as at the personal level. This is indeed challenging to propose ways to drive gender equality
in the workplace. If one or two of these levels are satisfied with a set of solutions the others
might remain unsatisfied posing potential barriers to gender equality in the workplace.
For an example, the women in the United Kingdom will not be able to receive the
benefits from the strategic engagement of the European Commission for Gender Equality. It is
due to the Brexit that will prevent women from accessing these benefits. Notably, the
engagement has been allocated with €6.17 for a span of time from 2016 to 2019 (Eige.europa.eu
2019). Hence, it can be said that such political state of a country is never fruitful to both the
women and HRM practitioners. The HRM practitioners in the United Kingdom will have to take
a stand against gender inequality to be able to increase participation from the women and thereby
helping the national economy. As identified by Rhode (2017), increased women participation in
jobs especially as full-timers will boost the national economy.
The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan has unveiled a new campaign “Behind every great
city”. The campaign promises to deliver on a bigger note. “City Hall” based on its first ever
gender pay audit has ensured to implement plans to reduce the gender pay gap. The campaign
will ensure that senior managers are given adequate training on how to conduct a fair recruitment

5HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
process. Additionally, senior managers will also be provided with mentoring as needed. There
will be an increment in few practices like increased part-time jobs and enhanced flexible working
options (Marieclaire.co.uk 2019). Indeed, this is a good move provided that there is no gender
pay gap in part-time jobs and also that there is increased aspiration for leadership positions in
women (Warren and Lyonette 2018).
González-González et al. (2018) confirm that STEM, which significantly contributes to
the United Kingdom economy has lower participation from women. The contribution could be
much stronger if more women become the part of STEM. Hence, the HRM practitioners in
STEM fields in particular should arrange and provide career consultation to women to help them
realise their job potentials and their feasibility with the industry. They need to be assured of that
STEM sectors is not just for male but for women as well. The sector needs them and they can
significantly respond to this need (Chau and Quire 2018).
3. Recruitment and Selection:
3.1 Factors contributing to the gender inequality:
The percentage of women in the boardrooms is less as compared with men. According to
an Analysis from Cranfield University, as part of its 20th Report on FTSE Women on Boards,
highlights a falling number of women in the boardrooms (The Guardian 2019). According to the
report, there is a sharp drop in the numbers of women being the chief financial officer (CFO),
chief executive (CEO) and other executive roles on FTSE 100 companies and 250 boards (The
Guardian 2019).

6HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Figure 1: Female Executive Directorships Percentage
(Source: The Guardian 2019)
The above figure shows how the number of women in senior job positions have
performed over the years in Britain.
There can be many reasons for a less or decreasing participation from women in the
boardrooms or at senior job positions. These are such as they leave for other industries because
they do not receive a fair treatment in the boardrooms or they find the industry very challenging
to sustain with. The evidence to the fact that women receive a less fair treatment as compared to
men is furnished as below.
Micro-inequities as according to Subramani (2018) is a common practice across
organisation in the world. Women are mostly affected of this. People sharing the boardroom

7HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
usually have gender biases for women inherited in them. As a consequences of such biases, they
tend to overlook or ignore the input from one or few of the women. Such an act can be the result
of several facts. According to Ambler (2016), few managers have perceptions that women cannot
be a better decision-maker due to many distractions they have in their lives. For an example, they
are considered as the only most responsible person in a family to take care of their kids. They
also need to take care of many other domestic works like cooking. Secules et al. (2018) support
the views of Subramani (2018) and say that it is generally very difficult to pretend whether
micro-inequity is intentionally being given a place in the workplace. It appears that the HRM
practitioners have tough task ahead of them in the form of low number of women in the
boardrooms and at higher leadership position.
The fact that a significant number of women are less likely to stay in STEM fields is
being discussed in this paragraph. Wang and Degol (2017) identified few professions such as
STEM where women are underrepresented. The authors produced six explanations to women’s
underrepresentation in STEM fields. These are cognitive ability, occupational interests or
preferences, relative cognitive strengths, field-specific ability beliefs, gender-based biases and
stereotypes, and work-family balance and lifestyle values preferences. Surprisingly, women
make up 14.4% of all those working in STEM fields in the United Kingdom (The Guardian
2019). This is despite a fact that Women represent half of the entire workforce in the STEM
fields (The Guardian 2019). If the percentage of women increases in STEM this will help to
increase the labour value in the United Kingdom by at least £2bn (The Guardian 2019). Women
certainly are less likely to enter and more likely to leave it for other industries. The rate of
women who started their business career in tech-intensive industries and leaving for other
industries is equal to 53% (Catalyst.org 2019). Additionally, women on boards in the information

8HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
technology industry as of 2015 is equal to 12.2%, which is comparatively less than for many
other industries like Financials (16.9%) and Consumer staples (17.4%) (Catalyst.org 2019).
There is a lack of transparency in the recruitment process as evidenced in a fact that
women are more preferred for non-executive positions (Makarova, Aeschlimann and Herzog
2016). However, the lack of transparency may be the consequences of few factors that compel
recruiters to behave unintentionally in a different manner. As stated by Slaughter (2015), men are
more superior to women in some regards like the tendency to win. According to the author, this
is one of the reasons why men are more dominating than women and seek the leadership roles.
This is also evidenced in how they represent them while being in the interview or in the
workplace. Recruitment as according to Riley, Michael and Mahoney (2017) is a process to
create assets to a company. By recruiting men for the executive positions they perceive as they
are creating leaders for the company.
To promote a true gender equality a quota system for the boardrooms, which presently
exists. Indeed, (Smith et al. 2015) feel a need to support and nurture talent from the grassroots.
This will ensure that talent pools are comprising of diverse people. As stated by Barak (2016),
senior management should vocally support the gender diversity. As opined by Chappell and
Waylen (2013), some legal barriers prevent the appointment of women on boards based on
gender only. For an example, the 2010 Equality Act allows a positive discrimination based on
the genders if both are equally deserving and there is an under-representation of a particular
gender in the workforce (The Guardian 2019).
3.2 The role of the HRM in mitigating the factors identified:

9HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Micro-inequities has been identified in this study as one of the barriers to promoting
gender equality in the workplace. Molina et al. (2019) provides some way out of the issue and
says that micro-inequities can be controlled by promoting micro-affirmations in the workplace.
Micro-affirmations according to Molina et al. (2019) is acknowledging the employees’ micro-
messages. It is about letting employees know that they are doing well.
The HRM practitioners can try to drive a culture where micro-messages are
acknowledged. This culture should not have any impact from gender-biases. The importance of
such a culture can also be derived from the Herzberg’s Two-factor Theory of Motivation. The
theory says that if there is an acceptable and appropriate relationship of the management with its
peers and subordinates, employee motivation will be high (Alshmemri, Shahwan-Akl and Maude
2017). However, as according to Kuranchie-Mensah and Amponsah-Tawiah (2016) this
wouldn’t just ensure more women in the boardrooms. Instead, as observed by Jungert et al.
(2018) there is a need for a collective effort from the employers, the government and individuals.
The UK government should ensure appropriate policy in place to influence the participation of
women in the boardrooms. The employers should facilitate a transparent selection process.
According to Greiner (2015), women are judged based on their experiences whereas men on
their skills. Heilman, Manzi and Braun (2015) say the gap of one or few years due to domestic
responsibilities are made as the excuses for not selecting too much of women in executive
positions.
The numbers of women in STEM fields should be increased. According to Hayes and
Bigler (2013), the HRM practitioners can contribute in increasing the participation from women
in STEM fields. (Edgar, Azhar and Duncan 2016) opine that quota system can certainly help to
improve the participation rate. According to GröSChl and Takagi (2016), there is a quota system

10HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
in Norway that allows 40% of women in the boardrooms. Lebanon as found by Barak (2016) has
quota system based on religious beliefs. In a similar ways Chidiac (2018) believes that quota
system should influence the women’s participation rate in the boardrooms.
4. Training and Development:
4.1 Factors contributing to the gender inequality:
According to Pingleton et al. (2016), leadership development opportunities provided to
women is not the same as it is to men. As opined by Gipson et al. (2017), leadership gender gap
matters as gender-balanced teams of leaders significantly impact the business results. Burton and
Weiner (2016) reports that development pipeline in the organisations needs a revisit as the higher
positions in a hierarchy is more often filled by men. The authors further say that the numbers of
men are higher in rating the training for leadership development as successful. As observed by
Schachter (2017), special training on strategic thinking and negotiation is given more to men
than women. As admitted by Kitada, Williams and Froholdt (2015) leadership performance was
found as much superior in those who receive training on negotiation skills. Rhode (2017) points
out that women have least access to leadership training especially in male-dominated fields such
as STEM.
4.2 The role of the HRM in mitigating the factors identified:
The HRM practitioners can play a significant role in enhancing the access to leadership
training for women. According to Helitzer et al. (2016), the HRM personnel can encourage
managers to extend their support towards women in form of accessing to leadership training.
Seo, Huang and Han (2017) suggest that the HRM personnel should propose this idea with its
expected positive outcomes. The list of expected benefits should include how women in the

11HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
leadership position can impact the company’s productivity. According to Brue and Brue (2016),
numerous business case studies have found a higher representation of women as the
manufacturing leaders. A meta-analysis of studies being conducted in the 1990s highlights that
the financial performance of a firm increases when more women are in the leadership roles
(IndustryWeek 2019). This is truer when women are the CEOs. Solaja, Idowu and James (2016)
opine that having more women in the boardrooms increases the earnings and sales.
Davis and Maldonado (2015) suggest the HRM personnel to be strategic while selecting
the modalities to support the multi-modal programs. This is to ensure that training is facilitated
and delivered in a way that it is equally benefitting and full of opportunities for both men and
women. Debebe et al. (2016) identify formal coaching especially tailored to meet the women’s
needs as an effective way to encourage women participation in the boardrooms. Pingleton et al.
(2016) feel the necessity to have performance measuring indicators to report on and measure the
outcomes of the coaching for both men and women. Women should be taught the target specific
skills to help them access to leadership-based training.
Case study:
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada:
The human resources personnel are committed to increase the number of women
Sciences and Engineering sector. To support the process they are offering career opportunities to
women along with it accommodating the women’s responsibility towards their family. Programs
are designed to ensure fair treatment with all applicants irrespective of the gender. NSERC
identify that attracting women more towards this industry is a major challenge. To deal with it
they will identify barriers impacting women’s participation in this industry (Jsps.go.jp 2019).