Human Rights and Social Advocacy: Obligations and Rights in Australia

This essay provides a literature review on the need to balance human rights and obligations in contemporary Australia. It begins by defining human rights and exploring their significance in the Australian context, emphasizing the inherent dignity and equal rights of all individuals. The essay then delves into the relationship between rights and obligations, highlighting their interconnectedness and the importance of respecting the rights of others. The review discusses the need for a fair balance between individual rights and societal obligations, considering the impact of the legal system, including democratically elected governments, independent judiciary, and statutory laws. It also notes the influence of common law and the importance of citizen participation. The essay concludes by emphasizing the importance of balancing rights and responsibilities for a just society and the impact of corruption and nepotism on political institutions. The essay argues that despite the awareness of human rights, there is a need for a better balance between rights and obligations in Australia.

Running head: HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
Human Rights and Social Advocacy
Nam of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

1HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
Table of Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................2
2. Literature Review...................................................................................................................2
2.1 Human Rights...................................................................................................................2
2.2 Relationship between Rights and Obligations.................................................................3
2.3 The need for balance in between the Human rights and obligations in contemporary
Australia.................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................5
References:.................................................................................................................................7

2HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
1. Introduction
As stated by Skelton (2018), “Justice and Peace is the recognition of the inherent
dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”. Right
after the devastation and trauma of the World War II, the leaders all around the world unite
with one another than never before, under the same charter of rights. On 10th of December,
1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations proclaimed and adopted the Universal
Declaration of the Human Rights (Friedman, 2018). However, a neglected feature of the very
declaration was that it ends with the obligations and the duties upon a person to their
community. Despondently, man has become obsessed with rights in absence of any sense of
duty, responsibility or obligation. It is believed that along with rights, there comes the
responsibilities as well and therefore, a balance in between them is very necessary. This paper
is going to provide a literature review on the topic- “the need to balance ‘rights’ and
‘obligations’ in the contemporary Australia.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Human Rights
As per Sen (2017), Human Rights refer to the fundamental rights and the freedoms
that belong to each individual in this world, right from their birth to their death. In the
contemporary Australia, most of the people have a wide range of several ideas regarding
what human rights means to them. It is often noticed that the Australians generally agree that
every individual has an inherent value and dignity and also, that the human rights helps them
to respect and to recognise the key worth in one another. It is the same for every people,
irrespective of their sexes, caste, creed, nationality, language, origin, ethnic, financial stability
and religion and this is what makes the Human Rights “universal”.

3HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
2.2 Relationship between Rights and Obligations
As stated by Hodgson (2015), “Accepting a framework of rights cannot imply simply
a selfish attitude on the parts of the individual, claiming his or her own rights while
remaining indifferent to the rights of the others. There is a corresponding obligation on each
members of the society to support and to respect the rights of the other people.” Rights and
obligations are interlinked and they cannot be segregated from each other in any way. They
are two different sides of a common coin. If a state gives its citizens the right to life, it also
inflicts on them a responsibility to not to uncover his life to the dangers and to respect the life
of other citizens. Jones (2017) in this context have stated that “Right of One is the Duty of
Others”. The rights could be enjoyed only in the world of duties and obligations. For each of
the rights there is a corresponding obligation and duty. When the citizen fail to release their
duties and obligations in proper way, the rights become completely meaningless. As it is the
state that safeguards and imposes rights, it becomes the duty of all the citizens to be true to
the state. All the citizens have an obligation to obey the state laws as well as to pay the taxes
lawfully. These rights come along with different responsibilities and obligations and are also
compelled by respect for the rights of the others individuals. For instance, the right to free
speech has nothing to do with getting the right to insult anyone. It does not mean that he or
she can insult others for absolutely no reason.
2.3 The need for balance in between the Human rights and obligations in contemporary
Australia
The vitality in the Human Rights cases of “responsibilities” in the sense of obligations
to the society is not at all controversial (Ghai, 2014). It is often stated that there is a need for a
fair balance in between the rights of the individuals and the obligations that they have and it
is generally “inherent in the whole of the Convention”. These issues of the rights and the
responsibilities or the obligations have been central of many of the political debates on

4HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
Human Rights Act. It is to state that Human Rights are both universal and inherent. The state
does not give the individuals those rights, in fact, it is the duty of the state to recognise them.
According to Matsuda (2018), Australians differ on the basis of understanding of where the
human rights have come from. However, it is very important to mention that Australia has
played a significant part in the making of the Universal Declaration of Human rights. In
contemporary Australia, there are a huge number of important methods in which the rights of
the individuals are protected and promoted and they include:
(1) Democratically elected governments
(2) Independent Judiciary
(3) Statutory laws, particularly the State anti-discrimination and the federal laws
(4) Centuries of the common law that is inherited form England
(5) The Constitutions of the States and the Australian Constitution
(6) A free media
Today, the importance of protection of the human rights by the legal system of Australia
and especially, by the federal statutory law has grown significantly in this area. Although,
does not mean to diminish the vitality of the Australian common law, which too plays a very
vital role in this area by the reason of its former regard for the key individual rights. One of
the very significant examples of the impact of common law on the domestic human rights is
the role that it plays in the development and acknowledgement of the rights of the native title
of the indigenous Australians. However, there is an importance of both the rights and
responsibilities for a citizen and a balance in between these two is hence very important
(Lister & Campling, 2017). It is also to note that exercising of the democratic obligations and
rights of the Australians as well as the service delivery are two different thought provoking
notions- particularly in the present scenario of Australia. It is far from the reality and the
services that are rendered to the Australians are still very poor. For example, the electorate in

5HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
Australia is prone to the hand-outs and is also very easily manipulated into the participation.
With the same, corruption and nepotism is also increasing side by side and is staining the
political institutions and the politics. Furthermore, to certain limits, there is a sort of
censorship of Australian press and also it seems to be in no separation of the powers.
It is also to note that the rights of human beings are not fabricate of the Western
Civilisation. In fact, they are universal and each spiritual and cultural tradition has different
laws and codes about the “rights of man”. However, Human Rights do not safeguards one’s
culture but it protect an individual from the confinements and limitations of his culture.
Human Rights are regarding the rights of humans. It is the responsibilities of human beings to
encourage the individual to be more betrothed with global community as well as in the
political processes and the social issues of the nation. As stated by Hoppe (2018), “The rights
of man come not from the generosity of the state, instead it comes from the hands of the
God”. Notwithstanding this fact, these rights come along with different duties and obligations
and are also compelled by respect for the rights of the others individuals. Every Australians
have the right of demonstrating but it must be kept in mind that such actions should not
violate on the rights of their peers. As per Richardson (2017), the rights without obligations
and responsibilities are similar to wildfires, dangerous and fearful. The citizens who are
irresponsible do not deserve these rights and instead, they are been controlled- by being
imprisoned. Thus, Mill (2016) has state that the privileges of human beings could be no way
more than of their obligations. The very first duty is of respecting the rights of the other
individuals. For instance, the right to free speech that the individuals inherent does not mean
that he or she can insult others for absolutely no reason. The ones who do so should face the
full outrage of the state law.

6HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
Conclusion
Hence, from the above analysis it is clear that in this contemporary Australia, the
impact and influence of the universal human rights law is ineffective. The growing challenges
of corruption and nepotism is staining the political institutions and the political environment
of the nation. Although, the Australian are well-aware of the importance of human rights and
the responsibilities that they hold towards respecting, still, there are several evident from
which it is clear that the Human Rights and the obligations here, does not go hand in hand.
Therefore, it is very important to have balance in
the ‘rights’ and ‘obligations’ in contemporary Australia.

7HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
References:
Friedman, E. (2018). Women’s human rights: The emergence of a movement. In Women's
Rights, Human Rights (pp. 18-35).
Ghai, Y. (2014). Rights, duties and responsibilities. In Asian Values (pp. 40-62).
Hodgson, G. M. (2015). Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and
legal rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4), 683-709.
Hoppe, H. H. (2018). Democracy–the god that failed: the economics and politics of
monarchy, democracy and natural order.
Jones, P. (2017). Human rights, group rights, and peoples’ rights. In Human Rights (pp. 277-
304).
Lister, R., & Campling, J. (2017). Citizenship: feminist perspectives. Macmillan International
Higher Education.
Matsuda, M. J. (2018). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story.
In Words that wound (pp. 17-51).
Mill, J. S. (2016). Utilitarianism. In Seven Masterpieces of Philosophy (pp. 337-383).
Richardson, G. (2017). The case for prisoners’ rights. In Prisoners' Rights (pp. 165-176).
Sen, A. (2017). Elements of a theory of human rights. In Justice and the Capabilities
Approach (pp. 221-262).

8HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ADVOCACY
Skelton, A. (2018). Human rights and restorative justice. In Routledge International
Handbook of Restorative Justice (pp. 60-70).